What's your timeframe (I won't be able to look through my stash for a
few weeks, I'm away)? I MAY have a built one that works well (don't
remember if I still have it). And where are you located?
David Erbas-White
> [As quiet as this newsgroup is, I'll try this anyway.]
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Thanks.
Captain - 22 Apr 2009 18:08 GMT
> What's your timeframe (I won't be able to look through my stash for a
> few weeks, I'm away)? I MAY have a built one that works well (don't
> remember if I still have it). And where are you located?
>
> David Erbas-White
I'm in no particular hurry, and I'm in west Michigan. Thanks for
looking - when you have time.
> [As quiet as this newsgroup is, I'll try this anyway.]
>
> I'm looking for someone who has an out-of-production Estes Skywinder
> that they would be willing to part with. It's fine if it's new or
> used, assembed or not. (Just that, if it's been assembled and flown,
> I'd like it to be in halfway decent shape.)
Why not just scratchbuild one? The plans are bound to be available
somewhere online.
Chris

Signature
Chris Eilbeck
MARS Flight Crew http://www.mars.org.uk/
UKRA #1108 Level 2 UYB
Tripoli UK Member #9527 LSMR
shreadvector - 22 Apr 2009 13:25 GMT
> > [As quiet as this newsgroup is, I'll try this anyway.]
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> UKRA #1108 Level 2 UYB
> Tripoli UK Member #9527 LSMR
Not really possible as the model used a large number of plastic parts
with unique shapes. The blades, the rotor hub, the fin can, the fins,
the nose cone, etc.
And the first production run did not work properly so they had to
double the nose weight to get it to come down nose first every time.
The added weight made it a real clunker during boost - ESPECIALLY when
the "Poopy Clay" nozzle motors were being sold and the C5-3 was
discontinued.
With a good nozzled C6-3 and a 4 foot long steel launch rod it is not
too bad.
Captain - 22 Apr 2009 18:36 GMT
> With a good nozzled C6-3 and a 4 foot long steel launch rod it is not
> too bad.
After the first few successful launches of my first Skywinder, I
wanted to step things up a bit and launch it on D power. I used an
Aerotech 18mm reload - the flight was great and the altitude awesome,
but the ejection charge literally blew the nosecone right off of it.
It tumbled rather than helicoptered. I found both parts, epoxied the
cone back on and tried again with half the black powder in the
ejection well. It blew the cone off again. I never found the cone,
and the front edge of the body tube was basically shot.
Bought another kit, used epoxy for the nose cone retainer again, and
tried a third time. I swear I used even less black powder, but it
blew the cone off again. I don't know how my fourth attempt went - I
lost track of it in the sky and never found it - or my 18mm reload
hardware. :(
So, my goal of a successful D-powered Skywinder launch was never
realized. Since my interest in rocketry has been recently piqued
again, I'm thinking of possibly attempting this again. How sad that
this kit is OOP and there is no suitable replacement. (Does anyone
know how long ago it went OOP?) I'd love to find folks that have
these and are willing to part with them.
shreadvector - 22 Apr 2009 20:36 GMT
> > With a good nozzled C6-3 and a 4 foot long steel launch rod it is not
> > too bad.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> know how long ago it went OOP?) I'd love to find folks that have
> these and are willing to part with them.
Better kits:
http://www.apogeerockets.com/Heli_Roc_Kit.asp
http://www.apogeerockets.com/texas_twister.asp
Captain - 22 Apr 2009 21:52 GMT
> Better kits:
> http://www.apogeerockets.com/Heli_Roc_Kit.asp
> http://www.apogeerockets.com/texas_twister.asp
Definitely cool - thanks!
§ - 23 Apr 2009 16:11 GMT
>> With a good nozzled C6-3 and a 4 foot long steel launch rod it is not
>> too bad.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> know how long ago it went OOP?) I'd love to find folks that have
> these and are willing to part with them.
I've always loved the Gyroc. Even made a few 'trirocs' but those
required significant nose weight to be stable.
One time I made a BT50 Triroc that I used to fly on Estes D. It flew
good but it would make a sizable audible pop upon ejection. Good thing
too considering I'd lose site of it every time I flew it.
Ted Novak
TRA#5512
Brian Elfert - 22 Apr 2009 14:12 GMT
>> [As quiet as this newsgroup is, I'll try this anyway.]
>>
>> I'm looking for someone who has an out-of-production Estes Skywinder
>> that they would be willing to part with. It's fine if it's new or
>> used, assembed or not. (Just that, if it's been assembled and flown,
>> I'd like it to be in halfway decent shape.)
>Why not just scratchbuild one? The plans are bound to be available
>somewhere online.
A skywinder would be a fairly difficult scratchbuild as it has rotors and
a special molded piece that the rotors pivot on.
I know someone who built and flew a very upscale version of the skywinder,
but it was a lot of work to machine the part where the rotors attach.
Chris Eilbeck - 22 Apr 2009 17:43 GMT
>>> [As quiet as this newsgroup is, I'll try this anyway.]
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> skywinder, but it was a lot of work to machine the part where the
> rotors attach.
A HPR one would be a different proposition but having looked at the
plans, I'm pretty sure I could scratch one of those given a craft
knife, some solvent and some plasticard in a few evenings.
Chris

Signature
Chris Eilbeck
MARS Flight Crew http://www.mars.org.uk/
UKRA #1108 Level 2 UYB
Tripoli UK Member #9527 LSMR
Captain - 22 Apr 2009 21:31 GMT
> A HPR one would be a different proposition but having looked at the
> plans, I'm pretty sure I could scratch one of those given a craft
> knife, some solvent and some plasticard in a few evenings.
Oh, just how high power are you talking? I'm not HP certified yet -
another potential goal.
I've done my own scratch builds using existing & available parts,
fabricating little more than my own fins (and sometimes incorporating
"non-rocketry" items in unique ways :), but never anything as
ambitious as you're talking. Let me know if you could seriously
consider taking this on.
Thanks.
Chris Eilbeck - 22 Apr 2009 21:40 GMT
>> A HPR one would be a different proposition but having looked at the
>> plans, I'm pretty sure I could scratch one of those given a craft
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> anything as ambitious as you're talking. Let me know if you could
> seriously consider taking this on.
A HPR one would need fibreglass sheet and epoxy to take the potential
recovery loads. A model one would be fine with plasticard, balsa
etc. and some short pieces of steel rod as the pivots. All the
sliding bits could be made from balsa and cardboard tube.
Chris

Signature
Chris Eilbeck
MARS Flight Crew http://www.mars.org.uk/
UKRA #1108 Level 2 UYB
Tripoli UK Member #9527 LSMR
Captain - 22 Apr 2009 21:57 GMT
> A HPR one would need fibreglass sheet and epoxy to take the potential
> recovery loads. A model one would be fine with plasticard, balsa
> etc. and some short pieces of steel rod as the pivots. All the
> sliding bits could be made from balsa and cardboard tube.
Forgive the stupid question, but what is plasticard? If I went into a
hobby shop and asked, would they know what I was talking about, or
would they look at me strange? :)
(Can you tell that my DIY experience is limited? :)
Chris Eilbeck - 22 Apr 2009 22:01 GMT
>> A HPR one would need fibreglass sheet and epoxy to take the potential
>> recovery loads. A model one would be fine with plasticard, balsa
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> (Can you tell that my DIY experience is limited? :)
I don't know what you call it over there but it's solid styrene sheet
and you bond it together using a solvent. It's very easy to cut
complex shapes and bond them together, and it's quite strong enough to
make simple mechanisms like this.
http://www.stationroadbaseboards.co.uk/z_faq-plasticard.htm
Chris

Signature
Chris Eilbeck
MARS Flight Crew http://www.mars.org.uk/
UKRA #1108 Level 2 UYB
Tripoli UK Member #9527 LSMR
Damian Burrin - 23 Apr 2009 18:00 GMT
>A HPR one would need fibreglass sheet and epoxy to >take the potential
>recovery loads
Chris,
Isn't it about time you made a HPR Srcoton. That was so cool!!
http://www.rocketreviews.com/reviews/all/scroton.shtml
Damian

Signature
Damian Burrin
UKRA 1159 Level 2 RSO
http://www.ukrocketry.com
http://www.larf-rocketry.co.uk
LARF - Putting the amateur back in rocketry!!
Chris Eilbeck - 23 Apr 2009 18:14 GMT
>>A HPR one would need fibreglass sheet and epoxy to >take the potential
>>recovery loads
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.rocketreviews.com/reviews/all/scroton.shtml
I just have issues with cutting three identical wing profiles for
that. A balsa/glass one for long-burn D motors would be really great
too.
Chris

Signature
Chris Eilbeck
MARS Flight Crew http://www.mars.org.uk/
UKRA #1108 Level 2 UYB
Tripoli UK Member #9527 LSMR