Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Railroads / June 2010



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Whoops! (Prototype Problems.)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Twibil - 06 Jun 2010 22:56 GMT
BNSF probably isn't happy about this situation (looks as if both locos
are totaled) but I'll bet the local wildlife is thrilled about the
grain that the leading hoppers spilled all along the river bank when
they tipped over...

http://www.gordon-elias.com/blog/570/bnsf-train-derails-in-wyoming-wind-river-ca
nyon-photos/


~Pete
David Nebenzahl - 06 Jun 2010 23:20 GMT
On 6/6/2010 2:56 PM Twibil spake thus:

> BNSF probably isn't happy about this situation (looks as if both locos
> are totaled) but I'll bet the local wildlife is thrilled about the
> grain that the leading hoppers spilled all along the river bank when
> they tipped over...
>
> http://www.gordon-elias.com/blog/570/bnsf-train-derails-in-wyoming-wind-river-ca
nyon-photos/

Wow. Looks like the back third or so of the trailing loco was completely
sheared off.

Time to take that old Athearn, put it in a vise and break off a chunk!

Signature

The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)

Twibil - 07 Jun 2010 01:35 GMT
> Wow. Looks like the back third or so of the trailing loco was completely
> sheared off.

Yes, it was.

But remember that the back portion contains mostly the radiators and
fans, so it's sort of "empty" as compared to the diesel engine and
generator (alternator?) that sit just ahead of it.

Tearing *those* out would have taken a lot bigger impact.

> Time to take that old Athearn, put it in a vise and break off a chunk!

The damage that doesn't show might be even worse: the leading unit got
it's expensive electronics submerged in the river, and is probably a
complete write-off.

~Pete
Fred Lotte - 07 Jun 2010 21:50 GMT
> On 6/6/2010 2:56 PM Twibil spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Time to take that old Athearn, put it in a vise and break off a chunk!

Actually, it looks like the end of the long hood (which is only
fans and radiators) separated from the frame.

I wonder if the grain is a hazardous spill?

Signature

Fred Lotte
flotte@nospam.stratos.net

David Nebenzahl - 07 Jun 2010 22:24 GMT
On 6/7/2010 1:50 PM Fred Lotte spake thus:

>> On 6/6/2010 2:56 PM Twibil spake thus:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Actually, it looks like the end of the long hood (which is only
> fans and radiators) separated from the frame.

I was thinking of the modeling possibilities. I love the idea of
modeling wrecks and disasters like these.

> I wonder if the grain is a hazardous spill?

Probably not, but certainly nothing you want spilled onto a riverbank or
into a river. Some of that stuff'll probably sprout soon.

Signature

The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)

Rick Jones - 07 Jun 2010 19:29 GMT
> BNSF probably isn't happy about this situation (looks as if both locos
> are totaled) but I'll bet the local wildlife is thrilled about the
> grain that the leading hoppers spilled all along the river bank when
> they tipped over...
>
> http://www.gordon-elias.com/blog/570/bnsf-train-derails-in-wyoming-wind-river-ca
nyon-photos/

   I guess they don't have rock slide sensors to shut down that line if
something like this happens. The story says the rock slide was reported
to the railroad but they couldn't contact the train. Automatic triggers
to turn block signals red might have prevented that.

Signature

                     Rick Jones
          Remove the Extra Dot to e-mail me

"It ain't the parts of the Bible that I can't understand that bother me,
it is the parts that I do understand."
   -Mark Twain

David Nebenzahl - 07 Jun 2010 21:15 GMT
On 6/7/2010 11:29 AM Rick Jones spake thus:

>> BNSF probably isn't happy about this situation (looks as if both locos
>> are totaled) but I'll bet the local wildlife is thrilled about the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> to the railroad but they couldn't contact the train. Automatic triggers
> to turn block signals red might have prevented that.

Amazing what "they" don't have, isn't it? Rock slide sensors; reliable
valves to shut off underwater oil pipes.

Signature

The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)

None - 08 Jun 2010 00:30 GMT
> Amazing what "they" don't have, isn't it? Rock slide sensors; reliable
> valves to shut off underwater oil pipes.

Indeed, I thought why not some sort of radar.

> --
> The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
> with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

The fashion in appeasement has an effete, shrill style this spring,
with metaphors of talking animals and fairies shown in technicolor.
Steve Caple - 08 Jun 2010 01:12 GMT
>> Amazing what "they" don't have, isn't it? Rock slide sensors; reliable
>> valves to shut off underwater oil pipes.
>
> Indeed, I thought why not some sort of radar.

Might work, _IF_ the road was a long straight stretch  -  but look at the
picture.  By the time any radar had a clear shot, and making the big
assumption that radar could pick up a rock on the line from other echoes,
stopping a train would be problematical at best.

Signature

Steve

David Nebenzahl - 08 Jun 2010 02:27 GMT
On 6/7/2010 5:12 PM Steve Caple spake thus:

>>> Amazing what "they" don't have, isn't it? Rock slide sensors; reliable
>>> valves to shut off underwater oil pipes.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> assumption that radar could pick up a rock on the line from other echoes,
> stopping a train would be problematical at best.

I'm pretty sure that the rock-slide sensors that some roads do use are
much simpler electrical devices, which work by having two wires touch
each other or some other mechanical switch closure action caused by
falling rocks. Remember reading about it many years ago in /Mainline
Modeler/.

Signature

The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)

Special Agent Melvin Purvis - 08 Jun 2010 16:41 GMT
> I'm pretty sure that the rock-slide sensors that some roads do use are
> much simpler electrical devices, which work by having two wires touch
> each other or some other mechanical switch closure action caused by
> falling rocks.

Areas prone to rockslides are protected by wires carrying current
which, when broken, interrupt the current holding a relay open.  The
closing relay activates a danger signal.

This is much better than radar.
bobharvey - 12 Jun 2010 14:12 GMT
> I'm pretty sure that the rock-slide sensors that some roads do use are
> much simpler electrical devices, which work by having two wires touch
> each other or some other mechanical switch closure action caused by
> falling rocks. Remember reading about it many years ago in /Mainline
> Modeler/.

Back in the 19th Century, human beings patrolled lengths of track,
clearing fallen leaves, checking for loose ties and fishplates, and
spotting obstacles.

But we are so much cleverer in the 21st century, aren't we?  And got
so few surplus people who need a job?
David Nebenzahl - 12 Jun 2010 20:20 GMT
On 6/12/2010 6:12 AM bobharvey spake thus:

>> I'm pretty sure that the rock-slide sensors that some roads do use are
>> much simpler electrical devices, which work by having two wires touch
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> But we are so much cleverer in the 21st century, aren't we?  And got
> so few surplus people who need a job?

Bingo. Good points.
I wouldn't mind walking those tracks myself ...

Signature

The fashion in killing has an insouciant, flirty style this spring,
with the flaunting of well-defined muscle, wrapped in flags.

- Comment from an article on Antiwar.com (http://antiwar.com)

bobharvey - 12 Jun 2010 14:09 GMT
> BNSF probably isn't happy about this situation (looks as if both locos
> are totaled) but I'll bet the local wildlife is thrilled about the
> grain that the leading hoppers spilled all along the river bank when
> they tipped over...
>
> http://www.gordon-elias.com/blog/570/bnsf-train-derails-in-wyoming-wi...

In a curious coincidence, this week's Scottish derailment was also
caused by Boulders:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/10251545.stm

This has some interesting pictures:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1284513/Glasgow-Oban-train-derailment-le
aves-carriages-hanging-embankment.html

but I apologise for linking to such a notorious and rabid newspaper

It took several days to arrange a lift, which is well worth looking
at:
http://news.stv.tv/scotland/182343-derailed-train-lifted-from-track/
The crane was a 1000 tonne lift, and the embankment it is stood on had
to be reinforced before it could be erected.
None - 12 Jun 2010 15:34 GMT
> > BNSF probably isn't happy about this situation (looks as if both locos
> > are totaled) but I'll bet the local wildlife is thrilled about the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> The crane was a 1000 tonne lift, and the embankment it is stood on had
> to be reinforced before it could be erected.

Fascinating. Thanks for posting.
Lobby Dosser - 13 Jun 2010 00:26 GMT
>> BNSF probably isn't happy about this situation (looks as if both locos
>> are totaled) but I'll bet the local wildlife is thrilled about the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> The crane was a 1000 tonne lift, and the embankment it is stood on had
> to be reinforced before it could be erected.

Thanks for the links.

Good thing they didn't have to bring out the Giant Hand!
bobharvey - 14 Jun 2010 10:46 GMT
....
> > The crane was a 1000 tonne lift, and the embankment it is stood on had
> > to be reinforced before it could be erected.
>
> Thanks for the links.
>
> Good thing they didn't have to bring out the Giant Hand!

It would make quite a diorama, perhaps with the lift in progress.  Fun
for a small exhibition project or a competition.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.