Saturn V Now a "Weapon"
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Cagey - 01 Aug 2007 00:23 GMT Just saw a posting on slashdot.org concerning the latest government crackdown. It seems that posters, data sheets, and blueprints, of the Saturn V have been ordered to be shredded at the Kennedy Space Center. Someone has decided that the Saturn V's technology falls under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Apparently that person is determined to destroy all data about the Saturn V that is in private hands, including the information on at least one website. Wonder what's next? Forced shutdown of Estes?
See article at:
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/30/0215204 _________________ Kenneth G. Holloway NAR #78336, L-II
Aaron - 01 Aug 2007 04:25 GMT > Just saw a posting on slashdot.org concerning the latest government > crackdown. It seems that posters, data sheets, and blueprints, of the [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Kenneth G. Holloway > NAR #78336, L-II Have you also noticed that that one website sells CDs with the Saturn V information? Have you read the comments in the slashdot article that point out that people from NASA have been contacted and no such thing has been ordered or done? This was just a ploy to sell his CDs.
The Saturn V would be a very bad choice for an ICBM as it is VERY tall compared to most ICBMs(hard to hide) and has a prolonged prep time (loading all that LH2 and LOX takes quite a bit of time) and is just plain too massive. Realistically, you wouldn't need a payload because a fully loaded Saturn V coming in ballistic to a location would result in nearly the same damage as if a small nuclear device was detonated.
I call BS on this one.
-Aaron
Alan Jones - 01 Aug 2007 04:32 GMT >Just saw a posting on slashdot.org concerning the latest government >crackdown. It seems that posters, data sheets, and blueprints, of the [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >Kenneth G. Holloway >NAR #78336, L-II Somebody has been watching too much Star Trek.
David Schultz - 01 Aug 2007 04:32 GMT > Just saw a posting on slashdot.org concerning the latest government > crackdown. It seems that posters, data sheets, and blueprints, of the [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Kenneth G. Holloway > NAR #78336, L-II The Saturn V clearly qualifies for control under ITAR as a launch vehicle because its payload and range greatly exceed the thresholds at 22 CFR 121.16. But because the technical data has seen such wide release I believe that it is exempt because it is now public domain as defined at 22 CFR 120.11
The person reportedly doing this is a contractor employed by NASA but enforcement of ITAR is the job of the State Department. (Condi Rice and company) This NASA employee has absolutely no authority outside of NASA.
 Signature David W. Schultz http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz ------ "What you don't know should be a goad to make you try and find out, not an excuse to bliss out and sit drooling into your filet mignon." -- PZ Myers
Chris Eilbeck - 01 Aug 2007 08:13 GMT > Just saw a posting on slashdot.org concerning the latest government > crackdown. It seems that posters, data sheets, and blueprints, of the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > private hands, including the information on at least one website. > Wonder what's next? Forced shutdown of Estes? What, in the land of the free? Surely not!
Chris
 Signature Chris Eilbeck MARS Flight Crew http://www.mars.org.uk/ UKRA #1108 Level 2 UYB Tripoli UK Member #9527 LSMR
BradGuth - 01 Aug 2007 18:46 GMT > Just saw a posting on slashdot.org concerning the latest government > crackdown. It seems that posters, data sheets, and blueprints, of the [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Kenneth G. Holloway > NAR #78336, L-II At a near 30% inert GLOW, and having a mere 60:1 ratio of rocket per payload is why that hocus-pocus rocket is getting ITAR rated.
Rather physics odd, in that most recently it's taking the best of the very least inert rocket deployment on behalf of accomplishing GSO, a good 80:1 ratio. Makes the rest of us village idiots wonder how that big old Saturn V accomplished their entire moon thing, with fuel and payloads to spare.
Apparently those Third Reich collaborating Jews were a whole lot smarter than we'd thought. Apparently our NASA/Apollo smoke and mirrors are equally ITAR rated.
Just think what Hitler could have accomplishjed if his smart Jewish wizards as partners in crimes against humanity had found enough spare energy for the process of creating additional h2o2? - Brad Guth
Tweak - 01 Aug 2007 19:05 GMT > > Just saw a posting on slashdot.org concerning the latest government > > crackdown. It seems that posters, data sheets, and blueprints, of the [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > At a near 30% inert GLOW, and having a mere 60:1 ratio of rocket per <snip>
> - Brad Guth Damnit, now I got some Guth on me. Anybody got a towel? Ick.
 Signature Tweak
Eekamouse - 01 Aug 2007 19:23 GMT > Damnit, now I got some Guth on me. Anybody got a towel? Ick. Try some "Goof-Off". Or maybe that's "Guth-Off".
BradGuth - 02 Aug 2007 18:56 GMT > > Damnit, now I got someGuthon me. Anybody got a towel? Ick. > > Try some "Goof-Off". Or maybe that's "Guth-Off". In other words, those pesky regular laws of physics and of the best available science that's replicated, as such simply does not apply to anything NASA/Apollo. - Brad Guth
Tweak - 02 Aug 2007 19:29 GMT > > > Damnit, now I got someGuthon me. Anybody got a towel? Ick. > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > anything NASA/Apollo. > - Brad Guth Blah blah blah, whatever.
Tell me, do you own a rat?
 Signature Tweak
Eekamouse - 02 Aug 2007 20:49 GMT >> > Damnit, now I got some Guth on me. Anybody got a towel? Ick. >> >> Try some "Goof-Off". Or maybe that's "Guth-Off". > > In other words, I'm a stark-raving moonbat nutcase! > - Brad Guth For once, you've said something valid.
TBerk - 03 Aug 2007 21:31 GMT > > "Tweak" <new...@keslers.removethistosend.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > anything NASA/Apollo. > - Brad Guth - You don't explain yourself well.
- You spout what comes across as racist whining.
- It all sounds like FUD; Fear, Uncertainty, & Doubt from you.
Do you yourself _think_ you are on the side of the Angels sir?
TBerk
BradGuth - 04 Aug 2007 15:19 GMT > > > "Tweak" <new...@keslers.removethistosend.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > TBerk Unlike yourself, I simply do the best that I can. Obviously that's not good enough for the likes of yourself.
Obviously you alone can best explain those laws of fly-by-rocket physics. Please feel free as to explaining how Saturn V managed to deploy nearly 50 tonnes so quickly into orbiting our moon (with fuel and payload to spare). - Brad Guth
Dave Grayvis - 06 Aug 2007 00:39 GMT >>> Just saw a posting on slashdot.org concerning the latest government >>> crackdown. It seems that posters, data sheets, and blueprints, of the [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >> > Damnit, now I got some Guth on me. Anybody got a towel? Ick. Try wiping it off with a piece of irvine.
W. E. Fred Wallace - 06 Aug 2007 01:09 GMT > >>> Just saw a posting on slashdot.org concerning the latest government > >>> crackdown. It seems that posters, data sheets, and blueprints, of the [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Try wiping it off with a piece of irvine. Speaking of a$$ wipe, have you any information on where gods gift to rocketry is? (:-)
Dave Grayvis - 06 Aug 2007 01:14 GMT >>>>> Just saw a posting on slashdot.org concerning the latest government >>>>> crackdown. It seems that posters, data sheets, and blueprints, of the [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > Speaking of a$$ wipe, have you any information on where gods gift to > rocketry is? (:-) I've heard some things.
Darrell D. Mobley - 06 Aug 2007 03:01 GMT > Speaking of a$$ wipe, have you any information on where gods gift to > rocketry is? (:-) (Darrell is waving his hand...)
I do! I do! :-\
 Signature Pluto downgraded? Get lost, Pluto. There's a new planet in town.
Rocketry Planet — http://www.rocketryplanet.com
BradGuth - 07 Aug 2007 20:38 GMT Hmmmmm, still no such fly-by-rocket physics that'll add up to what Saturn V supposedly accomplished.
at nearly 30% inert GLOW
60:1 ratio of rocket per payload
Quickly getting such tonnage to the moon with payload and fuel to spare ?????
Venus and a few other worthy items within the DR of their Kodak film, hiding better than Usama bin Laden and those Muslim WMD. - Brad Guth
tdstr - 07 Aug 2007 20:49 GMT > Hmmmmm, still no such fly-by-rocket physics that'll add up to what > Saturn V supposedly accomplished. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > hiding better than Usama bin Laden and those Muslim WMD. > - Brad Guth You've guth'd up rmr enough. Your stench isn't helping. Go away.
Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75
BradGuth - 07 Aug 2007 23:22 GMT > > Hmmmmm, still no such fly-by-rocket physics that'll add up to what > > Saturn V supposedly accomplished. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 In other words, since I'm 100% right as rain about our Saturn V having been insufficient for the daunting task of getting nearly 50 tonnes so quickly into orbiting our moon, in so much as all that you silly Yiddish rusemasters (aka Third Reich wizards) can manage is to cough up "Go away". - Brad Guth
moonglow - 08 Aug 2007 04:09 GMT >> You've guth'd up rmr enough. Your stench isn't helping. Go away. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Yiddish rusemasters (aka Third Reich wizards) can manage is to cough > up "Go away". No, it's not that you *think* your 100% right. It's because this is rec.models.rockets. Not alt.retardedkookboi.moonie.
Now, get the hell out of here moonkookboi.
Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75
Tweak - 08 Aug 2007 13:55 GMT > >> You've guth'd up rmr enough. Your stench isn't helping. Go away. > >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 Where is A. Paul Ling when you need him?
 Signature Tweak
Phil Stein - 08 Aug 2007 15:04 GMT >> >> You've guth'd up rmr enough. Your stench isn't helping. Go away. >> >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >> >Where is A. Paul Ling when you need him? In my kill filter. 8-)
tdstr - 08 Aug 2007 16:18 GMT >> No, it's not that you *think* your 100% right. It's because this is >> rec.models.rockets. Not alt.retardedkookboi.moonie. >> >> Now, get the hell out of here moonkookboi. >> > Where is A. Paul Ling when you need him? I'm guessing at alt.retardedkookboi.moonie
Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75
W. E. Fred Wallace - 08 Aug 2007 21:49 GMT > Where is A. Paul Ling when you need him? > -- > Tweak That's sick!! (:-)
Dave Grayvis - 09 Aug 2007 05:41 GMT >>>> You've guth'd up rmr enough. Your stench isn't helping. Go away. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >> > Where is A. Paul Ling when you need him? Are You suggesting a "Alien vs Predator" type of scenario?
moonglow - 09 Aug 2007 05:52 GMT >>>>> You've guth'd up rmr enough. Your stench isn't helping. Go away. >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Are You suggesting a "Alien vs Predator" type of scenario? I'm thinking tag team wrastlin'. Roidboi and The Guth full-Moon on one team and yours truly and The Amazing Super Dave Gravis on the the good guys team. Since we're the good guys we get a suitable top-heavy manager babe :)
Yah up fer it Dave?
Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75
Dave Grayvis - 09 Aug 2007 22:48 GMT >>>>>> You've guth'd up rmr enough. Your stench isn't helping. Go away. >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 Who could give up a chance to groin kick either one of those goofballs? I'm in.
Eekamouse - 09 Aug 2007 12:03 GMT >> Where is A. Paul Ling when you need him? > > Are You suggesting a "Alien vs Predator" type of scenario? Wouldn't "Freddy vs Jason" be more apropos?
Tweak - 09 Aug 2007 14:31 GMT > >> Where is A. Paul Ling when you need him? > > > > Are You suggesting a "Alien vs Predator" type of scenario? > > Wouldn't "Freddy vs Jason" be more apropos? I'm working on a bombshell, and here it is:
A. Paul Ling and Guth are actually...the same person! That's right, you heard it here first. Notice how they never interact? That would be blatant sock puppetry straight from the Irvine school, and a dead giveaway.
 Signature Tweak
Phil Stein - 09 Aug 2007 16:46 GMT >> >> Where is A. Paul Ling when you need him? >> > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >blatant sock puppetry straight from the Irvine school, and a dead >giveaway. Maybe they are the same person but each one is in a different dimension.
Phil
Dave Grayvis - 09 Aug 2007 22:53 GMT >>> Where is A. Paul Ling when you need him? >> Are You suggesting a "Alien vs Predator" type of scenario? > > Wouldn't "Freddy vs Jason" be more apropos? Acid spraying and laser cannons vs. chainsaws and knives, Who could choose?
BradGuth - 16 Aug 2007 03:28 GMT > >> You've guth'd up rmr enough. Your stench isn't helping. Go away. > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 So lo and behold, I'm 100% right, and per usual those Yiddish MIB are not about to let you folks share the whole truth and nothing but the truth. - Brad Guth
moonglow - 16 Aug 2007 03:56 GMT moontardboi wrote:
>> Now, get the hell out of here moonkookboi. >> > So lo and behold, I'm 100% right, and per usual those Yiddish MIB are > not about to let you folks share the whole truth and nothing but the > truth. Lo and behold, this is rec.models.rockets. The subject matter that is discussed here is pertaining to the hobby of sport rocketry on a whole. Well that and glue.
Now, since you do not desire to comment on the subject matter of sport rocketry(or glue for that matter) why don't you scamper on out of here and go back to your moonkooktardboi activities in a more suitable newsgroup of your liking.
I hear there is a raging discussion of nuclear meteorites from the moon(get it Brad, moon) and their mothers over in alt.midgetamputeepornfortards.moon.
You are needed somewhere..... just not here.
Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75
BradGuth - 24 Aug 2007 21:07 GMT > moontardboi wrote: > >> Now, get the hell out of here moonkookboi. [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 No, the subject here is that of Saturn V Now a "Weapon", whereas impressive LEO applications are in fact doable and rather the most reliable tonnage deployments to date.
Wow! once again and again, the Saturn V as utilized on behalf of accomplishing our NASA/Apollo fiasco is every bit as bogus as any 3 dollar bill, as otherwise you'd have tossed your best fly-by-rocket physics of hard numbers that can be easily replicated by so many others, as offering so much proof-positive in my face, but then you folks can't or would not dare without the risk of spilling those mutually perpetrated cold-war beans.
Perhaps by now, China should have a new and improved Saturn V of their very own, with nearly half the inert GLOW to deal with. How hard could that be? - Brad Guth
just jerry - 24 Aug 2007 22:06 GMT Yea and Ted Novaks wife uses his Estes SAT 5 as a dildo....Guess its true what Freddie BOi says, that Ted is a micro dick.
 Signature Via: http://www.jumlers.com/rec.models.rockets/
§ - 24 Aug 2007 22:16 GMT > Yea and Ted Novaks wife uses his Estes SAT 5 as a dildo....Guess its > true what Freddie BOi says, that Ted is a micro dick. Your sis(my wife) says hi. She wants to know how mom is doing.
Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75
Just Jerry - 24 Aug 2007 22:28 GMT On Aug 24, 4:16 pm, ? <td...@foadspammer.com> wrote:
> > Yea and Ted Novaks wife uses his Estes SAT 5 as a dildo....Guess its > > true what Freddie BOi says, that Ted is a micro dick. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > TRA#5512 > IEAS#75 bwaaaaaaaaaaa hahahahaha probably better than Freddies Mom is doing! Oh and you must have me confused with someone else as I have no sisters. DUH!
§ - 24 Aug 2007 22:53 GMT >>> Yea and Ted Novaks wife uses his Estes SAT 5 as a dildo....Guess its >>> true what Freddie BOi says, that Ted is a micro dick. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Oh and you must have me confused with someone else as I have no > sisters. DUH! Oh, almost forgot. She would also like to know if you found a job yet.
Ted Novak TRA#5512 IEAS#75
|
|
|