 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General ModelsRailroadsRocketsRadio Controlled Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater ModelsModelGeeks.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Model Forum / General / Rockets / June 2007The Rocketry Forum?
Anybody else have problems at this site since yesterday? > Anybody else have problems at this site since yesterday? Yep, it's not working correctly for me either..... Tom C. Yeaterday? Been problems all along with the admoderators, oh you mean connecting problems, dee dee dee, my bad > Anybody else have problems at this site since yesterday? No.  Signature"""Remove "zorch" from address (2 places) to reply. http://www.sirius.com/ > Anybody else have problems at this site since yesterday? > Anybody else have problems at this site since yesterday? I tried to reply to a post and it told me that I couldn't post more than once every 30 seconds. It was my first post of the day. -- Roger On Jun 4, 9:41 am, "goo...@jadebox.com" <goo...@jadebox.com> wrote: > > Anybody else have problems at this site since yesterday? > > I tried to reply to a post and it told me that I couldn't post more > than once every 30 seconds. It was my first post of the day. > > -- Roger Roger, the same thing happened to me. There do not appear to be any post made today. I also get the message about not being able to post more than once every 30 seconds, and no new messages since yesterday. Tom C. I enjoy TRF and hope it is repaired soon. I like reading actual posts about -rocketry- , and no, TRF isn't the only one. I don't see many -rocketry- posts here anymore--just a bunch of whiners complaining about nothing that has to do with the promotion of rocketry. To those, get out from behind your computer and launch a few rockets. Heck, you might just like it! Or find another hobby to piss on. Kevin It looks like they're back!!! Tom C. Quoted from a post whining and complaining about whiners complaining on RMR: > I don't see many -rocketry- posts here anymore--just a bunch of whiners > complaining about nothing that has to do with the promotion of rocketry. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Or find another hobby to piss on. Boy, we get touchy when can't get our forum fix, don't we? 8-) SignaturePluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town. Rocketry Planet — http://www.rocketryplanet.com > Quoted from a post whining and complaining about whiners complaining on RMR: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Boy, we get touchy when can't get our forum fix, don't we? 8-) The "Defenders of the Faith" show up every time someone dares malign the mighty TRF. SignatureTweak > I don't see many -rocketry- posts here anymore--just a bunch of whiners > complaining about nothing that has to do with the promotion of rocketry. The only problem with RMR lately is that all the whiners that can't piss in their own sandbox come here to piss. Want to complain about TRF? Take it there! SignatureBob Kaplow NAR # 18L >>> To reply, there's no internet on Mars (yet)! <<< Kaplow Klips & Baffle: http://nira-rocketry.org/Document/MayJun00.pdf www.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/ www.nira-rocketry.org www.nar.org Sir, if I was building a weapon of mass destruction, you wouldn't be able to find it. >> I don't see many -rocketry- posts here anymore--just a bunch of whiners >> complaining about nothing that has to do with the promotion of rocketry. > > The only problem with RMR lately is that all the whiners that can't piss in > their own sandbox come here to piss. Want to complain about TRF? Take it > there! And promptly have the post deleted... That's what the complaining was all about. Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 >I enjoy TRF and hope it is repaired soon. I like reading actual posts >about -rocketry- , and no, TRF isn't the only one. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Kevin Are you allowed to say piss on TRF? Someone might rat you out for being a potty mouth and then what are you going o do? > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:44:53 -0600, "K Cornelius" > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Phil, That is a rather vulgar (and low class) term, that unfortunately, I hear used on the radio quite often, with no thought given to it. Nothing worthwhile can come from the use of such language. Of course a lot of people think nothing of routinely looking at pornography, giving no thought to the effect it has on their mind. >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:44:53 -0600, "K Cornelius" >> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >Of course a lot of people think nothing of routinely looking at >pornography, giving no thought to the effect it has on their mind. I try not to judge people based on what I may perceive their class to be. Also, I don't think one's vocabulary is necessarily an indication of anything. The Internet was made for porn. It must be true - there's a song about it. ;-) > >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:44:53 -0600, "K Cornelius" > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Phil, a great deal can be determined about an individual by the language they use. I am inclined to disassociate myself from people who routinely utter vulgarities. That to me is just an indication that they are not taking the time to think about what they are saying. A routine use of vulgarity is as indicative of "low class" as is smoking cigarettes. It is my understanding that the primary use of the Internet is accessing pornography sites. I suspect that most child molesters get a steady diet of pornography. Never let anyone convince you that a diet of pornography is harmless. IMHO, it is worse than the effect of many drugs. Holy sh.t batman...what have you been drinking Darian? Cigarettes a sign of low class, as is porn or vulgar lang. like I said, Holy sh.t batman what the hell! Evidently there is not a TV in your house then either. Amazing there is a computer hooked to the internet. <<>>On Jun 5, 9:22 am, Phil Stein <PSt...@ArielSystems.spamsks.net> wrote: <<>>> On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:02:50 -0700, Darian <darian.rac...@gmail.com> <<>>> wrote: <<>>> <<>>> <<>>> <<>>> <<>>> <<>>> >On Jun 5, 8:17 am, Phil Stein <PSt...@ArielSystems.spamsks.net> wrote: <<>>> >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:44:53 -0600, "K Cornelius" <<>>> <<>>> >> <hsvrocketman_@_comcast.net> wrote: <<>>> >> >I enjoy TRF and hope it is repaired soon. I like reading actual posts <<>>> >> >about -rocketry- , and no, TRF isn't the only one. <<>>> <<>>> >> >I don't see many -rocketry- posts here anymore--just a bunch of whiners <<>>> >> >complaining about nothing that has to do with the promotion of rocketry. <<>>> <<>>> >> >To those, get out from behind your computer and launch a few rockets. Heck, <<>>> >> >you might just like it! <<>>> <<>>> >> >Or find another hobby to piss on. <<>>> <<>>> >> >Kevin <<>>> <<>>> >> Are you allowed to say piss on TRF? Someone might rat you out for <<>>> >> being a potty mouth and then what are you going o do?- Hide quoted text - <<>>> <<>>> >> - Show quoted text - <<>>> <<>>> >Phil, That is a rather vulgar (and low class) term, that <<>>> >unfortunately, I hear used on the radio quite often, with no thought <<>>> >given to it. Nothing worthwhile can come from the use of such <<>>> >language. <<>>> <<>>> >Of course a lot of people think nothing of routinely looking at <<>>> >pornography, giving no thought to the effect it has on their mind. <<>>> <<>>> I try not to judge people based on what I may perceive their class to <<>>> be. Also, I don't think one's vocabulary is necessarily an indication <<>>> of anything. <<>>> <<>>> The Internet was made for porn. It must be true - there's a song <<>>> about it. ;-)- Hide quoted text - <<>>> <<>>> - Show quoted text - <<>> <<>>Phil, a great deal can be determined about an individual by the <<>>language they use. I am inclined to disassociate myself from people <<>>who routinely utter vulgarities. That to me is just an indication that <<>>they are not taking the time to think about what they are saying. <<>> <<>>A routine use of vulgarity is as indicative of "low class" as is <<>>smoking cigarettes. <<>> <<>>It is my understanding that the primary use of the Internet is <<>>accessing pornography sites. I suspect that most child molesters get a <<>>steady diet of pornography. Never let anyone convince you that a diet <<>>of pornography is harmless. IMHO, it is worse than the effect of many <<>>drugs. ------- I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! On Jun 5, 9:50 am, Pondmeister <tristansaintjohnREM...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Holy sh.t batman...what have you been drinking Darian? Cigarettes a > sign of low class, as is porn or vulgar lang. like I said, Holy sh.t [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > ------- > I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! Pondmeister, You are correct about the fact that I do not have an 'idiot box' in my house. You'd be surprised how pleasant it is not to have that noise to deal with. I've not had one for years. I'll not go on about the negative effects of television; I'm not on a crusade. I'll bet that if you look at some information on who smokes cigarettes, you'll see it's the poorly educated people. > On Jun 5, 9:50 am, Pondmeister <tristansaintjohnREM...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 74 lines] > I'll bet that if you look at some information on who smokes > cigarettes, you'll see it's the poorly educated people. You're correct. The lower the education level, the greater the chance the individual is a smoker. > You're correct. The lower the education level, the greater the > chance the individual is a smoker. Where did you some by this metric? >> You're correct. The lower the education level, the greater the >> chance the individual is a smoker. er.. Where did you come by this metric? On Jun 5, 4:17 pm, Christopher Cox <chrisTOPHER...@coboxincORORATED.com> wrote: > >> You're correct. The lower the education level, the greater the > >> chance the individual is a smoker. > > er.. > Where did you come by this metric? http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5320a2.htm Google "smoking education level" and you'll find a number of similar articles and research showing similar results. James > On Jun 5, 4:17 pm, Christopher Cox > <chrisTOPHER...@coboxincORORATED.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > James Face it - you can prove anything you want with google... Including that the speed of light is slowing down! >>> You're correct. The lower the education level, the greater the >>> chance the individual is a smoker. > > er.. > Where did you come by this metric? He made it up based on his friends in high school... >>>> You're correct. The lower the education level, the greater the >>>> chance the individual is a smoker. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > He made it up based on his friends in high school... Nope, I'm im the medical field. So just keep smoking and die fool. Uh, I've got some bad news for you, sir... NOBODY gets out alive. Smoke or no smoke, red dye #2, saccharin, any and all of that crap that allegedly causes cancer or any other mortal condition... It doesn't matter. When the Lord calls your number, where you gonna hide? Get over it. J > > Nope, I'm im the medical field. So just keep smoking > and die fool. >Pondmeister, You are correct about the fact that I do not have an >'idiot box' in my house. You'd be surprised how pleasant it is not to [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >I'll bet that if you look at some information on who smokes >cigarettes, you'll see it's the poorly educated people. TV's are great for relaxation. I turn it on and fall asleep within 10 minutes. There's a lesson for you in this. That is how some people think. I'm not saying this necessarily applies to Damien, but to some it elevates their status (at least in their mind) to judge some as less desirable because that person does not conform to a stereotype of how an "higher class" person should behave, look, speak, live, spell or whatever. Phil >Holy sh.t batman...what have you been drinking Darian? Cigarettes a >sign of low class, as is porn or vulgar lang. like I said, Holy sh.t [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] >------- >I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! > There's a lesson for you in this. That is how some people think. I'm > not saying this necessarily applies to Damien, but to some it [quoted text clipped - 78 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Phil, When I am around a vulgar individual, it does not in my mind elevate me at all. It simply lowers my opinion of that individual. No one forces an individual to speak in a vulgar manner. I am really a bit perplexed why an individual chooses to do so. It's bad enough if it is a man, it's reprehensible behavior for a woman. You need a TV dude and tune it into watch the Kathy Griffin show....but it would probbaly stroke you out! <<>>On Jun 5, 3:53 pm, Phil Stein <PSt...@ArielSystems.spamsks.net> wrote: <<>>> There's a lesson for you in this. That is how some people think. I'm <<>>> not saying this necessarily applies to Damien, but to some it <<>>> elevates their status (at least in their mind) to judge some as less <<>>> desirable because that person does not conform to a stereotype of how <<>>> an "higher class" person should behave, look, speak, live, spell or <<>>> whatever. <<>>> <<>>> Phil <<>>> <<>>> On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:50:46 -0500, Pondmeister <<>>> <<>>> <<>>> <<>>> <tristansaintjohnREM...@yahoo.com> wrote: <<>>> >Holy sh.t batman...what have you been drinking Darian? Cigarettes a <<>>> >sign of low class, as is porn or vulgar lang. like I said, Holy sh.t <<>>> >batman what the hell! Evidently there is not a TV in your house then <<>>> >either. Amazing there is a computer hooked to the internet. <<>>> <<>>> >On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:37:48 -0700, Darian <darian.rac...@gmail.com> <<>>> >wrote: <<>>> <<>>> ><<>>On Jun 5, 9:22 am, Phil Stein <PSt...@ArielSystems.spamsks.net> wrote: <<>>> ><<>>> On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:02:50 -0700, Darian <darian.rac...@gmail.com> <<>>> ><<>>> wrote: <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> >On Jun 5, 8:17 am, Phil Stein <PSt...@ArielSystems.spamsks.net> wrote: <<>>> ><<>>> >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:44:53 -0600, "K Cornelius" <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> >> <hsvrocketman_@_comcast.net> wrote: <<>>> ><<>>> >> >I enjoy TRF and hope it is repaired soon. I like reading actual posts <<>>> ><<>>> >> >about -rocketry- , and no, TRF isn't the only one. <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >I don't see many -rocketry- posts here anymore--just a bunch of whiners <<>>> ><<>>> >> >complaining about nothing that has to do with the promotion of rocketry. <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >To those, get out from behind your computer and launch a few rockets. Heck, <<>>> ><<>>> >> >you might just like it! <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >Or find another hobby to piss on. <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >Kevin <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> >> Are you allowed to say piss on TRF? Someone might rat you out for <<>>> ><<>>> >> being a potty mouth and then what are you going o do?- Hide quoted text - <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> >> - Show quoted text - <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> >Phil, That is a rather vulgar (and low class) term, that <<>>> ><<>>> >unfortunately, I hear used on the radio quite often, with no thought <<>>> ><<>>> >given to it. Nothing worthwhile can come from the use of such <<>>> ><<>>> >language. <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> >Of course a lot of people think nothing of routinely looking at <<>>> ><<>>> >pornography, giving no thought to the effect it has on their mind. <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> I try not to judge people based on what I may perceive their class to <<>>> ><<>>> be. Also, I don't think one's vocabulary is necessarily an indication <<>>> ><<>>> of anything. <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> The Internet was made for porn. It must be true - there's a song <<>>> ><<>>> about it. ;-)- Hide quoted text - <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> ><<>>> - Show quoted text - <<>>> ><<>> <<>>> ><<>>Phil, a great deal can be determined about an individual by the <<>>> ><<>>language they use. I am inclined to disassociate myself from people <<>>> ><<>>who routinely utter vulgarities. That to me is just an indication that <<>>> ><<>>they are not taking the time to think about what they are saying. <<>>> ><<>> <<>>> ><<>>A routine use of vulgarity is as indicative of "low class" as is <<>>> ><<>>smoking cigarettes. <<>>> ><<>> <<>>> ><<>>It is my understanding that the primary use of the Internet is <<>>> ><<>>accessing pornography sites. I suspect that most child molesters get a <<>>> ><<>>steady diet of pornography. Never let anyone convince you that a diet <<>>> ><<>>of pornography is harmless. IMHO, it is worse than the effect of many <<>>> ><<>>drugs. <<>>> <<>>> >------- <<>>> >I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!- Hide quoted text - <<>>> <<>>> - Show quoted text - <<>> <<>>Phil, When I am around a vulgar individual, it does not in my mind <<>>elevate me at all. It simply lowers my opinion of that individual. No <<>>one forces an individual to speak in a vulgar manner. I am really a <<>>bit perplexed why an individual chooses to do so. It's bad enough if <<>>it is a man, it's reprehensible behavior for a woman. ------- I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! On Jun 5, 5:15 pm, Pondmeister <tristansaintjohnREM...@yahoo.com> wrote: > You need a TV dude and tune it into watch the Kathy Griffin > show....but it would probbaly stroke you out! [quoted text clipped - 95 lines] > ------- > I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! Who is Kathy Griffin? I've never heard of her. > On Jun 5, 5:15 pm, Pondmeister <tristansaintjohnREM...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 133 lines] > > Who is Kathy Griffin? I've never heard of her. An attractive woman comic who uses vulgar language. You'd like her! > > On Jun 5, 5:15 pm, Pondmeister <tristansaintjohnREM...@yahoo.com> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 135 lines] > > An attractive woman comic who uses vulgar language. You'd like her! Funnier than Dave Shepple? <<>>On Jun 6, 1:47 pm, "J.A. Michel" <jm44...@spamnotalltel.net> wrote: <<>>> "Darian" <darian.rac...@gmail.com> wrote in message <<>>> <<>>> news:1181101583.883594.39260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... <<>>> <<>>> <<>>> <<>>> > On Jun 5, 5:15 pm, Pondmeister <tristansaintjohnREM...@yahoo.com> <<>>> > wrote: <<>>> >> You need a TV dude and tune it into watch the Kathy Griffin <<>>> >> show....but it would probbaly stroke you out! <<>>> <<>>> >> On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:11:03 -0700, Darian <darian.rac...@gmail.com> <<>>> >> wrote: <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>On Jun 5, 3:53 pm, Phil Stein <PSt...@ArielSystems.spamsks.net> <<>>> >> wrote: <<>>> >> <<>>> There's a lesson for you in this. That is how some people think. <<>>> >> I'm <<>>> >> <<>>> not saying this necessarily applies to Damien, but to some it <<>>> >> <<>>> elevates their status (at least in their mind) to judge some as <<>>> >> less <<>>> >> <<>>> desirable because that person does not conform to a stereotype of <<>>> >> how <<>>> >> <<>>> an "higher class" person should behave, look, speak, live, spell or <<>>> >> <<>>> whatever. <<>>> >> <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> Phil <<>>> >> <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:50:46 -0500, Pondmeister <<>>> >> <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>><<>>> <tristansaintjohnREM...@yahoo.com> wrote: <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> >Holy sh.t batman...what have you been drinking Darian? <<>>> >> Cigarettes a <<>>> >> <<>>> >sign of low class, as is porn or vulgar lang. like I said, Holy <<>>> >> sh.t <<>>> >> <<>>> >batman what the hell! Evidently there is not a TV in your house <<>>> >> then <<>>> >> <<>>> >either. Amazing there is a computer hooked to the internet. <<>>> >> <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> >On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:37:48 -0700, Darian <<>>> >> <darian.rac...@gmail.com> <<>>> >> <<>>> >wrote: <<>>> >> <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>On Jun 5, 9:22 am, Phil Stein <<>>> >> <PSt...@ArielSystems.spamsks.net> wrote: <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:02:50 -0700, Darian <<>>> >> <darian.rac...@gmail.com><<>>> ><<>>> wrote: <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >On Jun 5, 8:17 am, Phil Stein <<>>> >> <PSt...@ArielSystems.spamsks.net> wrote: <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:44:53 -0600, "K Cornelius" <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> <hsvrocketman_@_comcast.net> wrote: <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >I enjoy TRF and hope it is repaired soon. I like <<>>> >> reading actual posts <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >about -rocketry- , and no, TRF isn't the only one. <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >I don't see many -rocketry- posts here anymore--just a <<>>> >> bunch of whiners <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >complaining about nothing that has to do with the <<>>> >> promotion of rocketry. <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >To those, get out from behind your computer and launch a <<>>> >> few rockets. Heck, <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >you might just like it! <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >Or find another hobby to piss on. <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> >Kevin <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> Are you allowed to say piss on TRF? Someone might rat <<>>> >> you out for <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> being a potty mouth and then what are you going o do?- <<>>> >> Hide quoted text - <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >> - Show quoted text - <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >Phil, That is a rather vulgar (and low class) term, that <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >unfortunately, I hear used on the radio quite often, with <<>>> >> no thought <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >given to it. Nothing worthwhile can come from the use of <<>>> >> such <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >language. <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >Of course a lot of people think nothing of routinely <<>>> >> looking at <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> >pornography, giving no thought to the effect it has on <<>>> >> their mind. <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> I try not to judge people based on what I may perceive their <<>>> >> class to <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> be. Also, I don't think one's vocabulary is necessarily an <<>>> >> indication <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> of anything. <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> The Internet was made for porn. It must be true - there's a <<>>> >> song <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> about it. ;-)- Hide quoted text - <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>> - Show quoted text - <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>Phil, a great deal can be determined about an individual by <<>>> >> the <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>language they use. I am inclined to disassociate myself from <<>>> >> people <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>who routinely utter vulgarities. That to me is just an <<>>> >> indication that <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>they are not taking the time to think about what they are <<>>> >> saying. <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>A routine use of vulgarity is as indicative of "low class" as <<>>> >> is <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>smoking cigarettes. <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>> <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>It is my understanding that the primary use of the Internet is <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>accessing pornography sites. I suspect that most child <<>>> >> molesters get a <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>steady diet of pornography. Never let anyone convince you that <<>>> >> a diet <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>of pornography is harmless. IMHO, it is worse than the effect <<>>> >> of many <<>>> >> <<>>> ><<>>drugs. <<>>> >> <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> >------- <<>>> >> <<>>> >I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know!- Hide <<>>> >> quoted text - <<>>> >> <<>>> <<>>> >> <<>>> - Show quoted text - <<>>> >> <<>> <<>>> >> <<>>Phil, When I am around a vulgar individual, it does not in my mind <<>>> >> <<>>elevate me at all. It simply lowers my opinion of that individual. No <<>>> >> <<>>one forces an individual to speak in a vulgar manner. I am really a <<>>> >> <<>>bit perplexed why an individual chooses to do so. It's bad enough if <<>>> >> <<>>it is a man, it's reprehensible behavior for a woman. <<>>> <<>>> >> ------- <<>>> >> I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! <<>>> <<>>> > Who is Kathy Griffin? I've never heard of her. <<>>> <<>>> An attractive woman comic who uses vulgar language. You'd like her! <<>>> <<>>> <<>> <<>>Funnier than Dave Shepple? IMHO Y E S!!!!!!!! ------- I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! > > On Jun 5, 5:15 pm, Pondmeister <tristansaintjohnREM...@yahoo.com> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 135 lines] > > An attractive woman comic who uses vulgar language. You'd like her! Porn has actually been the single largest motivator of the commercial and .edu side of the internet. I know a guy who works for NetApp. His states that their largest customer is some porn web company in Scottsdale ... storage and speed ... gotta see all the MILFs and GILFs that we can! Lunar >Phil, When I am around a vulgar individual, it does not in my mind >elevate me at all. It simply lowers my opinion of that individual. No >one forces an individual to speak in a vulgar manner. I am really a >bit perplexed why an individual chooses to do so. It's bad enough if >it is a man, it's reprehensible behavior for a woman. You sound a bit sexist here. As far as vulgarity, consider it a regional dialect. It's nothing to get to excited about. If you don't understand the words, try urbandictionary.com > >Phil, When I am around a vulgar individual, it does not in my mind > >elevate me at all. It simply lowers my opinion of that individual. No [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > regional dialect. It's nothing to get to excited about. If you don't > understand the words, try urbandictionary.com Sexist is one of those Stalinist-type terms that mean little to me. If finding feminism appealing is sexist, so be it. I simply find the company of crude people unappealing. > A routine use of vulgarity is as indicative of "low class" as is > smoking cigarettes. ?!? SignaturePluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town. Rocketry Planet — http://www.rocketryplanet.com On Jun 5, 1:46 pm, "Darrell D. Mobley" <dmob...@rocketryplanet.com> wrote: > > A routine use of vulgarity is as indicative of "low class" as is > > smoking cigarettes. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Rocketry Planet -http://www.rocketryplanet.com Darrell, What is it about that statement that you find perplexing? I'll add tatoos into the mix. : ) > On Jun 5, 1:46 pm, "Darrell D. Mobley" <dmob...@rocketryplanet.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Darrell, What is it about that statement that you find perplexing? > I'll add tatoos into the mix. : ) And let me add touchy attitude to the mix :) Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 But are they (the undereducated) TRA certified, or stuck at NAR? Thats the question. Or does it not enter into Darians equation. <<>>Darian wrote: <<>>> On Jun 5, 1:46 pm, "Darrell D. Mobley" <dmob...@rocketryplanet.com> <<>>> wrote: <<>>>> Darian wrote: <<>>>>> A routine use of vulgarity is as indicative of "low class" as is <<>>>>> smoking cigarettes. <<>>>> ?!? <<>>>> <<>>>> -- <<>>>> Pluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town. <<>>>> <<>>>> Rocketry Planet -http://www.rocketryplanet.com <<>>> <<>>> Darrell, What is it about that statement that you find perplexing? <<>>> I'll add tatoos into the mix. : ) <<>>> <<>> <<>>And let me add touchy attitude to the mix :) <<>> <<>>Ted Novak <<>>TRA#5512 <<>>IEAS#75 ------- I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! >> On Jun 5, 1:46 pm, "Darrell D. Mobley" <dmob...@rocketryplanet.com> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 ...and bible thumping close minded morality... I know many very bright people that swear, smoke, drink and have tatoos, get over yourself. Self destructive behavior has very little to do with intelligence, in fact sometimes great intelligence causes self destructive behavior. >>> On Jun 5, 1:46 pm, "Darrell D. Mobley" <dmob...@rocketryplanet.com> >>> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > intelligence, in fact sometimes great intelligence causes self destructive > behavior. I only have two tats left and thankfully, their are not visible. According to Darian, I must be getting smarter :) You going to the North Branch launch on Sat??? Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 > I only have two tats left and thankfully, their are not visible. > According to Darian, I must be getting smarter :) > > You going to the North Branch launch on Sat??? Yep, I'll be there bright and early. > >> On Jun 5, 1:46 pm, "Darrell D. Mobley" <dmob...@rocketryplanet.com> > >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the fellows when they go to a house to meet an underage girl, who is really a decoy? What they conveniently (deliberately) fail to mention is these people are addicted to pornography. >> ...and bible thumping close minded morality... >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > really a decoy? What they conveniently (deliberately) fail to mention > is these people are addicted to pornography. Wait, I thought you didn't watch tv because you didn't have a tv. btw, didn't see anything in Pat's post about pornography. Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 > >> ...and bible thumping close minded morality... > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Ted, I do not own one because I think the benefits are out weighed by the negative factors. Actually, there are some good things on TV. I occasionally watch at at friend's houses. I brought up pornography just to get his opinion. There are so many people who think it is something harmless. I'm not on a crusade regarding this either, but I really do believe that a steady diet of pornography has an insidious effect on an individual's mind. >>> Wait, I thought you didn't watch tv because you didn't have a tv. >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > the negative factors. Actually, there are some good things on TV. I > occasionally watch at at friend's houses. Well to me the negative factors are actually the standard over the air stations; ABC, NBC, etc. The *good* stuff you'll have to subscribe to. The most obvious would be the Rocket Challenge episodes on the Discovery Channel. Well, that any any sporting event :) Also, keep in mind when it comes to tv, you have 100% control over what *you* would like to watch. > I brought up pornography just to get his opinion. There are so many > people who think it is something harmless. I'm not on a crusade > regarding this either, but I really do believe that a steady diet of > pornography has an insidious effect on an individual's mind. No argument here BUT that was a out-of-realm oddball question to ask considering he didn't mention anything remotely related to prOn. Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 > >>> Wait, I thought you didn't watch tv because you didn't have a tv. > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 It might be Ted, but remember that my original post was simply about not being able to access TRF. >Ted, I do not own one because I think the benefits are out weighed by >the negative factors. Actually, there are some good things on TV. I [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >regarding this either, but I really do believe that a steady diet of >pornography has an insidious effect on an individual's mind. How many times a day do you have to hit the porn sites before you are considered addicted? 8-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWEjvCRPrCo >I brought up pornography just to get his opinion. There are so many this newsfroup is named "rec.models.rockets". It's title and charter is a discussion of model rocketry. Model rocketry has little to do with pornography. As a reader of this group, and occasional participant, I ask that you take that discussion over to private email. >people who think it is something harmless. I'm not on a crusade >regarding this either, but I really do believe that a steady diet of >pornography has an insidious effect on an individual's mind. So, can you characterize the effects it has had on your mind? Glen Overby >>>> On Jun 5, 1:46 pm, "Darrell D. Mobley" <dmob...@rocketryplanet.com> >>>> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > really a decoy? What they conveniently (deliberately) fail to mention > is these people are addicted to pornography. I thought You didn't own or watch tv? > Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? > I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the > fellows when they go to a house to meet an underage girl, who is > really a decoy? What they conveniently (deliberately) fail to mention > is these people are addicted to pornography. I don't think a steady diet of anything is such a great idea, but I don't think pornography is so much a cause as it is a symptom of people that clearly have other more serious problems. In fact I see your comment about it being worse for women to be vulgar a much more frightening attitude than somebody that w.nks at his computer. The harm of pornography is much deeper than people than use it or the people that are in it. It is a cultural problem rooted in archaic attitudes about gender and class, which you are propagating. Pat > > Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? > > I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Pat Pat, you go ahead and continue to deceive yourself about the harmlessness of pornography. Your statements regarding my attitude regarding vulgar women and pornography's do not merit a comment. > Pat, you go ahead and continue to deceive yourself about the > harmlessness of pornography. Your statements regarding my attitude > regarding vulgar women and pornography's do not merit a comment. I understand, it's easier to blame the problems of the world on others than it is to take any personal responsibility. ...and I'm pretty sure I never said pornography was harmless, just that it isn't "The Cause" that certain over-simplifying narrow minded types (usually religious) tend to make it. > > Pat, you go ahead and continue to deceive yourself about the > > harmlessness of pornography. Your statements regarding my attitude [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > isn't "The Cause" that certain over-simplifying narrow minded types > (usually religious) tend to make it. Well Pat, as I stated previously, I think it has a much more insidious nature than most people think. I just do not like the casual attitude about it that seems to be quite prevalent. It's very damaging, psychologically on individuals. >> > Pat, you go ahead and continue to deceive yourself about the >> > harmlessness of pornography. Your statements regarding my attitude [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >about it that seems to be quite prevalent. It's very damaging, >psychologically on individuals. I think you should go to the beach and confiscate any clothing that you think is responsible for indecent exposure. You should also take pictures prior to doing so to prove you were saving people from being exposed to pornography. 8-) >>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? >>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > harmlessness of pornography. Your statements regarding my attitude > regarding vulgar women and pornography's do not merit a comment. Why do you think woman are vulgar? What is your definition of pornography? >> Pat, you go ahead and continue to deceive yourself about the >> harmlessness of pornography. Your statements regarding my attitude >> regarding vulgar women and pornography's do not merit a comment. > > Why do you think woman are vulgar? What is your definition of pornography? Sports Illustrated swim suit edition :) Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 >>> Pat, you go ahead and continue to deceive yourself about the >>> harmlessness of pornography. Your statements regarding my attitude [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 We're all going to hell. >>>> Pat, you go ahead and continue to deceive yourself about the >>>> harmlessness of pornography. Your statements regarding my attitude [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > We're all going to hell. On a rocket sled! > >>> Pat, you go ahead and continue to deceive yourself about the > >>> harmlessness of pornography. Your statements regarding my attitude [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > We're all going to hell. Pssst...look around. Is it getting warm in here? SignatureTweak >>>> Pat, you go ahead and continue to deceive yourself about the >>>> harmlessness of pornography. Your statements regarding my attitude [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >We're all going to hell. Oh well - we might as well enjoy the ride. > >>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? > >>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Dave, I think there is a great deal to be said for feminine behavior. The less a woman acts like a man, the more appealing I find her. The definition of pornography in the New College Edition of The American Heritage Dictionary is: Written, graphic, or other forms of communication intended to excite lascivious feelings. >>>>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? >>>>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > American Heritage Dictionary is: Written, graphic, or other forms of > communication intended to excite lascivious feelings. No, I asked what *Your* definition was. Is The sports Illustrated swimsuit edition, pornography? Are reruns of Baywatch, pornography? > >>>>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? > >>>>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Dave, What is wrong with the definition I stated? Do you make up definitions for words other than those stated in dictionaries. Do you have your own personal definition of pornography? >>>>>>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? >>>>>>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > definitions for words other than those stated in dictionaries. Do you > have your own personal definition of pornography? Does feminine behavior in Woman excite You more than woman who behave like Men? > >>>>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? > >>>>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Actually Dave, I'd consider looking at the SI swimsuit issue or watching Baywatch a waste of my time. >>>>>>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? >>>>>>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Actually Dave, I'd consider looking at the SI swimsuit issue or > watching Baywatch a waste of my time. But are they pornography? > >>>>>>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? > >>>>>>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > But are they pornography? Would this be a good time to bring up chickens? SignatureTweak >> >>>>>>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? >> >>>>>>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >> >Would this be a good time to bring up chickens? Are you saying Darian is into chickens? Wonder if there is a newsgroup for that. Don't confuse wondering with caring. >>>>>>>>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? >>>>>>>>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] >> > Would this be a good time to bring up chickens? Just don't choke that chicken! >>> Actually Dave, I'd consider looking at the SI swimsuit issue or >>> watching Baywatch a waste of my time. >>> >> But are they pornography? >> > Would this be a good time to bring up chickens? Any time is a good time to bring up chickens. Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 > >>> Actually Dave, I'd consider looking at the SI swimsuit issue or > >>> watching Baywatch a waste of my time. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 I've been saving the chickens for a special occasion, you know. This may be it. SignatureTweak >>>>> Actually Dave, I'd consider looking at the SI swimsuit issue or >>>>> watching Baywatch a waste of my time. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I've been saving the chickens for a special occasion, you know. This > may be it. And I do believe it is. And when this special occasion becomes even more special, I'll bring in my rabbits. Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 >>>>>> Actually Dave, I'd consider looking at the SI swimsuit issue or >>>>>> watching Baywatch a waste of my time. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 Rabbits! That's just perverted. >>>>> Would this be a good time to bring up chickens? >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Rabbits! That's just perverted. That they are. But they should be ok after I take Bob Barker's advice. Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 >>>>>> Actually Dave, I'd consider looking at the SI swimsuit issue or >>>>>> watching Baywatch a waste of my time. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >TRA#5512 >IEAS#75 Your chickens and rabbits won't have a chance with my viper - even if it only has one eye. ;-) >>> I've been saving the chickens for a special occasion, you know. This >>> may be it. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Your chickens and rabbits won't have a chance with my viper - even if > it only has one eye. ;-) Your such a perv :) Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 >>>> I've been saving the chickens for a special occasion, you know. This >>>> may be it. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >TRA#5512 >IEAS#75 Thanks ;-) > >>> I've been saving the chickens for a special occasion, you know. This > >>> may be it. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 Hmmm, I just want to know if its ok for a man to be penetrated by an Arabian horse? If say a man were to marry a horse and bring it to a NAR event, would the NAR see the horse as an equal partner and therefore give it rights to fly? I remember one afternoon in the heat of passion, using a BNC-55 (filled and painted nose cone) on my girl friend. After that, anytime she came with me to launch, she would get a devilish smile on her face when she saw the cone atop the rocket ready for launch! Oh well, back to pornographic horses, and the men that love them ... Lunar - Can't we just all get along? And where the hell is Jerry Irvine?! > Hmmm, I just want to know if its ok for a man to be penetrated by an > Arabian horse? If say a man were to marry a horse and bring it to a > NAR event, would the NAR see the horse as an equal partner and > therefore give it rights to fly? Give it a whirl and please report back on your findings. Time for you to broaden your horizons. > I remember one afternoon in the heat of passion, using a BNC-55 > (filled and painted nose cone) on my girl friend. After that, anytime > she came with me to launch, she would get a devilish smile on her face > when she saw the cone atop the rocket ready for launch! I don't believe it. I know your lying. Rosie, would never go for that. Heard she likes to eat at the Y. > Oh well, back to pornographic horses, and the men that love them ... It starts with chickens, then on to rabbits and now horses.... the mind wobbles. > Lunar - Can't we just all get along? And where the hell is Jerry > Irvine?! Who is this Jerry Irvine you speak of? Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 > It starts with chickens, then on to rabbits and now horses.... the mind > wobbles. It's the obvious p0rnographic overload. SignaturePluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town. Rocketry Planet — http://www.rocketryplanet.com > lunarlosREMOVE2EM...@juno.com wrote: > > Hmmm, I just want to know if its ok for a man to be penetrated by an [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Give it a whirl and please report back on your findings. Time for you > to broaden your horizons. Nah, the Boeing Aerospace Engineer who died from his mammal-too-mammal love experimentation died: http://tinyurl.com/2bsfz8 > > I remember one afternoon in the heat of passion, using a BNC-55 > > (filled and painted nose cone) on my girl friend. After that, anytime [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I don't believe it. I know your lying. Rosie, would never go for that. > Heard she likes to eat at the Y. Nope, I have penetrated women with nose cones, my own penis, dildos, beer bottles, and a hair brush. The beer bottle incident was the most interesting! > > Oh well, back to pornographic horses, and the men that love them ... > > It starts with chickens, then on to rabbits and now horses.... the mind > wobbles. No it REALLY starts with Beat Nicks, Hippies, Liberals ... our rights wobble and are taken away... > > Lunar - Can't we just all get along? And where the hell is Jerry > > Irvine?! > > Who is this Jerry Irvine you speak of? Jerry Irvine co-invented High Power Rocketry along with Al Gore. Didn't you KNOW this?! > Ted Novak > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 >> >>> I've been saving the chickens for a special occasion, you know. This >> >>> may be it. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >Lunar - Can't we just all get along? And where the hell is Jerry >Irvine?! The Pink Book probably covers this. Where are the Pink Book lawyers when you need one? > >>> I've been saving the chickens for a special occasion, you know. This > >>> may be it. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 I thought it was prev? SignatureTweak > Your chickens and rabbits won't have a chance with my viper - even if > it only has one eye. ;-) I heard it was more like a lizard. SignaturePluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town. Rocketry Planet — http://www.rocketryplanet.com > And I do believe it is. And when this special occasion becomes even > more special, I'll bring in my rabbits. Chocolate? SignaturePluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town. Rocketry Planet — http://www.rocketryplanet.com >> And I do believe it is. And when this special occasion becomes even >> more special, I'll bring in my rabbits. > > Chocolate? No Harvey here :) Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 >>>>>>>>> Pat, Do you think a steady diet of pornography is harmless? >>>>>>>>> I'm sure you've seen the Dateline(?) programs where they arrest the [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] >> > Would this be a good time to bring up chickens? Are the chickens naked? > Dave, I think there is a great deal to be said for feminine behavior. > The less a woman acts like a man, the more appealing I find her. But others, equally as entitled to their own opinion, may find women who act a bit less feminine appealing. Some men even like their women to take charge sexually. That doesn't make the women less female, nor does it make it pornographic nor does it make the person low class. It just makes them different and everyone should be allowed to be who they are without being labeled or judged or classified. SignaturePluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town. Rocketry Planet — http://www.rocketryplanet.com > > Dave, I think there is a great deal to be said for feminine behavior. > > The less a woman acts like a man, the more appealing I find her. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > makes them different and everyone should be allowed to be who they are > without being labeled or judged or classified. Shut up, you...you...you...you deviated prevert, you. SignatureTweak > Darrell, What is it about that statement that you find perplexing? > I'll add tatoos into the mix. : ) Where do you place narrow-mindedness? SignaturePluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town. Rocketry Planet — http://www.rocketryplanet.com >> I try not to judge people based on what I may perceive their class to >> be. Also, I don't think one's vocabulary is necessarily an indication >> of anything.>> >> A routine use of vulgarity is as indicative of "low class" as is > smoking cigarettes.<< You just said you don't try to judge people on what you percieve their class to be, but yet say that people who smoke are "low class". Sounds hypoctitical to me. I smoke, so please class me accordingly. Did I make a bad descision when I was young to start? Yes! It was dumb, but what's done is done. I will quit when I'm ready. My "low-class" a.s has gotten an Associate of Applied Science and Bacholeor of Science degrees. I get up at 5:30A everyday, go to work and pay taxes just like you do. My "low-class" a.s has a good-paying important technical carrer at a major Aerospace Prime contractor. My "low-class" a.s makes sure that your "high-class" a.s arrives safely at it's destination everytime you board a commercial aircraft. Who made you the judge of everyone? Since I have used the word "a.s" you now have an additional reason to call me "low-class" ;-) Joe Michel NAR 82797 L2 > drugs. > important technical carrer at a major Aerospace Prime contractor. My > "low-class" a.s makes sure that your "high-class" a.s arrives safely at > it's destination everytime you board a commercial aircraft. Who made I'm not concerned about your porn addiction, television watching, smoking, drinking, or cursing. However, improper use of apostrophes is another matter entirely... <G> David Erbas-White >> important technical carrer at a major Aerospace Prime contractor. My >> "low-class" a.s makes sure that your "high-class" a.s arrives safely at [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > David Erbas-White LOL! >>> I try not to judge people based on what I may perceive their class to >>> be. Also, I don't think one's vocabulary is necessarily an indication [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > Joe Michel > NAR 82797 L2 My "low class" a.s retired in my mid 40's.. And part of the reason I got to where I did is that I didn't judge people based on a childish standard, such as the length of their hair, if they smoke, or if they have a pierced nose! "Class" has nothing to do with these type of things. Class can best be judged on the "honor" of the individual. Does Scooter Libby have "class" as he was a resource for the pres? I think not, as he's now got a 30 month term in the poky! >>>> I try not to judge people based on what I may perceive their class to >>>> be. Also, I don't think one's vocabulary is necessarily an indication [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > as he was a resource for the pres? I think not, as he's now got a 30 > month term in the poky! Well said, Woody! Joe Michel NAR 82797 L2 > >> I try not to judge people based on what I may perceive their class to > >> be. Also, I don't think one's vocabulary is necessarily an indication [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Joe, You need to inhale a little more deeply on those cancer sticks. You must not be getting the full benefit of the calming effect of that nicotine. Perhaps you think that smoking is glamorous. Occasionally I come in contact with young, attractive women. It's really disappointing to see them light up a cigarette. > Occasionally I come in contact with young, attractive women. Tell me - do these young, attractive women sense your power, and seek your life essence? Do they try to sap and impurify all of your precious bodily fluids? Is that why you deny them your essence? >> Occasionally I come in contact with young, attractive women. > > Tell me - do these young, attractive women sense your power, and > seek your life essence? Do they try to sap and impurify all of your > precious bodily fluids? Is that why you deny them your essence? I think you're some kind of deviated prevert. SignatureSteve Humphrey (replace "spambait" with "merlinus" to respond directly to me) > >> Occasionally I come in contact with young, attractive women. > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I think you're some kind of deviated prevert. Ok, intentional or not that's funny. SignatureTweak > I think you're some kind of deviated prevert. ;-) For the benefit of the confused... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekw3XVq1uHs and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUAK7t3Lf8s >> Occasionally I come in contact with young, attractive women. > > Tell me - do these young, attractive women sense your power, and > seek your life essence? Do they try to sap and impurify all of your > precious bodily fluids? Is that why you deny them your essence? Nah, he never gets the chance. They sense his narrow-mindedness and run like hell! SignaturePluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town. Rocketry Planet — http://www.rocketryplanet.com I think he started an invasion of preverts. and Darian if you keep this up you'll have to answer to the Coca Cola company. >> >> I try not to judge people based on what I may perceive their class to >> >> be. Also, I don't think one's vocabulary is necessarily an indication [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > contact with young, attractive women. It's really disappointing to see > them light up a cigarette. >My "low-class" a.s makes sure > that your "high-class" a.s arrives safely at it's destination everytime you > board a commercial aircraft. And those of us that fly on a regular basis greatly appreciate your efforts! ; ) Keep up the good work! Randy www.vernarockets.com > Phil, a great deal can be determined about an individual by the > language they use. I am inclined to disassociate myself from people [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > of pornography is harmless. IMHO, it is worse than the effect of many > drugs. Check it out guys, we have Lord Chesterfield in our midst. All bow. SignatureTweak > Check it out guys, we have Lord Chesterfield in our midst. All bow. ROFLMAO! ;-) SignaturePluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town. Rocketry Planet — http://www.rocketryplanet.com >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:44:53 -0600, "K Cornelius" >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > given to it. Nothing worthwhile can come from the use of such > language. What vulgarity? Are you referring to piss, rat and potty mouth? Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75 >On Jun 4, 9:41 am, "goo...@jadebox.com" <goo...@jadebox.com> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Roger, the same thing happened to me. There do not appear to be any >post made today. Maybe everyone is on "Super Secret Moderation." >>On Jun 4, 9:41 am, "goo...@jadebox.com" <goo...@jadebox.com> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Maybe everyone is on "Super Secret Moderation." Dean Wormer is doing rocket forums? What a pinhead. Chuck > On Jun 4, 9:41 am, "goo...@jadebox.com" <goo...@jadebox.com> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Roger, the same thing happened to me. There do not appear to be any > post made today. It's called Nazi-Moderation. Your post is deleted at the same time you click the 'post' button! It saves the mods time doing it that way. ;-) Joe Michel NAR 82797 L2 I bet Jerry Irvine had something to do with it! <<>>On Jun 4, 9:02 am, Darian <darian.rac...@gmail.com> wrote: <<>>> Anybody else have problems at this site since yesterday? <<>> <<>>I tried to reply to a post and it told me that I couldn't post more <<>>than once every 30 seconds. It was my first post of the day. <<>> <<>>-- Roger ------- I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! On Jun 4, 12:36 pm, Pondmeister <tristansaintjohnREM...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I bet Jerry Irvine had something to do with it! > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > ------- > I forgot more about ponds and koi than I'll ever know! I suspect al Qaeda may be involved! I emailed tech support for TRF.....they said the forum software is malfunctioning and they are working on it. Tom C. >I emailed tech support for TRF.....they said the forum software is > malfunctioning and they are working on it. Maybe they just need to adjust the knobs. > >I emailed tech support for TRF.....they said the forum software is > > malfunctioning and they are working on it. > > Maybe they just need to adjust the knobs. Banging the side of your computer with your fist sometimes helps. : ) >Maybe they just need to adjust the knobs. ooh! good one! I'm sure you'd still get banned for using 'knob' :) >I emailed tech support for TRF.....they said the forum software is >malfunctioning and they are working on it. "Copyright ©2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited." Perhaps an upgrade is in order. SignatureDarren J Longhorn http://www.geocities.com/darrenlonghorn/ NSRG #005 http://www.northstarrocketry.org.uk/ /UKRA #1094 /L2 /RSO http://www.ukra.org.uk/ > Anybody else have problems at this site since yesterday? There's been problems with TRF alot longer than since yesterday. I hope it never comes back up! Joe Michel NAR 82797 L2 |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2012 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.