>> interesting. rol decides to discontinue rol news last summer. then,
>> rocketry planet hands rol their a.s in a hat and now they want to start
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> --Matt ;^]
>I am personally glad to see that ROL is getting back on it's feet. My
>brother and I used to surf it many a late night as we first started out in
>this hobby. Info Central was a great tool to help design and build your
>rockets! Kevin and Tim are doing a great job, and I can't wait to see ROL
>return to the great rocketry information site it used to be!
Not to take away from Kevin but I'd like to give some credit to
Darrell who was the creater of ROL 1.0. Many people (including me)
stopped liking ROL when it bacame 2.0. Darrell has done a nice job
with his latest creation - Rocketry Planet.
Phil
Darrell D. Mobley - 27 Feb 2007 20:13 GMT
> Not to take away from Kevin but I'd like to give some credit to
> Darrell who was the creater of ROL 1.0. Many people (including me)
> stopped liking ROL when it bacame 2.0. Darrell has done a nice job
> with his latest creation - Rocketry Planet.
Thanks Phil. I appreciate the kind words. While there has been a lot
of controversy surrounding Rocketry Online since I sold it and the
subsequent "upgrade" to 2.0, most people do not realize how much work
goes into running a vertical portal where people come to expect a daily
buffet. I wish Kevin and Tim all the best, but it takes more than just
an established domain name to be successful in that market.

Signature
Rocketry Planet — hobby rocketry news, feature articles, news archive,
discussion forums, live chat, free auctions, launch calendar and the
largest collection of web links anywhere!
http://www.rocketryplanet.com
> I am personally glad to see that ROL is getting back on it's feet. My
> brother and I used to surf it many a late night as we first started out in
> this hobby. Info Central was a great tool to help design and build your
> rockets! Kevin and Tim are doing a great job, and I can't wait to see ROL
> return to the great rocketry information site it used to be!
what's the matter erik, newsgroup access so limited in your part of the world you have to reach back in time to respond to a message about the current owners of ROL and the site in general? sounds to me like ya'll are talking about it and you came out to their defense.
i am also intrigued by your definition of "good job". if what they are doing defines a good job, then they get what they deserve. in his latest rush to post a cut-n-paste news release, one of the new owners forgot to even put the "[ROL]" in the title (with the missing space before the title, too, mind you). defining his style?
ROL used to be a great site. it was run in the ground by McWeenie who started this cut-n-paste mentality. one of the new owners is also the person who recommended the move to ROL 2.0. McWeenie wasn't a computer-oriented person, he relied on this new person's advice, therefore the old cut-n-paste mentality is intact and thriving at ROL, under a new ownership who thinks the new design looks great.
infocentral is a good idea that is being held hostage. it may be the only thing that saves ROL.
Darrell D. Mobley - 27 Feb 2007 20:45 GMT
> infocentral is a good idea that is being held hostage. it may be
> the only thing that saves ROL.
Interesting term, "held hostage."
The INFOcentral concept was born to be a graphical compliment to the
UseNET rec.models.rockets FAQ. At the time, the largest Internet-based
repository of information about hobby rocketry was located in the RMR
FAQ, which was all text and lacked the graphical capability of the Web.
INFOcentral was created to be a community-driven web repository project
that was independent of any group or business interest. This was so no
matter what organization or club a contributor was affiliated with, or
no matter what website or portal a contributor might be affiliated with,
they could feel their contributions were still being made to a neutral
destination that benefited the community at large. That is why
INFOcentral was set up on a separate, independent domain name. This,
along with the superb editorial guidance of John Coker, is what made
INFOcentral the great thing it became. I may have created it, but it
was the community who built it.
From what I have heard about the future plans for INFOcentral, it may
soon lose its independence. After being folded into the ROL site, its
independent nature will be over. That segregation, like all
segregation, will hurt the community that built INFOcentral.

Signature
Rocketry Planet — hobby rocketry news, feature articles, news archive,
discussion forums, live chat, free auctions, launch calendar and the
largest collection of web links anywhere!
http://www.rocketryplanet.com