I have a Canon 400D camera which came with a 17-55 lens. This is all
that I used on my first use of this camera in 2007. The results can be
seen at the beginning of my 'real' photos. I have added a UV filter and
lens hood to this lens. This has improved the quality.
The main improvement I've made personally is that I'm learning more
about post production before posting pics
I have also recently added a 100-499 telephoto lens. That really brings
thing into close up. I'll be posting some of the results on my fotopic
site soon,
Hope this helps answer your question

Signature
Mike Hughes
Marketing Co-ordinator NMRA British Region
Modelling the North American Way
Interested in American trains real and model?
Look here http://mikehughes627.fotopic.net/
Hi,
> I have a Canon 400D camera which came with a 17-55 lens. This is all
The Canon EOS 400D is what I found as a subtitle ;-) So you got the
better of Canon's kit lenses. Mind, the other one is not bad, but the
17-55 is better ;-) It's a good choice and quite versatile.
> that I used on my first use of this camera in 2007. The results can be
> seen at the beginning of my 'real' photos. I have added a UV filter and
> lens hood to this lens. This has improved the quality.
You bet. That reminds me, I've still got to get the UV filter for my
latest lens (the Tamron 17-50). And I've got to figure out how to fix my
tripod - the head I have doesn't hold the camera...
> The main improvement I've made personally is that I'm learning more
> about post production before posting pics
Which is almost as important as taking the pictures themselves ;-)
Although I limit myself mostly to minor post-processing steps ;-) Have
you tried "raw-therapee"? It's the best raw-converter I found and the
Canon one does not work with Linux...
> I have also recently added a 100-499 telephoto lens. That really brings
> thing into close up. I'll be posting some of the results on my fotopic
> site soon,
You know this is a crop camera and you have to multiply the values on
the lens with 1.6? That's a loooonnnng lens for sure - and probably
saves you from ever visiting another fitness studio ;-)
Keep on taking so good pictures!
Ciao...
.
Mike Hughes - 31 Jul 2009 11:09 GMT
>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>latest lens (the Tamron 17-50). And I've got to figure out how to fix
>my tripod - the head I have doesn't hold the camera...
Actually the tripod was my first purchase after the camera and UV
filter. That has proved to be the best 'extra' as it makes taking
pictures using the Av function easier and *really* increases the depth
of field.
>> The main improvement I've made personally is that I'm learning more
>>about post production before posting pics
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>the lens with 1.6? That's a loooonnnng lens for sure - and probably
>saves you from ever visiting another fitness studio ;-)
I bought that from my half brother (at around half price!). He has a
macro lens that I'm seriously thinking of buying, but I have to save up
a bit for that.
>Keep on taking so good pictures!
There's a lot more to be processed and added. The next lot will be more
model pictures from Edmonton - I took loads and the best is yet to come!

Signature
Mike Hughes
A Taxi driver licensed for London and Brighton
at home in Tarring, West Sussex, England
Interested in American trains real and model?
Look here http://mikehughes627.fotopic.net/