In the middle of your holiday celebrations with family and friends, I
hope many of you have had a chance to read my latest Model Rocketeer
column, "Pressing the Fight Home". There, I outline the future we
face unless we win our current legal struggle against BATFE.
As the most recent Joint Statement on Regulatory Matters outlines,
we're making slow but steady progress in the courts. I believe that
litigation remains our most powerful weapon against the illegal
regulation of the sport rocket hobby.
I need your direct financial support and assistance to press this
battle forward to a successful conclusion. Our own legal team of Joe
Egan and Marty Malsch have provided us with $3,000 in pro bono work.
As you consider last minute donations as a part of your tax planning,
I hope you'll consider the NAR Legal Fund. As an additional incentive
for donations, let me offer two other ways your donation might bear
benefits, both for the NAR and yourself.
One long term NAR member, Gary Cole, has volunteered to jump start the
process by providing a dollar for dollar, $3,000 matching grant. When
you donate, please make sure you ask us to match your donation to
Gary's generosity by marking your check or on-line donation as "Cole
matching" and help us enhance your donation.
For those capable of donating $100 or more, I'd like to announce a new
premium available for your generosity. By making a donation in this
size, we'll send you a CD ROM containing all Sport Rocketry magazine's
2003 issues in PDF form as a token of our thanks. These CD-ROM's are
in production now, and will be available by the end of January 2005.
You can donate today by using the form attached to the latest issue of
the Model Rocketeer or by visiting the NAR website and donating
securely on line at:
https://secure.consumersinterest.com/nar/NARfrompres9911.html#donorform
Your contributions go totally into an account set up to support the
legal fight. No administrative costs are incurred; 100% of your
donations go to prevent the strangulation of your hobby.
We also can accept stock donations. Please contact me directly if you
wish to consider donating stock.
Finally, check with your employer about matching donations. The NAR
is a tax exempt non profit corporation, registered as a 501 (c) 3
corporation with the IRS. Basic information about a non profit
seeking matching donations is often required by such matching
programs, and can be found at www.guidestar.org. Please consider this
option as a way to enhance your donation to our fight.
This regulatory fight isn't fun, it's not what we all would like to be
involved in, and it's going to take a lot more effort to finish our
work. But without such a fight, we face a slow death for high power
rocketry and a bleaker future for our Association. If at all
possible, please consider making a financial donation to protect an
unregulated vision of our safe, educational and fun hobby.
Pay forward. Aim high.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Mark B. Bundick mbundick - at - earthlink - dot - net
NAR President www - dot - nar - dot - org
"A dark night in a city that knows how to keep its secrets, but high
above the quiet streets on the twelfth floor of the Acme Building,
one man is still trying to find the answers to life's persistent
questions. Guy Noir, Private Eye."
OdorDestroyer.com - 28 Dec 2004 03:29 GMT
Bunny, I posted this to RMR about a week ago. Can you please update and
correct the status as discussed below
Thx,
Philip
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Start previous message
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Ok guys, here's what I see as the present summary of the current lawsuit
status. Would Bunny/Ken please fill in the blanks.
Also, [Bunny/Ken] the joint updates are fine, but with each one you have to
re-read all
the previous material. How about a periodic "state of the union" type joint
statement organized by count. Something like what I have below.
Philip
http://www.OdorDestroyer.com
------------------------------------------
Count 1: APCP is not an explosive
Status: Denied. Seperated, and pending appeal by NAR/TRA
Last Update: Dec 22, 2004
------------------------------------------
Count 2 - APCP was inproperly listed on explosives register.
Status: Denied. Summary judgement for BATFE. Reason: Statute of
limitations has run.
Last Update: May 12, 2004
------------------------------------------
Count 3: Assembled Rocket motors are PAD's
Status: Until proper rulemaking can occur SU motors are PAD's, reloads
are undetermined. (May 12, 04)
Despite ruling, the BATFE still asserts that all APCP grains
exceeding 62.5gm are regulated. (Aug 9, 04)
Last Update: See above.
------------------------------------------
Count 4: 62.5gm limit was invalid because it was arbitrary
Status: BATFE request to dismiss was denied but the actual issues is
still undecided.
Last Update: May 12, 2004
------------------------------------------
Count 5: 62.5gm limit was invalid because of improper rulemaking.
Status: undecided
Last Update: See above.
------------------------------------------
> "Mark B. Bundick" <70156@idonttakespam.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8921t0l2t2oib551553jfpfncidvr79i6f@4ax.com...
> In the middle of your holiday celebrations with family and friends, I
> hope many of you have had a chance to read my latest Model Rocketeer
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> one man is still trying to find the answers to life's persistent
> questions. Guy Noir, Private Eye."
OdorDestroyer.com - 28 Dec 2004 03:30 GMT
Bunny, I posted this to RMR about a week ago. Can you please update and
correct the status as discussed below
Thx,
Philip
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Start previous message
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Ok guys, here's what I see as the present summary of the current lawsuit
status. Would Bunny/Ken please fill in the blanks.
Also, [Bunny/Ken] the joint updates are fine, but with each one you have to
re-read all
the previous material. How about a periodic "state of the union" type joint
statement organized by count. Something like what I have below.
Philip
http://www.OdorDestroyer.com
------------------------------------------
Count 1: APCP is not an explosive
Status: Denied. Seperated, and pending appeal by NAR/TRA
Last Update: Dec 22, 2004
------------------------------------------
Count 2 - APCP was inproperly listed on explosives register.
Status: Denied. Summary judgement for BATFE. Reason: Statute of
limitations has run.
Last Update: May 12, 2004
------------------------------------------
Count 3: Assembled Rocket motors are PAD's
Status: Until proper rulemaking can occur SU motors are PAD's, reloads
are undetermined. (May 12, 04)
Despite ruling, the BATFE still asserts that all APCP grains
exceeding 62.5gm are regulated. (Aug 9, 04)
Last Update: See above.
------------------------------------------
Count 4: 62.5gm limit was invalid because it was arbitrary
Status: BATFE request to dismiss was denied but the actual issues is
still undecided.
Last Update: May 12, 2004
------------------------------------------
Count 5: 62.5gm limit was invalid because of improper rulemaking.
Status: undecided
Last Update: See above.
------------------------------------------
> "Mark B. Bundick" <70156@idonttakespam.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:8921t0l2t2oib551553jfpfncidvr79i6f@4ax.com...
> In the middle of your holiday celebrations with family and friends, I
> hope many of you have had a chance to read my latest Model Rocketeer
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> one man is still trying to find the answers to life's persistent
> questions. Guy Noir, Private Eye."
Greg Cisko - 29 Dec 2004 06:44 GMT
I was curious what the definition of "pro bono" was. Thanks.

Signature
gcisko@hotmail.com
> In the middle of your holiday celebrations with family and friends, I
> hope many of you have had a chance to read my latest Model Rocketeer
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> one man is still trying to find the answers to life's persistent
> questions. Guy Noir, Private Eye."
David Erbas-White - 29 Dec 2004 06:54 GMT
>I was curious what the definition of "pro bono" was. Thanks.
>
>
"for free"
originally from the Latin "pro bono publico," or "for the public good"
David Erbas-White
Cliff Sojourner - 29 Dec 2004 06:55 GMT
> I was curious what the definition of "pro bono" was. Thanks.
lawyers do some work for free, it is called "pro bono".
Bob Kaplow - 29 Dec 2004 15:35 GMT
Q: What's the difference between the BATFE and the Mafia?
A: The Mafia follows its rules.
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
>>> To reply, remove the TRABoD! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle: http://nira-rocketry.org/LeadingEdge/Phantom4000.pdf
www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/ www.nira-rocketry.org www.nar.org
"I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed.
The U.S. government will lead the American people in and the
West in general into an unbearable hell and a choking life."