 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General ModelsRailroadsRocketsRadio Controlled Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater ModelsModelGeeks.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Model Forum / General / Rockets / March 2007A new better poll
Which is the most important manned booster? Donlad A. Laskey > Which is the most important manned booster? African, or European? > African, or European? WHAT?? and what I ment was "what is the most important manned booster?" sorry I did not catch that > > African, or European? > > WHAT?? > > and what I ment was "what is the most important manned booster?" sorry > I did not catch that It's a question of weight to air speed velocity... Now see in Europe one booster can't lift it, but an African one can... of course you could tie a string between 2 Eureopean boosters, and they might lift it. Oh no... I said IT again... I am the rocketeer that says Nih! Doug On Feb 25, 12:02 am, "stealthboo...@aol.com" <stealthboo...@aol.com> wrote: > > > African, or European? > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > I am the rocketeer that says Nih! > Doug I sould have konwn > It's a question of weight to air speed velocity... Now see in Europe > one booster can't lift it, but an African one can... of course you > could tie a string between 2 Eureopean boosters, and they might lift > it. What, held under the dorsal guiding fins? > Which is the most important manned booster? > > Donlad A. Laskey I'm unaware of any boosters that were manned. Usually the humans ride in the payload... <G> David Erbas-White > Which is the most important manned booster? > > Donlad A. Laskey I still say R7 series.  SignaturePP -------------------------------------- Deactivate the DYNOMITE to reply. On Feb 25, 10:28 am, Pete Pemberton <bfpember...@DYNOMITEfuse.net> wrote: > > Which is the most important manned booster? > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > -------------------------------------- > Deactivate the DYNOMITE to reply. Gee one vote for the R7 I can see how this was wroth my time to a poll so you all could vote for the shuttle Donald A. Laskey > Gee one vote for the R7 I can see how this was wroth my time to a poll > so you all could vote for the shuttle You forgot to say "Simon Says" this time. > Which is the most important manned booster? > > Donlad A. Laskey ROTFLMAO. You are amazingly inept, aren't you? > ROTFLMAO. > > You are amazingly inept, aren't you? Isn't there a bridge you ought to be hiding under, or something? > > Which is the most important manned booster? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > You are amazingly inept, aren't you? "Which" is still a valid question I am simply implying that there is limited number of answers Donald A. Laskey >>>Which is the most important manned booster? >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Donald A. Laskey You are not just inept, you are stupid. "manned booster..." Where in the booster do the men ride? Last I looked, none of the three countries with manned space programs ever put people inside a booster. Each utilize separate payload sections for their cosmonauts / astronauts / whatever. Did you actually mean "man rated" booster? Thats a very different thing. If you meant "man rated" booster why not say so? Words, after all, do have meanings. Important meanings....precise meanings. After all, this actually is ROCKET SCIENCE. Then again, since you can not even consistently type your own name ("Donald" / "Donlad") and haven't figured how to include articles in the sentences you do type, we probably shouldn't expect you to understand ROCKET SCIENCE. >> "Which" is still a valid question I am simply implying that there is >> limited number of answers [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > sentences you do type, we probably shouldn't expect you to understand > ROCKET SCIENCE. Who pissed in your Corn Flakes? Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 > >> "Which" is still a valid question I am simply implying that there is > >> limited number of answers [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 Tony? SignatureTweak "They're GREAT!" Say, aren't you that irritating disbarred lawyer from a few years back? > You are not just inept, you are stupid. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > sentences you do type, we probably shouldn't expect you to understand > ROCKET SCIENCE. > Say, aren't you that irritating disbarred lawyer from a few years back? 'terry6969@aol.com' :) Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 >> Say, aren't you that irritating disbarred lawyer from a few years back? > > 'terry6969@aol.com' :) I don't think it is. 'edbedb' reminds me of Triumph the insult comic dog, minus the "comic" part. >>> Say, aren't you that irritating disbarred lawyer from a few years back? >>> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > 'edbedb' reminds me of Triumph the insult comic dog, minus the "comic" part. That was a joke :) Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 >Then again, since you can not even consistently type your own name >("Donald" / "Donlad") You are right I should proofread my all of my e-mails. So to all you belittling, mocking, perfectionist who publicly berate people, I am sorry for being young, a bad speller, a bad typist and I am very sorry for having dyslexia. I would thank you, that if you are going call me inept and stupid, that you do it in private and not to the entire group. Donald A. Laskey P.S. (I know you like precise meanings so post script) I understand rocket science I also understand it is rocket science and not "ROCKET SCIENCE". Oh and Hab SoSlI' Quch! > You are right I should proofread my all of my e-mails. Yes you should; as should everyone else. > I am > sorry for being young, a bad speller, a bad typist and I am very sorry > for having dyslexia. Nah, don't apologize for those things. The old farts here (like me) are jealous you are young, need spell checkers (I also have a well-worn Word Book), don't type well (I use four fingers, two from each hand), and have worse problems than dyslexia (like rudeness). I'd ask that you post a link to your school report so we could read it, but you might be gun shy at this point. I hope you do let us see it, I'd like to read it. Steve Humphrey > not "ROCKET SCIENCE". > Oh and Hab SoSlI' Quch! You better watch your back for a while, saying things like that! :) |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.