While reading a blog I ran across an item concerning the Scooter Libby
case. It seams that a number of heavyweights want to file in support of
Scooter. Judge Walton's response is interesting...
"It is an impressive show of public service when twelve prominent and
distinguished current and former law professors of well-respected
schools are able to amass their collective wisdom in the course of only
several days to provide their legal expertise to the Court on behalf of
a criminal defendant. The Court trusts that this is a reflection of
these eminent academics' willingness in the future to step to the plate
and provide like assistance in cases involving any of the numerous
litigants, both in this Court and throughout the courts of our nation,
who lack the financial means to fully and properly articulate the merits
of their legal positions even in instances where failure to do so could
result in monetary penalties, incarceration, or worse. The Court will
certainly not hesitate to call for such assistance from these
luminaries, as necessary in the interests of justice and equity,
whenever similar questions arise in the cases that come before it."
I found this, along with comments of course, at:
http://www.davidcorn.com/
I am not sure what this says about Judge Walton's approach to the
NAR/TRA lawsuit.

Signature
David W. Schultz
http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz
------
"What you don't know should be a goad to make you try and find out, not
an excuse to bliss out and sit drooling into your filet mignon." -- PZ Myers
Phil Stein - 10 Jun 2007 22:17 GMT
>While reading a blog I ran across an item concerning the Scooter Libby
>case. It seams that a number of heavyweights want to file in support of
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>I am not sure what this says about Judge Walton's approach to the
>NAR/TRA lawsuit.
I have no issue with his attitude in this statement.
Phil
stealthboogie - 12 Jun 2007 05:38 GMT
> I am not sure what this says about Judge Walton's approach to the
> NAR/TRA lawsuit.
It just reinforces my position I've stated before about Reggie...
he's going to do what he wants to do irregardless of the facts.
What I'm curious about is whether Reggie would have handled the trial
the same had it been Colin Powell or Condie Rice instead of Scooter?
IMO his comments smack of the typical black liberal mindset... which
is surprising given the fact that he worked for Bush senior and was
nominated to the federal bench by George W. Maybe his comments bode
well for the TRA/NAR suit, as Reggie seems to have a disdain for power
in Washington?. Maybe TRA & NAR should claim poverty and Reggie will
"call for such assistance from these luminaries." ;)
Doug
Kurt - 12 Jun 2007 09:57 GMT
>> I am not sure what this says about Judge Walton's approach to the
>> NAR/TRA lawsuit.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Doug
Yeah,
If this means Judge Walton loathes authorities when they have their
facts wrong, the suit might stand a chance. If he can't see through the
the ATF's "smoke and mirrors" it means trouble in River City. I guess
we have to wait till July to see?
Kurt