Is there anywhere I can find a list of CG locations for Estes engines both
loaded and at burnout? I can't spot this information in the Estes engine
tables (or have I missed it?).
Or will I just need to start measuring?
Many thanks for any guidance you can give.
Kevin Lucas
shockwaveriderz - 14 Jun 2006 16:45 GMT
kevin:
you are probably going to hav to generate this date yourself from used
engines . I once did this for A3-4T's and the CG moved around up to a
1/4".... same goes for loaded CG..although closer as the weight difference
was in 10th's of a gram...
terry dean
> Is there anywhere I can find a list of CG locations for Estes engines both
> loaded and at burnout? I can't spot this information in the Estes engine
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Kevin Lucas
Kevin Lucas - 16 Jun 2006 00:29 GMT
Terry
Thanks for the tip.
I was looking for this information just to get VCP models as accurate as I
could and I assumed the Cg wouldn't necessarily be in the middle of a given
Estes engine simply by noting that some engines use the full length for fuel
and some do not.
As the Cg information doesn't seem to readily available does this mean most
people model the engine Cgs in the middle of the engine cases or just at the
bottom of body tubes or is there some other rule of thumb typically used to
site engine mass in rocket Cg calculations perhaps?
Thanks
Kevin
> kevin:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>
>> Kevin Lucas
Steve Humphrey - 16 Jun 2006 01:35 GMT
> As the Cg information doesn't seem to readily available does this mean most
> people model the engine Cgs in the middle of the engine cases or just at the
> bottom of body tubes or is there some other rule of thumb typically used to
> site engine mass in rocket Cg calculations perhaps?
Kevin, there are enough variables in building a model that it's mass
rarely matches what a simulation estimates, and thus the estimated CG is
suspect even without the motor.
I'd take a worst case motor CG (put the CG at the nozzle). This will
hardly affect the model's CG unless you're modeling a Mosquito-style
rocket, in which case the worst-case CG will guide you to design a safe CP.
Then build the model and balance it to find the real CG. :-)

Signature
Steve Humphrey
(replace "spambait" with "merlinus" to respond directly to me)
shockwaveriderz - 16 Jun 2006 01:37 GMT
kevin:
I don't know how people model the motor CG... I never really thought about
it all that much to be honest; I also don't know how any simulation
software tried to model the CG for any specific motor.
my experience with motor burnout CG's primarliy has to do with rocket
gliders where you have to use a sepnt motor casing to determine the glide cg
vs the boost cg....
terry dean
> Terry
> Thanks for the tip.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>>
>>> Kevin Lucas
Malcolm Reynolds - 16 Jun 2006 02:23 GMT
One important thing to keep in mind here, is that in an end-burning BP motor,
the CG will only move forward during the burn. Therefore, any effect the motor's
CG change will have on the rocket's stability will be positive, except in the case
of certain esoteric designs (i.e., tractor rockets).
falingtrea - 16 Jun 2006 19:16 GMT
You may just have to measure the rocket's Cg with an unburnt motor and
then with a empty motor case and then interpolate. As mentioned before,
since Estes motors are end burning the Cg will progess forward at an
initially fast rate then will slow down as it reaches the end of the
burn. Core and c-slot engines, like Aerotech, probably won't change Cg
much, unless you are using the 29mm case with like a E or F reload.
I think, though, that the Cg of a motor is not going to be as critical
as the affect of the loss of propellant during flight on the model's
Cg. An end burning motor will move the Cg forward fasted than a
core/slot burning motor.
Tim Barr
Kevin Lucas - 23 Jun 2006 18:27 GMT
Thanks to you all for your replies. At least I now know that I was searching
for this information in vain and can get on with experimenting rather than
searching.
We're new to rocket design and simulation and haven't yet built up enough
experience to know which factors really matter, which can be approximated
and therefore when we must chase a design factor down rigorously or just go
with the flow. So meanwhile, we're assuming we should find all the facts we
can.
Having flown Estes motor-based rockets so far we're just beginning to look
at RMS too and hence core-burners are on our horizon. And it hadn't occured
to me that the motor Cg positions would be affected differently from the
end-burners.
From here on we'll start keeping and testing our bunt-out motors to see what
happens to the Cgs experimentally.
Many thanks once again.
Kevin
> Is there anywhere I can find a list of CG locations for Estes engines both
> loaded and at burnout? I can't spot this information in the Estes engine
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Kevin Lucas