Wow - it's under 100 pages. I can't recall any MR being that short
for quite a while [although I have not looked at back issues for
specifics]. I hope that's not a sign that the hobby's advertising
revenue is drying up.
__________
Mark Mathu
Whitefish Bay, Wis.
The Green Bay Route: http://www.greenbayroute.com/
> Wow - it's under 100 pages. I can't recall any MR being that short
> for quite a while [although I have not looked at back issues for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Whitefish Bay, Wis.
> The Green Bay Route:http://www.greenbayroute.com/
Maybe they ran out of articles to recycle
> Wow - it's under 100 pages. I can't recall any MR being that short
> for quite a while [although I have not looked at back issues for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Whitefish Bay, Wis.
> The Green Bay Route: http://www.greenbayroute.com/
I think it's more a sign of the magazine drying up. When I read the old
versions of the magazine, there's always something there to fire the
imagination or maybe a different way of looking at things that still
holds true today.
When was the last time MR's feature article was anything other than "how
to build /something/?" (I let my subscription lapse several months ago,
so I'm not quite sure myself.)
Puckdropper

Signature
Never teach your apprentice everything you know.
The Seabat - 30 May 2010 03:01 GMT
>>Mark Mathu <mark@mathu.com> wrote in
>>news:47k2069e6vqj1la74krres4o9vjn1jig0u@4ax.com:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>imagination or maybe a different way of looking at things that still
>>holds true today.
I agree.
>>When was the last time MR's feature article was anything other than "how
>>to build /something/?" (I let my subscription lapse several months ago,
>>so I'm not quite sure myself.)
I remember hearing the same argument some years ago, only it was about
how there was nothing but articles about prototype stuff, no
construction/how to's content!
I dropped my subscription years ago and only occasionally pick up a
copy at a magazine rack @ H.E.B. I think it has jus turned into a
kinda review new product type of mag.
>>Puckdropper

Signature
The seabat
Filtering GoogleGroups & Goobers with extreme prejudice!
Usenet Improvement Project: R.I.P. Lee aka Blinky the Shark
> Wow - it's under 100 pages. I can't recall any MR being that short
> for quite a while [although I have not looked at back issues for
> specifics]. I hope that's not a sign that the hobby's advertising
> revenue is drying up.
There is always at least one mid-year issue that is thin, is there not?
Even September 2009 was only 100 pages excluding covers. I had always
assumed that it was because summer is the time of year when Americans
are least active in the hobby - is that so ????????
Lobby Dosser - 30 May 2010 04:36 GMT
>> Wow - it's under 100 pages. I can't recall any MR being that short
>> for quite a while [although I have not looked at back issues for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> assumed that it was because summer is the time of year when Americans are
> least active in the hobby - is that so ????????
That is the common wisdom. Problem is, the common wisdom dates to the 1930s.
And just Model Railroader. Railroad Model Craftsman does not seem to care,
other than doing a bit larger issue toward the end of the year.
Had issue 192 of Model Railway Journal in the mail today. What an
astonishingly better publication than most of what we see here (US)! Now if
I could just get past the $110 or so subscription cost ...
Rich - 30 May 2010 16:13 GMT
This is just the world media and the hobby evolving. Not to worry, the
hobby will continue on. Just not like we would like it to.
I am presently scanning all my train magazines into my PC and recycle
the paper.
Change is inevitable, struggle is an option.
r
Lobby Dosser - 30 May 2010 21:48 GMT
> This is just the world media and the hobby evolving. Not to worry, the
> hobby will continue on. Just not like we would like it to.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> r
You could recycle the magazines for cash on eBay. As usual, people are
paying a lot more than cover price.