Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / June 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

jack boots turning up heat on Performance Hobbies

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Harold Bradtke - 27 Jun 2006 05:07 GMT
How long has the BATFE been after Performance Hobbies?
This sounds serious.

http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20060625-114725-9396r.htm

Harold Bradtke
Signature

                rocketflyer|@|att|.|net

|      spam defense.  Please remove the ||      |
|  characters from the above email address.  |
Kevin OClassen - 27 Jun 2006 11:00 GMT
> How long has the BATFE been after Performance Hobbies?
> This sounds serious.
>
> http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20060625-114725-9396r.htm
>
> Harold Bradtke

This happened several weeks ago. Ken was at NERRF last Saturday, so hasn't
been sent away to the Black Hole. From what I understand (little), the
issues were more around proper recordkeeping than anything else. Of course,
that doesn't mitigate how serious this might be for him.

Kevin OClassen
Bob Kaplow - 27 Jun 2006 23:18 GMT
> How long has the BATFE been after Performance Hobbies?
> This sounds serious.
>
> http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20060625-114725-9396r.htm

I heard they visited at least one hobby shop in Indiana and asked for
similar records. The hobby shop "just said no".

Signature

 Bob Kaplow   NAR # 18L   >>> To reply, there's no internet on Mars (yet)! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle:    http://nira-rocketry.org/Document/MayJun00.pdf
   www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/    www.nira-rocketry.org    www.nar.org

    S&T is becoming this decades Steve Weaver!

Malcolm Reynolds - 27 Jun 2006 23:59 GMT
>> http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20060625-114725-9396r.htm
>
> I heard they visited at least one hobby shop in Indiana and asked for
> similar records. The hobby shop "just said no".

That hobby shop owner can expect some IRS (or similar) trouble in the near future.

Of course, it will be completely coincidental (wink, wink).
Bob Kaplow - 28 Jun 2006 02:05 GMT
>>> http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20060625-114725-9396r.htm
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Of course, it will be completely coincidental (wink, wink).

Alas, the JBGTs are no longer part of the Treasury dept.

The shop sold no regulated materials. The JBGTs had no warrant. Even if they
did, there were no records to turn over.

Signature

 Bob Kaplow   NAR # 18L   >>> To reply, there's no internet on Mars (yet)! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle:    http://nira-rocketry.org/Document/MayJun00.pdf
   www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/    www.nira-rocketry.org    www.nar.org

    S&T is becoming this decades Steve Weaver!

David Schultz - 28 Jun 2006 03:12 GMT
>>>> http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20060625-114725-9396r.htm
>>> I heard they visited at least one hobby shop in Indiana and asked for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Alas, the JBGTs are no longer part of the Treasury dept.

Not required. The pyrotechnics community is having its own troubles with
the CPSC. Two organizations (PGI and The Fireworks Foundation) that
stepped up to help a chemical supplier defend themselves in court found
themselves subject to a tax audit on the recommendation of an unnamed
agency. Almost certainly the CPSC.

> The shop sold no regulated materials. The JBGTs had no warrant. Even if they
> did, there were no records to turn over.

Signature

David W. Schultz
http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz/

Just because you're constitutionally entitled to a personal opinion
doesn't mean you're constitutionally entitled to a professional opinion

Charles P Lamb - 28 Jun 2006 05:44 GMT
Has anyone written to the Washington Times to correct their reference to
APCP as a "federally regulated explosive" ?

> How long has the BATFE been after Performance Hobbies?
> This sounds serious.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> |      spam defense.  Please remove the ||      |
> |  characters from the above email address.  |
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.