I'm wondering about the fin configuration on rockets like the Talon
(http://www.giantleaprocketry.com/products_kits_talon.asp); is there any
aerodynamic purpose to having larger fins further up, and smaller fins behind,
or is it just for appearance? Seems like it would be more unstable, although it
does make the rocket stand out a bit in a crowd, I suppose.
AlMax - 31 Dec 2004 03:54 GMT
> I'm wondering about the fin configuration on rockets like the Talon
> (http://www.giantleaprocketry.com/products_kits_talon.asp); is there any
> aerodynamic purpose to having larger fins further up, and smaller fins behind,
> or is it just for appearance? Seems like it would be more unstable, although it
> does make the rocket stand out a bit in a crowd, I suppose.
In a sounding rocket there is no need for the forward fins.
No need for forward fins on a space booster either.
In a guided missile however, the forward fins give lift while the rear fins
are moved with servos to navigate.
Missiles are really different from normal rockets in many ways, and usually
need neutral stability instead of positive stability of a sounding rocket.
In hobby rockets like the Talon, the 'Missile Look' is the selling point.
Or was the missile holder a selling point ?
I'm confused ;-)
Joe Pfeiffer - 31 Dec 2004 05:44 GMT
> I'm wondering about the fin configuration on rockets like the Talon
> (http://www.giantleaprocketry.com/products_kits_talon.asp); is there any
> aerodynamic purpose to having larger fins further up, and smaller fins behind,
> or is it just for appearance? Seems like it would be more unstable, although it
> does make the rocket stand out a bit in a crowd, I suppose.
Just for looks. If you want efficiency, you want 3FNC.

Signature
Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D. Phone -- (505) 646-1605
Department of Computer Science FAX -- (505) 646-1002
New Mexico State University http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer