Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Vashon Freon Rockets on Ebay

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David Sleeter - 08 Feb 2005 18:09 GMT
Hi Folks:

Regarding my auction for the Vashon & Estes freon-powered rocket motors (the
one that eBay cancelled), I've received several inquiries asking if the
auction will started again.

As I said in a previous post, I've sent eBay a long email explaining their
mistake, and asking that the auction be reinstated. I sent them a second
email this morning, and I'm still awaiting their reply.

A recent form letter from their president says that they're in the process
of reorganizing and personalizing their customer service department and the
way they respond to customer problems, so I'm expecting that, at least for
now, their reply might take a while.

David Sleeter
tater schuld - 08 Feb 2005 21:53 GMT
good luck.

Ebay did the same think for a cb base radio. talked to them, they said it
was ok, then they pulled it a second time.

luckily I got the emails of the highest 2 bidders and sold it directly.

I advise ROL

Signature

Tater
KC9ESF
NAR #79654 L1
AMA #747769
EAA #703312

> Hi Folks:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> David Sleeter
Bruce Canino - 09 Feb 2005 04:42 GMT
> Ebay did the same think for a cb base radio. talked to them, they said it
> was ok, then they pulled it a second time.

OK, I'll bite..... Why won't eBay let you sell a CB radio?
tater schuld - 09 Feb 2005 13:29 GMT
the model i was selling was an older base station type, well known for being
easily modified.....

I specifically posted in the auction that the radio was not modified and
they still pulled it (sigh)

Signature

Tater
KC9ESF
NAR #79654 L1
AMA #747769
EAA #703312

>
> > Ebay did the same think for a cb base radio. talked to them, they said it
> > was ok, then they pulled it a second time.
>
> OK, I'll bite..... Why won't eBay let you sell a CB radio?
Mark Hamilton - 10 Feb 2005 02:33 GMT
> the model i was selling was an older base station type, well known for being
> easily modified.....
>
> I specifically posted in the auction that the radio was not modified and
> they still pulled it (sigh)

Modified to to what?
Dave Grayvis - 10 Feb 2005 03:05 GMT
>> the model i was selling was an older base station type, well known for
>> being
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Modified to to what?

Higher output power, also off frequency operation.
John Stein - 10 Feb 2005 12:58 GMT
>> the model i was selling was an older base station type, well known for
>> being
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Modified to to what?

Transmit out of the CB band of frequencies.

John
mark.johnson@lsil.com - 10 Feb 2005 14:09 GMT
> >> the model i was selling was an older base station type, well known for
> >> being
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Transmit out of the CB band of frequencies.

The FCC is nuts on this kind of thing...depending on which way you go
out of band on a 27 MHz CB it is possible to interfere with amateur radio
(annoying to hams, illegal, but maybe not particularly hazardous) or, worse,
with DOD (usually USAF) HF communications. The FCC and the Air Force
get really upset when a couple of truckers come up on a frequency used
by B-52's...

MJ
WB9QLR
randyolb@charter.net - 27 Feb 2005 15:51 GMT
> The FCC is nuts on this kind of thing...depending on which way you go
> out of band on a 27 MHz CB it is possible to interfere with amateur radio
> (annoying to hams, illegal, but maybe not particularly hazardous) or, worse,
> with DOD (usually USAF) HF communications. The FCC and the Air Force
> get really upset when a couple of truckers come up on a frequency used
> by B-52's...

They might get upset but it would be something really weird, if it ever
happened, considering a standard CB transmits on less than 5 watts, a B-52
would have to be flying mid service ceiling and directly overhead to cause
much interference.

Randy
David Erbas-White - 10 Feb 2005 16:04 GMT
>They might get upset but it would be something really weird, if it ever
>happened, considering a standard CB transmits on less than 5 watts, a B-52
>would have to be flying mid service ceiling and directly overhead to cause
>much interference.
>
>  

Up until the time that MCAS El Toro was closed, there were plenty of
times that B-52s would come in to land over one of the busiest freeway
interchanges in the world (the junction of the 405 and 5, called the El
Toro 'Y').  They weren't very high above oodles of truckers at that point...

David Erbas-White
Will Marchant - 10 Feb 2005 16:27 GMT
The problem is that people are modifying ham radio gear to transmit at
MUCH higher power levels in the CB band.  They get much longer range but
tend to splatter signal outside the CB band...

I think that is why the original poster told eBay that the equipment was
unmodified.  That was obviously too fine a distinction for the eBay
screeners.

I would expect eBay to have "specialists" to screen particular bid
types.  That doesn't seem to be the case...  8(

>>with DOD (usually USAF) HF communications. The FCC and the Air Force
>>get really upset when a couple of truckers come up on a frequency used
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> would have to be flying mid service ceiling and directly overhead to cause
> much interference.

Signature

Will Marchant, NAR 13356, Tripoli 10125 L2
kc6rol@amsat.org     http://www.spaceflightsoftware.com/will/

Tim Wilson - 13 Feb 2005 22:55 GMT
I suspect those who can modify CB's to operate on illegal frequences have
the know-how to jack up the power too ... they're operating on a lot more
than 5 watts.

- tw

> > The FCC is nuts on this kind of thing...depending on which way you go
> > out of band on a 27 MHz CB it is possible to interfere with amateur radio
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Randy
David Bacque - 14 Feb 2005 00:04 GMT
>I suspect those who can modify CB's to operate on illegal frequences have
> the know-how to jack up the power too ... they're operating on a lot more
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>>
>> Randy

I spent many years working on the B-52 Weapon Systems Trainer (simulator).
During that time I was well aquainted with some of the top Buff crews and
the aircraft capabilities.  A friend who was a top radar navagator in the
B-52s and was the test director for the acceptance of the Block 2 upgrade to
the simulator used to tell me stories about CB and RC transmissions and
their effect on the B-52.  You don't have much to worry about except the
loss of your equipment if you bother these people.

The vehicle has equipment that can scan all frequences and jam anything they
want.  He enjoyed flying over R/C sites and when he saw more R/C activity
than he cared for he had several choiced depending on his mood.  He could
chose to ignore them.  He could put enough RF out on their frequences to jam
the transmitter to receiver connection, resulting of the loss of any plane
in the air and if he was feeling really vindictive, he could send signals
with enough power to literally burn out the flight packs in the airplanes.

So I don't think we have much to worry about in terms of causing RF problems
on a B-52.  But it would behoove you to be aware of your surroundings and
try to keep emissions to a minimum when these aircraft are making training
sessions in your area.  It's a loud aircraft, when you hear one, clear the
airspace so they can do their job and keep us all safe.

Dave
randyolb@charter.net - 14 Feb 2005 01:28 GMT
snip

POINT!

Randy
Tweak - 14 Feb 2005 20:08 GMT
> >I suspect those who can modify CB's to operate on illegal frequences have
> > the know-how to jack up the power too ... they're operating on a lot more
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> want.  He enjoyed flying over R/C sites and when he saw more R/C activity
> than he cared for he had several choiced depending on his mood.  

"More that he cared for"...just what does that mean?  Since when are
military personal authorized with "Judge Dredd" style enforcement of
civilian activities?  I wasn't authorized to run over civilian vehicles
in the 5 ton recovery unit I operated if they broke the law, no matter
how tempted I might have been.

Sounds like a court martial looking for a location.  Or BS.

> He could  chose to ignore them.  He could put enough RF out on their frequences to jam
> the transmitter to receiver connection, resulting of the loss of any plane
> in the air and if he was feeling really vindictive, he could send signals
> with enough power to literally burn out the flight packs in the airplanes.

Really starting to smell now, and it ain't the smell of burned
transistors, either.  Not the technical feasibility, but the idea that
someone actually did these actions.

Signature

Tweak

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.