Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / September 2003



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

launch report - perfect day

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gary & Emily - 30 Sep 2003 01:54 GMT
this is probably old hat to most of you but i just had the most magnificent
flights in my 1 year rocket career.  the thing that made it even more sweet
is because both rockets were previously fired about a year ago and both did
the corkscrew horizontal flight thing (luckily no damage).

the rockets i am talking about are the estes fat boy and stormcaster.   a
couple of days ago i dug out the fat boy out of the garage and decided i
would try again and did not really care what happened to the rocket.
loaded it up with a C6-5 and off it went.  hey, it flew straight up.  maybe
there is hope for fat boy after all.  so today, i dug out an aerotech
reloadable (D13-4W) that i bought about a year ago.  first time to use a
reloadable.  assembly was fairly easy.  the aerotech site even has a video
on how to assemble.   i did add a tad bit of weight to the nose of the fat
boy.  off to the field and sent her (him) up.  unbelievable!! i guesstimate
it went about 1000 feet and the sound of that motor was nothing like the C
size i have been accustomed to hearing.  recovery was good - floated down
wind about 5oo feet or so.  i use a mountain bike for recovery so not too
bad.  i will definitely be using more of the reloadables for future launches
(assuming i can find them - seems like most places have them on backorder).

other rocket was the stormcaster;  similar story about first 2 flights one
year ago at a public launch.  nice looking rocket but first two flights
corkscrewed and flew horizontal.  so today added a bit of weight to the nose
(seems to be a cure all).   first flight was on a C11-5;  straight as an
arrow for about 300 feet.  perfect recovery about 50 feet from launch.
load up again with a D12-5.   much better altitude (approx 600 - 700 feet).
very stable and straight flight.  whew!  what a relief.

these were my two best looking rockets but was afraid to fly them for the
last year because they flew so badly on the initial flights.    my thoughts
were that the initial flights were hampered by underpowered motor (B6-4 in
the fat boy) and possibly a little bottom heavy (hence the nose weight
addition).  additionally, first flights on the stormcaster was with a C11-5
but the wind was blowing steadily about 20 miles an hour or more and gusts
higher than that.  normally would not fly in those conditions but was a very
large field.

as a final flight of the day sent the polaris up on a B6-4;   did not seem
as exciting after the success of the fat boy and stormcaster;  but the
polaris is a great flying rocket and easily recoverable about 50 feet from
launch pad.  more exciting on a Cmotor though.  by the way,  winds were
around 3 - 5 mph and temp around 75 degrees.  doesn't get much better than
that.

just too excited to keep this lauch report to myself. now off to search for
some more reloadables.

gw
Randy - 30 Sep 2003 04:26 GMT
Sounds like a good day flying and a great one for it. I'm glad someone got
to fly and take advantage.

Randy
Randy - 30 Sep 2003 04:29 GMT
Sounds like a good day flying and a great one for it. I'm glad someone got
to fly and take advantage.

Randy
Bob Kaplow - 30 Sep 2003 18:42 GMT
> the rockets i am talking about are the estes fat boy and stormcaster.   a
> couple of days ago i dug out the fat boy out of the garage and decided i
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> boy.  off to the field and sent her (him) up.  unbelievable!! i guesstimate
> it went about 1000 feet and the sound of that motor was nothing like the C

The Fat Boy hauls butt on the D13-4, but does need a touch of nose weight. I
even did one flight with the E27-4 before those vanished. Anything less than
a C is severely underpowered for this rocket.

    Bob Kaplow    NAR # 18L    TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
        >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle:    http://nira-rocketry.org/LeadingEdge/Phantom4000.pdf
   www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/    www.nira-rocketry.org    www.nar.org

Save Model Rocketry from the HSA!   http://www.space-rockets.com/congress.html
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.