Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / December 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

GOT MAGAZINE?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
shreadvector - 20 Dec 2005 19:52 GMT
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1424214
shreadvector - 21 Dec 2005 14:10 GMT
Gee, no comments.

-Fred Shecter NAR 20117
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQfgtpZ1QQfrppZ25QQfsooZ1QQfsopZ1QQsassZshreadvector
Doug Sams - 21 Dec 2005 16:39 GMT
>> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1424214

Then wrote:

> Gee, no comments.

Yeah, I expected more, too.  But I guess the ID thread is sucking
up everyone's attention.

I read the article.  My first thought was that this could lead to
tightening of enforcement of the explosives laws resulting in
non-explosive propellants getting mroe scrutiny or worse.  And the sad
irony is that if the BATFEces would worry about the real explosives and
forget about us, then maybe this wouldn't have happened, eh?

That said, I caught a snippet on the radio this morning but didn't get
the details...did they recover the stolen stuff?

Doug
New - 21 Dec 2005 19:39 GMT
My first thought - after reading about the sheets of explosives - Keep those
cards and letters coming, folks!
Mark Hamilton - 29 Dec 2005 22:39 GMT
>>>http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1424214
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Doug

All the explosives have been recovered, and four bozos arrested. One
other is still on the run, but I expect that he won't last long. Amazing
what a $50,000 reward offer can do.

Mark E. Hamilton
NAR #48641-SR
ARSA #418
Mark Hamilton - 29 Dec 2005 22:39 GMT
>>>http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1424214
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Doug

All the explosives have been recovered, and four bozos arrested. One
other is still on the run, but I expect that he won't last long. Amazing
what a $50,000 reward offer can do.

Mark E. Hamilton
NAR #48641-SR
ARSA #418
Gus - 21 Dec 2005 21:58 GMT
> Gee, no comments.

OK, here's one:

"No guards and no security cameras."

Bright.

Darwin Award for Mr. Cherry, perhaps?

Mayhaps the thieves will build a "Cherry" bomb.
hiltyt@weinerboy.org - 21 Dec 2005 22:26 GMT
>> Gee, no comments.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Darwin Award for Mr. Cherry, perhaps?

GAAAAA!  DON'T USE THAT WORD!!!!

<vbg>

tah

--

Tod A. Hilty
Hilty Information Systems

Do not look in the direction of the flash...
Curl up in a ball as you hit the ground...

CAUTION: The Mass of This Product Contains the Energy Equivalent
of 85 Million Tons of TNT per Net Ounce of Weight

Please replace weinerboy dot org with adelphia dot net for reply.
Dave Grayvis - 21 Dec 2005 22:35 GMT
>>>Gee, no comments.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> tah

What?  You don't like the word, perhaps?

Perhaps perhaps perhaps!
David Schultz - 22 Dec 2005 00:58 GMT
>>Gee, no comments.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Mayhaps the thieves will build a "Cherry" bomb.

The federal explosives laws pretty much require that storage be located
in remote locations. They also only require weekly inspections. The
locks are supposed to keep the site secure. The existing federal
regulations probably eliminate about 99% of thefts. As anyone can tell
you, there is a law of diminishing returns on just about anything.
Controlling that last 1% will cost far more than controlling the first 99%.

To get an idea of the extreme other end of the spectrum, take a look at
the newly enacted (without any opportunity for comment)  regulations in
Pennsylvania. (Look at the news items at http://www.ime.org ) These new
regulations will result in enormous costs to the industry with little
impact on thefts.

Signature

David W. Schultz
http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz/

"Ahh Fuji! Why is it always monkeys? Why couldn't I be attacked by
crazed super models?" - Ron Stoppable

Bob Kaplow - 22 Dec 2005 03:36 GMT
> The federal explosives laws pretty much require that storage be located
> in remote locations. They also only require weekly inspections. The
> locks are supposed to keep the site secure. The existing federal
> regulations probably eliminate about 99% of thefts. As anyone can tell
> you, there is a law of diminishing returns on just about anything.
> Controlling that last 1% will cost far more than controlling the first 99%.

Better than that, the BATFE sells their mailing list to junk mailers. I get
a handful of junk mail from my LEUP every year. Most of it is either
fireworks or gun catalogs. But I once got a "job offer" to be a security
guard for a local armored car company, and around Y2K got several
survivalist catalogs.

So if any one actually wants to steal explosives, all they have to do is buy
the mailing list, and they know exactly where to go to steal all the
explosives they need. All thanks to our own inept government
over-regulation.

Signature

 Bob Kaplow   NAR # 18L   >>> To reply, there's no internet on Mars (yet)! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle:    http://nira-rocketry.org/Document/MayJun00.pdf
   www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/    www.nira-rocketry.org    www.nar.org

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, except
to encourage attendance in Christian churches; or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof, except to require prayer in schools; or abridging the
freedom of speech, except for those questioning the Bush administration; or
of the press, except that not owned by Rupert Murdoch; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, except those protesting pre-emptive wars; and
to petition the government for a redress of grievance, except those we don't
like." -former U.S. Sen. Gary Hart

Bob Kaplow - 22 Dec 2005 03:33 GMT
> "No guards and no security cameras."
> Bright.

There is nothing in the regs that require either.  And my LEUP requires that
I store my "regulated" materials in a LESS secure manner than the way I
store my Questes type motors.

Signature

 Bob Kaplow   NAR # 18L   >>> To reply, there's no internet on Mars (yet)! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle:    http://nira-rocketry.org/Document/MayJun00.pdf
   www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/    www.nira-rocketry.org    www.nar.org

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, except
to encourage attendance in Christian churches; or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof, except to require prayer in schools; or abridging the
freedom of speech, except for those questioning the Bush administration; or
of the press, except that not owned by Rupert Murdoch; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, except those protesting pre-emptive wars; and
to petition the government for a redress of grievance, except those we don't
like." -former U.S. Sen. Gary Hart

Gus - 22 Dec 2005 11:55 GMT
> > "No guards and no security cameras."
> > Bright.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> --
Yes, but there's a difference between what the law requires and what is
just "good practice".

I think I'd like to at least have security cameras.

They don't cost a whole lot, either.

Hell, even the local junk yard has security cams.

The bit about ATFE selling mailing lists is troublesome, to put it
mildly.
default - 22 Dec 2005 15:25 GMT
> The bit about ATFE selling mailing lists is troublesome, to put it
> mildly.

Yes, if it were proven to be true it would be even more troublesome.
All we have now though is the supposition from one poster that it has
occured.  Nobody else has reported the same type of unsolicited mail.
That, and the poster is very outspoken about his negative feelings
toward the government.

I'm not saying it isn't true.  I guess it could be.  But I'm not saying
it's true, or even probably so, based upon the postings of one
anti-government crusader.  We've seen no proof or even credible
evidence to back the claims.

steve
Bob Kaplow - 22 Dec 2005 16:11 GMT
> Yes, if it were proven to be true it would be even more troublesome.
> All we have now though is the supposition from one poster that it has
> occured.  Nobody else has reported the same type of unsolicited mail.
> That, and the poster is very outspoken about his negative feelings
> toward the government.

Since I moved to our "new" house in 1990, I've coded my name and address
every time I give it to anyone. There's a unique piece of information in
every one, so I can tell when someone sells my name and address. I tell
companies that I deal with to NOT do so, and stop doing business with them
when they violate my privacy.

A few years later, I was able to help a magazine prove that a competitor had
stolen their mailing list.

My ATF application contained one of those unique encodings. It's on my LEUP.
And it's on several of those catalogs I mentioned. So it's not a guess, it's
a FACT that names and addresses collected from LEUP holders are sold to mass
mailers. And it's still going on in the post-911 era.

Signature

 Bob Kaplow   NAR # 18L   >>> To reply, there's no internet on Mars (yet)! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle:    http://nira-rocketry.org/Document/MayJun00.pdf
   www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/    www.nira-rocketry.org    www.nar.org

Vulcans believe peace should not depend on force. -- Amanda, "Journey to
Babel," stardate 3842.3

Fred Shecter - 22 Dec 2005 16:50 GMT
I thought this was answered before and someone pointed out that they were not "sold", but
part of the public record that anyone can go and search, get, use. Just like property
records when you own a house.

Signature

"""Remove "zorch" from address (2 places) to reply.

>> Yes, if it were proven to be true it would be even more troublesome.
>> All we have now though is the supposition from one poster that it has
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> a FACT that names and addresses collected from LEUP holders are sold to mass
> mailers. And it's still going on in the post-911 era.
Jerry Irvine - 22 Dec 2005 19:27 GMT
> > Yes, if it were proven to be true it would be even more troublesome.
> > All we have now though is the supposition from one poster that it has
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> companies that I deal with to NOT do so, and stop doing business with them
> when they violate my privacy.

So are you going to stop doing business with the ATF?

> A few years later, I was able to help a magazine prove that a competitor had
> stolen their mailing list.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> a FACT that names and addresses collected from LEUP holders are sold to mass
> mailers. And it's still going on in the post-911 era.

Signature

Jerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA
Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net>
Please bring GROWTH back to consumer rocketry.
Produce then publish.  http://www.usrockets.com

Bob Kaplow - 23 Dec 2005 03:30 GMT
> So are you going to stop doing business with the ATF?

As soon as we wi the lawsuit...

Signature

 Bob Kaplow   NAR # 18L   >>> To reply, there's no internet on Mars (yet)! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle:    http://nira-rocketry.org/Document/MayJun00.pdf
   www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/    www.nira-rocketry.org    www.nar.org

Vulcans believe peace should not depend on force. -- Amanda, "Journey to
Babel," stardate 3842.3

Jerry Irvine - 23 Dec 2005 14:17 GMT
> > So are you going to stop doing business with the ATF?
>
> As soon as we wi the lawsuit...

It's stupid to wait. Look at how AT and Magnum suffered for their
illegal designation of exempt goods as "restricted access".

Look further how the HPR market "population" has shrunk 90-95%.

And AT thinks some hobby industry co-op ads will solve this INTERNAL
problem?

The LAW is on our side NOW. Live life NOW.

Gees.

Signature

Jerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA
Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net>
Please bring GROWTH back to consumer rocketry.
Produce then publish.  http://www.usrockets.com

Dave Grayvis - 23 Dec 2005 15:43 GMT
>>>So are you going to stop doing business with the ATF?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Gees.

jerry, you must be very lonely as a felon, who cannot legally possess
HPR motors and  propellant.

Maybe you should take up another hobby, say, model airplanes or something.
Jerry Irvine - 23 Dec 2005 18:54 GMT
> jerry, you must be very lonely

You have no life.

Say merry christmas to your kids for me.

Signature

Jerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA
Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net>
Please bring GROWTH back to consumer rocketry.
Produce then publish.  http://www.usrockets.com

Phil Stein - 23 Dec 2005 19:42 GMT
>> jerry, you must be very lonely
>
>You have no life.
>
>Say merry christmas to your kids for me.

rmr has been much nicer without this crap.  How about you two take
this off line and have a nice holiday.
Dave Grayvis - 23 Dec 2005 19:47 GMT
>>jerry, you must be very lonely
>
> You have no life.
>
> Say merry christmas to your kids for me.

Hey jerry, maybe if you're really, really good for the rest of today and
for all of tomorrow, for Christmas, Santa will give you what's coming
to... er, I mean you'll get what you deserve... um... well I'm sure
Santa will bring you something.

Maybe, if you're really, really, really good.
W. E. Fred Wallace - 29 Dec 2005 01:18 GMT
> >>>So are you going to stop doing business with the ATF?
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Maybe you should take up another hobby, say, model airplanes or something.

No one will allow Jerry to ship anything marked as "MODEL AIRPLANE
PARTS", so I hear.(:-)
W. E. Fred Wallace - 29 Dec 2005 01:15 GMT
> The LAW is on our side NOW. Live life NOW.
>
> Gees.
>
> Jerry Irvine

Are you living the life Jerry?? Do you have more model airplane parts to
ship??(:-)
David Schultz - 22 Dec 2005 18:05 GMT
>>The bit about ATFE selling mailing lists is troublesome, to put it
>>mildly.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> steve

I have also received unexplained mail.

I received a political fund raising mailing from New York
(emergency defeat some evil liberal sort of nonsense). Since the
Republican party has no way of knowing who I am (Texas does not require
you to declare a party affiliation when you register and I have never
voted in the Republican primary.), this was very odd. The state of
Oklahoma mailing me a copy of their brand new state explosives law
almost makes sense but they had to get the address from the ATF.

The latest was a fireworks catalog from a company I had never heard of.
Considering I have never so much as purchased a sparkler at a fireworks
stand, this was odd.

Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :-)

Signature

David W. Schultz
http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz/

"Ahh Fuji! Why is it always monkeys? Why couldn't I be attacked by
crazed super models?" - Ron Stoppable

Jerry Irvine - 22 Dec 2005 19:26 GMT
> > The bit about ATFE selling mailing lists is troublesome, to put it
> > mildly.
>
> Yes, if it were proven to be true it would be even more troublesome.

I can confirm it as well and the last 3-4 times this was brought up it
was confirmed by several folks. It is a fact.

Your senseless post aside.

> All we have now though is the supposition from one poster that it has
> occured.  Nobody else has reported the same type of unsolicited mail.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I'm not saying it isn't true.  I guess it could be.  But I'm not saying
> it's true, or even probably so,

So why post this dribble?

> based upon the postings of one
> anti-government crusader.  We've seen no proof or even credible
> evidence to back the claims.
>
> steve

Signature

Jerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA
Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to:01rocket@gte.net>
Please bring GROWTH back to consumer rocketry.
Produce then publish.  http://www.usrockets.com

Kurt - 22 Dec 2005 02:36 GMT
> Gee, no comments.
>
> -Fred Shecter NAR 20117
> http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQfgtpZ1QQfrppZ25QQfsooZ1QQfsopZ1QQsassZshreadvector

The ATF should be concerned with people who store that kind
of stuff and leave the model rocket people alone.
Only people who would steal rocket engines would be
"evil" rocketeers who would use them up themselves.
Wouldn't make a very good explosive device but I
expect C4 would. :)

                                   Kurt Savegnago
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.