NFPA 1127, Code for High Power Rocketry, is currently starting its next
revision cycle. If you have a change to recommend, the deadline is 23
November 2005.
http://www.nfpa.org/itemDetail.asp?categoryID=821&itemID=20936&URL=Codes%20and%2
0Standards/Code%20development%20process/Technical%20Committees/Committees%20Soli
citing%20Proposals
You must use the form provided and follow the instructions. Just sending
a letter griping about something will be rejected out of hand. You must
propose a specific revision including the revised text. You must
reference the current (2002) document.
I have sent a proposal to alter the first line of the safe distances
table impulse limits from "160.00-320.00" N-sec to "0.00-320.00" N-sec.
The reason for this change is that some rockets/motors that have
less than 160.00 N-sec of total impulse nevertheless meet the definition
of a high power rocket/motor. This has created a situation where no
minimum safe distance has existed in NFPA 1127 for these rockets/motors.
NFPA 1122, Code for Model Rocketry, is also starting its revision cycle
but no proposal closing date is posted:
http://www.nfpa.org/aboutthecodes/AboutTheCodes.asp?DocNum=1122

Signature
David W. Schultz
http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz/
"Ahh Fuji! Why is it always monkeys? Why couldn't I be attacked by
crazed super models?" - Ron Stoppable
Kurt - 31 Oct 2005 16:12 GMT
> NFPA 1127, Code for High Power Rocketry, is currently starting its next
> revision cycle. If you have a change to recommend, the deadline is 23
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I have sent a proposal to alter the first line of the safe distances
> table impulse limits from "160.00-320.00" N-sec to "0.00-320.00" N-sec.
Don't mean to be disrespectful but is that a typo "0.00-320.00"
Suggests that a zero power motor is "high powered". You discover
the secret of zero point propulsion? :)
Kurt Savegnago
> The reason for this change is that some rockets/motors that have
> less than 160.00 N-sec of total impulse nevertheless meet the definition
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> http://www.nfpa.org/aboutthecodes/AboutTheCodes.asp?DocNum=1122
shreadvector - 31 Oct 2005 16:33 GMT
He explained it quite clearly. Maybe it should be 0.01 or 0.001 or
0.0001 or 0.00001.......