>>>This seems like an "impossible" shot. Anyone know how it was taken?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>it's not a sound stage, it is Black Rock desert.
>>>>This seems like an "impossible" shot. Anyone know how it was taken?
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Never mind. You win.
if you look closely you can see my tinfoil hat at the edge of the picture.
This seems like an "impossible" shot. Anyone know how it was taken?
http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040125a/p150xL_per_
str-B0R2_br2.jpg
<<<<
I do not know the specifics from any definitive source, but it would be
something like this:
Don't think of it as one single photo pointing straight down. Think of it as a
camera on wide angle that is pointing outwards and down, down enough to include
straight down in its field of view. Then take a shot, rotate a bit to the
right, take a shot, rotate to the right, etc, till it's completed a full 360
degrees. Then "photo stitch" with software into one image.
You can see a few "artifacts" of the stitched photo at the very top, glaringly
so. And to the lower right, on the ground, two dark areas that have 90 degree
corners. Also on the lander itself, one of the ramp "petals" shows a great deal
of stitching irregularity, both on the outer edge and the crosshatch pattern
that is not lined up.
Now, for anyone who might have caught the first images live from Opportunity
late Saturday night, I think it was this very photo that built itself up over
time. Actually now that I think of it, it seemed like it came in with some
inner segments first, then outer segments later, as though the camera was
angled with at least two if not three different elevation angles. So rather
than thinking of this one photo-stitched in azimuth-only segments like a clock
face, it was more like dartboard segments.
It is interesting though that the arm of the camera managed to be left out of
the completed stitched image. Unless it's part of those artifacts at the top.
BTW - when ground tests were made with the Viking Lander camera prototype in
the early 1970's, the engineers made a "fun" photo where the slowly rotating
camera was shooting a horizontally-aimed panoramic 360 degree photo (the Viking
camera, IIRC, shot pretty much a vertical "slit" digital image then rotated
slightly to the next "slit" position, on and on so the adjacent slits made up
the horizontal portion of the field of view). As the camera slowly rotated past
them so they were no longer in the field of view, the engineers ran around it
in the other direction then posed again, and again, so the final completed
photo looked like there were clones of the engineers all posing together.
- George Gassaway
HDS - 28 Jan 2004 08:11 GMT
"GCGassaway"
> I do not know the specifics from any definitive source, but it would be
> something like this:
-------
Stop it... you'll ruin the fun of the conspiracy.
I've taken some of those shots and inserted pictures of family and friends
waving in the background. Funny photo shop fun.
HDS
Thomas Parson - 29 Jan 2004 01:14 GMT
Hmm, speaking of which, I got this picture of Mars a week ago, anyone still
think there might be intelligent life on mars??
hehe
http://members.rushmore.com/~p5pilot/mars.jpg

Signature
T. E. Parson
29S2R
Black Hills Rocketry Club
NAR Chapter#638
NAR #78955 L2
AMA #767628
.
>
> "GCGassaway"
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> HDS
Dave Grayvis - 29 Jan 2004 01:17 GMT
> Hmm, speaking of which, I got this picture of Mars a week ago, anyone still
> think there might be intelligent life on mars??
>
> hehe
>
> http://members.rushmore.com/~p5pilot/mars.jpg
Yeah, I heard it's staffed by aliens, like on earth. ;)
Jerry Irvine - 29 Jan 2004 02:50 GMT
> anyone still
> think there might be intelligent life on mars??
There is now.
Made by Intel :)

Signature
Jerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA
Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net>
Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration.
Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com
My articles valuable? Donate http://tinyurl.com/2hmgv
Bob Kaplow - 28 Jan 2004 19:34 GMT
> This seems like an "impossible" shot. Anyone know how it was taken?
>
> http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040125a/p150xL_per_
> str-B0R2_br2.jpg
Why does it look like there are footprints around the site?
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
>>> To reply, remove the TRABoD! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle: http://nira-rocketry.org/LeadingEdge/Phantom4000.pdf
www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/ www.nira-rocketry.org www.nar.org
Save Model Rocketry from the HSA! http://www.space-rockets.com/congress.html