Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / July 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

A Preiser problem

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
harrym - 18 Jul 2005 21:41 GMT
I have a problem with Preiser/WS figure packs of six. Sometimes six is
more than I need/want. For example, I could use one brown bear in my
little wilderness area, but six would have to eat the train crews to
survive. I would like a couple of fishermen, but six would outnumber the
fish in my small stream. A couple of deer would be nice, but six would
overpopulate the layout. You get the idea. Too bad there isn't a place
to trade my extra figures for others' extras. Or maybe there is. I have
done some trading, but there are not many N-scalers around here.
Bruce Favinger - 18 Jul 2005 22:38 GMT
Yes. I see the problem. Another packaging dilemma sort of like the hotdog
and bun thing. I don't know if you can have too many fisherman. For every
fish around here it seems like there are a dozen guys out to catch him. But
if you can't trade your way down to appropriate numbers I think you can get
away with just one brown bear. You won't need any dear because the six
fisherman scared them away. You won't need any fisherman because the brown
bear has run them off. You really don't even need a brown bear if you have
one figure in camouflage pants with an assault rife and his dead bear
hauling SUV near by. Bruce

> I have a problem with Preiser/WS figure packs of six. Sometimes six is
> more than I need/want. For example, I could use one brown bear in my
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> to trade my extra figures for others' extras. Or maybe there is. I have
> done some trading, but there are not many N-scalers around here.
Brian Smith - 18 Jul 2005 22:39 GMT
> Yes. I see the problem. Another packaging dilemma sort of like the hotdog
> and bun thing. I don't know if you can have too many fisherman. For every
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> one figure in camouflage pants with an assault rife and his dead bear
> hauling SUV near by. Bruce

LOL! Excellent.
G.M. - 19 Jul 2005 15:47 GMT
Anybody hunting a bear with an assault rifle is likely to find himself
over the bear's mantle.

>>Yes. I see the problem. Another packaging dilemma sort of like the hotdog
>>and bun thing. I don't know if you can have too many fisherman. For every
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> LOL! Excellent.
autobus_prime@yahoo.com - 19 Jul 2005 18:25 GMT
What, you don't think a 5.56mm round can knock down
an upset grizzly?

Muhahahahahaha.
G.M. - 19 Jul 2005 23:07 GMT
First of all, an assault rifle doesn't have to be 5.56mm.  In fact the
AK-74 fires a 7.62 cartridge, which is not the same as the NATO round,
which might be useful against a bear.
And no, I wouldn't trust a 5.56 mm against a grizzly, though the bear
specified was a brown bear.

> What, you don't think a 5.56mm round can knock down
> an upset grizzly?
>
> Muhahahahahaha.
Ken Rice - 19 Jul 2005 23:40 GMT
>> What, you don't think a 5.56mm round can knock down
>> an upset grizzly?

>> Muhahahahahaha.

>First of all, an assault rifle doesn't have to be 5.56mm.  In fact the
>AK-74 fires a 7.62 cartridge, which is not the same as the NATO round,
>which might be useful against a bear.
>And no, I wouldn't trust a 5.56 mm against a grizzly, though the bear
>specified was a brown bear.

I wouldn't trust "a" 5.56mm round against a grizzly either. I would use the
entire clip.

Signature

Ken Rice -=:=- kennrice (AT) erols (DOT) com
http://users.erols.com/kennrice - Lego Compatible Flex Track,
   Civil War Round Table of DC & Concentration Camp made of Lego bricks
http://members.tripod.com/~kennrice
   Maps of Ultima 7 Parts 1 & 2, Prophecy of the Shadow, Savage Empire,
   Crusaders of Dark Savant & Others.

G.M. - 20 Jul 2005 19:25 GMT
Hmm.  Pure rivet counting here, but an assault rifle fires bullets
contained in a magazine.  The magazine is often loaded from a clip or
stripper clip which holds five or ten rounds.  (It's been awhile since
I've loaded an M-16 magazine.)

>>>What, you don't think a 5.56mm round can knock down
>>>an upset grizzly?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I wouldn't trust "a" 5.56mm round against a grizzly either. I would use the
> entire clip.
Paul Newhouse - 20 Jul 2005 19:57 GMT
> Hmm.  Pure rivet counting here, but an assault rifle fires bullets
> contained in a magazine.  The magazine is often loaded from a clip or
> stripper clip which holds five or ten rounds.  (It's been awhile since
> I've loaded an M-16 magazine.)

Used to be a 20 round  magazine that you weren't supposed to put more
than 16 rounds in ... IIRC.

Paul

>>>>What, you don't think a 5.56mm round can knock down
>>>>an upset grizzly?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> I wouldn't trust "a" 5.56mm round against a grizzly either. I would use the
>> entire clip.

Signature

Excuse me, I'll be right back.  I have to log onto a server in Romania
and verify all of my EBay, PayPal, bank and Social Security information
before they suspend my accounts.

Working the Rockie Road of the G&PX

G.M. - 20 Jul 2005 20:23 GMT
Modern ones hold 30.  The old 20 rounders could normally hold 19 easily,
and they seem to have solved the 20 round double feed problem.

>>Hmm.  Pure rivet counting here, but an assault rifle fires bullets
>>contained in a magazine.  The magazine is often loaded from a clip or
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>>I wouldn't trust "a" 5.56mm round against a grizzly either. I would use the
>>>entire clip.
Paul Newhouse - 21 Jul 2005 03:37 GMT
> Modern ones hold 30.  The old 20 rounders could normally hold 19 easily,
> and they seem to have solved the 20 round double feed problem.

You could get 20 in them but, it stressed the aluminum magazine.
After a while it wouldn't feed the next round (near the end of
the magazine) enough and you had a jam.   Usually at an inconvienient
moment.


>>>Hmm.  Pure rivet counting here, but an assault rifle fires bullets
>>>contained in a magazine.  The magazine is often loaded from a clip or
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>>>I wouldn't trust "a" 5.56mm round against a grizzly either. I would use the
>>>>entire clip.

Signature

Excuse me, I'll be right back.  I have to log onto a server in Romania
and verify all of my EBay, PayPal, bank and Social Security information
before they suspend my accounts.

Working the Rockie Road of the G&PX

Eric - 20 Jul 2005 21:35 GMT
"I wouldn't trust "a" 5.56mm round against a grizzly either. I would
use the entire clip."

Given that there have been cases where .357 magnum slugs have bounced
off a bear's skull I wouldn't expect a dozen or two 5.56 rounds to do
more than piss off the bear.

Eric
'Captain' Kirk DeHaan - 22 Jul 2005 16:14 GMT
Eric said the following on 7/20/2005 1:35 PM:

> "I wouldn't trust "a" 5.56mm round against a grizzly either. I would
> use the entire clip."
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Eric

Just wait til he opens his mouth to bite your friend.  Hit him in a soft
spot. ;-)

Kirk
Jon Miller - 20 Jul 2005 00:40 GMT
>And no, I wouldn't trust a 5.56 mm against a grizzly, though the bear
specified was a brown bear.<
   Years ago I had a discussion with an Alaskan about the best weapon to
use against a grizzly.  Me knowing nothing about the bear and not being a
hunter suggested I would like a 44 mag (probably from the Dirty Harry
shows).  His comment was,  Your dead!
Steve Caple - 20 Jul 2005 02:47 GMT
>     Years ago I had a discussion with an Alaskan about the best weapon to
> use against a grizzly.

Ma Deuce!

Signature

Steve

Eric - 20 Jul 2005 21:30 GMT
"First of all, an assault rifle doesn't have to be 5.56mm.  In fact the
AK-74 fires a 7.62 cartridge, which is not the same as the NATO round,
which might be useful against a bear."

No it doesn't. The AK-47 uses a 7.62x39 mm cartridge. The AK-74 uses a
5.45 x39mm cartridge.

http://www.sovietarmy.com/small_arms/ak-74.html
http://izhmash.udm.ru//ak74.html

Eric
G.M. - 20 Jul 2005 22:12 GMT
Yep, you are right.  In any event, my point is that "assault rifle" is a
nomenclature, like "flat car."  Just like all flat cars don't have to be
40 feet long, an assault rifle doesn't have t be 5.56mm.  In any event,
the Soviet 7.62 mm assault rifle cartridge is nothing like the 7.62mm
NATO.

> "First of all, an assault rifle doesn't have to be 5.56mm.  In fact the
> AK-74 fires a 7.62 cartridge, which is not the same as the NATO round,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Eric
Jim Stewart - 21 Jul 2005 04:00 GMT
> Yep, you are right.  In any event, my point is that "assault rifle" is a
> nomenclature, like "flat car."  Just like all flat cars don't have to be
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> http://www.sovietarmy.com/small_arms/ak-74.html
>> http://izhmash.udm.ru//ak74.html

AKM is the later soviet rifle. Fires 7.62 semi automatic or automatic 30
rounds. Sniper rifle
is SDV. dragunov 10 rounds. This is adaptable to APC and command car mounts.

Same AMMO (&.62) in belts and clips fits various light, heavy and combo with
tripod or bipod
mounts and modified mounts. The heavy has a longer barrel and a 1000 meter
range. It also
fires 250 rpm (the entire round belt in a minute). Bear gets snack faster if
it can run
with 250 rounds in skull....It weighs 60 pounds, Rambo.

Reference FM 30-40
Jim Stewart
Eric - 21 Jul 2005 19:10 GMT
"AKM is the later soviet rifle. Fires 7.62 semi automatic or automatic
30 rounds."

The AKM is a cheaper redesigned version of the AK-47 with the stamped
sheet metal versus the original's machined forgings. Also a plastic
magazine and a laminated versus solid wood stocks. They're both 7.62 x
39 mm.

The AK[S]-74 is the later family of soviet assault rifles. They use a
5.45 x 39 mm carttridge.

"Sniper rifle is SDV. dragunov 10 rounds. This is adaptable to APC and
command car mounts. Same AMMO (&.62) in belts and clips fits various
light, heavy and combo with tripod or bipod mounts and modified mounts.
The heavy has a longer barrel and a 1000 meter range. It also fires 250
rpm (the entire round belt in a minute). Bear gets snack faster if it
can run
with 250 rounds in skull....It weighs 60 pounds, Rambo. "

The Draganov uses the 7.62 x 54R. It's rimmed cartidge unlike the
rimmless AK(S)-47/AKM(S) It uses a magazine not a belt.  It is not
adaptable to vehicle mounts.

The PK, PKS, PKB, PKT and PKM family of soviet belt feed medium machine
guns are the ones  that operate off vehicles. The only thing it has in
common with the Dragunov is the 7.62 x 54R cartridge.

Eric
G.M. - 21 Jul 2005 21:36 GMT
Eric,
I think that Jim snipped something as the SDV is not a machine gun, as
you mention, which the rest of the paragraph describes. BTW, the
Browning .50 machine gun has been used as a sniper rifle when fired on
semi-automatic.

> "AKM is the later soviet rifle. Fires 7.62 semi automatic or automatic
> 30 rounds."
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Eric
video guy - www.locoworks.com - 21 Jul 2005 04:56 GMT
So what is the scale caliber? 0.00762?
Roger Aultman - 21 Jul 2005 05:33 GMT
My calculations show a 06 would be .0035" in H-0.   Roger Aultman

> So what is the scale caliber? 0.00762?
Steve Caple - 21 Jul 2005 16:09 GMT
> So what is the scale caliber? 0.00762?

Reminds me of typos/ignorance marks in several mysteries/thrillers I've
read that refer to things like a ".9 mm automatic" or a ".20 mm cannon"  -
obviously some doofus who thought that if it's .38 caliber or .50 caliber,
it must be .9 mm or .20 mm

Still out of scale for HO, though  . . .

Signature

Steve

Eric - 21 Jul 2005 18:33 GMT
Steve wrote:

"Reminds me of typos/ignorance marks in several mysteries/thrillers
I've read that refer to things like a ".9 mm automatic" or a ".20 mm
cannon"  - obviously some doofus who thought that if it's .38 caliber
or .50 caliber, it must be .9 mm or .20 mm"

I've actually come across serious news articles which have done this.
It's always fun sending them an e-mail to tell them how clueless they
are.

It's almost as much fun as correcting the news people who have refered
to British intelligence as M sixteen. ;-)

Eric
G.M. - 21 Jul 2005 19:11 GMT
Maybe heading this back towards modeling of some sort, back when I was a
kid, Aurora came out with a 1/48th model of a U.S. Army "howitzer tank"
which was a model of a self-propelled howizer, perhaps the early M-109
or M-108.  I really can't remember.  I'm here to tell you that a
self-propelled howitzer is not a tank.

> Steve wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Eric
Eric - 21 Jul 2005 20:38 GMT
I agree.

But it's important to correct fallacies. Think of how many years people
believed the 'if it doesn't have dynamic brakes it's a GP7 if it does,
it's a GP9' thing.

Well if you don't know any better, if it runs on tracks it's a tank.
Remember in WWII every tank was a Tiger and all artillery were 88s.

A 1/48 scale SPH? If one had an O scale layout and were modeling the
right era they would make interesting loads.

I always get annoyed when some idiot gets on the news and refers to an
military plane as a fighter jet. Especially if they are standing in
front of an A-10. They sound like a ten year old. By no one ever
accused the press of being smart, particularly the broadcast
contingent.

Eric

"Maybe heading this back towards modeling of some sort, back when I was
a
kid, Aurora came out with a 1/48th model of a U.S. Army "howitzer tank"

which was a model of a self-propelled howizer, perhaps the early M-109
or M-108.  I really can't remember.  I'm here to tell you that a
self-propelled howitzer is not a tank."
G.M. - 21 Jul 2005 21:41 GMT
I'm probably wrong on the scale.  IIRC, the Aurora plane models were
1:48, but their armor models were much smaller.  And yes, "figher jet"
has bothered me the last few years, just like "WMD" when refering to
chemical and biological agents since neither are.  Supppsedly they are
mass casualty weapons, or MCW.  I tend to disagree.

> I agree.
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> or M-108.  I really can't remember.  I'm here to tell you that a
> self-propelled howitzer is not a tank."
Eric - 22 Jul 2005 05:33 GMT
GM wrote:

"And yes, "figher jet" has bothered me the last few years, just like
"WMD" when refering to chemical and biological agents since neither
are.  Supppsedly they are mass casualty weapons, or MCW.  I tend to
disagree."

I've always thought that B-52s carpeting bombing from 30,000 feet is
much more likely to create mass causulties.

Eric
Steve Caple - 22 Jul 2005 07:43 GMT
> I always get annoyed when some idiot gets on the news and refers to an
> military plane as a fighter jet.

Or more so, some idiot refers to an antisubmarine warfare aircraft with a
side-by-side two seat cockpit and a couple more crew positions as a
"fighter jet"  -  and the idiot who climbed out of it wearing a borrowed
flight suit as the "pilot", even though he lost his pilot qualification
decades before in shadowy circumstances (hard to pee in a cup at a flight
physical when you snorted coke at a party a week before) and at any rate
was NEVER, EVER, carrier qualified.

Signature

Steve

What's the difference between Iraq and Vietnam?  Bush knew how to get out
of Vietnam.  Or at least his Daddy did for him.

Steve Caple - 22 Jul 2005 07:36 GMT
> "howitzer tank"

Or hairspray mannequins  -  er, uh, local TV "reporters"  -  calling
cartridge cases left at a crime scene "bullet shells".

Signature

Steve

John - 26 Jul 2005 14:46 GMT
> First of all, an assault rifle doesn't have to be 5.56mm.  In fact the
> AK-74 fires a 7.62 cartridge, which is not the same as the NATO round,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> Muhahahahahaha.

Using a 7.62 wouldn't be much better than the 5.56. While the AK round
is 30 caliber, it doesn't have enough "punch". Recommended caliber for
bear is 300WinMag.
G.M. - 26 Jul 2005 15:03 GMT
You misunderstood.  The 7.62 NATO cartridge is much more powerful than
the 5.56 used by the M-16.

>> First of all, an assault rifle doesn't have to be 5.56mm.  In fact the
>> AK-74 fires a 7.62 cartridge, which is not the same as the NATO round,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> is 30 caliber, it doesn't have enough "punch". Recommended caliber for
> bear is 300WinMag.
Steve Caple - 26 Jul 2005 21:31 GMT
> Using a 7.62 wouldn't be much better than the 5.56. While the AK round
> is 30 caliber, it doesn't have enough "punch". Recommended caliber for
> bear is 300WinMag.

I still say there's nothing wrong with a Ma Deuce  -  other than lugging
the damn thing around.  The noise alone should scare off Smokey.

Signature

Steve

autobus_prime@yahoo.com - 19 Jul 2005 18:26 GMT
What, you don't think a 5.56mm round can knock down
an upset grizzly?

Muhahahahahaha.
Paul Newhouse - 19 Jul 2005 22:16 GMT
> Anybody hunting a bear with an assault rifle is likely to find himself
> over the bear's mantle.

Better to use a bow, much more sporting!

>>>Yes. I see the problem. Another packaging dilemma sort of like the hotdog
>>>and bun thing. I don't know if you can have too many fisherman. For every
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>> LOL! Excellent.

Signature

Excuse me, I'll be right back.  I have to log onto a server in Romania
and verify all of my EBay, PayPal, bank and Social Security information
before they suspend my accounts.

Working the Rockie Road of the G&PX

Steve Caple - 19 Jul 2005 00:39 GMT
> You really don't even need a brown bear if you have
> one figure in camouflage pants with an assault rife and his dead bear
> hauling SUV near by.

Or a bear in cammies with an assault rifle, and a dead SUV driver tied over
a log nearby.

Signature

Steve
Support your right to arm bears.  

Please contribute to our fund to arm Alaskan wolves with SAM-7s to shoot
down the w.nkers in light aircraft.

Mike Tennent - 19 Jul 2005 13:18 GMT
>> You really don't even need a brown bear if you have
>> one figure in camouflage pants with an assault rife and his dead bear
>> hauling SUV near by.
>
>Or a bear in cammies with an assault rifle, and a dead SUV driver tied over
>a log nearby.

LOL.  The "Far Side" lives.

Somewhat related:

At the Clearwater GATS a dealer was carrying an HO scale swimming pool
with clear plastic "water" covering the pool. It occurred to me that
you could put a Prieser body at the bottom of the pool and have a
couple of CSI's running around processing the crime scene.

Mike Tennent
"IronPenguin"
Jens Wulf - 19 Jul 2005 13:31 GMT
> Steve Caple <stevecaple@commoncast.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> you could put a Prieser body at the bottom of the pool and have a
> couple of CSI's running around processing the crime scene.

similar to this?
http://www.miniatur-wunderland.de/php/galerie/pictures/01_Harz/3008.jpg
http://www.miniatur-wunderland.de/php/galerie/pictures/01_Harz/81012.jpg

/jw
Mike Tennent - 19 Jul 2005 17:51 GMT
>> Steve Caple <stevecaple@commoncast.net> wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>/jw

LOL.

Is that from that incredible layout in Hamburg - with all the super
animation?

Mike Tennent
"IronPenguin"
Jens Wulf - 19 Jul 2005 19:16 GMT
> Is that from that incredible layout in Hamburg - with all the super
> animation?

yes. even from their home-page http://www.miniatur-wunderland.de/ ;)
/jw
Steve Caple - 19 Jul 2005 15:42 GMT
> It occurred to me that
> you could put a Prieser body at the bottom of the pool and have a
> couple of CSI's running around processing the crime scene.

Oh, yeah!  I could make a model of my house, with a couple of CSOs on the
porch outlining a pair of bodies in chalk.  I'm not sure that my printer
can manage the detail on the scattered pile of Watchtowers, though.

Signature

Steve

Edvardo - 19 Jul 2005 21:33 GMT
Actually, I would like to find the ref I had to the "sex-scenes" that
Preiser?  had shown earlier in the year.  I've come across a couple of
N-scale 60's/70's houses with a deck over the attached garage and including
chaise lounges,etc.  A couple enjoying "fun in the sun" would be interesting
to add....

Edvardo

>> It occurred to me that
>> you could put a Prieser body at the bottom of the pool and have a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> porch outlining a pair of bodies in chalk.  I'm not sure that my printer
> can manage the detail on the scattered pile of Watchtowers, though.
Ian Birchenough - 19 Jul 2005 23:19 GMT
>Actually, I would like to find the ref I had to the "sex-scenes" that
>Preiser?  had shown earlier in the year.  I've come across a couple of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Edvardo

I think that's Noch.
Signature

Ian Birchenough

Edvardo - 20 Jul 2005 12:20 GMT
Any url to it - I just looked and couldn't find anything.

Edvardo

>>Actually, I would like to find the ref I had to the "sex-scenes" that
>>Preiser?  had shown earlier in the year.  I've come across a couple of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
> I think that's Noch.
'Captain' Kirk DeHaan - 20 Jul 2005 16:12 GMT
Edvardo said the following on 7/19/2005 1:33 PM:
> Actually, I would like to find the ref I had to the "sex-scenes" that
> Preiser?  had shown earlier in the year.  I've come across a couple of
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>porch outlining a pair of bodies in chalk.  I'm not sure that my printer
>>can manage the detail on the scattered pile of Watchtowers, though.

I have the Adam & Eve set from Preiser.  Many positions can be achieved.
 A small scene and a miniature version of the Kama Sutra.  There is
also the nude sunbathers.  They're going next to my lake with some
peeping Toms nearby.

Kirk
David Epling - 20 Jul 2005 08:32 GMT
In the Feb-Apr 1986 issues of Model Railroader, MR did a project layout featuring the Western Pacific in Z Scale. Do any of you know where this layout is at this time?

thanks

David Epling
FRRS/PRM Webmaster
Portola Railroad Museum
http://www.wplives.org
Wild Zontar - 23 Jul 2005 03:46 GMT
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:32:09 GMT, David Epling <frrsweb@sbcglobal.net>
said...
> In the Feb-Apr 1986 issues of Model Railroader, MR did a project layout featuring the Western Pacific in Z Scale. Do any of you know where this layout is at this time?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Portola Railroad Museum
> http://www.wplives.org

Hi David,

Sorry, don't have an answer for you, but someone here probably does:  
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/z_scale/

WZ
Norman Morgan - 25 Jul 2005 19:23 GMT
>>Or a bear in cammies with an assault rifle, and a dead SUV
>>driver tied over a log nearby.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Mike Tennent
> "IronPenguin"

But, Mike, where are you going to find HO scale yellow "Crime
Scene" tape to put around it?  <grin>

Signature

===========================================================
Norman Morgan <> http://www.norm-morgan.com
===========================================================
Sometimes I wake up grumpy.  Other times I let her sleep.
===========================================================

Robert Heller - 25 Jul 2005 22:03 GMT
 Norman Morgan <nmorgan@**nospam**brake.com>,
 In a message on Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:23:04 -0000, wrote :

NM>
NM>
NM> >>Or a bear in cammies with an assault rifle, and a dead SUV
NM> >>driver tied over a log nearby.
NM> >
NM> >
NM> > LOL.  The "Far Side" lives.
NM> >
NM> > Somewhat related:
NM> >
NM> > At the Clearwater GATS a dealer was carrying an HO scale
NM> > swimming pool with clear plastic "water" covering the pool. It
NM> > occurred to me that you could put a Prieser body at the bottom
NM> > of the pool and have a couple of CSI's running around processing
NM> > the crime scene.
NM> >
NM> > Mike Tennent
NM> > "IronPenguin"
NM> >
NM>
NM> But, Mike, where are you going to find HO scale yellow "Crime
NM> Scene" tape to put around it?  <grin>

That is what high-res color-inkjet printers are for....

NM>
NM> --
NM> ===========================================================
NM> Norman Morgan <> http://www.norm-morgan.com
NM> ===========================================================
NM> Sometimes I wake up grumpy.  Other times I let her sleep.
NM> ===========================================================
NM>
NM>                                            

                                    \/
Robert Heller                        ||InterNet:   heller@cs.umass.edu
http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~heller  ||            heller@deepsoft.com
http://www.deepsoft.com              /\FidoNet:    1:321/153

                                                                                                 
Robert Heller - 18 Jul 2005 23:10 GMT
 harrym <harrym@ruraltel.net>,
 In a message on Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:41:16 -0500, wrote :

h> I have a problem with Preiser/WS figure packs of six. Sometimes six is
h> more than I need/want. For example, I could use one brown bear in my
h> little wilderness area, but six would have to eat the train crews to
h> survive. I would like a couple of fishermen, but six would outnumber the
h> fish in my small stream. A couple of deer would be nice, but six would
h> overpopulate the layout. You get the idea. Too bad there isn't a place
h> to trade my extra figures for others' extras. Or maybe there is. I have
h> done some trading, but there are not many N-scalers around here.

One thing *I* do is save the 'extras' for future use.  Until such time
as your layout is 'done' (is it *every* 'done'?) there is always a
possibility you'll need one of the extras.  There is also breakage
issues. What if something happens to your one brown bear?  He falls off
your little wilderness area and gets eaten by the floor daemon...  What
do you do?  Well, you reach into your 'spare parts' drawer and get a
replacement...  Ditto for the deer or the fishermen, etc.  I have a 400
scale foot bridge with a module at each end with a pair of fishermen on
each of the modules (under each end of the bridge).  I used 4 fishermen
from a set of 6 and put the extra two away.  More recently, I built a
small 'test' track section, with a bridge.  I used the two extra
fishermen on this section.

h>                              

                                    \/
Robert Heller                        ||InterNet:   heller@cs.umass.edu
http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~heller  ||            heller@deepsoft.com
http://www.deepsoft.com              /\FidoNet:    1:321/153

                                                               
cat - 18 Jul 2005 23:55 GMT
>I have a problem with Preiser/WS figure packs of six. Sometimes six is
>more than I need/want. For example, I could use one brown bear in my
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>to trade my extra figures for others' extras. Or maybe there is. I have
>done some trading, but there are not many N-scalers around here.

    I buy the unpainted figs and modify any which i don't need.
Too many fisherman? Clip off the pole and you have a figure who can
hold something or just be hanging out. Heat the deer legs and stretch
them out and you have something that can be hanging from a tree or
over a car fender and show it is deer season.  Too many bears? How
about a zoo? The figs are cheap enough (unpainted) and easy to modify
so any actual "unusable" figs will be rare.
    Creativity solves many problems.

                                cat
Eric - 20 Jul 2005 21:50 GMT
"I would like a couple of fishermen, but six would outnumber the fish
in my small stream."

Have you ever seen those opening day human interest reports on the
local news pieces where the fishermen are literally shoulder to sholder
in the river?

Eric
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.