 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General ModelsRailroadsRocketsRadio Controlled Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater ModelsModelGeeks.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Model Forum / General / Rockets / October 2004[Dave Grayvis] Brian Teeling
When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items previously scanned and posted by me, or public websites. What is his purpose in life other than to troll rmr daily? Jerry  SignatureJerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com Ebay auction deals and specials. http://tinyurl.com/6wlp8 > When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he > is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items > previously scanned and posted by me, or public websites. > > What is his purpose in life other than to troll rmr daily? Is "Dave Grayvis" even actually the mysterious Brian Teeling after all if he's unable to produce a copy of a document that the real "Brian Teeling" would have had access to? Someone who comes forth out of nowhere and says things like "when are you going to give me my money" ought to be subject to certain burdens of proof with respect to identifying himself, no? -dave w little jerry wrote: >>When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he >>is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > a document that the real "Brian Teeling" would have had > access to? What document would that be? If I had access to it, then so does jerry. Maybe he can scan you a copy. Or he could just reach around and hand it to you. > What document would that be? If I had access to it, then so does jerry. > Maybe he can scan you a copy. Or he could just reach around and hand it > to you. The point is to prove that You are a person with access. Jerry already said what document. (Something about a "patnership agreement" IIRC - I think the real "Brian Teeling" would know perfectly well what he was referring to...) -dave w little jerry wrote: >>What document would that be? If I had access to it, then so does jerry. >>Maybe he can scan you a copy. Or he could just reach around and hand it [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I think the real "Brian Teeling" would know > perfectly well what he was referring to...) maybe the document jerry refers to does not exist. big jerry, was the document in question, entered as evidence? Post a copy. >> When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he >> is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >-dave w Do you think Jerry would pay him if he did? > >> When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he > >> is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Do you think Jerry would pay him if he did? Everybody but Brian has met, conferred, received. Jerry SignatureJerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com Ebay auction deals and specials. http://tinyurl.com/6wlp8 >> >> When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he >> >> is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >Jerry That's hard to believe. Why wouldn't he? > >Everybody but Brian has met, conferred, received. > > > >Jerry > > That's hard to believe. Why wouldn't he? Ask Dave Grayvis yourself. You seem to love blasting emails back and forth with him. Jerry SignatureJerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com Ebay auction deals and specials. http://tinyurl.com/6wlp8 >> >Everybody but Brian has met, conferred, received. >> > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Jerry Wattsa matter? You Jealous? >>>>When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he >>>>is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Jerry More BS from jerry. jerry has never paid off any of the judgment. Not a penny. > >> When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he > >> is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Do you think Jerry would pay him if he did? That would be between Jerry and Brian... it has yet to be conclusively demonstrated that the entity posting as "Dave Grayvis" has any standing in the matter. -dave w >> >> When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he >> >> is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > >-dave w That's obvious. I was asking what you think. > That would be between Jerry and Brian... > it has yet to be conclusively demonstrated > that the entity posting as "Dave Grayvis" > has any standing in the matter. > > -dave w More to the point, he refuses to say and also refuses to meet and confer. His goal seems to be discord not cash. Jerry SignatureJerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com Ebay auction deals and specials. http://tinyurl.com/6wlp8 >>That would be between Jerry and Brian... >>it has yet to be conclusively demonstrated [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Jerry What's to confer? Where do you want to meet? will you Bring My money? > ? > ? When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > -dave w Yea, where is my consulting fee?? > > ? > > ? When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Yea, where is my consulting fee?? Sounds like it was on a "contingency fee" basis... you can have all the H160's you want as soon as you make arrangements for DOT to view them as materials of well-known and manageable hazard characteristics (instead of "untested New Explosives"). Otherwise, there is no legal way for you to collect... since you are referring to a "fee", any attempt to send you what you have coming would constitute "transportation in commerce", wouldn't it? :) -dave w > ? > ? David Weinshenker wrote: [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > -dave w I guess I'm screwed on both counts.. Jerry wins again. :) Fred > > > ? > > > ? When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > -dave w Bullseye! SignatureJerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com Ebay auction deals and specials. http://tinyurl.com/6wlp8 >> > > ? >> > > ? When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > >Bullseye! Jerry - wipe your face or is your mouth the bullseye? > When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he > is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Jerry Why don't you post your document? Does it exist? What does/would it say? What would it prove? Jerry Irvine wrote: << When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he is unable to do so.>> Maybe the document only exists in your imagination? << He is reliant entirely on public filings and items previously scanned and posted by me, or public websites. >> Well, at least you can't claim these things are bogus. > Jerry Irvine wrote: > << When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he is > unable to do so.>> > > Maybe the document only exists in your imagination? Definitely not. It was signed personally by Brian Teeling and was entered as evidence in the original partnership dissolution trial. Are you refuting THAT?? Jerry SignatureJerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com Ebay auction deals and specials. http://tinyurl.com/6wlp8 >>Jerry Irvine wrote: >><< When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he is [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Jerry It was a civil fraud trial. I guess the jury did not find it compelling evidence. >When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he >is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Jerry I think he has made more on topic tech posts that you have recently. Who really cares anymore? > When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he > is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Jerry The same people that care about Jerry's motors being decertified. (Jerry and a few of his supporteres) In other words no one. >Who really cares anymore? > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> >> Jerry > The same people that care about Jerry's motors being decertified. You mean Tripoli, Rogers, Kelly? SignatureJerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com Ebay auction deals and specials. http://tinyurl.com/6wlp8 >> The same people that care about Jerry's motors being decertified. > >You mean Tripoli, Rogers, Kelly? At this point, they don't seem to care. Remember a few years ago I asked them what had to be done to get your motors certified? You have to do the same thing everyone else is doing. Check the TMT page. Good news - it looks like there is going to be another approved manufacturer soon. > Who really cares anymore? Phil Stein Dave Grayvis Ray Dunakin Fred Wallace Oh,wait those are the same precise names on most folks killfiles. > > When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he > > is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items > > previously scanned and posted by me, or public websites. > > > > What is his purpose in life other than to troll rmr daily? SignatureJerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com Ebay auction deals and specials. http://tinyurl.com/6wlp8 > ? Who really cares anymore? > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Jerry Better to be in someone's kill file than fined $40 gran by the man and on pins and needles till the next hand..(;-) >> ? Who really cares anymore? >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >Better to be in someone's kill file than fined $40 gran by the man and >on pins and needles till the next hand..(;-) Wanna bet that BIG FINE doubles down in the next hand? > When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he > is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Jerry hence he is on my killfile (which makes this thread challenging to read) If he had a case, he would sue, and most likeley win. it seems he doesn't, he didn't. Jerry, while you may be motivated to keep justifying that you are "in the right" I would think of filing a cease and desist order on this guy. RMR doesn't need his drivel, you'll be able to sue for dammages if he is wrong and doesnt shut up, or he could file a countersuit if he is right (I doubt considering his foul language) SignatureTater President of MARS Club (NAR #660) www.mars-rocketry.com KC9ESF NAR #79654 L1 AMA #747769 EAA #703312 remove spam spelled backwards to reply > Jerry, while you may be motivated to keep justifying that you are "in the > right" I would think of filing a cease and desist order on this guy. RMR > doesn't need his drivel, you'll be able to sue for dammages if he is wrong > and doesnt shut up, or he could file a countersuit if he is right (I doubt > considering his foul language) I'm not sure that "making argumentative postings on usenet" is something that a cease-and-desist order can be applied to... -dave w >> Jerry, while you may be motivated to keep justifying that you are "in the >> right" I would think of filing a cease and desist order on this guy. RMR [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > -dave w Even if you could, enforcing it would be near impossible. >>>Jerry, while you may be motivated to keep justifying that you are "in the >>>right" I would think of filing a cease and desist order on this guy. RMR [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Even if you could, enforcing it would be near impossible. Actually for a while JI did do a cease and desist, when he went on vacation to Hawaii. Lucky bastard :) Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 >>>>Jerry, while you may be motivated to keep justifying that you are "in the >>>>right" I would think of filing a cease and desist order on this guy. RMR [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >TRA#5512 >IEAS#75 We were lucky too - then he came back. > Actually for a while JI did do a cease and desist, when he went on > vacation to Hawaii. Lucky bastard :) :) I didn't tell anyone :) SignatureJerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net> Please bring common sense back to rocketry administration. Produce then publish. http://www.usrockets.com Ebay auction deals and specials. http://tinyurl.com/6wlp8 Tater wrote: << If he had a case, he would sue, and most likeley win. >> He already has won in court against Jerry, and still hasn't been paid. What good would it do to sue again? << Jerry, while you may be motivated to keep justifying that you are "in the right" I would think of filing a cease and desist order on this guy. RMR doesn't need his drivel, you'll be able to sue for dammages if he is wrong and doesnt shut up...>> Jerry can't sue anyone, he's a "vexatious litigant". >>When asked to post a particular document from a trial and case file, he >>is unable to do so. He is reliant entirely on public filings and items [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > and doesnt shut up, or he could file a countersuit if he is right (I doubt > considering his foul language) Yea jerry, sue Me, that way I can get My money. Oh wait, you can't sue Me, you've been deemed a vexatious litigant. Poor jerry. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2012 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.