Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hexagon rather than circle?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Puckdropper - 24 Jul 2008 09:58 GMT
On my layout design, I have what could be described as a "folded dogbone".  
Access to the inside of the layout will be given between the loops.  
Currently, I'm working on a preliminary design of the borders, and have
begun to wonder if using a hexagon or octagon shape would look better than
simply following the track curve (not to mention be easier to build).

Has anyone done something similar?  How did it work out?

Puckdropper
Signature

If you're quiet, your teeth never touch your ankles.

To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm

Wolf Kirchmeir - 24 Jul 2008 13:50 GMT
> On my layout design, I have what could be described as a "folded dogbone".  
> Access to the inside of the layout will be given between the loops.  
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Puckdropper

Well, I think you should do what seems best to you. The advantage of a
layout with straight edges is the odd spaces between track and layout
edge that can be used to add cuts and fills, small buildings, roads,
creeks, rocky outcrops, and such. These will tend to distract the eye
from the edge. OTOH, a curved edge looks good, and in some places will
allow a couple or three extra inches of aisle space, which can be
significant as you age and your middle expands. ;-)

I've built both styles, and found that the difficulty of building curved
layout edges depends on the type of benchwork used. L-girders make it
easy to vary joist length to accommodate curved edges, while box frames
require scabbed on short joists.

In either case, paint, and curtains to hide what's underneath, improve
the looks immensely.

HTH

Signature

wolf k.

Puckdropper - 24 Jul 2008 22:29 GMT
>> On my layout design, I have what could be described as a "folded
>> dogbone".  Access to the inside of the layout will be given between
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> HTH

Perhaps distracting the eye is something I actually want to do.  By using
a nice plywood (rather than the old standby hardboard) on the layout
edges, the viewer would be a little distracted looking at the plywood
edges and the layout would seem larger.

Thanks for the suggestions, I found a few spaces on my layout design that
might be a bit on the narrow side when I started looking at aisle widths.  

Puckdropper
Signature

If you're quiet, your teeth never touch your ankles.

To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm

Dan Merkel - 24 Jul 2008 19:20 GMT
> On my layout design, I have what could be described as a "folded dogbone".
> Access to the inside of the layout will be given between the loops.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Puckdropper

Mine has a bunch of straight sides but at some strange angles.  For what
it's worth, I've read that not having track parallel with your layout's
sides "helps" in its appearance but I don't know that I've seen a bunch of
layouts done that way to judge.  And, I'd think that, depending on the
radius of the curve, an edge piece wouldn't be too hard to attach using some
thinner paneling or even some thin plywood.  Sharp curves would be a problem
though...

dlm
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.