Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Rockets / October 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

sugar rocket motor questions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
shockwaveriderz - 31 Oct 2006 02:16 GMT
I have a few questions about sugar rocket motors.

Its my understanding they are very hygroscopic, ie they absorb mositure very
readily.... would it be posible to perhaps prevent this by vaccuum degasing
and squishing the sugar propellant together  to also prevent voids and get
any extra moisture out plus then apply a thin vaccum bagged coating or
carrier film?

Also has anybody ever done any end burning sugar rocket motors successfuly?

tia

terry dean
nar 16158

Signature

"Old Rocketeer's don't die; they just go OOP"

Gary - 31 Oct 2006 07:17 GMT
> I have a few questions about sugar rocket motors.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> terry dean
> nar 16158

The big moisture problem, for KNSU, comes from humidity in the
air affecting the grain surface after the grain is cast. With
high humidity, the surface of an exposed grain will literally
dissolve into a syrupy goo in just a few hours. Storage in vacuum
bags or desiccant jars is standard.

Jimmy Yawn has some nitrocellulose lacquer coating tests on his
website. It seemed to keep the humidity out, but I don't know if
he has working motors with such a coating.

Sure, my first sugar motors were 4" long end burners modeled
after Estes motors (very short core to start with). But it
depends upon what you mean by "successful". Low thrust and very
inefficient; but they flew, every once in a while. ;)

They were nothing compared to the "great discovery" of core
burners, though. If you measure "success" against a modern BP or
APCP motor, the end burning KNSU PVC motor is just a big Jetex.
But I imagine that a catalyzed sugar propellant grain in a
properly designed (higher Kn) aluminum motor case would make a
usable, if not efficient, motor.

What, exactly, are you looking for in an end burning candy motor?

Signature

Gary

***********************************************
* "summum jus, summa injuria est"             *
* http://home.comcast.net/~bollesg/index.html *
* bollesg at comcast dot net                  *
***********************************************

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.