A visit to the loft revealed my '80s Hornby track, locos, rolling stock etc.
I see that I junked the controllers in favour of the Zero 1 control system
inc one slave unit.
Not all locos have modules, but I wonder if I should module them or perhaps
"un-module" the ones that have them!
Has anyone any experience/expertise of this contro system? Is it worth
pursuing, or are there problems not making it worthwhile?
This might be very important because I'm thinking about a "loft" conversion
in our double garage to provide a family and animal free environment in
which to have a really good-sized room dedicated to this hobby. This could
be expensive enough without paying out for something that proves not to be
worthwhile.
All advice gratefully rec'd about any of this, not just Zero 1.
Thanks
PS. This is my first effort with Newsgroups, so please excuse any cock-ups!!
Graeme Eldred - 30 Oct 2004 14:27 GMT
>PS. This is my first effort with Newsgroups, so please excuse any cock-ups!!
Peter, you have posted to a predominantly US based group, about a
British subject. You will probably fare better by posting the same
question to the predominantly British newsgroup uk.rec.models.rail.

Signature
Graeme, Scotland
Frank A. Rosenbaum - 30 Oct 2004 14:44 GMT
> A visit to the loft revealed my '80s Hornby track, locos, rolling
> stock etc. I see that I junked the controllers in favour of the Zero
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> PS. This is my first effort with Newsgroups, so please excuse any
> cock-ups!!
No 'cock-ups' that I could detect.
Now on to Zero One. I used it in the '70's. I kept burning out the master
controller. It might have had something to do with our cycles, but I assumed
that if it was sold on the American market it was rated for our current.
I don't know if Zero one is still being produced.
There are products out there that are much better than Zero One. Check out
DCC. Similar in concept, but very different in execution.
Try Tony's Train Exchange for starters. www.dcctrains.com
Or search the web for DCC

Signature
Please change my Email address to farosenbaum@earthlink.net
I will not be able to access SBC Global after the end of August.
The Gratiot Valley Railroad Club bi-annual train show and sale
November 7, 2004, at the Macomb Community College Sports
and Expo Center. Macomb County Michigan.
Please visit our Web Site
Click here: http://www.gvrr.org/
Wolf Kirchmeir - 30 Oct 2004 15:46 GMT
> A visit to the loft revealed my '80s Hornby track, locos, rolling stock etc.
> I see that I junked the controllers in favour of the Zero 1 control system
> inc one slave unit.
[...]
Zero 1 is no longer produced. It has been superseded by Digital Comand
Control. You may find the odd module as a used item here and there, but
it's not worth the hassle. Junk it. If you want the convenience of Zero
One, go for DCC -- it's actually more robust, easier to use, versatile
than Zero One. Don't use plain DC controllers, but use DCC from the
start. In the long run it will be cheaper, since you won't have to
replace DC stuff.
Reusing decades old material is always a problem. You apparently intend
to build a fairly large layout, which implies purchase of new rolling
stock, track, etc. You will encounter compatibility problems, even with
new Hornby items, as Hornby has (finally) decided to join the 20th
century and is busy upgrading to modern, finer scale, more or less
industry-wide standards. Their recent offereings are miles beyond the
old stuff IMO.
I suggest you consider the following:
a) display the old material in a nice multi-shelf, glass-ronted
wall-hung display case -- it does have sentimental value, after all, and
it's worth preserving in original conditon.
or:
b) examine each piece of rolling stock, locos and wagons etc, for
suitability for conversion to modern wheel sets and couplers. You will
find that ease of conversion varies a lot.
I would _not_ reuse old Hornby track: use Peco instead, preferably flex
rather that set-track. I urge you to buy a current book on model railway
planning and construction that will guide you to make choices that you
can live with in the long term. Model trains have changed a lot in the
last 20 odd years. A few recent issues of the model railway magazines
will give you an idea of the enormous range and high quality. Prices are
higher, true, but price/quality ratios IMO are better than ever. Since
you intend to add a loft to a garage, I don't think current prices will
scare you away. :-)
Good luck, and have fun!
Bill McCutcheon - 30 Oct 2004 16:02 GMT
>A visit to the loft revealed my '80s Hornby track, locos, rolling stock
>etc. I see that I junked the controllers in favour of the Zero 1 control
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> PS. This is my first effort with Newsgroups, so please excuse any
> cock-ups!!
Zero One is old technology. In the long run, it's probably better to go
with DCC if your old equipment can accept the decoders. However, there's
at least one outfit that still makes some Z1 compatible products:
http://ztccontrols.com/.
-- Bill McC.
Gregory Procter - 30 Oct 2004 23:22 GMT
> A visit to the loft revealed my '80s Hornby track, locos, rolling stock etc.
> I see that I junked the controllers in favour of the Zero 1 control system
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Has anyone any experience/expertise of this contro system? Is it worth
> pursuing, or are there problems not making it worthwhile?
The motor output from the decoder modules is particularly harsh on modern
motors, being variable length half wave pulses. This was aceptable with the old
open frame X04 motors and the large ringfield motors but will cause smaller
motors to disintegrate over time.
Sell the Zero One gear while it still has some value!
> This might be very important because I'm thinking about a "loft" conversion
> in our double garage to provide a family and animal free environment in
> which to have a really good-sized room dedicated to this hobby. This could
> be expensive enough without paying out for something that proves not to be
> worthwhile.
Your decision has to be between conventional analogue DC or DCC.
IMHO DCC is ideal for small layouts where you want multiple trains running, or
larger layouts where station areas become too complex for conventional control.
Sounds to me like you're in the middle sized analogue category.
Regards,
Greg.P.
Steve Magee - 31 Oct 2004 03:31 GMT
>A visit to the loft revealed my '80s Hornby track, locos, rolling stock
>etc. I see that I junked the controllers in favour of the Zero 1 control
>system inc one slave unit.
Most of the posters here recommend junking the Zero 1 system in favour of
the modern (and satandardised across manufacturers) DCC system. I agree with
this as far as a system for controlling your loco's goes - and you can do
things with DCC undreamed of with Zero 1 - sound, prototypical lighting etc.
But there was one use I had intended for my old layout for a Zero 1 system,
however a change in scale and layout design made it academic. The old layout
had a centalised dispatchers panel, plus local panels. I wanted the local
panels to have control of the turnouts for local switching, but access to
the main line turnouts only under thge Dispatcher's permission. Can't have
the local switcher decide to use the main as a switching lead just as the
hotshot freight or limited is due!
My idea was to mount a Zero 1 keypad on the Dispatchers panel, and have Zero
1 accessory modules at the local yard switch power to the local panel
switches when the Dispatcher entered the code for that turnout. Never went
beyond the conceptual stage (and discussion with a Zero 1 owning friend who
uses his for turnout control only), but we could see no reason why it
couldn't work
So the moral is (in best model railroader tradition): never throw anything
out - you can never tell when a use will turn up for it!
But for the loco's, definitely go DCC.
Regards
Steve
Newcastle NSW Aust
Joe Ellis - 31 Oct 2004 04:32 GMT
>Most of the posters here recommend junking the Zero 1 system in favour of
>the modern (and satandardised across manufacturers) DCC system. I agree with
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>But for the loco's, definitely go DCC.
Sounds to me like you need the JMRI software, particularly the PanelPro
application. You can do the above either with DCC or with C/MRI.
It's good, it's free, it's Open Source, and as long as you can use Java on
your computer it doesn't care what operating system you have.
Here's the JMRI project:
http://jmri.sf.net
Check here for downloading PanelPro:
http://jmri.sf.net/PanelPro
And check here for the User's Group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jmriusers/

Signature
Joe Ellis
Steve Magee - 01 Nov 2004 00:39 GMT
> Sounds to me like you need the JMRI software, particularly the PanelPro
> application. You can do the above either with DCC or with C/MRI.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> And check here for the User's Group:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jmriusers/
Thanks Joe
I use Decoder Pro and am also a member of the JMRI user group - indeed, a
good source of info for Decoder Pro users.
But all this is now past tense. The layout only uses switch machines because
I had them from the previous layout. Buttons on the fascia board next to the
turnouts and used by the engineer are the only turnout control I now have.
We're talking 1920's logging here!
Steve
Newcastle NSW Aust
Peter Lines - 31 Oct 2004 04:53 GMT
Apparently, Hornby Zero-One trains can be controlled with a ZTC controller
ztccontrols.com/
Peter
Richard P. Kubeck - 31 Oct 2004 09:28 GMT
I would have to agree with the one gentleman that Zero 1 is not only
outdated but was very touchy in regards to pick-up,your track and wheels
need to be spotless.
Another gentleman also recommended using it as a switch control
system,which is what I use mine for.
Zero 1 had a problem when you used the accessory module for switching it
made the engine hesitate becase of the power draw.
I presently use a dcc system but do not and have not tried it with a
switch control system,so I cannot state if this happens with dcc.
Dcc is a lot more forgiving when it comes to power and control signal
pick up.
I have alot of animation in my layout and use all my old control systems
to control these.
So nothing goes to waste.
UNCLE
YESTERDAY WAS
TODAY IS
TOMORROW WILL BE