>> When I first hooked up my Digitrax UR-91 I followed instructions and
>> hooked up the unit to a 12V DC power supply. The system ran fine but
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Thank you
> Mike Mueller
A UR90 is infrared only, right? Are you sure there's a clear line of
sight to the transmitter and no bright light sources in the way?
If you want to check the working of your IR beam, point your DT400 at a
digital camera and press a button. You should see a light from the IR
diode.
Puckdropper

Signature
On Usenet, no one can hear you laugh. That's a good thing, though, as
some writers are incorrigible.
To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm
Jeff Dippel - 19 Dec 2008 16:53 GMT
Mystery solved! I appreciate the information regarding the UR-91 however it
turns out that this problem, like so many of my electrical problems, was
self-induced. To power my UR-91 I use an old powerpack set to 12V DC.
Apparently at some point I hit the Forward-Reverse switch and reversed the
polarity to the UR-91 which it didn't accept. Flipping the Forward-Reverse
switch again solved my problem. (It's now taped down)
Carter
>>> When I first hooked up my Digitrax UR-91 I followed instructions and
>>> hooked up the unit to a 12V DC power supply. The system ran fine but
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Puckdropper
Puckdropper - 20 Dec 2008 00:19 GMT
> Mystery solved! I appreciate the information regarding the UR-91
> however it turns out that this problem, like so many of my electrical
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Carter
Good to hear. You don't need any more power for a UR-91 than a simple
300mA universal power supply available for around $5 at a store, so you
might want to consider one... Especially if you want your old power pack
for something else.
Puckdropper

Signature
On Usenet, no one can hear you laugh. That's a good thing, though, as some
writers are incorrigible.
To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm
Jeff Dippel - 20 Dec 2008 01:17 GMT
ok, thanks
Carter
>> Mystery solved! I appreciate the information regarding the UR-91
>> however it turns out that this problem, like so many of my electrical
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Puckdropper
mike mueller - 21 Dec 2008 21:58 GMT
>>> When I first hooked up my Digitrax UR-91 I followed instructions and
>>> hooked up the unit to a 12V DC power supply. The system ran fine but
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Puckdropper
Hi Puckdropper
Yes, IR only. Interestingly when pointed directly at the UR90 the
response is very sketchy. If I point it just in the direction of or off
slightly towards the UR90 it works great. Almost instant response.
It works well if you point it in the direction of the loco you are
controlling. Go figure.
Thank you for your help
Mike Mueller
Puckdropper - 22 Dec 2008 06:32 GMT
>>> Hi All
>>> I'm having a similar problem with my UR90 and a DT400 throttle.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Thank you for your help
> Mike Mueller
I haven't done much with infrared (besides use a remote control), but
two things come to mind: Multipath and excessive brightness.
To check on multipath, I'd find something to put over the IR detector
that would allow light in from the front but not sides. A hollow tube
would work.
Excessive brightness might be tested by placing a piece of clear tape
over the IR detector and trying it. The idea is simply to reduce the
brightness, not do anything funny with the beam.
This might be something you'd have to ask Digitrax about.
Puckdropper

Signature
On Usenet, no one can hear you laugh. That's a good thing, though, as
some writers are incorrigible.
To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm
Bob May - 23 Dec 2008 02:35 GMT
I'd also check the lighting in the room. A room with a bright light
(especially an incadescent bulb) pointted at the detector can ovdrload the
IR diode and make for bad recption.
The IR" beam" is a pulse train of IR light to improve the snesitivity of the
system but if the detector has a high incidence of infrared light on it then
it will often not see the signal well and only the correct pointing of the
remote to the detector will end up with a response. The LED in the remote
also may not be pointed directly straight out of the remote control so this
is why pointing it somewhat off from the center will provide a signal.
--
Bob May
rmay at nethere.com
http: slash /nav.to slash bobmay
http: slash /bobmay dot astronomy.net