
Signature
If you're quiet, your teeth never touch your ankles.
To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm
> David Nebenzahl <nobody@but.us.chickens> wrote in news:490642f2$0$5792
> $822641b3@news.adtechcomputers.com:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Puckdropper
FWIW, Caboose Industries lists 0.135" for N, 0.190 for HO. Many
modellers us the N throws for HO.
Per NMRA RP12.3, heel spread should be 1/8" (0.125"). Heel spread is the
distance from the running rail to the point at rail, measured on same
edges of rail at the hinge point. Code 100 railhead is about 0.040"
wide, so the distance between the rails (flangeway) at this point would
be about 0.085". Minimum flangeway per S3 is 0.050".
Hence the throw must be at least 0.050", and should not be more than
0.085". The extra throw in the Caboose Industry turnouts is designed to
be taken up some springing arrangement. Their -S series throws have this
springing built in.
I've built turnouts with minimum flangeway at the points, this min.
flangeway looks very good. However, locos with long wheel bases, and
even six wheel trucks (bogies), can brush the open point, which will
cause a short if the points (and closure rails) are not insulated from
each other.
HTH

Signature
Wolf Kirchmeir
Robert Heller - 28 Oct 2008 15:47 GMT
> > David Nebenzahl <nobody@but.us.chickens> wrote in news:490642f2$0$5792
> > $822641b3@news.adtechcomputers.com:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> FWIW, Caboose Industries lists 0.135" for N, 0.190 for HO. Many
> modellers us the N throws for HO.
Peco uses the *same* switch machines for both N and H0.
> Per NMRA RP12.3, heel spread should be 1/8" (0.125"). Heel spread is the
> distance from the running rail to the point at rail, measured on same
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> HTH

Signature
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
heller@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/
Wolf Kirchmeir - 28 Oct 2008 18:12 GMT
[...]
>> FWIW, Caboose Industries lists 0.135" for N, 0.190 for HO. Many
>> modellers us the N throws for HO.
>
> Peco uses the *same* switch machines for both N and H0.
I know. But then their N turnouts are rather coarse. As are all code 80
rail N turnouts.

Signature
Wolf Kirchmeir
Bob May - 29 Oct 2008 20:55 GMT
Wolf, you've got it wrong. All of the dimensions are for a gauge line, not
a real rail width.
The general rule is that the dimension of the aperture of the guard rail to
the running rail (again the gauge lines, not the width of the rail!) is the
minimum for the end of the point rail to the running rail (ignoring any cuts
that may be made to allow the point rail to snuggle into the stock rail -
the flange doesn't care if a bit of rail is missing!). Naturally, this
dimension os from the far stock rail.
--
Bob May
rmay at nethere.com
http: slash /nav.to slash bobmay
http: slash /bobmay dot astronomy.net
> > David Nebenzahl <nobody@but.us.chickens> wrote in news:490642f2$0$5792
> > $822641b3@news.adtechcomputers.com:
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> --
> Wolf Kirchmeir