In my experience, it's more reliable and actually easier to use a dipped
igniter. With the shaved grain type, one must sheath the nichrome wire or a
short is highly likely. Also, it takes a good deal more current to fire
nichrome than it does to light the majority of dipped igniters. If one
clusters AP motors one desires the most efficient (mechanically speaking)
igniter available.

Signature
R. J. Talley
Teacher/James Madison Fellow
NAR #69594
NRA #133073736
> I am curious why people have moved away from using shavings from motor
> propellant to make igniters. I recall reading where rocketeers use to make
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> disappeared as an alternative to buying pryogens and dipping matches or
> buying matches.
Arnold Roquerre - 29 Aug 2004 02:53 GMT
The way I saw it done was one lead was shorter than the other. The nichrome
was wrapped around the lower lead the sliver of propellant placed on the
longer lead and the nichrome wrapped around the sliver and the longer lead
until it reached the exposed wire on the longer lead. This basically
prevented any shorts. The time to ignite didn't seem much different from
other matches. It is interesting. I wonder if the perception is worse than
the reality?
> In my experience, it's more reliable and actually easier to use a dipped
> igniter. With the shaved grain type, one must sheath the nichrome wire or a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> > disappeared as an alternative to buying pryogens and dipping matches or
> > buying matches.