Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NEWS: Rocket Fuel Found in Breast Milk

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
The Rocket Scientist - 23 Feb 2005 20:43 GMT
Just when you thought the ATF was all we had to worry about!

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-perchlorate23feb23,1,266433
7.story?coll=la-headlines-nation&ctrack=1&cset=true


or

http://tinyurl.com/5uyr4

Synopsis: This "deadly chemical" is being found in "alarming"
quantities in human breast milk.

If I were a conspiracy nut, I would suspect that the ATF was behind
this.

Bill Sullivan

"You laughin' at my duck?" -- Garibaldi
Chuck Rudy - 23 Feb 2005 22:26 GMT
> Just when you thought the ATF was all we had to worry about!
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> "You laughin' at my duck?" -- Garibaldi

Soooooooo is it safe to assume we have a new source for our chemicals?
Will those, you know, breasstssts have to be kept in a day box?  Or will
the 62.5 gram ruling be in effect?  Will permits be needed to transport?
  Will they be classed 1/2A to R as motors, depending on potential energy?

Or am I looking at the article the wrong way?  Need some clarification here.

Chuck
The Rocket Scientist - 24 Feb 2005 16:16 GMT
Because of the recent discovery of ammonium perchlorate in breast milk,
breast milk now falls under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, and Firearms.

http://www.atf.treas.gov/explarson/safexpact/modelrockets.htm

In an attempt to address the legitimate needs of nursing mothers while
still appropriately protecting against the acquisition of explosive
materials by terrorists and other criminals who might misuse them, ATF
has maintained a longstanding exemption for feeding bottles containing
up to 62.5 grams of explosive fluid. This exemption applies to the vast
majority of feeding bottles used by parents. ATF has never required a
permit of any kind to acquire or possess a feeding bottle containing up
to 62.5 grams of APCP, and this will not change under the expanded
explosives controls that have been set forth in the Safe Explosives Act
of 2002.

Nursing mothers will need to obtain a Low Explosive Use Permit (LEUP)
from ATF prior to lactation.  Since the storage magazine (in this case
the breasts) will be located within the residence, total amount of milk
shall be limited to not more than 11 kg (25 lbs.)  The indoor magazine
(breasts) shall be painted red and the top shall bear the following
words in white letters at least 76mm (3 in) high: EXPLOSIVES - KEEP
FIRE AWAY.  (An appropriate foundation garment may be utilized for this
purpose.)  The indoor magazine (breasts) shall be stored at least 7.6 m
(25 ft) from smoking, open flames and other sources of heat.

Bill Sullivan

"Vir, intelligence has nothing to do with politics!" -- Londo Mollari
randyolb@charter.net - 24 Feb 2005 18:28 GMT
snip

Puts a whole new spin on obtaining levels 1, 2 and 3.

Randy
The Rocket Scientist - 25 Feb 2005 22:12 GMT
> snip
>
> Puts a whole new spin on obtaining levels 1, 2 and 3.
>
> Randy

At least it ought to make you think twice about smoking after...

Bill Sullivan

"Initiating the 'getting the hell out of here' maneuver" - Lennier
raydunakin@aol.com - 24 Feb 2005 18:53 GMT
> Because of the recent discovery of ammonium perchlorate in breast milk,
> breast milk now falls under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Alcohol,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> materials by terrorists and other criminals who might misuse them, ATF
> has maintained a long standing exemption for feeding bottles
containing
> up to 62.5 grams of explosive fluid. This exemption applies to the vast
> majority of feeding bottles used by parents. ATF has never required a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Nursing mothers will need to obtain a Low Explosive Use Permit (LEUP)
> from ATF prior to lactation.

Actually, the mother would need a Low Explosive Manufacturer Permit,
and her child would need a LEUP.

r
Dave Grayvis - 25 Feb 2005 20:49 GMT
>>Because of the recent discovery of ammonium perchlorate in breast
>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
> r

If the milk in question was not a commercial product for sale, then no
LEMP would be necessary, although possession of said milk, could not be
transferred to a minor.
Mike Dennett - 24 Feb 2005 19:35 GMT
> Soooooooo is it safe to assume we have a new source for our chemicals?
> Will those, you know, breasstssts have to be kept in a day box?  Or will
> the 62.5 gram ruling be in effect?  Will permits be needed to transport?
>    Will they be classed 1/2A to R as motors, depending on potential energy?

Now I know where those "double-D" motors came from that I occassionally hear
about; "Yep, I shot rockets when I was younger. Used to be able to get those
double-D's, they still make those?".   Never heard of a cup bigger than D
though. Which leads me to believe that breasts are actually based on black
powder, not APCP.

Mike D.
Alex Mericas - 24 Feb 2005 19:56 GMT
>> Soooooooo is it safe to assume we have a new source for our chemicals?
>> Will those, you know, breasstssts have to be kept in a day box?  Or will
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> though. Which leads me to believe that breasts are actually based on black
> powder, not APCP.

All I can say is that I'm glad I have a user permit ;-)
Niall Oswald - 24 Feb 2005 20:25 GMT
>> Soooooooo is it safe to assume we have a new source for our chemicals?
>> Will those, you know, breasstssts have to be kept in a day box?  Or will
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> though. Which leads me to believe that breasts are actually based on black
> powder, not APCP.

I've heard that in times of yore they came up to 'H', but had a tendency to
explode and destroy your rocket ;-)

Signature

Niall Oswald
================================
http://www.bits.bris.ac.uk/niall
UKRA 1345
EARS 1151
MARS

Mike Dennett - 25 Feb 2005 21:27 GMT
My gosh, I stand corrected! There are indeed "HPR" bra cups!

http://plussizebras.org/size.html

Shows what I know.

> > Soooooooo is it safe to assume we have a new source for our chemicals?
> > Will those, you know, breasstssts have to be kept in a day box?  Or will
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Mike D.
Chuck Rudy - 25 Feb 2005 22:54 GMT
> My gosh, I stand corrected! There are indeed "HPR" bra cups!
>
> http://plussizebras.org/size.html
>
> Shows what I know.

I want to see the M cluster.  ;-)

Chuck
Phil Stein - 26 Feb 2005 00:10 GMT
>> My gosh, I stand corrected! There are indeed "HPR" bra cups!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Chuck

Watch out for the recoil when they are let loose.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.