Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / November 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Drilled brick nozzles

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Vello - 26 Nov 2004 08:52 GMT
One simple (probably silly) idea for making cheap easy-to-make nozzles:
drill them out from firebrick (or even tile?, stone?) with round hole-cutter
with centering drill bite. What you get is piece of brick looking like Bates
grain. Later then it is possible to make central hole conical. Does anybody
have experience or is it just not working idea?

Best,

Vello
Tom Biasi - 26 Nov 2004 10:52 GMT
> One simple (probably silly) idea for making cheap easy-to-make nozzles:
> drill them out from firebrick (or even tile?, stone?) with round
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Vello

The stuff does not drill easily and neatly.
You could form the nozzle in place from "Leak Fix" cement. The kind used to
repair leaks in the basement walls. It expands when cured and will stay in
place.
I have made some from ceramic also, formed them soft and had them baked.
Local craft shop had ceramic lessons and I enrolled and made a bunch of
nozzles.
Tom
James L. Marino - 26 Nov 2004 13:36 GMT
       If you don't have access to a lathe and some graphite, this is an
excellent idea!

James

> I have made some from ceramic also, formed them soft and had them baked.
> Local craft shop had ceramic lessons and I enrolled and made a bunch of
> nozzles.
> Tom
David Weinshenker - 26 Nov 2004 13:51 GMT
>         If you don't have access to a lathe and some graphite, this is an
> excellent idea!

I've thought that there are possibilities along this line for
making composite parts, if one could get some high-strength
ceramic fiber, wet it out with clay "slip", and then lay it up
in the desired shape and bake it...

-dave w
Marcus Leech - 26 Nov 2004 17:00 GMT
>         If you don't have access to a lathe and some graphite, this is an
> excellent idea!
>
> James

Only if you're burning relatively-low temperature propellants.  It
  might work out OK for KNO3/{Sucrose,Dextrose,Sorbitol}, but for
  aluminized APCP, you'd likely see substantial erosion.  And no way
  will it work for hybrids.

I use firebricks on one of my test stands on the blast deflector.
  The stuff actually melts and flows, leading me to believe that it
  would be a relatively poor material for nozzles.
Vello - 26 Nov 2004 21:16 GMT
> >         If you don't have access to a lathe and some graphite, this is an
> > excellent idea!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>    The stuff actually melts and flows, leading me to believe that it
>    would be a relatively poor material for nozzles.

For sure I'm talking about simple single use motors. What I love is that
this way nozzles come one per 5 seconds (well, there is some thinking about
how to make them tight in motor case). For sure brick can't match grafite,
but is it really worse then just clay? If yes, there is a lot of stone-like
materials to drill, so I just have to test.
KNO3 is only oxidizing stuff available here, so my choices are candy or
kno3-epoxy.
James L. Marino - 26 Nov 2004 22:25 GMT
       Really. Can't be any worse than "Durham's Water Putty".  Talk about
erosion. I did my first batch of pvc test motors with it a few years back.
Composite ate that stuff alive. At least I was smart enough to put a steel
insert throat into them, or my "a" and "n" results would have been even more
questionable. I have since refined my methods. And bought a lathe to turn
graphite (among other things).

James

> > >         If you don't have access to a lathe and some graphite, this is
> an
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> KNO3 is only oxidizing stuff available here, so my choices are candy or
> kno3-epoxy.
RayDunakin - 27 Nov 2004 00:37 GMT
If you don't have a lathe, how can you turn the bricks? Sure, you can drill out
the nozzle but you need a way to shape the rest of it too, right?
Vello Kala - 27 Nov 2004 15:55 GMT
> If you don't have a lathe, how can you turn the bricks? Sure, you can drill out
> the nozzle but you need a way to shape the rest of it too, right?

Take hole-cutter of the same dia as motor casing and centering drill
bite of the size of nozzle-hole you want (problem is, hole-cutters
come with some standard dia centering bites so if it don't fit your
design, you have to drill central hole one more time to get right
dia). Shaping the inner part of nozzle is easy with $5 conical milling
cutter and drill. Outer surface will stay as it is and will be glued
(epoxy or clay, cement) to the casing. Remember, we're talking about
simple single use motors - idea is to keep costs of tooling and
materials as low as possible. Roughly: hole-cutter $10-12 (profi stuff
$30), milling cutter $5 (or $10 if you take different angle cutters
for inner and outer end of nozzle), brick or tile ? $1?. Hopefully
hand drill is in household anyway.

Best

Vello
T - 27 Nov 2004 12:42 GMT
Brick sounds porous and therefore inclined to deal with heat unevenly
and be mechanically weak.

I would think a better alternative would be to 'cast' your own, if you
don't turn them on a lathe.

I'm thinking something you pour in a mold that either self-sets (cures)
and/or later gets fired in a kiln.

Speaking of nozzles, are semi-exotic metals any help? Thinking of Titanium.
It's more expensive than more common metals but you don't need _that_
much, do you?

TBerk
Dave Grayvis - 27 Nov 2004 14:58 GMT
> Brick sounds porous and therefore inclined to deal with heat unevenly
> and be mechanically weak.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> TBerk

Titanium would be a bad choice.
Vello - 27 Nov 2004 22:53 GMT
> Brick sounds porous and therefore inclined to deal with heat unevenly
> and be mechanically weak.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I'm thinking something you pour in a mold that either self-sets (cures)
> and/or later gets fired in a kiln.

But this will be in many times more time. There are different materials to
try, stone floor plates at first.

> Speaking of nozzles, are semi-exotic metals any help? Thinking of Titanium.
> It's more expensive than more common metals but you don't need _that_
> much, do you?
>
> TBerk

Melting point: iron - 2750 F, steel - 2500 F, titanium - 3034 F. Not big
gap, but sure titanium nozzle will be lighter. What I can't know is the
thermal stability of titanium. Titanium is melted and welded in vacuum, due
"extremal reaction with oxygen in high temperatures"(Google). Price must be
not too high - but no idea about retail shops:-)

Vello
Vello - 27 Nov 2004 22:57 GMT
> Speaking of nozzles, are semi-exotic metals any help? Thinking of Titanium.
> It's more expensive than more common metals but you don't need _that_
> much, do you?
>
> TBerk

Go ahead with titanium! Look  http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=233
Marcus D. Leech - 28 Nov 2004 01:53 GMT
> Go ahead with titanium! Look  http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=233

Wouldn't work with anything but KNO3+Sucrose or cooler.  APCP
composites, bi-props, and
 hybrids generally burn hotter than the melting point of titanium
(1600C). And
 most titanium isn't pure, it's alloyed with other materials like iron,
aluminum,
 etc.  Which often lowers the melting point.

It doesn't say what these particular nozzles are for, but it wouldn't
surprise me if
 it was for an RCS system with relatively low throat temperatures (or
they're regen
 cooled--but it doesn't look like that in the cited article).

Graphite really is the material of choice for the amateur experimenter,
and it *can*
 be machined without a lathe.  In fact, graphite machines quite well
generally, so
 the suggested method of using a hole saw to cut out slugs would work
modestly well.

Signature

Marcus Leech                Mail:   Dept W669, M/S: 04352P16
Advisor                     Phone: (ESN) 393-9145  +1 613 763 9145
Internet & Security Services
Nortel Networks                          mleech@nortelnetworks.com

Vello Kala - 28 Nov 2004 10:40 GMT
>  
> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>   the suggested method of using a hole saw to cut out slugs would work
> modestly well.

Isn't graphite too expencive for single use motor?
Marcus D. Leech - 29 Nov 2004 00:52 GMT
> Isn't graphite too expencive for single use motor?

Not necessarily.  Depends on the size of the motor.  Also, you can use a
 graphite throat section that is submerged in some cheaper metal, but
EDM
 graphites of the cheaper grades would be ideal for single-use nozzles,
even
 if they're full-width up to 54mm or so.

Graphite is very often available on the surplus market quite cheaply,
and even
 new material is now conveniently available at modest prices
(www.graphitestore.com
 for example).  Aerocon often carries surplus material, and their new
material is
 also quite reasonably priced (www.aeroconsystems.com).

Signature

Marcus Leech                Mail:   Dept W669, M/S: 04352P16
Advisor                     Phone: (ESN) 393-9145  +1 613 763 9145
Internet & Security Services
Nortel Networks                          mleech@nortelnetworks.com

Vello - 29 Nov 2004 10:40 GMT
You are right, but my original idea was to "compete" is class of paper/PVC
motors with clay nozzles and candy propellant. Drilled is easier and
stronger. But, sure, it is not for comparing with more expencive solutions -
more to give easy access for young boys. And young boys interested in
rocketry we want - it is first time in 2000 years now granddads can talk to
kids that when they were young they had technologies in use we don't have
today.

Best

Vello

> > Isn't graphite too expencive for single use motor?
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> material is
>   also quite reasonably priced (www.aeroconsystems.com).
RayDunakin - 28 Nov 2004 05:33 GMT
<< Go ahead with titanium! Look  http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=233

Cool! Looks like a big, high tech version of an Aerotech Medusa nozzle. I would
have thought titanium would burn, though.
Vello - 28 Nov 2004 11:15 GMT
> << Go ahead with titanium! Look  http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=233
>
> Cool! Looks like a big, high tech version of an Aerotech Medusa nozzle. I would
> have thought titanium would burn, though.

Do anybody know what they use in military/professional (apart of hi-tech
composite materials)? Wolfram?
Marcus D. Leech - 29 Nov 2004 00:49 GMT
> Do anybody know what they use in military/professional (apart of hi-tech
> composite materials)? Wolfram?

Usually a tungsten(wolfram)/tantalum/niobium alloy.  The SSMEs use such
an
 alloy, and the engine and nozzle are made as a "tubing bundle"
thousands
 of tubes of the correct profile, welded together into a leakproof
combustion
 chamber.  [possibly faulty memory here, so bear with me].  The H2
enters somewhere
 around the middle of the divergent section and flows back towards the
injector in the
 combustion chamber.  So they're using *both* a refractory metal alloy,
and regenerative
 cooling to keep the chamber from burning itself to bits.  It does have
to sustain 8
 minutes of total screaming hellfire, and it has to be able to do it
multiple times.

Signature

Marcus Leech                Mail:   Dept W669, M/S: 04352P16
Advisor                     Phone: (ESN) 393-9145  +1 613 763 9145
Internet & Security Services
Nortel Networks                          mleech@nortelnetworks.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.