 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General ModelsRailroadsRocketsRadio Controlled Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater ModelsModelGeeks.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Model Forum / General / Rockets / March 2006Recent BS posts
I remember not too long ago that this group used to have some model rocketry related posts. Where did they go? I , for one, am sick of heatrig about Brad Guth's credentials or lack of them, and whether or not Thr Govt faked the Apollo oon landings and what is politically correct as far as drunks in bars. Just to have some modroc content, I finished my Big Bretha 3 engine cluster and will paint it in a couple of days. Might be able to get some pics put up on ABPMR. > I remember not too long ago that this group used to have some model > rocketry related posts. Where did they go? > > I , for one, am sick of heatrig about Brad Guth's credentials or > lack of them, and whether or not Thr Govt faked the Apollo oon > landings and what is politically correct as far as drunks in bars. Ya know, I've been thinking the same thing of late, as well. Just sold off most of my modroc bits and pieces; just don't have time for LPR anymore. I did keep some stuff, though, so my kids have something to fly when I they come to a launch with me. Also just got word that a rocket I shipped to VA for painting is almost ready to come home. Should have it next week; can't wait to see it! -Kevin >I , for one, am sick of heatrig about Brad Guth's credentials or >lack of them, and whether or not Thr Govt faked the Apollo oon >landings and what is politically correct as far as drunks in bars. That goes for me too, as I'd much rather focus upon the sorts of small/compact rockets that'll best accomplish the most payload(s) of getting microsatellites to LL-1. GOT COMPOSITE ROCKET that'll accomplish 10+kg? - Brad Guth >>I , for one, am sick of heatrig about Brad Guth's credentials or >>lack of them, and whether or not Thr Govt faked the Apollo oon [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >- >Brad Guth Then why do you keep 'discussing' it? >GOT COMPOSITE ROCKET that'll accomplish 10+kg? >- >Brad Guth Phil Stein; Then why do you keep 'discussing' it? What the freaking hell has that pathetic statement got to do with the question of small multi-stage or composite rocket getting 10+kg to LL-1? - Brad Guth >>GOT COMPOSITE ROCKET that'll accomplish 10+kg? >>- [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >- >Brad Guth As a one time courtesy, I want you to know that I will never discuss anything with you unless it pertains to something on topic. Last I checked, Apollo wasn't a model or a rocket. Anyway, don't bother asking. >>>GOT COMPOSITE ROCKET that'll accomplish 10+kg? >>>- [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > checked, Apollo wasn't a model or a rocket. Anyway, don't bother > asking. Mr. Stein, I thought that there was a model rocket with the name of apollo, back in the late 70's. single stage, 3 fins, 2 chutes. At least, that's my memory of it. Bob You may be right but I bet it wasn'tused to send 10+kg to LL-1 like the one Brad was discussing. I'm not familiar with the one you are talking about but I bet there are some people hare that are and they'd be happy to discuss it. Phil >>>>GOT COMPOSITE ROCKET that'll accomplish 10+kg? >>>>- [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > >Bob Phil Stein, In other words, you're being just another damn pagan liar, liar, pants on fire sort of guy. Because this "Recent BS posts" thoughtfully included by name, as such my contributions and of my asking whatever questions is clearly 100% on and/or within topic. What a total wuss. - Brad Guth > I , for one, am sick of heatrig about Brad Guth's credentials or > lack of them, and whether or not The Govt faked the Apollo oon > landings and what is politically correct as far as drunks in bars. AMEN! Randy www.vernarockets.com I'm with you!! What really pisses me off is that my filters haven't been making that crap disappear. Maybe rocketeers should all use ambr and leave the rmr to the hallucinogen users. >I remember not too long ago that this group used to have some model >rocketry related posts. Where did they go? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** >*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** > I remember not too long ago that this group used to have some model > rocketry related posts. Where did they go? > > I , for one, am sick of heatrig about Brad Guth's credentials or > lack of them, and whether or not Thr Govt faked the Apollo oon > landings and what is politically correct as far as drunks in bars. Kill files are your friends. I don't see any of those threads unless they change the subkect. Then I see one post.  SignatureBob Kaplow NAR # 18L >>> To reply, there's no internet on Mars (yet)! <<< Kaplow Klips & Baffle: http://nira-rocketry.org/Document/MayJun00.pdf www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/ www.nira-rocketry.org www.nar.org Government's view of the econpmy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. -- Ronald Reagan > I , for one, am sick of heatrig about Brad Guth's credentials or lack of them, Yep, I sure is. >I remember not too long ago that this group used to have some model >rocketry related posts. Where did they go? > > I'm kind of out of the launching mode for a while, and am pretty busy, but I've got a Semroc Mars Lander that I'm building. I'm REALLY pleased with this kit, and (in my mind) I'm hoping it will do justice to the one I had as a kid (which in my own memory must have been just PERFECT!). As an additional rocketry related question, what would folks recommend for the simplest/cheapest kit scale model rocket for a group of kids? Again, requirements are simplicity, cost, and an actual 'scale' model. David Erbas-White >>I remember not too long ago that this group used to have some model >>rocketry related posts. Where did they go? [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > David Erbas-White I like the Semroc "Aerobee Hi" (admittedly not 100% accurate) and their "Astrobee 350". ThrustAero also has their very nice clones of the classic Estes "Honest John" (both the BT-50 and BT-55 version); the "Little John", "Aerobee 300", "WAC Corporal" and the BT-55 V-2. They also have a very nice BT-60 sized V-2 in their line of original kits. I have all of the above, in various stages of construction, and am very pleased with each. SignatureGreg Heilers Registered Linux user #328317 - SlackWare 10.2 (2.6.13) AUS ..... He gets it from your side of the family, you know. No monsters on my side. -- Homer Simpson Treehouse of Horror II I've been killfiling the people who post responses to the insane cross-posted threads. I've probably killfiled many "normal" r.m.r. posters who jumped on the stupidity bandwagon. So far I have not killfiled Bob k and David E-W, but if I click too fast..... -Fred Shecter Signature"""Remove "zorch" from address (2 places) to reply. http://www.sirius.com/ >>I remember not too long ago that this group used to have some model >>rocketry related posts. Where did they go? [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > David Erbas-White > I've been killfiling the people who post responses to the insane cross-posted threads. > I've probably killfiled many "normal" r.m.r. posters who jumped on the stupidity [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > -Fred Shecter Where is the fun in that? If the responders can't be bothered to eliminate the x-posts then far be it from me to do so. What cracks me up is a top posting git taking such a superior tone on a netiquette issue. Oh, and "meow". SignatureTweak > > I've been killfiling the people who post responses to the insane cross-posted threads. > > I've probably killfiled many "normal" r.m.r. posters who jumped on the stupidity [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > -- > Tweak Hummmmm, did I just read two new items qualified for for the FAQ?? (:-) Fred Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - it enables them to conveniently read the response without needing to scroll down. The only time bottom-posting is really required, is when multiple points are being addressed sequentially. With quoted text clearly indented, only the most dimwitted reader has difficulty discerning the responder's text from that which is being replied to. Thus, only the dimwitted have a problem with it. RRRREOWR! > What cracks me up is a top posting git taking such a superior tone on a > netiquette issue. > > Oh, and "meow". > Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - it enables them to > conveniently read the response without needing to scroll down. The only [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > RRRREOWR! True for email, not true for public forums. > Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - it enables them to > conveniently read the response without needing to scroll down. The only [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > > > Oh, and "meow". Another clueless, top posting git posting in defense of the brotherhood of clapperheads. Suprise suprise. How are we ever going to get a good cascade if you keep top posting? M. .:M MMMM. .:MMMM MMMMMMMM .:MMMMMMM :MMHHHMMMMHMM. .:MMMMMMMMM:. .:MMHHMHMM: :MMHHIIIHMMMM.:MMHHHHIIIHHMMMM. .:MMHIHIIHHM: MMMHIIIIHHMMMIIHHMHHIIIIIHHMMMMMMHHHIIIIHHM: :MMHIIIIIHMMMMMMMHHIIIIIIHHHMMMMMHHII:::IHM. MH:I:::IHHMMMMMHHII:::IIHHMMMHHHMMM:I:IHMM :MHI:HHIHMMHHIIHII::.::IIHMMHHIHHMMM::HMM: MI::HHMMIIM:IIHII::..::HM:MHHII:::IHHMM: MMMHII::..:::IHMMHHHMHHMMI:::...::IHM: :MHHI::....::::HMMMMMMHHI::.. ..:::HM: :MI:.:MH:.....:HMMMMHHMIHMMHHI:HH.:M M:.I..MHHHHHMMMIHMMMMHMMHHHHHMMH:.:M. M:.H..H I:HM:MHMHI:IM:I:MM:: MMM:M: :M:HM:.M I:MHMIIMMIIHM I:MM::.:MMI:M. 'M::MM:IMH:MMII MMHIMHI :M::IIHMM:MM MH:HMMHIHMMMMMMHMMIMHIIHHHHIMMHHMM MI:MMMMHI:::::IMM:MHI:::IMMMMHIM :IMHIHMMMMMM:MMMMMHHHHMMMHI:M HI:IMIHMMMM:MMMMMMHHHMI:.:M ..... ............M::..:HMMMMIMHIIHMMMMHII:M:::'''' ....:::MHI:.:HMMMMMMMMHHHMHHI::M:::::::'''''' '' ...:MHI:.::MMHHHMHMIHMMMMHH.MI.......... '' ...MHI::.::MHHHHIHHMM:::IHM ''' ' IMH.::..::HMMHMMMH::..:HM: :M:.H.IHMIIII::IIMHMMM:H.MH IMMMH:HI:MMIMI:IHI:HIMIHM: .MMI:.HIHMIMI:IHIHMMHIHI:MIM. .MHI:::HHIIIIIHHI:IIII::::M:IM. .MMHII:::IHIII::::::IIIIIIHMHIIM MHHHI::.:IHHII:::.:::IIIIHMHIIHM: MHHHII::..::MII::.. ..:IIIHHHII:IM. .MHHII::....:MHII::. .:IHHHI::IIHMM. MMHHII::.....:IHMI:. ..:IHII::..:HHMM MHHII:::......:IIHI...:IHI::.....::HM: :MMH:::........ ...::..::.... ...:IHMM IMHIII:::.......... .........::IHMM. :MHIII::::...... .......::IHMM: MHHIII::::... ......::IHMM: IMHHIII:::... .....::IIHMM, :MHHIII:::I:::... ....:::I:::IIHMM MMHHIII::IHI:::...........:::IIH:IHMM :MMHHII:IIHHI::::::.....:::::IH:IHMIM MMMHHII:IIHHI:::::::::::::IHI:IIHM:M. MMMHHIII::IHHII:::::::::IHI:IIIHMM:M: :MMHHHIII::IIIHHII::::IHI..IIIHHM:MHM :MMMHHII:..:::IHHMMHHHHI:IIIIHHMM:MIM .MMMMHHII::.:IHHMM:::IIIIIIHHHMM:MI.M .MMMMHHII::.:IHHMM:::IIIIIIHHHMM:MI.M .MMMMHHMHHII:::IHHMM:::IIIIIHHHHMM:MI.IM. .MMHMMMHHHII::::IHHMM::I&&&IHHHHMM:MMH::IM. .MMHHMHMHHII:::.::IHMM::IIIIHHHMMMM:MMH::IHM :MHIIIHMMHHHII:::IIHMM::IIIHHMMMMM::MMMMHHHMM. MMHI:IIHMMHHHI::::IHMM:IIIIHHHMMMM:MMMHI::IHMM. MMH:::IHMMHHHHI:::IHMM:IIIHHHHMMMM:MMHI:.:IHHMM. :MHI:::IHMHMHHII::IHMM:IIIHHHMMMMM:MHH::.::IHHM: 'MHHI::IHMMHMHHII:IHMM:IIHHHHMMMM:MMHI:...:IHHMM. :MHII:IIHMHIHHIIIIHMM:IIHHHHMMMM:MHHI:...:IIHMM: 'MHIII:IHHMIHHHIIHHHMM:IHHHMMMMM:MHHI:..::IIHHM: :MHHIIIHHMIIHHHIHHHMM:HHHHMMMMM:MHII::::IIIHHMM MHHIIIIHMMIHHHIIHHMM:HHHHMMMM:MMHHIIHIIIIIHHMM. 'MHHIIIHHMIIHHIIIHMM:HHHMMMMH:MHHMHII:IIIHHHMM: 'MHHIIIHMMIHHHIHHMM:HHHMMMHH:MMIMMMHHHIIIHHMM: 'MHHIIHHMIHHHHHMMM:HHHMMMH:MIMMMMMMMMMMHIHHM: 'MHIIIHMMIHHHHHMM:HHHMMMH:IMMMMMHHIHHHMMHHM' :MHHIIHMIHHHHHMM:HHHMMMM:MMHMMHIHMHI:IHHHM MHHIIHM:HHHHHMM:HHHMMMM:MMMHIHHIHMM:HHIHM MHHIHM:IHHHHMM:HHHHMM:MMHMIIHMIMMMHMHIM: :MHIHMH:HHHHMM:HHHHMM:MMHIIHMIIHHMMHIHM: MMHHMH:HHHHMM:HHHHMM:MHHIHMMIIIMMMIIHM' 'MMMMH:HHHHMM:HHHMM:MHHHIMMHIIII::IHM: :MMHM:HHHHMM:HHHMM:MHIHIMMHHIIIIIHM: MMMM:HHHHMM:HHHHM:MHHMIMMMHHHIHHM:MMMM. :MMM:IHHHMM:HHHMM:MHHMIIMMMHHMM:MMMMMMM: :MMM:IHHHM:HHHHMM:MMHHHIHHMMM:MMMMMMMMMM MHM:IHHHM:HHHMMM:MMHHHHIIIMMIIMMMMMMMMM MHM:HHHHM:HHHMMM:HMMHHHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMM: .MI:MM:MHHMM:MHMMHMHHMMMMHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMM' :IM:MMIM:M:MM:MH:MM:MH:MMMMMHHHHHMMMMMMMM' :IM:M:IM:M:HM:IMIHM:IMI:MMMMMHHHMMMMMM:' 'M:MHM:HM:MN:HMIHM::M' '::MMMMMMM:' 'M'HMM'M''M''HM'I' SignatureTweak Hmm, Tweak replied, but since he didn't even offer the courtesy of top-posting, I shall ignore whatever useless turd he dropped. >> Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - it enables them to >> conveniently read the response without needing to scroll down. The only [quoted text clipped - 100 lines] > 'M:MHM:HM:MN:HMIHM::M' '::MMMMMMM:' > 'M'HMM'M''M''HM'I' > Hmm, Tweak replied, but since he didn't even offer the courtesy > of top-posting, I shall ignore whatever useless turd he dropped. Top posting is not the custom in Usenet groups. Others have already explained why. If you need more information, try this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting Quote from above: Unsurprisingly, different online communities differ on whether or not top-posting is objectionable; but if it is found objectionable in a particular community, top-posting in that community will generally be seen as major breach of etiquette and will provoke particularly vehement responses from self-named community regulars. The sci.space groups have been around far longer than I have been reading Usenet (which dates back to 1988), so you'll find these groups are conservative and prefer the use of proper Netiquette: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette Jeff SignatureRemove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address. I know. I'm just tweaking his buttons. p.s. I find that trimming extraneous content is FAR more courteous and important to readability than bottom-posting. > Top posting is not the custom in Usenet groups. Others have already explained why. If you need more information, try this: >I know. I'm just tweaking his buttons. > >p.s. I find that trimming extraneous content is FAR more >courteous and important to readability than bottom-posting. > IMHO, I like the bottom posting method better, as then I don't have to scroll down to see what exactly the reply is in response to. The one that gets on my nerves is a reply that has no content from the posting it is a response to in it. This makes it very hard to determine what exactly the poster is talking about without backtracking the thread. Pat > The one that gets on my nerves is a reply that has no content from the > posting it is a response to in it. > This makes it very hard to determine what exactly the poster is talking > about without backtracking the thread. Context is important, but, at last with a news group on a news reader, you can backtrack it. What kills me is web forums where there is no thread structure, just sequential posts. I can't understand web tools like that not supporting threading <sigh> Even Google, with all their hot programmers, has been challenged to recreate the thread structure of the usenet archives. The structure is built into the headers via pointers, right? Doug > IMHO, I like the bottom posting method better, as then I don't have to > scroll down to see what exactly the reply is in response to. I don't care if it's top posted or bottom posted as long as it's on topic and is posted to the appropriate group and not every unrelated newsgroup on the net. Randy www.vernarockets.com Pat: Think about it- the only time bottom posting is "better" is when a newbie is entering a thread for the first time and needs to get "caught up." So your point is that those who have been paying attention all along must scroll down past all the historical stuff they already know, every time a new post is added, in order to make life easier one time for the ocasional clueless newbie? Ya know, we had this one out back in the early 80s and a common feeling back then was that top posting was like Apple- definitely superior in so many ways, but hey, everybody else is using IBM . . . (OBTW- anyone using "Wikipedia" as an athouritative source on *anything* has really jumped the shark big time) Signature********************************* Steve & Leslie Swartz Abolish the Police State and the Welfare State VOTE LIBERTARIAN! ******************************** > >>I know. I'm just tweaking his buttons. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Pat >Pat: > > Think about it- the only time bottom posting is "better" is when a newbie >is entering a thread for the first time and needs to get "caught up." > I've got my newsreader set so that it shows all the threads at once in the order the messages were received in; therefore I can be hopping back and forth between a lot of threads as I advance through the messages, and the real aid there is if the poster leaves some context so I can see what they're responding to. > So your point is that those who have been paying attention all along must >scroll down past all the historical stuff they already know, every time a >new post is added, in order to make life easier one time for the ocasional >clueless newbie? > I just prefer bottom posting due to way I read the messages... however it's a personal thing, and open to individual tastes. Top posting is a minor inconvenience at most, and I'm not going to lose sleep over it. Pat > > Top posting is not the custom in Usenet groups. Others have already explained why. If you need more information, try this: > In article <44adndEbC4Uh_rXZ4p2dnA@adelphia.com>, sp@mbait.com says... > I know. I'm just tweaking his buttons. Not really. Please expend a little more effort. > p.s. I find that bottom-posting is FAR more > courteous and important to readability than trimming extraneous content. There. Fixed it for you. SignatureTweak Who gives a flying f,,k? >> Hmm, Tweak replied, but since he didn't even offer the courtesy >> of top-posting, I shall ignore whatever useless turd he dropped. [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > >Jeff Whazza matta? You to chicken to top post? I'm not the spelling police but it isn't git, it's jit. Phil ps - aren't yopu glad you didn't have to scroll to the bottom of this to find out how to spell jit? >> Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - it enables them to >> conveniently read the response without needing to scroll down. The only [quoted text clipped - 100 lines] > 'M:MHM:HM:MN:HMIHM::M' '::MMMMMMM:' > 'M'HMM'M''M''HM'I' > Whazza matta? You to chicken to top post? > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > ps - aren't yopu glad you didn't have to scroll to the bottom of this > to find out how to spell jit? See http://www.londonslang.com/db/g/ for proper spelling of "git". And it should read "You TOO chicken to top post", by the way. If you are going to be the speeeling police... A simple snip fixes the scrolling. SignatureGit Chicken? >> Whazza matta? You to chicken to top post? >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >A simple snip fixes the scrolling. Then how do you spell git chicken as in I'm gonna git me some chicken? And isn't jit a deritive of jizz - as in jitbag? > >> Whazza matta? You to chicken to top post? > >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Then how do you spell git chicken as in I'm gonna git me some chicken? > And isn't jit a deritive of jizz - as in jitbag? Phil-boy, you make "Larry the Cable Guy" look like a genius! >> >> Whazza matta? You to chicken to top post? >> >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >Phil-boy, you make "Larry the Cable Guy" look like a genius! I knew the mention of jitbags would bring you out. > >> >> Whazza matta? You to chicken to top post? > >> >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > I knew the mention of jitbags would bring you out. Whatta matter, Phil-boy? Hamas turn down your application? > >> Whazza matta? You to chicken to top post? > >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Then how do you spell git chicken as in I'm gonna git me some chicken? > And isn't jit a deritive of jizz - as in jitbag? Huh? Git is git, ya git. Git it? SignatureTweak :Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - Hogwash! <plonk> Signature"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil." -- Socrates You <plonk> people because you disagree with their opinion on top-posting? O.k.... > :Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - > > Hogwash! > > <plonk> > You <plonk> people because you disagree with their opinion on top-posting? > > O.k.... You also seem to say little that is on topic. I'm sure Fred isn't the first or the last person to killfile you. Jeff SignatureRemove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address. :> You <plonk> people because you disagree with their opinion on top-posting? :> :> O.k.... : :You also seem to say little that is on topic. I'm sure Fred isn't the first :or the last person to killfile you. Not given his attitudes. I, like a lot of folks, killfile the stupidly annoying. Just trying to improve the signal to noise ratio at my end of the wire.... Signature"It's always different. It's always complex. But at some point, somebody has to draw the line. And that somebody is always me.... I am the law." -- Buffy, The Vampire Slayer > Not given his attitudes. I, like a lot of folks, killfile the > stupidly annoying. Just trying to improve the signal to noise ratio > at my end of the wire.... ...by producing nothing of merit to add to any of the newsgroups you're x-posting to? : :> You <plonk> people because you disagree with their opinion on top-posting? : :> : :> O.k.... : : : :You also seem to say little that is on topic. I'm sure Fred isn't the first : :or the last person to killfile you. : Not given his attitudes. I, like a lot of folks, killfile the : stupidly annoying. Just trying to improve the signal to noise ratio : at my end of the wire.... To actually do that you'd have to stop posting altogether! Eric He does it because he's basically a prick... : You <plonk> people because you disagree with their opinion on top-posting? : O.k.... : > :Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - : > : > Hogwash! : > : > <plonk> Ah, but pissing off Fred is a good thing... : :Top posting is a courtesy to the intended reader(s) - : Hogwash! : <plonk> There is also "Mark conversation as read" and "Ignore conversation", but killfiling is so satisfying.... Signature"""Remove "zorch" from address (2 places) to reply. http://www.sirius.com/ >>I remember not too long ago that this group used to have some model >>rocketry related posts. Where did they go? [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > David Erbas-White As much as I enjoy needling the trolls, I have to agree with you. One of the TARC teams I mentor (Pennridge High in PA) is going to have their qualification flight next weekend. I'm going to witness it. The team used some Estes Scrambler egg capsules I got from a hobby shop that was goung out of business. I can't wait to see how they will do. Bill Sullivan "The lesser of two evils is still evil." > I remember not too long ago that this group used to have some model > rocketry related posts. Where did they go? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** > *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** Are they coming to PARA Sunday? I'll try to be there. A robotics team I'm mentoring has their competition at Drexel From Thursday thru Saturday. By the time that's over, I might be to burnt out to go Sunday. We'll see. It's a shame that this group is heading in the direction that it is. At least when Jerry used to rant about things that were related to the hobby. The current crop of morons don't have a clue. Phil >As much as I enjoy needling the trolls, I have to agree with you. > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >> *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** >> *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** > Are they coming to PARA Sunday? The date will be either Saturday or Sunday depending on the teacher's schedule. It will be at Pennridge HS. I will extend an invitation to them to come to PARA. I have also been in touch with the local CAP squadron and they are interested in starting a Rocketry program. I gave a presentation at their meeting last month. I am encouraging them to fiels a TARC team. > I'll try to be there. A robotics team I'm mentoring has their > competition at Drexel From Thursday thru Saturday. By the time that's [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > At least when Jerry used to rant about things that were related to the > hobby. The current crop of morons don't have a clue. Sad commentary, Bill Sullivan Will Gus be there?? (:-))) > Are they coming to PARA Sunday? > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > >> *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** > >> *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** Gus knows how welcome he is at PARA. If he shows up anyway, we'll try to keep things cordial. It's to bad there isn't a permanent cure for whatever is wrong with him. Phil >Will Gus be there?? (:-))) > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] >> >> *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** >> >> *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** >It's a shame that this group is heading in the direction that it is. >At least when Jerry used to rant about things that were related to the >hobby. The current crop of morons don't have a clue. The main reason this group is heading in the dircetion that it is, is because of the arseholes like Min & Guth who started cross posting thier crap in rmr... and TOO many idiots in these other groups just keep replying - probably not even aware they're cross posting. For example, notice the groups of a recent Min post: From: Daniel Joseph Min - view profile Date: Sat, Mar 25 2006 12:23 am Email: Daniel Joseph Min <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> Groups: alt.battlestar-galactica, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, rec.models.rockets, sci.space.history DSC >>It's a shame that this group is heading in the direction that it is. >>At least when Jerry used to rant about things that were related to the [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >DSC I'm done responding to Guth & McNichole and the rest of their type. I suggest everyone do likewise. > >>It's a shame that this group is heading in the direction that it is. > >>At least when Jerry used to rant about things that were related to the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > I'm done responding to Guth & McNichole and the rest of their type. I > suggest everyone do likewise. Aw please. SignatureTweak |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.