Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / January 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Columbia Shuttle #1385

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
randyolb@charter.net - 30 Jan 2005 17:54 GMT
Anyone here ever built the Estes Columbia kit #1385? I'm in the middle of a
kit bash and got to the point where the instructions say to make a flap on
just one side. That just seems strange to me that you would only do it on
one side. Anyone?

Randy
John Stein - 31 Jan 2005 22:12 GMT
Randy,

The instructions do indeed say (and show) the flap (or should we say
aileron) and I believe it was to allow for a circling glide.

John

> Anyone here ever built the Estes Columbia kit #1385? I'm in the middle of
> a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Randy
R S - 31 Jan 2005 22:46 GMT
This kit comes down on parachute... It does not glide.
John Stein - 31 Jan 2005 22:57 GMT
DUH!!!!  It parachute recovery.  I was thinking of the wrong shuttle.

The flap was for spin going up for stability.  I need new glasses.

John

> Randy,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>
>> Randy
shreadvector - 31 Jan 2005 23:07 GMT
It is not a glider.

Spin during boost for stability.
R S - 31 Jan 2005 22:45 GMT
The flap causes it to spin during liftoff so it does not arch over to
one side.  
randyolb@charter.net - 31 Jan 2005 23:24 GMT
> The flap causes it to spin during liftoff so it does not arch over to
> one side.

Ok, I can buy that. My first thoughts were also that the flap was for a
circling glide effect because they only wanted a flap on one side but I knew
that it recovers by chute.

I built the Centuri version in 1980 and still fly it. The two are very
similar and the Centuri version does not use a flap but it does spin ever so
slightly during flight. Since I'm building this one as the Armageddon
Shuttle (from the movie) and it will have twin boosters next to the OMS pods
anyway, I don't think the flap would make much difference in the flight
profile for this version.

Randy
shreadvector - 31 Jan 2005 23:07 GMT
pin during boost for stability during boost.

To avoid the deadly flight path of the later foam-orbiter-of-death.

-Fred Shecter NAR 20117

> Anyone here ever built the Estes Columbia kit #1385? I'm in the middle of a
> kit bash and got to the point where the instructions say to make a flap on
> just one side. That just seems strange to me that you would only do it on
> one side. Anyone?
>
> Randy
shreadvector - 31 Jan 2005 23:09 GMT
Spin during boost for stability during boost.

To avoid the deadly flight path of the later foam-orbiter-of-death.

-Fred Shecter NAR 20117

> Anyone here ever built the Estes Columbia kit #1385? I'm in the middle of a
> kit bash and got to the point where the instructions say to make a flap on
> just one side. That just seems strange to me that you would only do it on
> one side. Anyone?
>
> Randy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.