Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / October 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NFPA 1127 proposal deadline

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David Schultz - 30 Oct 2005 15:16 GMT
NFPA 1127, Code for High Power Rocketry, is currently starting its next
revision cycle. If you have a change to recommend, the deadline is 23
November 2005.

http://www.nfpa.org/itemDetail.asp?categoryID=821&itemID=20936&URL=Codes%20and%2
0Standards/Code%20development%20process/Technical%20Committees/Committees%20Soli
citing%20Proposals


You must use the form provided and follow the instructions. Just sending
a letter griping about something will be rejected out of hand. You must
propose a specific revision including the revised text. You must
reference the current (2002) document.

I have sent a proposal to alter the first line of the safe distances
table impulse limits from "160.00-320.00" N-sec to "0.00-320.00" N-sec.

The reason for this change is that some rockets/motors that have
less than 160.00 N-sec of total impulse nevertheless meet the definition
of a high power rocket/motor. This has created a situation where no
minimum safe distance has existed in NFPA 1127 for these rockets/motors.

NFPA 1122, Code for Model Rocketry, is also starting its revision cycle
but no proposal closing date is posted:

http://www.nfpa.org/aboutthecodes/AboutTheCodes.asp?DocNum=1122

Signature

David W. Schultz
http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz/

"Ahh Fuji! Why is it always monkeys? Why couldn't I be attacked by
crazed super models?" - Ron Stoppable

Kurt - 31 Oct 2005 16:12 GMT
> NFPA 1127, Code for High Power Rocketry, is currently starting its next
> revision cycle. If you have a change to recommend, the deadline is 23
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I have sent a proposal to alter the first line of the safe distances
> table impulse limits from "160.00-320.00" N-sec to "0.00-320.00" N-sec.

Don't mean to be disrespectful but is that a typo "0.00-320.00"
Suggests that a zero power motor is "high powered".  You discover
the secret of zero point propulsion? :)

                                  Kurt Savegnago
> The reason for this change is that some rockets/motors that have
> less than 160.00 N-sec of total impulse nevertheless meet the definition
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> http://www.nfpa.org/aboutthecodes/AboutTheCodes.asp?DocNum=1122
shreadvector - 31 Oct 2005 16:33 GMT
He explained it quite clearly. Maybe it should be 0.01 or 0.001 or
0.0001 or 0.00001.......
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.