>> INT WTF
>
> I posted to the wrong group and cancelled the post from my end.
>Apparently it wasn't cancelled before you saw it.
Most providers don't honour cancel requests these days, because people
were writing cancelbots to remove other people's messages they didn't
like especially in controversial groups.
Brian Smith - 01 Feb 2010 21:11 GMT
> Most providers don't honour cancel requests these days, because people
> were writing cancelbots to remove other people's messages they didn't
> like especially in controversial groups.
I didn't know that, thanks for the information. If I do mix up posts
again, I will just post an apology right at that time.
Christopher A. Lee - 01 Feb 2010 21:21 GMT
>> Most providers don't honour cancel requests these days, because people
>> were writing cancelbots to remove other people's messages they didn't
>> like especially in controversial groups.
>
> I didn't know that, thanks for the information. If I do mix up posts
>again, I will just post an apology right at that time.
Thanks - we all mix up posts.
The cancelbots started off with the best of intentions, to cut down on
spam, but it didn't take long for too many people to use them.
Brian Smith - 01 Feb 2010 21:31 GMT
> Thanks - we all mix up posts.
>
> The cancelbots started off with the best of intentions, to cut down on
> spam, but it didn't take long for too many people to use them.
Apparently so.
David Nebenzahl - 02 Feb 2010 00:47 GMT
On 2/1/2010 12:59 PM Christopher A. Lee spake thus:
>>> INT WTF
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> were writing cancelbots to remove other people's messages they didn't
> like especially in controversial groups.
Just for accuracy's sake, canceling posts *sometimes* works. I've been
able to cancel posts, within the last couple years. But cancelling a
post is an iffy proposition, as described.

Signature
You were wrong, and I'm man enough to admit it.
- a Usenet "apology"