Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / December 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fin Configuration Cosmetic or Practical?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Paul Wake - 31 Dec 2004 03:25 GMT
I'm wondering about the fin configuration on rockets like the Talon
(http://www.giantleaprocketry.com/products_kits_talon.asp); is there any
aerodynamic purpose to having larger fins further up, and smaller fins behind,
or is it just for appearance?  Seems like it would be more unstable, although it
does make the rocket stand out a bit in a crowd, I suppose.
AlMax - 31 Dec 2004 03:54 GMT
> I'm wondering about the fin configuration on rockets like the Talon
> (http://www.giantleaprocketry.com/products_kits_talon.asp); is there any
> aerodynamic purpose to having larger fins further up, and smaller fins behind,
> or is it just for appearance?  Seems like it would be more unstable, although it
> does make the rocket stand out a bit in a crowd, I suppose.

In a sounding rocket there is no need for the forward fins.
No need for forward fins on a space booster either.

In a guided missile however, the forward fins give lift while the rear fins
are moved with servos to navigate.

Missiles are really different from normal rockets in many ways, and usually
need neutral stability instead of positive stability of a sounding rocket.

In hobby rockets like the Talon, the 'Missile Look' is the selling point.

Or was the missile holder a selling point ?

I'm confused ;-)
Joe Pfeiffer - 31 Dec 2004 05:44 GMT
> I'm wondering about the fin configuration on rockets like the Talon
> (http://www.giantleaprocketry.com/products_kits_talon.asp); is there any
> aerodynamic purpose to having larger fins further up, and smaller fins behind,
> or is it just for appearance?  Seems like it would be more unstable, although it
> does make the rocket stand out a bit in a crowd, I suppose.

Just for looks.  If you want efficiency, you want 3FNC.
Signature

Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D.       Phone -- (505) 646-1605
Department of Computer Science       FAX   -- (505) 646-1002
New Mexico State University          http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.