Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / March 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Something For The Voyeur!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ray Haddad - 22 Mar 2009 22:36 GMT
. . . of trains! What did you think I meant?

I'm sure this link has been posted before and in spite of that, here
it is again for your enjoyment. Some of the train videos are quite
long but the detail . . . well, judge for yourself.

http://www.trainorders.com/cameras/tehachapi/

Enjoy!
--
Ray
Twibil - 23 Mar 2009 00:19 GMT
> http://www.trainorders.com/cameras/tehachapi/

Erm, you *DO* know that this has now become a paid site and that most
of us can't/won't use it for that reason, right?

~Pete
Ray Haddad - 23 Mar 2009 00:40 GMT
>> http://www.trainorders.com/cameras/tehachapi/
>
>Erm, you *DO* know that this has now become a paid site and that most
>of us can't/won't use it for that reason, right?

Sorry, mate. I use Firefox which logs me in automatically and I
forgot. Forgive me?
--
Ray
Twibil - 23 Mar 2009 01:55 GMT
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:19:39 -0700 (PDT), Twibil
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Sorry, mate. I use Firefox which logs me in automatically and I
> forgot. Forgive me?

Why shore, pardner! (Grins)

~Pete
NICHE541 - 23 Mar 2009 03:12 GMT
> > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:19:39 -0700 (PDT), Twibil
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> ~Pete

Too expensive
Niche541
Ray Haddad - 23 Mar 2009 05:00 GMT
>> > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:19:39 -0700 (PDT), Twibil
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Too expensive

Firefox is free! No kidding!
--
Ray
NICHE541 - 24 Mar 2009 03:37 GMT
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:12:29 -0700 (PDT), NICHE541
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> --
> Ray

Firefox is not too expensive I use it myself. the website with the
pictures is 40 dollars a year and that is too expensive just to look
at some pictures.
John
Ray Haddad - 24 Mar 2009 03:46 GMT
>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:12:29 -0700 (PDT), NICHE541
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>pictures is 40 dollars a year and that is too expensive just to look
>at some pictures.

John, I knew what you were referring to. I was having a laugh and
hoped you'd join in. The cost is for the bandwidth. Each of the movies
is around 10Mbytes (some much higher) and if 100 people download just
a few of them per month you can imagine the fees the account holder
would pay. Now that this is established for the purpose of this
discussion, his actual download would most likely be 1000 users per
month. Let's just guess that each user downloads or views just 10
movies each. His download limits could be overrun by quite a bit
unless he chooses his hosting site very carefully.

I can truly understand why anyone would think that $40.00 a year is
just beyond sensible spending for the images but it's certainly not
too much and not at all expensive when you compare it to $300.00 per
locomotive or the cost of your layout.
--
Ray
Twibil - 24 Mar 2009 05:26 GMT
> I can truly understand why anyone would think that $40.00 a year is
> just beyond sensible spending for the images but it's certainly not
> too much and not at all expensive when you compare it to $300.00 per
> locomotive or the cost of your layout.

However, it's still expensive when compared to the fact that I can
hike a mile or two down the canyon behind my home and watch trains all
day long for free if I so desire.

~Pete
BleuRaeder@aol.com - 24 Mar 2009 06:24 GMT
> > I can truly understand why anyone would think that $40.00 a year is
> > just beyond sensible spending for the images but it's certainly not
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> ~Pete
or the fact that many of "our model Railroads, seem more realistic
Ray Haddad - 24 Mar 2009 07:50 GMT
>> I can truly understand why anyone would think that $40.00 a year is
>> just beyond sensible spending for the images but it's certainly not
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>hike a mile or two down the canyon behind my home and watch trains all
>day long for free if I so desire.

Yes, but can you watch the Tehachepi Loop from the comfort of your
computer chair? Can you then zoom to Arizona in less than a minute?
--
Ray
Twibil - 24 Mar 2009 19:30 GMT
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:26:11 -0700 (PDT), Twibil
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Yes, but can you watch the Tehachepi Loop from the comfort of your
> computer chair? Can you then zoom to Arizona in less than a minute?

A. My computer chair isn't comfortable. If it were, I'd spend too much
time in it.

B. Tehachepi is only an hour away. By way of Cajon Pass. I *live* on
Beaumont Hill/Whitewater Pass.

C. Who wants to zoom to Arizona anyway? };^P

~Pete
Ray Haddad - 24 Mar 2009 23:39 GMT
>> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:26:11 -0700 (PDT), Twibil
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>A. My computer chair isn't comfortable. If it were, I'd spend too much
>time in it.

Oh, but mine surely is. It has to be. It'd be in the scrap heap
otherwise.

>B. Tehachepi is only an hour away. By way of Cajon Pass. I *live* on
>Beaumont Hill/Whitewater Pass.

I lived in San Diego and Escondido for a number of years before moving
to Australia. I miss being an hour away from such sites as those in
their movies. I did say that it's not for everybody but for the price,
I can hardly complain about seeing railroads in action on demand. All
the way from Australia, too!

>C. Who wants to zoom to Arizona anyway? };^P

Just for when you need to fry eggs on the hood of your car. Saves
energy. Know what I mean?
--
Ray
NICHE541 - 25 Mar 2009 15:51 GMT
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:30:27 -0700 (PDT), Twibil
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> --
> Ray

Once a year I could take a vacation and videotape rail movements if
that was my thing. I did videotape movements at the Tehachepi loop
several years ago. When I got home I waited a couple of years before I
viewed it again. when I did it was extremely boring. Being there was
part of the interest and excitement.. Going to Chama,NM is always
exciting to me and I do look at the still photographs and videos that
I took but I can't smell the coal smoke and feel the heat off of the
locomotive. Maybe it is the difference between Diesel and Steam. Point
being I will take my $40 and add it to my travel fund.I can see all of
the arguments coming. Easy accessibility of videos etc.
John Hubbard
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.