Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / June 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tank cars

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Don Harstad - 14 Jun 2008 17:45 GMT
Can someone tell me the reason for tank cars of apparently similar capacity
having one, two and three domes?  Is it for the carriage of different grades
of material in the same car?

Thank you,

Don H.
Bill - 15 Jun 2008 00:07 GMT
>Can someone tell me the reason for tank cars of apparently similar capacity
>having one, two and three domes?  

Just FYI, there are tank cars out there with up to 6 domes.
The D&RGW used a 6-dome former wine tank in MOW service for
several years.

It made sense in the first half of the 20th century to use
several compartments in a tank car, but as volumes increased
and shipping times decreased, the tank car fleet shifted to
mostly single dome cars.

>Is it for the carriage of different grades
>of material in the same car?

Yes.  The liquids wouldn't be restricted to different
grades of the same material though, one compartment
could carry a completely different substance.
C. Dewick - 15 Jun 2008 08:47 GMT
>Can someone tell me the reason for tank cars of apparently similar capacity
>having one, two and three domes?  Is it for the carriage of different grades
>of material in the same car?

Generally yes, though these days a tank car only has one type of commodity
when in service. The extra domes can still be useful for cleaning and all
tank cars contain baffles to dampen the movement of the liquid contents so
domes can serve as accesses to each section of the tank in between baffle
groups.

Craig.

Signature

Craig Dewick - HO-Scale Railway Modeller and Professional Train Manager at
http://lios.apana.org.au/~craigd or craigd@lios.apana.org.au if you're game!
RailZone Australia - http://www.railzone.org - No Fundies! No RailCorp CodeCon!
http://lios.apana.org.au/mailman/listinfo/aus_rail_safety for Oz Rail Safety

Bill Whale - 19 Jun 2008 14:06 GMT
And the next question is, why do modern tank cars have no domes?

............................................................Bill

>>Can someone tell me the reason for tank cars of apparently similar
>>capacity
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Craig.
bladeslinger@earthlink.net - 24 Jun 2008 17:34 GMT
>And the next question is, why do modern tank cars have no domes?


They do have domes, they're just not as big as on the older cars.  All
the dome was was a cover for the valves.  But a lot of cars now do
have a small cover over the valves.  Depends on the car
Howard Garner - 25 Jun 2008 02:36 GMT
>> And the next question is, why do modern tank cars have no domes?
>>
>  
> They do have domes, they're just not as big as on the older cars.  All
> the dome was was a cover for the valves.  But a lot of cars now do
> have a small cover over the valves.  Depends on the car

Not right!
The dome was for the expansion of the product. It may also have covered
various valves, etc.
Today the control the loading to provide for the expansion, yesterday
the filled the shell of the tank andthe dome took care of the expansion.

Howard Garner
Len - 26 Jun 2008 12:00 GMT
: >> And the next question is, why do modern tank cars have no domes?
: >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
:
: Howard Garner

I loaded tank cars at Pfizer Chemicals some years back. All I ever
saw under the domes was pipes and pressure gauges. We had strict
rules about how much material could be loaded into a car specifically
to prevent expansion spills or tank/pipe ruptures.

I never got a good explanation why, but several materials were
actually loaded through the 'discharge' valve on the bottom of the
car. The air in the car vented out through a pipe on the top as it
filled. It was your job if you overfilled and blew material out the
top.

Len
Wolf Kirchmeir - 27 Jun 2008 02:35 GMT
[...]
> I never got a good explanation why, but several materials were
> actually loaded through the 'discharge' valve on the bottom of the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Len

I suspect it was to reduce venting of gases. In you fill through the top
valve, then gases from the fluid will mix with the air being displaced
and vented outside the tank.

Signature

wolf k.

Dan Merkel - 27 Jun 2008 14:08 GMT
> [...]
>> I never got a good explanation why, but several materials were
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> valve, then gases from the fluid will mix with the air being displaced and
> vented outside the tank.

I'm not sure how tank cars are filled, but it may be that filling from the
bottom also minimized the disturbance of the material being loaded.  If you
use a hose to fill a water bucket, as the water shoots into the bucket from
above, the water is stirred considerably and makes a lot of bubbles, etc.
If you submerge the end of the hose. the water is still agititated but not
nearly as much.

Like I said, just a thought as I really don't know how it is done...

dlm
Val - 27 Jun 2008 15:59 GMT
> Len wrote:
> [...]
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> valve, then gases from the fluid will mix with the air being displaced and
> vented outside the tank.

I'm not sure how tank cars are filled, but it may be that filling from the
bottom also minimized the disturbance of the material being loaded.  If you
use a hose to fill a water bucket, as the water shoots into the bucket from
above, the water is stirred considerably and makes a lot of bubbles, etc.
If you submerge the end of the hose. the water is still agititated but not
nearly as much.

Like I said, just a thought as I really don't know how it is done...

dlm

~~~~~~~
Also, filling from the bottom, with less agitation of the product, can
reduce static electricity buildup and vaporization of the liquid.  Note that
large aircraft are fueled from the bottom.  It's not just for the
convenience of the workers.
Val
mark - 27 Jun 2008 03:45 GMT
<snip
> I loaded tank cars at Pfizer Chemicals some years back. All I ever
> saw under the domes was pipes and pressure gauges. We had strict
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> filled. It was your job if you overfilled and blew material out the
> top.

My wife says that some of the heavy diesels would work, loaded that way, but
she can't think of anything else. (Her stories with loading tankers, train
and other, usually have to do with things like lox and hydrazine....)

       mark
Len - 27 Jun 2008 12:00 GMT
: <snip
: > I loaded tank cars at Pfizer Chemicals some years back. All I ever
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
:
:         mark

Er...were they trying to send a tank car to the moon?

We were dealing with things that were a bit less hazardous to life
and limb. Things like citric acid slurry (check the ingredient list
of your next Coke or Pepsi), ascorbic acid, and similar stuff.

Len
mark - 30 Jun 2008 01:49 GMT
> : <snip
> : > I loaded tank cars at Pfizer Chemicals some years back. All I
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Er...were they trying to send a tank car to the moon?

She was an engineer at KSC, and fueling rockets, for real. <g>

> We were dealing with things that were a bit less hazardous to life
> and limb. Things like citric acid slurry (check the ingredient list
> of your next Coke or Pepsi), ascorbic acid, and similar stuff.

Ah, slurries. Yup.

       mark "no slurry with the fringe on top?"
Mike Hudson - 17 Jun 2008 16:13 GMT
>Can someone tell me the reason for tank cars of apparently similar capacity
>having one, two and three domes?  Is it for the carriage of different grades
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Don H.

Different commodities in multiple compartments.  You may sometimes
notice TWO or more different Hazmat Placards on a tank car like this,
which indicates that two (or more) entirely different commodities are
being shipped in the same car.
David Nebenzahl - 17 Jun 2008 22:47 GMT
On 6/17/2008 8:13 AM Mike Hudson spake thus:

>>Can someone tell me the reason for tank cars of apparently similar capacity
>>having one, two and three domes?  Is it for the carriage of different grades
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> which indicates that two (or more) entirely different commodities are
> being shipped in the same car.

So, how 'bout a tank car with milk in one side and sulfuric acid in the
other? What if they get mixed up?

Signature

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute
conversation with the average voter.

- Attributed to Winston Churchill

Howard Garner - 17 Jun 2008 23:26 GMT
> On 6/17/2008 8:13 AM Mike Hudson spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> So, how 'bout a tank car with milk in one side and sulfuric acid in the
> other? What if they get mixed up?

Never happen.
They require different linings in the tank and the milk would require
insulation.

A couple of proper examples
Gas, diesel and kerosene
different types of wine

Howard Garner
Geezer - 18 Jun 2008 00:22 GMT
> On 6/17/2008 8:13 AM Mike Hudson spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> So, how 'bout a tank car with milk in one side and sulfuric acid in the
> other? What if they get mixed up?

My understanding is that the multi-compartment tank cars were not operated
like an LCL box car or baggage car, picking up partial loads at multiple
stations.  The multi-compartment tank cars would be loaded at one site and
delivered to a different single site.  Geezer
bladeslinger@earthlink.net - 19 Jun 2008 00:11 GMT
>> On 6/17/2008 8:13 AM Mike Hudson spake thus:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>stations.  The multi-compartment tank cars would be loaded at one site and
>delivered to a different single site.  Geezer

This is exactly how it happens.  I have delivered tank cars to Ashland
Chemical in Doraville that have placards for two different chemicals,
and thus two domes on the car on a number of occassions.
bladeslinger@earthlink.net - 19 Jun 2008 00:11 GMT
>On 6/17/2008 8:13 AM Mike Hudson spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>So, how 'bout a tank car with milk in one side and sulfuric acid in the
>other? What if they get mixed up?

Do you seriously think they would ship food commodities along with
chemicals?  Doesn't happen.  And in fact, milk isn't shipped in tank
cars these days.  Also, it would generally be two different chemicals
that would not have a detrimental reaction, because if the tank car
derailed and spilled the contents a potential mix would be
devastating.
the OTHER Mike - 27 Jun 2008 12:12 GMT
> Can someone tell me the reason for tank cars of apparently similar capacity
> having one, two and three domes? �Is it for the carriage of different grades
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Don H.

So that people who own Tyco trains can pretend they are actually model
railroaders ?
( rimshot )
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.