Model rocketry dieing? Dead?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Christopher Pine - 23 Apr 2004 18:38 GMT I would like to start a new post based on a post made by a "Beatle man" who claims this hobby is dead or dieing. While I respect the mans( I assume it to be a male no offense if otherwise) right to his opinion. He also said it was boring and too expensive and chooses another hobby to occupy his time.. That's fine to each his own. I personally do not care if it is dieing other than I enjoy doing it and would like to continue. Regulation is necessary unfortunately and I am all for reasonable controls and regulations. Reasonable is in the eye of the beholder I guess. The Oklahoma bombings were done with fertilizer yet they did not make all fertilizers of thsitype illegal... And outlawing all high power or otherwise rocket motors is just as unreasonable. I think there will be compromise and workable solutions will and have thus far been reached. Kind of brings me to the question that some ask WHY do you do model rocketry... well I enjoy it! That's why... am I trying to win a Nobel prize or make some great scientific discovery... no just having fun, myself and my children.. Maybe it is a dieing hobby but not for me I still pursue it regularly and enjoy it.
 Signature Chris Pine
www.penartists.com
Ever look at your watch then look away again and you don't know what time it is?!
Joel. Corwith - 23 Apr 2004 18:53 GMT > I would like to start a new post based on a post made by a "Beatle man" who > claims this hobby is dead or dieing. While I respect the mans( I assume it > to be a male no offense if otherwise) right to his opinion. He also said it > was boring and too expensive and chooses another hobby to occupy his time.. > That's fine to each his own. My dog has an opinion too, I just wish it wouldn't keep leaving it on the grass.
Joel. phx
Get off rmr and go fly rockets.
mark.johnson@lsil.com - 23 Apr 2004 19:23 GMT Is this hobby dying?
Not from my perspective.
Popularity of an activity ebbs and flows with time - just look at slot cars for an example of that. Slot car racing has 'died' at least twice or three times in my lifetime. So has bowling, for that matter.
So long as the products continue to be available in any way, I'll still be involved.
Why?
Several reasons. First, it's been my major hobby activity for 38/48's of my life. I can't imagine all the ways in which my life would have been poorer without model rocketry, including:
- Two junior-high division regional science fair wins. - A tremendous experience at one of the biggest NARAMs of all time, NARAM-15 in Columbus, Ohio (thanks again, Dr. Gregorek!) - Friends I look forward to seeing every summer on the flying field, whether at NARAM, regional meets, fun fly events, or at HPR events. - A never ending challenge to improve my building and flying skills. I don't know why, but it never gets old for me.
MJ
Jerry Irvine - 30 Apr 2004 21:44 GMT > Get off rmr and go fly rockets. No.
 Signature Jerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com My articles valuable? Donate http://tinyurl.com/2hmgv
Randy - 23 Apr 2004 19:18 GMT > Maybe it is a dieing hobby but not for me I still pursue it regularly and > enjoy it. First off, it's not dying, not by a long shot. Under attack but it's not dead.
> Ever look at your watch then look away again and you don't know what time it > is?! Most people on rmr are just confused. Every time I ask someone here what the time is, I get a different answer. ; )
Randy
John Stein - 23 Apr 2004 19:26 GMT > > Maybe it is a dieing hobby but not for me I still pursue it regularly and > > enjoy it. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Randy Does anybody really know what time it is? Does anybody really care?
:-) John
Randy - 23 Apr 2004 21:09 GMT > Does anybody really know what time it is? Does anybody really care? About time? No I can't imagine why? Oh no, we've all got time enough to die....
Randy
Well, only in Chicago. ; )
Chuck Rudy - 24 Apr 2004 02:03 GMT > Does anybody really know what time it is? Does anybody really care? > > :-) > > John The time is the present, which is why it's called a gift.
 Signature Chuck Rudy
VooDoo Digital Productions
http://homepage.mac.com/wesrudy
"The devil's boots don't creak." --Scottish Proverb
Bill Botook - 28 Apr 2004 02:31 GMT And I was walking down the street one day Being pushed and shoved by people trying to beat the clock, oh, so I just don't know, I just don't know And I said, yes I said .....
Does anybody really know what time it is ?
> > > Maybe it is a dieing hobby but not for me I still pursue it regularly > and [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > John Michael Mackay-Blair - 28 Apr 2004 02:49 GMT 9:47 am 28/04/04 ( note you daft yanks the CORRECT Date formatt not that silly backward one you guys use....bah putting the month before the day....I suppose you put carts in front of horses as well)
Love the group heretic.
> And I was walking down the street one day > Being pushed and shoved by people trying to beat the clock, [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > > > John Randy - 28 Apr 2004 02:58 GMT > 9:47 am 28/04/04 ( note you daft yanks the CORRECT Date formatt not that > silly backward one you guys use....bah putting the month before the day....I > suppose you put carts in front of horses as well) That's on your side of Greenwich. You're looking at it in a mirror. ; )
Randy
Michael Mackay-Blair - 28 Apr 2004 16:51 GMT Nice try but our side of greenwich was found before your side....pffffffftttt :-P
> > 9:47 am 28/04/04 ( note you daft yanks the CORRECT Date formatt not that > > silly backward one you guys use....bah putting the month before the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Randy Jerry Irvine - 30 Apr 2004 21:44 GMT > 9:47 am 28/04/04 ( note you daft yanks the CORRECT Date formatt not that > silly backward one you guys use....bah putting the month before the day....I > suppose you put carts in front of horses as well) Well . . . yes? And get explosives permits for exempt materials too.
Daft indeed.
> Love the group heretic. > > And I was walking down the street one day [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > > > > > John
 Signature Jerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com My articles valuable? Donate http://tinyurl.com/2hmgv
Dave Grayvis - 24 Apr 2004 02:19 GMT >> Maybe it is a dieing hobby but not for me I still pursue it regularly and >>enjoy it. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Randy When did You ask them? ;)
Mike Pearson <see .sig> - 23 Apr 2004 20:34 GMT > Maybe it is a dieing hobby but not for me I still pursue it regularly and > enjoy it. Not dead....
Just resting.
 Signature Mike KD7PVT NAR #70953 - Sr/HPR Level-1 ~ BEMRC - NAR Section #627 NO Junk Email, please! Real email to: amphoto [at] blarg [dot] net. <WANTED: Experienced Kamikaze Pilot>
Rick Dickinson - 23 Apr 2004 23:19 GMT >> Maybe it is a dieing hobby but not for me I still pursue it regularly and >> enjoy it. > >Not dead.... > >Just resting. It's just pining for the fjords....
- Rick "beautiful plumage" Dickinson
 Signature "...we take the South road out of Nairobis for about twelve miles and then ask." "Does anyone speak Swahili, sir?" "Oh, yes I think most of them do down there." -- Sir(s) George Head and Arthur(s) Wilson plan an expedition to climb both peaks of Mount Kilimanjaro
Chad L. Ellis - 24 Apr 2004 03:50 GMT Resting...I think not. Record motor sales. AT producing more and more reloads, CTI and AMW with new motors, and Ellis Mountain doing the same.
"Mike Pearson <see .sig>" > > Maybe it is a dieing hobby but not for me I still pursue it regularly and
Not dead....
> Just resting. shockwaveriderz - 23 Apr 2004 20:53 GMT model rocketry will never die, unless of course the BATFE gets a wild hair up its butt someday....
shockie B)
> I would like to start a new post based on a post made by a "Beatle man" who > claims this hobby is dead or dieing. While I respect the mans( I assume it [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Maybe it is a dieing hobby but not for me I still pursue it regularly and > enjoy it. Beatle Man - 24 Apr 2004 04:27 GMT Hello Christopher,
Well a scan of the replies does not surprise ... after all this is a BIASED group :)
If you asked the AVERAGE man/woman on the street ... they would not know nor care about model rockets ... we do. Yes WE ... there boaring to fly, but collecting and reselling for cash is interesting ... guess that is why the majority of sellers at Barbie Doll shows are male sellers ... its the money ...
Look the readers and posters here are still going to do the hobby till they are either cremated or lowered into the ground ... but who will be flying rockets 75 years from now ... 150 ... there will probably be AI robots kept as pets ... model rocketry was a FAD in the 60s and 70s ... for some of the nerds of today its a lifestyle ... but public interest has all but dried up.
The same thing happens with any hobby/collectible ... take a look at comics. Growing up I spent my allowance at the comic stores. X-Men were 15 cents a book. Thor and Silver Surfer were about the same. With $5.00 I could walk out of the store with an arm full of comics to read for the remainder of the Saturday afternoon.
Now lets roll the clock forward 30 years ... Comics regularly sell for $3 - $5 a book! They are no longer being purchased by average ten year olds in the scores ... the comic industry destroyed itself in the mid 90s as did the sports card industry with high prices and volumes of low quality products ... the same is true with rocketry ... made in China ... plastic "idiot" kits [sic] that require 10 - 15 minutes of time investment ... then its back to the Playstation or the XBOX or Yu-Gi-Oh or Magic the Gathering ... or paint balls ... or Rap music ... or surfing the porn sites in the libraries ... or anyhing but cuttting balsa, sanding, gluing, sealing wood and spirals, paint primer ... painting ... dull/gloss coating ... joining up with a couple dozen other young people your age to fly the lastest rocket offfered from FSI, Centuri, AVI, pre Damon Estes ... its NOT the same culture as it was 30 - 40 years ago. Kids are NOT captivated with, "God Speed John Glen", or "Lift-Off of Apollo 11 at 32 minutes past the hour", or even, "Challenger Houston, your go at throttle up" ... times change ... public interest changes ... hobby shops rarely carry model rockets ... instead they carry R/C Cars ... believe me, a 16 year old today is more interested in a 1:10 scale HPI r/c car, then they are running down to their local club house and trying to form a NAR chapter.
One other thing that should be noted:
In the responces so far, no one has given numbers of membership rosters. Also, how much of the hobby industry in dollars does model rocketry account for when compared to 1966? I am 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 percent sure that it is "back ground noise" today when compared to other hobby interests.
Now, does that mean I am trying to get you to leave the hobby ... hell no, I don't care what turns your crank ... I am just looking at things objectively. When I walk into hobby shops and toy stores and see little to no model rockets, I have to go with what I see as opposed to what I hope and feel ... thats all.
Model rockets are not the only hobbys taking hits ... greenware shops, yes I do greenware, are closing and not being replaced ... young girls no longer do crafts like before ... instead they dream of breast enlargements so they can look like Brittney ... women no longer make dresses so McCalls went out of business ... why because its cheaper and far less hassle to let some Chinese sweat shop in Harlem make the things for a fraaction of the costs to make the dresses yourself ... rocketry is no diffferent ... why should a 10 year old wait hours, days, for glue, and paint to cure, when they can plop $10 - $20 down for a plastic ready made rocket, spend 10 min installing the batteries, motor and igniter into it press the button ... ok done ... now back to Pokemon ... using drugs ... having sex ... play station .. xbox ... rap ... its a different world from when you were growing up in the "summer of love" back in 1967 ... kids DON'T work with their hands like they used to ... no more spending hours of cutting stringers and bulkheads for that tissue rubber plane being built with your dad oon the kitchen table ... those days are over ...
I guess saying Model Rocketry is "DEAD" was a strech ... what I should have said is that Model Rocket with regards to the public at large, really is INSIGNIFICANT. Oh, YOU the space minded hobbyist care, but the public at large does not. If it did, hobby shelves would be over flowing with kits, rockets would be launched at NFL halftime shows as was once done back in 1970, every science exhibit at school would have some type of rocket theme ... it ain't happenen folks.
Here is a tip ... invest in Magic the Gathering ... very hot and lucrative. It first made its arrival back in 1993 and then died out back in 1999 - 2000. Now it is hotter than every and single cards can sell for $500 - $700.
Now you might say, well model rocket interest flow and eb so just give model rockets time ... the difference is that I can go down to my local swap meet or card shop, and I will see 20 - 30 kids all sitting down playing Magic at the sellers tables ... they are not bulding Astron Alphas or the modern day equivalent ... and the nice thing is that these kids in the next 20 or so years will be tomorrow's Magic the Gathering collectors :) Where are tomorrow's "ground swell" of model rocket flyers and collectors?
So is Model Rocketry dead? ... I guess it depends on perspective ... is model rocketry significant in today's culture? ... NO.
> I would like to start a new post based on a post made by a "Beatle man" who > claims this hobby is dead or dieing. While I respect the mans( I assume it [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Maybe it is a dieing hobby but not for me I still pursue it regularly and > enjoy it. Joel. Corwith - 24 Apr 2004 06:26 GMT > Hello Christopher, <Snip worthless troll bile>
> So is Model Rocketry dead? ... I guess it depends on perspective ... > is model rocketry significant in today's culture? ... NO. Model rocketry never has, nor will be 'significant' in any culture.
Is it dead? No.
Joel. phx
> > I would like to start a new post based on a post made by a "Beatle man" who David Weinshenker - 24 Apr 2004 09:41 GMT > is model rocketry significant in today's culture? ... NO. Is "today's culture" significant? I have my doubts...
-dave w
TF - 24 Apr 2004 06:48 GMT Yup.. the glory days are gone.. but I can say that about a lot of different hobbies..
Just got back from launching at the local undeveloped park, Seems three of us "rocketeers" got the same idea at the same time... One group was three generations just cracking open a starter set RTF. Another group also had a RTF set, but they have flown before... Then you have I and my family.. I'm a BAR... All rockets were balsa, etc, etc, except for one Almost ready to fly Shuttle Express.. Everyone had a good time. One of the men stated.... "I thought model rocket interest had all but vanished.. I'm surpised there are three of us here!!!" .... I told him, when the wind dies down and the skies are blue, we come out of the woodwork.
I sure left a lasting impression when I launched my Maxi Honest John on a F21 ... Up to pressure ... Baaammmmm!!!
This is just a park around the corner from where I live...
It's not dead..
TF
JAO6469 - 24 Apr 2004 14:36 GMT ok i admit i am what you all call a "lurker" but this post has some significance. I am a horse shoer of 17 years. My clientele consists of people from all walks of life. The other day one of my clients, whom is a science teacher for 9-12th grade. I brought up the convo of Model Rocketry. She told me that they have a new teacher coming in and that for the first time in the school's history , there will be a Rocketry program. I then scriibeld so many websites for her to pass along so that they could get the kids interested and captivated, including ones that have some decent video to watch. Also gave them the NAR and Estes sites so they can get the classes really involved. So you see, here is a single person involving them selves for the future....the kids...isnt that how the first astronauts started? Maybe 1 or 2 of a class of 30 will only take the interest, but at least its a start for a school that never had a program in the past. Now do the math..if EVERY school got involved in the hobby, then maybe, just maybe the numbers would grow and sales, production, and strength in the industry would become even more greater. I believe, we as parents, and i know there are many of us out there, should take the time to get involved in the hobby with our kids. I know my 11 year old son wants nothing more in his life other than rockets. And he is not happy with the 18 yr old age requirement for certification, but he is patient. At least i can say he can assemble a HPR motor correctly. The smile he has when its completed is amazing. Now THATS the satisfaction i like to see coming from the hobby. Hopefully others do too. Jim
Mark B. Bundick - 24 Apr 2004 14:53 GMT Beatle Man (mainrain_2@juno.com) wrote:
>> Well lets see how could a high powered rocket motor be used to kill >> human beings and spread terror to a population: All methods with lower reliability and accuracy than almost any other stealth delivery mechanism.
>> the fact that they could be setup, deployed, and employed would cause MAJOR >> damage to public safety confidence and cause our stock markets to >> fall hundreds if not a few thousand points. Its only money; pensions, >> retirement 401k ... who cares ... On what economic basis can such a statement be made? I fail to see the connection between long term investment performance and this kind of potential event.
>> Besides, we all know (but some won't admit) Model Rocketry is a dying >> (dead) hobby. Fewer and fewer kids play with rockets. I respectifully disagree. Estes still sells millions of rockets and motor annually.
>> Last time I checked the local TRU, there were like 4-5 model rocket >> products on the shelf and a spattering of engines This is no different than it was 20 years ago. Mass market outlet don't make money on speciality products; they cater to a different market. Recognizing that economic fact does not relegate the hobby to "dying" status.
>> The public doesn't care about manned space flight. I agree.
>> So 100,000 / 300,000,000 * 100 percent = 0.03 percent of the population >>cares about rockets The absolute number of hobbyists in any given hobby isn't necessarily relevent to whether or not a hobby is dying. The real ratios I believe should be examined are whether any given hobby has a sufficent critcial mass to develop products and promote events. If you look at the past 10 years of the rocketry hobby, that critical mass has been more than present.
I would obviously prefer that more people participated. However, with the numbers we have or are likely to reach, we have a sustaniable hobby, IMHO.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Mark B. Bundick mbundick - at - earthlink - dot - net NAR President www - dot - nar - dot - org
"A dark night in a city that knows how to keep its secrets, but high above the quiet streets on the twelfth floor of the Acme Building, one man is still trying to find the answers to life's persistent questions. Guy Noir, Private Eye."
Randy - 24 Apr 2004 15:10 GMT > I would obviously prefer that more people participated. However, with > the numbers we have or are likely to reach, we have a sustaniable > hobby, IMHO. Once we reached the moon, I've been hearing "the hobby is fading" since 1970. 34 years later, it's going very strong even with all we are dealing with today. Consider the size, type of rockets, engines available and the numbers of people belonging to the clubs and number of clubs since 1970, then tell me the hobby is fading.
There may have been a few drop out since 911 and because of the ATF but for the most part, I think the current environment has made the true rocketeers, more determined than ever to build, fly and enjoy the hobby.
Randy
Yves - 24 Apr 2004 18:18 GMT Hello,
> Once we reached the moon, I've been hearing "the hobby is fading" since > 1970. 34 years later, it's going very strong even with all we are dealing [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > the most part, I think the current environment has made the true rocketeers, > more determined than ever to build, fly and enjoy the hobby. I beg to disgress but here in Canada the situation is the opposite. Because of Aerotech's motor supply problems and seeming inability to deliver motors to Canada, people here have been dropping out of the hobby like flies.
Our club here near montreal has gone from a peak of around 40 active members to about 20 due to lack of motors, lack of insurance (CAR) which means we're forced to seek more expensive alternatives (MAAC/Tripoli) which has discouraged alot of folks here from flying.
The "bigger variety of motors" seems to be far for us up here in Canada. Our main supplies these days are CTI motors (Cesaroni), Hyperteks and Estes. No aerotech motors to be found anywhere.
I have tons of colleagues with 29mm and 24mm powered rockets that are gathering dust because we just can't fly them and retrofiting them to use 38mm is just a real big pain.
Hobby shops in Quebec carry fewer and fewer rocket kits. Five years ago you could walk into most hobby shops and find Estes and Aerotech kits everywhere. Nowadays, many have simply stopped carrying rocket kits at all, and if they do have kits, it's mainly Estes RTF junk.
I don't think rocketry is going to die inasmuch as there's always going to be a hardcore bunch of flyers who will do whatever it takes to get motors and fly. But the reality is that there's very little new blood coming into the hobby here and the barrier to entry is getting higher and higher which means to me, we're only going to see the hobby dwindle.
I don't know how it's going in other parts of Canada recently but my gut feeling is that many rocket clubs have seen similar things happen.
The irony of it all is that it's probably EASIER to fly HPR than to fly low-power now because more HPR motors are available (via CTI). However since the entry-level is sorely lacking, there's just no new flyers.
MHO.
- Yves
RayDunakin - 24 Apr 2004 20:20 GMT << But the reality is that there's very little new blood coming into the hobby here and the barrier to entry is getting higher and higher which means to me, we're only going to see the hobby dwindle. >>
I think what we're seeing right now is that there are issues affecting the hobby on a regional basis. For you folks in the "Great White North", it's a lack of AT motors. In the states, some areas have been hit hard by the ATF regs (or vendors' interpretations of them), inability to get local storage, etc. Meanwhile, in regions where local vendors and a good motor supply are available, the hobby has been growing by leaps and bounds.
Randy - 24 Apr 2004 20:55 GMT > I think what we're seeing right now is that there are issues affecting the > hobby on a regional basis. I think you're right Ray and I was only speaking about the U.S. At least in the South, I think there is still some growth at least on lpr, which is where most of us got our start.
Randy
lweber0820 - 24 Apr 2004 16:54 GMT On the contrary... My son and I just took up the hobby and are finding it totally fun for us to do! We have made 4 flights to date, (in two days) - but I am finding issues with the Rocket motors... out of 6 motors, 2 have been duds.. or am I doing something wrong??? If I am please reply!!
mkropf99@rogers.com
> I would like to start a new post based on a post made by a "Beatle man" who > claims this hobby is dead or dieing. While I respect the mans( I assume it [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > Ever look at your watch then look away again and you don't know what time it > is?! David Erbas-White - 24 Apr 2004 18:22 GMT >On the contrary... >My son and I just took up the hobby and are finding it totally fun for us to [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > What do you mean by duds? They didn't ignite, or something happened in flight?
If they didn't ignite, 99 times out of 100 it's because the igniter was inserted incorrectly, or the clips to the controller were too far apart/shorted, or the battery was low, etc.
I did a launch with a bunch of kids a couple of weeks ago. Out of > 500 engines, we had a couple of dozen fail to ignite. In EVERY CASE, it was either inserting or connecting the igniter incorrectly, and re-using the engine with a new (properly installed and connected) igniter made it work just fine.
David Erbas-White
Gary - 24 Apr 2004 18:25 GMT > On the contrary... > My son and I just took up the hobby and are finding it totally fun for us to [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > mkropf99@rogers.com Hard to say what might be the motor problem from just this info. I assume these are Estes black powder motors. Most failures are external electrical issues, not motor problems.
What do the igniters look like after a launch attempt on a "dud" motor? Are they burned/melted in half? Are they melted at some point OTHER than in the middle? Do they show any indication of being heated at all? Many ignition failures are caused by shorts in the igniters and/or clips outside of the motor or the igniters are not inserted all the way into the motor and up against the propellant grain. Its easy to short the igniter wires together if the plastic nozzle plug holding the igniter in is not inserted properly. Make sure the silver colored igniter leads do not touch each other. Also make sure the igniter leads and launch clips do not touch the metal blast deflector, or other metal parts, and cause a short across the launcher leads.
Test fire an igniter outside of a motor and ensure you get a prompt ignition of the igniter and pyrogen (the black stuff on the igniter). If the igniter does not fire almost instantly, replace the launcher batteries.
Peer down into the nozzle end of a "dud" motor with a flashlight. You should see dark black propellant. Sometimes light gray nozzle clay will be coating the propellant and preventing ignition.
A 33% failure rate is NOT typical of commercial BP motors.
 Signature Gary Bolles NAR 82636
summum jus, summa injuria est
To contact me; bollesg at comcast dot net http://home.comcast.net/~bollesg/rockets/rockets.html
Slingblade - 26 Apr 2004 01:12 GMT >On the contrary... >My son and I just took up the hobby and are finding it totally fun for us to [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >wrong??? >If I am please reply!! What kind of motors are you using...and just for the record...out of the well over 1000 rocket launches I've made in my lifetime, I don't recall ever having a motor fail to operate. I've had a few where I had to use more than one igniter, but that's usually because you did not install the igniter properly, or IT was defective.
I did have ONE rocket engine that for some reason had a "blow out" in the side of the motor which burned through the wall of the motor and through the body of my rocket as well, but I didn't know it until the rocket landed. I knew that it sure didn't fly very straight, but didn't know why until I examined it. But honestly, I don't think I've ever had a motor to fail.
Christopher Pine - 26 Apr 2004 05:00 GMT I recon I like your name...hmmmmmmm I have that name on gamespy.com How funny.
 Signature Chris Pine
www.penartists.com
Ever look at your watch then look away again and you don't know what time it is?!
> >On the contrary... > >My son and I just took up the hobby and are finding it totally fun for us to [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > didn't know why until I examined it. But honestly, I don't think > I've ever had a motor to fail.
|
|
|