Model Forum / General / Rockets / January 2006

Dear Robert Juliano (aka "Special Needs" person),
My "weaknesses" for tolerating such born again liars is a problem that
perhaps some day I'll get myself fully assimilated into your
brown-nosed status quo that'll help to keep your mainstream of
disinformation flowing like so much other disinformation crapolla
that's keeping your kind of happy campers so nicely inside that box of
your's.

I believe your contributions of "you have shown", "you keep using" and
of your "therefore" conclusions need a little work, especially since
the only contrasting facts that do not add up are for the most part of
those contributed by folks like yourself and as otherwise having been
provided from your NASA/Apollo official record, as well as by most of
everything else as having transpired since.

You left off that I'm a wee bit more than merely vindictive and just
plain old and narly, that's in addition to my good standing in "lack of
punctuation" and "reliance on 100+ sentences".  I've also become
especially testy (aka favor returning) whenever certain folks that
claim knowing all there is to know simply don't want to be caught dead
forking over the whole truth and nothing but the truth, whereas that's
when I tend to go a little Usenet postal with my formuaic battery of
lose cannons that have been known to invent a few new words without
proper punctuation rather than having invented WMD that never existed
in the first place.  Besides the NASA/Apollo fiasco portion of our
perpetrated cold-war, would you like to know of what else I think of
our LLPOF naysay administrations, including their Skull and Bones SEC
portion of their ulterior motives, of what I'm thinking has been at the
root of most all modern day evil(s) upon Earth?

Of course, since you're so above it all that you wouldn't have noticed
that I'm only utilizing my "oral formuaic structure" upon those that so
badly deserve a good butt kicking, especially if it's a past due sort
of favor that needs badly to be returned, and thus qualifying as to a
few retroactive butt kickings comes to mind.  Of folks taking a
positive and thereby constructive point of view, which by the way does
not have to agree with each and every one of my deductive
interpretations, by their way of contributing useful information that
adds up to being the most likely truth, instead of the skewed truth
that suits the formuaic structure of whatever the mainstream status quo
has in their sick/perverted mindset, whereas I've been rather nice and
accepting as to the likes of such constructive topic contributions,
especially if those are pro-ET and thereby pro other intelligent life
as being entirely possible upon Venus.  However, your brown-nose status
quo of having chosen to stay the mainstream course of a thousands
lights is NOT what I'd qualify as being constructive.

Unlike yourself, I'm not the least bit all-knowing, just otherwise
all-wondering and having to be all-guessing  from time to time, as to
why the heck those rocket-science and fly-by-rocket numbers simply are
not adding up, especially since Kodak-science has already proven that
we've NOT walked upon the moon.  In fact, I may even have to research
upon a few of those other "attention grabbing" phrases of your's before
I can grasp their typical usage, especially as to how your intended
usage of such applies to myself.  Whereas you say "This could possibly
point to a mental illness, as opposed to a mere learning disability.
Many people with mental illness _may_ learn coping skills, but this
course is not a certain solution", which thereby explains as to why
folks like yourself that have become so totally snookered and thereby
having slipped way past the dumbfounded point of no return are just
like those fools that followed Hitler, and perhaps even himself were
foregone conclusions of the self destructive nature of such folks
living a lie on the edge of reality, and wherever possible perpetrating
another lie.  Matter of fact, I think that's the hard core basis of
most born again religious cults that have been known to suck the heart
and soul out of humanity without a stitch of remorse.

Here I'd thought the best course of any war was to thoroughly know thy
enemy and to as much as possible snooker thy enemy (somewhat like how
Osama bin Laden is doing to us), was back then and still is a good
tactic.  What I had not realized up until 6+ years ago was the extent
of how well snookered we've been taken to the cleaners by our own kind,
as having perpetrated such cold-wars that obviously needed trillions
upon trillions of funding that simply would not have materialized if we
weren't so snookered and summarily dumbfounded by our own kind in the
first place.  Clearly the pillaging and plundering of the vast
intellectual and scientific superiority of Germany was the opening of a
motherload worth of what Pandora's box had to share.  Unfortunately,
since Russia accomplished by far the most good on behalf of terminating
Hitler and his Third Reich minions, as such they took their fair share
of whatever Pandora's box of goodies had to offer.

Therefore, your "I strongly urge you to seek professional help" I'd
thought was pretty much exactly what I was doing, by way of
communicating via my lose cannon, especially with regard to the likes
of rocket-science that simply can not manage to have such an outrageous
difference as 64:1 up against the 764:1, which is actually a whole lot
worse off because the amount of time required for achieving the 764:1
deployment of the extremely little Lunar Prospector as taken nearly 50%
longer than the NASA/Apollo ruse accomplishment of having supposedly
deployed 47t in under 3 days is suggesting the absolute absurdity that
a scaled up 470t deployment would therefore only involve a 6.4:1
rocket/payload factor as based upon the old Saturn-V formula.  Is that
the phony baloney basis of what the 2018 plan of action is founded
upon? (somehow with all the SRB/SRM stacking and usage of composites
that's being planned, I don't think so)

BTW;  if it weren't for my limited "spell checker" you'd be in need of
a good Klingon code decryption manual.  Unfortunately, my wall-of-words
processor via "NoteTab" software does not auto-punctuate, does not seem
to offer dyslexic syntax corrections, nor has it any grammar
compression mode, whereas at best it merely catches a few dozen reverse
spelled words per paragraph.

BTW No.2;  you're not actually a very good "teacher of Special Needs"
if you can't grasp onto the "Special Needs" of what I've had to share
for the past 6 years and counting.  Is it the dyslexic truthsayer or
the ulterior motivated naysayer;  which one of us represents a lost
cause?

Christ almighty on another stick, Robert.  For resolving all of that
you're certainly dirt cheap.

BTW No.3;  this "room" that you speak of as containing others of your
kind.  Could you be a little more title and physical address specific
as to the exact nature of this MI6/NSA~CIA "room" of special needs that
you've spoken of?
-
Brad Guth

I had to give him the benefit of a doubt...

Bob

It all got started with his "analysis" of things he had seen in the
Magellan radar images from Venus. To us it looked like static, but he
saw bridges, giant airships, roads, and all sorts of other things,
rather like seeing animal shapes in clouds.
Each week would bring new "finds" on that remote and forbidding sphere,
and we thought he was doing a pretty clever parody of a whacko website,
but then realized that he was serious about this.
His posting of a topographical map of Mars and claiming it was Venus
became one of the best  laughs sci.space.history ever had, ranking right
up there with the time one of the posters was chased around by an
amorous cow....or maybe it was just  angry.
Let's say it was f.cking mad and cover both possibilities.
Speaking of f.cking mad, Guth's postings got stranger and stranger, soon
moving into discussions that I never could understand about cyclopean
Cathar lizards living on Venus.
As to how creatures that lack stereo vision survive (is it a fly at one
inch distance, or a pterodactyl at one hundred feet? You can eat ne, the
other can eat you), as well as why they would follow a medieval
Christian heresy was never explained to my satisfaction.
Anyway, his constant and frenzied writing has resulted in him getting
more verbose with a larger vocabulary over the years, if still
completely incomprehensible.
He also seem to have moved from simple delusions into the realm of
paranoia, but thinking too much about one-eyed lizards is liable to do
that to you. :-)

Pat