Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / November 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Polar Express Inaccuracies Explained.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ken Rice - 25 Nov 2004 17:52 GMT
Polar Express Inaccuracies Explained.

The model railroad community has directed much criticism toward the producers
of the recent Polar Express movie for inaccurately portraying the workings of
the steam locomotive in advertisements for the movie's spin-off products. In a
surprise press release today, the Polar Express producers apologized for those
inaccuracies, but explained that they were necessary due to exorbitant demands
of licensing fees from the Union Pacific and CSX railroads to use their
patented designs of the steam locomotive mechanical configuration. Although
those patents have long expired, and are considered to be in the public domain,
UP and CSX are demanding that all who portray such designs in their work pay
exorbitant fees. Additionally, UP and CSX claim complete ownership of all works
incorporating their mechanical designs.

Signature

Ken Rice -=:=- kennrice (AT) erols (DOT) com
http://users.erols.com/kennrice
   Civil War Round Table of DC & Concentration Camp made of LEGO bricks
http://members.tripod.com/~kennrice
   Maps of Ultima 7 Parts 1 & 2, Prophecy of the Shadow, Savage Empire,
   Crusaders of Dark Savant & Others.

Beowulf - 25 Nov 2004 19:05 GMT
Salvé
Ken Rice <no@email.ads> skrev i
diskussionsgruppsmeddelandet:eZopd.4582$Rs2.2256@trnddc03...
> Polar Express Inaccuracies Explained.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> exorbitant fees. Additionally, UP and CSX claim complete ownership of all works
> incorporating their mechanical designs.

Dear Ken,
What sort of valve gear did the loco use? It sounds a bit dodgy considering
the film version can only have valve gear on one side :) haev they patentd a
one sided valve gear too?
Beowulf
Whodunnit@earthlink.net> - 25 Nov 2004 20:45 GMT
>> Polar Express Inaccuracies Explained.

[snip]

>What sort of valve gear did the loco use? It sounds a bit dodgy considering
>the film version can only have valve gear on one side :) haev they patentd a
>one sided valve gear too?

Yes, as a matter of fact...but MTH beat UP and CSX to that marvel
of engineering. :^)
Randy Sweeney - 26 Nov 2004 01:27 GMT
> Polar Express Inaccuracies Explained.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> works
> incorporating their mechanical designs.

This sounds extremely suspicious - like urban lore.
Ken Rice - 26 Nov 2004 02:05 GMT
>> Polar Express Inaccuracies Explained.

>> The model railroad community has directed much criticism toward the
>> producers
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>This sounds extremely suspicious - like urban lore.

It's not urban lore until it appears on http://www.snopes.com

Signature

Ken Rice -=:=- kennrice (AT) erols (DOT) com
http://users.erols.com/kennrice
   Civil War Round Table of DC & Concentration Camp made of LEGO bricks
http://members.tripod.com/~kennrice
   Maps of Ultima 7 Parts 1 & 2, Prophecy of the Shadow, Savage Empire,
   Crusaders of Dark Savant & Others.

JCunington - 26 Nov 2004 05:31 GMT
>It's not urban lore until it appears on http://www.snopes.com

or urbanlegends.com
Jay

website URL: members.aol.com/orphantrainlocos/index.html
All the world's a stage - and everybody's a critic.
Bill - 26 Nov 2004 07:01 GMT
Jay wrote:
or urbanlegends.com
Jay
website URL: http://members.aol.com/orphantrainlocos/index.html
-----------------------------------------------------

Orphan trains, eh? A great idea, Jay. Best wishes for every success!

Bill
Bill's Railroad Empire
N Scale Model Railroad:
http://www.billsrailroad.net
Brief History of N Scale:
http://www.billsrailroad.net/history/n-scale
Model Railroad Bookstore:
http://www.billsrailroad.net/bookstore
Children's Books and Toy Trains:
http://www.billsrailroad.net/bookstore-4
Resources--Links to 1,000 sites:
http://www.billsrailroad.net/bills-favorite-links
JCunington - 27 Nov 2004 10:20 GMT
>Orphan trains, eh? A great idea, Jay. Best wishes for every success!

It all got started because _I_ felt like building a Baldwin DT6-6-20 after
seeing it at Illinois Railway Museum. I took some key measurements during the
winter and made some drawings. I then shelved those drawings for about 10
years. I dug them out summer before last and had a go at it. I then talked to a
guy at the LHS, who is real Alcohaulic, who said "Build me one...no, two!". I'm
in the process. Now, that left with two hoodless shells, so Athearn kindly
"donated" a GP7 hood for my "Katy" Baldwins, so almost nothing went to waste on
those 2 projects.

The RS1325 got started when I saw the article in the July 2000 (?) issue of
Trains. I thought it was kind of cute, and being a two-off, I figured I could
model the entire production run.

Now I'm into the North Shore Line (CNS&M), and being a true wirehead, I have to
have the freight locomotives. By all accounts, the old brass models run for
crap, so I'm going to have a try at building my own gearbox based on Athearn
parts. This can hopefully let me get the prototypical 6'6" wheelbase instead of
7' that is typical of the SPUD and  other underfloor motors. Another method is
to use an N scale EMD SD truck with the center wheels removed. That ends up
almost exactly 6'6". The problem is then to get it out to 16mm gauge. Mike
Bauers of Cream City Traction has been investigating that particular problem.
No word yet on his success or failure.

As I plan to be heading back to college soon (ITT Tech), time will be at an
absolute premium.

Jay

website URL: members.aol.com/orphantrainlocos/index.html
All the world's a stage - and everybody's a critic.
Jim Stewart - 27 Nov 2004 23:21 GMT
> >Orphan trains, eh? A great idea, Jay. Best wishes for every success!
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> "donated" a GP7 hood for my "Katy" Baldwins, so almost nothing went to waste on
> those 2 projects.

I would be interested in Pennsy other than GG1.
I could have some production facilities out here....

Jim Stewart
Roger T. - 26 Nov 2004 03:25 GMT
"Randy Sweeney"

>> ............................ the Polar Express producers apologized for
>> those
>> inaccuracies, but explained that they were necessary due to exorbitant
>> demands
>> of licensing fees from the Union Pacific and CSX railroads to use their
>> patented designs of the steam locomotive mechanical configuration.

Bunk.  Since when does anyone still own the patents to Stephenson, Baker,
Walschaert et al valve gear?

Some people will believe anything.

--
Cheers
Roger T.

Home of the Great Eastern Railway
(Site now back up and working)
http://www.highspeedplus.com/~rogertra/
TRAINDOC - 26 Nov 2004 05:10 GMT
Since when did UP or the Chessie Still  eXperimenting take patent on Lima's
Berkshire. Sounds like a bunch of greedy bastards.
Christian - 26 Nov 2004 09:55 GMT
| > exorbitant fees. Additionally, UP and CSX claim complete ownership of all
| > works
| > incorporating their mechanical designs.
|
| This sounds extremely suspicious - like urban lore.

Reads like someone is yanking some legs on this group!
Satire guys, satire.

CTucker
NY
Lt. Kizhe Catson - 26 Nov 2004 17:46 GMT
> | > exorbitant fees. Additionally, UP and CSX claim complete ownership of
>  all
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Reads like someone is yanking some legs on this group!

....and very successfully, I would say ;-).

> Satire guys, satire.
Jack - 28 Nov 2004 13:51 GMT
> Polar Express Inaccuracies Explained.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> exorbitant fees. Additionally, UP and CSX claim complete ownership of all works
> incorporating their mechanical designs.

Care to explain this in light of the fact that Pere Marquette 1225 was
the model for the loco in the movie? Is PM in any way connected with UP
or CSX? Hm?
Signature

de Jack N2MPU FN20
Modeling the NYC and NYNH&H in HO and CP Rail and D&H in N
Proud NRA Life member
addy: jackn2mpu@monmouth.com

Charles Woolever - 28 Nov 2004 14:09 GMT
PM became part of the C&O, which is now CSX. CSX claims to own all prior
heralds.

Charles

> > Polar Express Inaccuracies Explained.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> the model for the loco in the movie? Is PM in any way connected with UP
> or CSX? Hm?
Daniel A. Mitchell - 29 Nov 2004 15:41 GMT
> PM became part of the C&O, which is now CSX. CSX claims to own all prior
> heralds.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>>the model for the loco in the movie? Is PM in any way connected with UP
>>or CSX? Hm?

Heralds are a form of trademark, and are a totally different issue than
gnereic steam loco design features.

Dan Mitchell
============
Charles Woolever - 29 Nov 2004 21:11 GMT
This whole thread is just a joke anyway. But the poster asked if PM was
connected to CSX. It is and that is what I answered. The issue is not
steam design.

It's all a joke anyway.

> > PM became part of the C&O, which is now CSX. CSX claims to own all prior
> > heralds.
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> Dan Mitchell
> ============
Steve Caple - 28 Nov 2004 23:41 GMT
> Care to explain this in light of the fact that Pere Marquette 1225 was
> the model for the loco in the movie? Is PM in any way connected with UP
> or CSX? Hm?

I can only postulate that many peoples' sense of the absurd has been so
totally ravaged by four years, and four to come, of a financially
profligate "conservative" regime, that they can't realize when their legs
are being pulled.

Luckily American folk wisdom only specifies what to do with people who
can't take a joke and not those who don't get one.

Signature

Steve

Our representative government today is perhaps more representative than it
has ever been before in history.  It is not necessarily representative _per
capita_, but it most surely is _ad valorem_.
  -  Fred Pohl & C. M. Kornbluth, "The Space Merchants" [1953]

Robert Peirce - 29 Nov 2004 15:08 GMT
> > Care to explain this in light of the fact that Pere Marquette 1225 was
> > the model for the loco in the movie? Is PM in any way connected with UP
> > or CSX? Hm?

Yes.  C&O (now part of CSX) owned the PM when I worked for the B&O (also
owned by C&O) in the mid-60s.  I don't know when it was bought.

Signature

Robert B. Peirce, Venetia, PA  724-941-6883
bob AT peirce-family.com [Mac]
rbp AT cooksonpeirce.com [Office]

Daniel A. Mitchell - 29 Nov 2004 15:40 GMT
>>Polar Express Inaccuracies Explained.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> the model for the loco in the movie? Is PM in any way connected with UP
> or CSX? Hm?

Well, PM was part of the C&O, which merged into CSX, so there is a
relationship.

Still, this thread seems like hokum. There's little or nothing on PM
1225 that ever was a C&O patent feature. Most is stock Lima, or generic
steam loco practice, and the patents for which have LONG since run out
(most probably 50 years or more ago).

Dan Mitchell
============
Steve Caple - 29 Nov 2004 16:56 GMT
> Still, this thread seems like hokum. There's little or nothing on PM
> 1225 that ever was a C&O patent feature. Most is stock Lima, or generic
> steam loco practice, and the patents for which have LONG since run out
> (most probably 50 years or more ago).

Is it hard to walk with one leg that much longer than the other?

Signature

Steve

"The liberties of the people never were nor ever will be secure when the
transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them."

- Patrick Henry

Mark Newton - 30 Nov 2004 10:08 GMT
>> Care to explain this in light of the fact that Pere Marquette 1225
>> was the model for the loco in the movie? Is PM in any way connected
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Still, this thread seems like hokum. There's little or nothing on PM
> 1225 that ever was a C&O patent feature.

No, but just about everything on it <was> designed by the Advisory
Mechanical Committee in conjunction with the three big builders and the
specialty suppliers. All of the Van Sweringen controlled roads - C&O and
PM included - used the AMC design locos. So when I read the first post I
was inclined to take it at face value, since there is a relationship,
however tenuous, between PM and CSX...

As for the movie, I won't be seeing it - I can't stand Tom Hanks.
Ian G. Mathers - 29 Nov 2004 09:11 GMT
It sounds a little far-fetched that UP/CSX would be claiming patent rights
on something as common as the Walshaert valve mechanism.  If they had
patents on some of the parts, they have long expired.  It's like claiming
royalties on the design of a coal scoop.

Ian Mathers
Yellowknife
Beowulf - 29 Nov 2004 23:19 GMT
Salvé
Ian G. Mathers <imathers@internorth.com> skrev i
diskussionsgruppsmeddelandet:41aae875@news.tera-byte.com...
> It sounds a little far-fetched that UP/CSX would be claiming patent rights
> on something as common as the Walshaert valve mechanism.  If they had
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Ian Mathers
> Yellowknife

No US company could own Waelshaerts mechanism patents or heusinger as it is
also known, W was Belgian and H German (Preussian I think) no more than they
could own Adams or Robertson or Gooch grab link patents :)
Beowulf
Steve Caple - 29 Nov 2004 16:55 GMT
> Polar Express producers apologized for those inaccuracies, but explained
> that they were necessary due to exorbitant demands of licensing fees
> from the Union Pacific and CSX railroads to use their patented designs
> of the steam locomotive mechanical configuration

Ken, I loved it, but please: tell folks it was a joke.  It's obvious that
the Bush/Pinocheney campaign  and the War on Everything has exhausted the
capacity of people to comprehend irony and satire.

Signature

Steve

"With the Bush-Cheney presidency, it appears that mendacity has become
policy."   -  John Dean, "Worse Than Watergate", p. 136

Ken Rice - 29 Nov 2004 21:28 GMT
>> Polar Express producers apologized for those inaccuracies, but explained
>> that they were necessary due to exorbitant demands of licensing fees
>> from the Union Pacific and CSX railroads to use their patented designs
>> of the steam locomotive mechanical configuration

>Ken, I loved it, but please: tell folks it was a joke.  It's obvious that
>the Bush/Pinocheney campaign  and the War on Everything has exhausted the
>capacity of people to comprehend irony and satire.

Yes, as many other folks have said, it is a joke. And it seems to have been a
good one. I wonder how many more folks will miss the humor of it?

Signature

Ken Rice -=:=- kennrice (AT) erols (DOT) com
http://users.erols.com/kennrice
   Civil War Round Table of DC & Concentration Camp made of LEGO bricks
http://members.tripod.com/~kennrice
   Maps of Ultima 7 Parts 1 & 2, Prophecy of the Shadow, Savage Empire,
   Crusaders of Dark Savant & Others.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.