Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / October 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Letters of concern viz. atf

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
paul@junglevision.com - 27 Oct 2006 17:43 GMT
Could someone repeat who and where to write the letter of concern for
the atf motor issue.
I know that the physical snail mail must be in Washington by November
9th 2006.

Thanks
David Schultz - 28 Oct 2006 00:05 GMT
All the information required is in the NPRM:

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/200
6/pdf/E6-13201.pdf


> Could someone repeat who and where to write the letter of concern for
> the atf motor issue.
> I know that the physical snail mail must be in Washington by November
> 9th 2006.
>
> Thanks

Signature

David W. Schultz
http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz/

Just another day hard at work for the U.S. Senate:
Senate convened at 9:30 a.m., and adjourned at 9:40 a.m.,
until 2 p.m., on Monday, September 25, 2006

Bruce Canino - 28 Oct 2006 00:50 GMT
Public comments are due not later than November 9, 2006, and must be
delivered in writing to:

James P. Ficaretta, Program Manager
Room 5250
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
P.O. Box 50221
Washington, DC 20091-0221

ATTN: ATF 9P

Written comments must include your mailing address and be signed, and may be
of any length.

see http://www.nar.org/NARfrompres.html for more infomation

> Could someone repeat who and where to write the letter of concern for
> the atf motor issue.
> I know that the physical snail mail must be in Washington by November
> 9th 2006.
>
> Thanks
Bob Kaplow - 28 Oct 2006 15:44 GMT
> Public comments are due not later than November 9, 2006, and must be
> delivered in writing to:

IIRC last time there were both FAX and email alternatives ofr delivering
responses. Are those still available?

And is the MAILING date, i.e. postmark 11/9 or does it have to be DELIVERED
by 11/9.

Finally, is there some significance to 11/9 vs 9/11...

Signature

 Bob Kaplow   NAR # 18L   >>> To reply, there's no internet on Mars (yet)! <<<
Kaplow Klips & Baffle:    http://nira-rocketry.org/Document/MayJun00.pdf
   www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/    www.nira-rocketry.org    www.nar.org

    S&T is becoming this decades Steve Weaver!

Glen Overby - 28 Oct 2006 17:44 GMT
>And is the MAILING date, i.e. postmark 11/9 or does it have to be DELIVERED
>by 11/9.

I suspect _delivered_.  Remember, they don't want comments.  Only compliance.

>Finally, is there some significance to 11/9 vs 9/11...

sadly, it appears so.

--
Glen Overby
 "It so happens that everything that is stupid is not unconstitutional."
   -- US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.