> I'm still playing with the basics of rocket-assisted gliders. Here's
> a question: which is better (or easier) - boost gliders or rocket
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Anyone else enjoy the delights and frustrations of gliders?

Signature
As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should
be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours;
and this we should do freely and generously. (Benjamin Franklin)
> "lektric....@gmail.com" <lektric....@gmail.com> writes:
> > I'm still playing with the basics of rocket-assisted gliders. Here's
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> I don't think I'd bother with building, then strengthening, then adding
> boost: just build it the way you want to fly it.
One of the sayings of the local club (usually said in a very loud
voice) is "You just reached the speed of balsa" (or paper and plastic,
or ...). I'd like to *avoid* this particular for of (gentle)
ridicule. The wings are big, long, draggy cantilevers. One thing
I've done to increase strength is to glue craft paper strips to
reinforce the glue joints. Might try this w/Tyvek (plastic paper), if
yellow glue will bond it. That stuff seems almost impossible to tear!
> One of my back-burner ideas is a canard rocket glider.
I'd like to see the plans for that! One of the gentlemen in the local
club makes big "delta-wing" rocket gliders that have a pop-up canard
on the engine tube. He calls his design the "BORG" (Big Old Rocket
Glider). With a 29mm engine, they are a sight. I can email you a
short video if you want to see one (unfortunately, the engine didn't
pop out and it did a nose dive). The entire video is an .asf but I've
edited it down to just the flight into an .avi file - but lost the
audio in the edit.
Since the binaries newsgroups have essentially died, how can we
exchange designs/drawings/pictures?
Alan Jones - 01 Sep 2010 16:33 GMT
You moght want to review the RMR Boost Gllider FAQ. Bob Kaplow has a
lot of experience with composit material reinforcement of boost
gliders, so you might look for additional tips from Bob.
>Since the binaries newsgroups have essentially died, how can we
>exchange designs/drawings/pictures?
The alt.binaaries.models.rockets NG is still working. I posted a
Superoc R&D report there a few weeks before NAMRAM-52. As it turned
out, there was a high qualification rate jin F-SR, but a very high DQ
rate in DEL. But yes, rocketeers do not seem to use the mewsgroups as
much as they could.
Alan JOnes
lektric.dan@gmail.com - 01 Sep 2010 17:51 GMT
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:45:07 -0700 (PDT), "lektric....@gmail.com"
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> lot of experience with composit material reinforcement of boost
> gliders, so you might look for additional tips from Bob.
I have a copy of that. Some good stuff, a lot of dead links too.
> The alt.binaaries.models.rockets NG is still working. I posted a
> Superoc R&D report there a few weeks before NAMRAM-52. As it turned
> out, there was a high qualification rate jin F-SR, but a very high DQ
> rate in DEL. But yes, rocketeers do not seem to use the mewsgroups as
> much as they could.
I'll have to see if I can find a way to pick the binaries back up.
Bob - 02 Sep 2010 14:31 GMT
On Sep 1, 11:51 am, "lektric....@gmail.com" <lektric....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > You moght want to review the RMR Boost Gllider FAQ. Bob Kaplow has a
> > lot of experience with composit material reinforcement of boost
> > gliders, so you might look for additional tips from Bob.
>
> I have a copy of that. Some good stuff, a lot of dead links too.
Alas the auto distribution of the RMR FAQ seems to be frozen in the
past, and no one knows how to update the antique files.
The latest version of the glider FAQ can be found at
http://eisner.encompasserve.org/~kaplow_r/glider.faq
If there are dead links, please let me know, and I'll do what I can to
fix them.