Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / November 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Rocket Recovery

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Scott - 22 Nov 2004 15:09 GMT
Built my first two rockets in 15 years this weekend. They flew great on A8-3
engines and I recovered both of them after the parachutes fully deployed (I
was quite proud). However, when I put C6-7's into them....well, that was the
last I saw of either of them.....one just totally dissapeared and the other
we thought we saw the 'chute deploy but then lost it.....FYI...both rockets
were Estes Sizzlers.

What am I doing wrong. I love shooting the rockets lower for my son and his
friends to see but I also like the idea of high flying for me as well.....

All tips are appreciated!!!!

Thanks!

Scott
David Weinshenker - 22 Nov 2004 15:19 GMT
> Built my first two rockets in 15 years this weekend. They flew great on A8-3
> engines and I recovered both of them after the parachutes fully deployed (I
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Scott

Fly larger rockets - they are easier to see at altitude, and
can accommodate payloads such as radio-beacons to help track
them.

-dave w
Zathras of the Great Machine - 22 Nov 2004 18:23 GMT
>Fly larger rockets - they are easier to see at altitude, and can accommodate payloads such as radio-beacons to help track them.
>
>-dave w

 I can agree with this for the above reasons. It also allows you to
also use larger motors that put on a better show for everyone, and let's
face it, it's all about the show with the smoke, fire, and sound.
Otherwise you could get the same thrill from tossing a ball up in the
air, it's doing the same basic thing as a rocket.
Up....down....up....down..... This isn't a dump on smaller rockets.
They're a heck of alot of fun and I can get as big a grin from an "A"
motor as I can from an "I" motor. Just remember they have limits if you
want them back.
 More spotters isn't an issue since I'm always flying with the local
club. Watching the flights is part of the social function of the launch,
so spotters are everywhere.
 The advice of contrasting colors I use myself. Almost all my rockets
are painted in broad stripes. One's light for visiblity on the ground,
one's dark for against the sky, and the third fits in between for
contrast in either. I also prefer parachutes that contrast both in the
sky and on the ground. Inspite of my best efforts I haven't lost one of
my big ones yet.
 Never tried colored talc/chalk dust, but I've seen it used to good
effect more than once.
 And remember the "economy of fun." If your kits are less than $15,
that's about the price of a dozen 13mm's, or 3 of the bigger 24mm Estes
C/D/E motors. Would you rather spend the money on yet another kit after
losing one, and the time to build it, or would you rather use that same
coin to grab some sky with a rocket that'll fly well on those things and
still come back? Hmmm, more time flying, fewer lost rockets....hmmm, boy
that's a hard call for me to make! ;-)

Chuck
Dwayne Surdu-Miller - 22 Nov 2004 16:30 GMT
(my tips follow the quoted message)

> Built my first two rockets in 15 years this weekend. They flew great on A8-3
> engines and I recovered both of them after the parachutes fully deployed (I
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Scott
--------------------------------------------
Here are a few notions that might help...

Having more observers at the launch is invaluable for tracking high
flyers.  If more people are tracking the flight, there's more of a
likelyhood that at least one person will be able to keep it in sight
while others are searching for it in the sky.

Having trackers stand quite far from the launch pad can help.  They will
see the rocket from the side during the entire flight.  When you are
close to the flight path, you are looking up the butt-end of your
rocket, which is a tiny area compared to the side view.  This is also
why a larger, longer rocket is easier to track.

Avoid flying high when clouds are in the sky... at least within the
flight area.  When the ejection charge fires, you're more likely to see
the puff of smoke when the sky is a contrasting blue colour.

Painting your high-flying rockets a dark contrasting colour (like black)
helps tracking when the sky is quite light-coloured.

Cut a spill-hole in your parachutes.  Less drift time means less of a
likelihood that you will lose sight of the rocket during descent.

Use black parachutes.  They are more visible against a light-coloured sky.

Happy flying!

Dwayne Surdu-Miller
SAROS #1
bit eimer - 22 Nov 2004 16:38 GMT
Add talcum powder or colored powder to increase the visibility of ejection.

Signature

...The Bit Eimer     NAR 84054      L0
"My goal in life is to be the kind of person my cat thinks he is"
[remove keinewurst and reverse letters in domain to email me]
--------------------------------------------------------------

> (my tips follow the quoted message)
>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> Dwayne Surdu-Miller
> SAROS #1
EldredP - 22 Nov 2004 17:33 GMT
>Cut a spill-hole in your parachutes.  Less drift time means less of a
>likelihood that you will lose sight of the rocket during descent.

I would think that it would just come down quicker, and less likely to drift
away.  It's just down on the ground before you see it.<g>

>Use black parachutes.  They are more visible against a light-coloured sky.
Never heard this one before, but it makes sense.  Problem is, a black chute
would be harder to see once it gets to the ground.  So if you don't SEE it
land, you could be searching for a while.  So, I wonder what's the best
combination of colors to use?  Black, so it shows against the sky.  White or
orange for better visibility on the ground.  Orange rocket with a black chute?
I launched my Renegade(a black rocket almost 2 ft. tall) yesterday, and lost it
before ejection.  It just so happened that someone else saw it land, and was
able to point me in the right direction.  Another benefit of launching with a
bunch of people.<g>  When I got close, I was able to see the chute.

Eldred

Signature

http://www.umich.edu/~epickett

GPLRank -6.0    MoGPL rank +267.80
Ch.Rank +52.58
Hist. +82.34
N2k3 rank: -1.182
Slayer Spektera lvl 79 assassin
Slayer Spectral_K lvl 44 Necro
US East

Dwayne Surdu-Miller - 22 Nov 2004 18:11 GMT
(comments inserted in reply)

>>Cut a spill-hole in your parachutes.  Less drift time means less of a
>>likelihood that you will lose sight of the rocket during descent.
>
> I would think that it would just come down quicker, and less likely to drift
> away.  It's just down on the ground before you see it.<g>

That helps too!  My thought was that the longer it's a tiny speck, the
more chance there is of losing sight of it.  Our club has lost a few
long, high drifters that way.

>>Use black parachutes.  They are more visible against a light-coloured sky.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> able to point me in the right direction.  Another benefit of launching with a
> bunch of people.<g>  When I got close, I was able to see the chute.

That's true.  Our club launches from virgin prairie which is
light-coloured for most of the year.  A better 'chute on a sunny day
might be silver mylar.  The 'chute of a Solar Sailor II is real easy to
spot in the air and on the ground.

<snip>

Dwayne Surdu-Miller
SAROS #1
AlMax - 23 Nov 2004 04:47 GMT
> land, you could be searching for a while.  So, I wonder what's the best
> combination of colors to use?  Black, so it shows against the sky.  White or
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> able to point me in the right direction.  Another benefit of launching with a
> bunch of people.<g>  When I got close, I was able to see the chute.

Someone said that they saw an orange chute in the sky for like 4-5 mins on a
fly away flight.
Doug Sams - 22 Nov 2004 17:59 GMT
> > However, when I put C6-7's into them....well, that was the
> > last I saw of either of them.....

Dwayne  wrote some great guidelines for flying rockets <snipped for
brevity>

Scott,

The bottom line is you made a BAR-rookie mistake.  Going from A to C is
4X.  Shoulda used a B first.  That said, on a BT-20 based 3FNC like the
Sizzler, even a B is flirtin' with losing it.

We've all done it.  There's a Quark out there somewhere we flew on an A.
Shoulda never tried that, at least not without less wind, more eyes and
a better choice of paint color.

Please don't get discouraged.  Build some more, and fly them with a tad
more caution now that you're a little wiser for it.

And welcome back after 15 years.

Doug
EldredP - 22 Nov 2004 17:25 GMT
>What am I doing wrong. I love shooting the rockets lower for my son and his
>friends to see but I also like the idea of high flying for me as well.....

I'm the same way.  I bought these things to FLY, darnit!  Put 'em up there on a
C engine...
Then I totally lose track of it...<g>  Oh well, I've gotten used to the idea
that if you keep launching rockets, you're bound to lose a few.  That (and the
fact that most of mine are under $15) helps east the occasional fly-away..
I do stick to B and below for my local field, but I'll load the Cs at club
launches.  More space, more people walking around, more chance of it being
found, even if no one actually sees it come down.

Eldred
Signature

http://www.umich.edu/~epickett

GPLRank -6.0    MoGPL rank +267.80
Ch.Rank +52.58
Hist. +82.34
N2k3 rank: -1.182
Slayer Spektera lvl 79 assassin
Slayer Spectral_K lvl 44 Necro
US East

David Erbas-White - 22 Nov 2004 18:17 GMT
>>What am I doing wrong. I love shooting the rockets lower for my son and his
>>friends to see but I also like the idea of high flying for me as well.....
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Eldred
>  

My attitude has been changing somewhat over the past few years.  I'm
leaning more towards bigger, clumsier (draggier) rockets, that require a
larger engine, but that don't go too terribly high on the 'stock'
engine.  Then, when I want some more altitude, I can use one of the
composite motors (RMS or SU) to get up there.  I particularly like some
of the upscale clones such as the QModeling rockets, or using some of
the Estes 'D' rockets (such as the Maxi Big Bertha or Maxi Alpha).  They
can be modified for the Estes E (and work great on them), work okay on a
D, but you can use an Aerotech F if you want to.

The larger rockets are far easier to see and recover, with the 'smaller'
engine (relatively) can still be used on a small field (and look
impressive as heck there), and can still get some altitude when you're
out on a larger field.

I still like the smaller rockets for many reasons (some nostalgic, some
just because they're 'neat'), but I'm trending more towards the
mid-power.  I don't, however, find myself trying for any altitude
records the way I used to with the smaller rockets (it's fun to see how
high you can go on a single 18mm motor).  Once they're going out of
sight, I find it more frustrating than satisfying.

I would feel different if I were in HPR, but at that point I'd be using
tracking signals, etc.  I'm just not at that point right now.

David Erbas-White
Doug Sams - 22 Nov 2004 20:42 GMT
> My attitude has been changing somewhat over the past few years.  I'm
> leaning more towards bigger, clumsier (draggier) rockets, that require a
> larger engine, but that don't go too terribly high on the 'stock'
> engine.  

Building on Tweak's definition of knob motors, we now have knob rockets.

I like it.  Flying real high and fast sounds exciting (but spending two
hours hunting for your rocket does not).  Seeing your low-n-slow
knob-rocket stage in plain sight _is_ exciting.  

Doug
Tweak - 22 Nov 2004 21:49 GMT
> > My attitude has been changing somewhat over the past few years.  I'm
> > leaning more towards bigger, clumsier (draggier) rockets, that require a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Doug

My personal favorite:  5.5 inch upscale EZI-65, weight of ~20 pounds.  
Launch on I435, then airstart three H180s (or I200s, the H128 just
doesn't make enough racket).  Get no-smoke, then smoke, lots of noise,
staging is at about 500 feet and total altitude around 2k.  Then stack 3
or 4 deployment bags to deploy progressively bigger, obnoxious neon
chutes.  It only the I435 were green, it would be totally "knobtastic".

Signature

Tweak

tater schuld - 29 Nov 2004 05:21 GMT
me likey!~

Signature

Tater
KC9ESF
NAR #79654 L1
AMA #747769
EAA #703312

> >
> > > My attitude has been changing somewhat over the past few years.  I'm
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> or 4 deployment bags to deploy progressively bigger, obnoxious neon
> chutes.  It only the I435 were green, it would be totally "knobtastic".
Niall Oswald - 22 Nov 2004 17:34 GMT
> Built my first two rockets in 15 years this weekend. They flew great on
> A8-3
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Scott

You could use a streamer - Apollo 11 over here (UK) sell a great reflective
mylar, which has saved several of my rockets by being very visible. I have
an 18mm minimum diameter rocket called 'Offering to the Rocket Gods' (since
putting a C6-7 in something so small is asking to lose it) which I haven't
yet managed to lose, even though its ended up kicking the motor quite a few
times. getting on for 10 flights I think, it comes back quite fast but I've
never had a problem, its so light!

Happy flying,

Niall Oswald
===================================
Electronic & Electrical Engineering
University of Bristol
UKRA 1345 - http://www.ukra.org.uk 
Lew Garrow - 24 Nov 2004 21:15 GMT
you didn't do anything wrong, you did something right! you just learned the
literal definition of making a donation to the rocket gods.....;-)
> Built my first two rockets in 15 years this weekend. They flew great on
> A8-3
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Scott
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.