Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / February 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Safety of Saphion Batteries ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Simon Clubley - 22 Nov 2005 13:23 GMT
I'm looking at using LiPo batteries for an upcoming project, but have been
concerned about the safety issues and so am looking at the Saphion technology.

Everything that I have read seems to indicate that the safety of Saphion
batteries is comparable to NiMH batteries. Does anybody here have any
different experiences ?

Also, what is the cheapest source of these batteries in the UK ? The going
rate for a 3S1P 9.6v 1200mAh seems to be about 25 quid (from places like
Overlander).

Thanks for any information,

Simon.

Signature

Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP      
Scientific Theory: A testable hypothesis that is supported by a body of evidence

Funfly3 - 22 Nov 2005 14:48 GMT
all batteries are dangerous,you need look at the total number of LiPo's in
use compared to the very small amount of problems, 99% of mobile phones use
LiPo batteries and you don't see people randomly setting there ears on fire,
your just as likely to have an accident in the car
> I'm looking at using LiPo batteries for an upcoming project, but have been
> concerned about the safety issues and so am looking at the Saphion
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Simon.
Simon Clubley - 22 Nov 2005 17:46 GMT
> all batteries are dangerous,you need look at the total number of LiPo's in
> use compared to the very small amount of problems, 99% of mobile phones use
> LiPo batteries and you don't see people randomly setting there ears on fire,
> your just as likely to have an accident in the car

Quite true, but I don't see many people attaching wings to their mobile phone
and flying it into the ground at speed when things go wrong. :-)

Been serious though, it is the damage caused in such an accident that I am
concerned about (as well as when charging) and if the Saphion batteries
really are as safe as NiMH in this type of situation.

Thanks to anyone for any information,

Simon.

Signature

Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP      
Scientific Theory: A testable hypothesis that is supported by a body of evidence

Rational Philosopher - 22 Nov 2005 21:08 GMT
> > all batteries are dangerous,you need look at the total number of LiPo's in
> > use compared to the very small amount of problems, 99% of mobile phones use
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> --

Simon, I comment as a scientific writer with degrees in chemistry and
as an aeromodeller.

As I understand Saphion batteries they have a Phosphate based cathode
which is not prone to the thermal runaway effect of Li-Ion batteries
Cobalt Oxide cathode in the event of hard shorting or overcharge.  ie
they shouldnt catch fire in the event of the worst.

>From this point of view alone they should be safer than Li-Ion.

However, aeromodelling in flight battery environment is a harsh one,
and although it is calimed that Saphion batteries are durable enough to
be a safer replacement for mobile phone / laptop batteries etc, I think
it remains to be seen whether they are that durable.

> Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
> Scientific Theory: A testable hypothesis that is supported by a body of evidence
Paul McIntosh - 23 Nov 2005 03:33 GMT
No but I see people dropping their phones on hard ground surfaces almost
daily.  No fires there either.

Signature

Paul McIntosh
RC-Bearings.com
"when steel just isn't enough"

>> all batteries are dangerous,you need look at the total number of LiPo's
>> in
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Simon.
The Natural Philosopher - 24 Nov 2005 00:01 GMT
>> all batteries are dangerous,you need look at the total number of LiPo's in
>> use compared to the very small amount of problems, 99% of mobile phones use
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Quite true, but I don't see many people attaching wings to their mobile phone
> and flying it into the ground at speed when things go wrong. :-)

If you smash a LIPO pack its into the slow discharge regime in the salt
water bucket, and toss it.

I try NOT to fly mine into hard ground at high speed.

If it catches fire in an accident, you lose the plane. Tough. you already
lost it, its just how much you may get back afterwards.

LIPOS meanyou nearly always have power to go round again, and the plane
weighs less and doesn't hit as hard.

*shrug* some peopl buy volvos because they are safer in a crash

Other people buy cars with decent handling acceleration and brakes because
they are less likely to have accidents. YMMV.

> Been serious though, it is the damage caused in such an accident that I am
> concerned about (as well as when charging) and if the Saphion batteries
> really are as safe as NiMH in this type of situation.

Of you want inferior performance, get spahions.

LIPOS are worth the risk, - the performance increae is like putting a glo
engine in...no more 3 minute flights and bringing an overwieght model in
under failing power. 20 minute flights if you want, and the model flies
like an angel,

Those who try Lipos never ever go back.

> Thanks to anyone for any information,
>
> Simon.
Simon Clubley - 25 Nov 2005 12:17 GMT
> I try NOT to fly mine into hard ground at high speed.
>
> If it catches fire in an accident, you lose the plane. Tough. you already
> lost it, its just how much you may get back afterwards.

It's not really the plane that I'm concerned about, it's the environment
that the battery may be in (house/garage/etc) especially in the event of
non-obvious damage and hence thinking it's ok to recharge and continue using
the pack.

> LIPOS are worth the risk, - the performance increae is like putting a glo
> engine in...no more 3 minute flights and bringing an overwieght model in
> under failing power. 20 minute flights if you want, and the model flies
> like an angel,
>
> Those who try Lipos never ever go back.

I'm currently regarding a LiPo fire as a low probability but high impact event.

Thanks to everyone for the range of comments.

Simon.

Signature

Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP      
Scientific Theory: A testable hypothesis that is supported by a body of evidence

SC - 25 Nov 2005 17:41 GMT
> I'm currently regarding a LiPo fire as a low probability but high impact
> event.
>
> Thanks to everyone for the range of comments.
>
> Simon.

Simon - my take exactly........

It's not hard to manage - When at home I store and charge cells in a Pyrex
dish with another larger pirex dish on top leaving big vents holes either
side. I did a controlled burn on an old pack to test this arrangement and it
works nicely - so nicely I still charge in my living room where I can keep
an eye on em in comfort:) Vent with flames is what they do - there is no
explosion unless you encase them in a semi-airtight container- then like any
flammable they become a bomb!

Scott
Dave (Sgt. Pepper) - 25 Nov 2005 18:35 GMT
> Scientific Theory: A testable hypothesis that is supported by a body of evidence

I'm very glad you brought that up.  Imagine if one of these packs decides to
go up in flames in your trouser pocket ... what state are your testables
going to be in after that!    ;o)
Signature

Dave (Sgt. Pepper)       Epsom, England
   Nikon D2X / D2H / D100 / Coolpix 5700 / Canon Ixus 400 / Paintshop Pro 8
   My photo galleries at  http://www.pbase.com/davecq
   "I will not tolerate intolerance ... Doh!!"

Rational Philosopher - 26 Nov 2005 12:14 GMT
> > I try NOT to fly mine into hard ground at high speed.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
> Scientific Theory: A testable hypothesis that is supported by a body of evidence
Rational Philosopher - 26 Nov 2005 12:20 GMT
'... I'm currently regarding a LiPo fire as a low probability but high
impact event'.

Yes, I would say thats about the measure of it. From there it is a
personal judgement whether to use LiPos or to go for the inherantly
safer chemistry of Saphions.
The Natural Philosopher - 28 Nov 2005 10:42 GMT
>> I try NOT to fly mine into hard ground at high speed.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> non-obvious damage and hence thinking it's ok to recharge and continue using
> the pack.

Then store them where they won't do the damage

If they are not gone up in smoke 48 hours after  a crash, they likely won't
ever.

about 95% of LIPO fires are during charging or as the immediate reult of
physical rtrauma (shorting/overheating in flkight, or left in hot sunlight)

>> LIPOS are worth the risk, - the performance increae is like putting a glo
>> engine in...no more 3 minute flights and bringing an overwieght model in
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I'm currently regarding a LiPo fire as a low probability but high impact event.

Many peopel who ruin packs - most in fact - see no more than puffing and
loss of capacity.

The fires are raer. They happen usually because of a combination of things.

They are rare. very rare. But not unheard of.
Neither is getting killed crossing a road, or falling off a ladder , or
having mice eat through house wiring and burn the place down.

You just need a perspective.

> Thanks to everyone for the range of comments.
>
> Simon.
Red Scholefield - 24 Feb 2006 22:11 GMT
They are very safe - mostly because they are not readily available to the
hobby yet.  :->
Signature

Red S.
The Battery Clinic
www.rcbatteryclinic.com

> > I try NOT to fly mine into hard ground at high speed.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Simon.
Dave :^) - 25 Feb 2006 09:05 GMT
> They are very safe - mostly because they are not readily available to the
> hobby yet.  :->

Really? perhaps in the U.S.A. but they are in the U.K.!
http://www.overlander.co.uk/results.asp?categoryid=89
Dave :^)

>> In article <11nxow6mdrhvr.fbsr9f1gyuw3$.dlg@40tude.net>, The Natural
> Philosopher <A@b.c> writes:
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>>
> evidence
Stuart Robinson - 23 Nov 2005 16:34 GMT
> 99% of mobile phones use LiPo batteries

Really ?

Both mobile phones I currently have, a Siemens and a Ericson use Lithium
Ion batteries ........

Are my phones in the 1% that dont use LiPo batteries then ?

Stuart.
Paul McIntosh - 23 Nov 2005 18:45 GMT
LiPo is a form of Lion.

Signature

Paul McIntosh
RC-Bearings.com
"when steel just isn't enough"

>> 99% of mobile phones use LiPo batteries
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Stuart.
The Natural Philosopher - 24 Nov 2005 00:04 GMT
>> 99% of mobile phones use LiPo batteries
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Stuart.

LIPOS are lithium ion batteries..they are optimised for higher discharge
rates with a slighrtly more flammable electroyte, thats all,

LIPOS in cellphones are sligjly better protected agaiuns over charging and
discharging, and come with a hard plastic case...but the are nearly as
capable of serious fires if abused.

If you don;t bugger around with Lipos, and make sure you are operating well
withing their stated limits (which the vendors have a habit of
exagerrating)  they are safe. Period. If you play silly buggers with them,
you deserve to get your car burnt out anyway.
SC - 22 Nov 2005 21:51 GMT
> I'm looking at using LiPo batteries for an upcoming project, but have been
> concerned about the safety issues and so am looking at the Saphion
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> rate for a 3S1P 9.6v 1200mAh seems to be about 25 quid (from places like
> Overlander).

My view on this issue is that if you have an accident bad enough to damage
the cells either they had insufficient attention paid to them during
installation (foam etc) or it really was a big 'event' in which case it will
be a total loss anyway.

I have been using them since Graham Stabler started selling them, have over
40 packs and 3 serious 'events' have occurred in that time. Only once did a
pack receive damage and that was due to the fact it and the nose of the ac
were 8 inches under resulting in shafted prop, motor, ESC and servo's.
Everything got bined of course except for the LIPO - the only damaged cell
was in the middle of a 4S 2600 pack - this later became a certified 3S pack
after much testing in a ceramic dish.

Certainly with slow/3d/indoor fly I don't beleive an issue exists - I have
had some real howlers involving walls ceiling and floors -  not once have I
damaged a pack - not least because they only weigh 100g tops!

With bigger stuff I know its an issue. I made a 3.6m cap232 a while back and
that needed 5S3P to stay airborne for longer than 5 mins. The pack weighed
800g and when I did finally mess up big style during some low rolling
circles the pack came out alive - 4ft from the plane! Clearly - as they get
heavier the issue is more apparent but I still say if you don't take simple
steps like foaming in front of the cell you are asking for trouble.

And yes, I've pushed em too hard, overcharged (charger error) and had
ballooning but not once have I seen one go up in flames accidently or as a
result of someone looking at them the wrong way............

More on topic........... do the saphions really offer significant advantage
over NIMH to make the expense worthwhile? Last time I looked they cost a
fortune!.

SC
Paul McIntosh - 23 Nov 2005 03:37 GMT
I have 1500mAh, 3S, 15C LiPos available for $34.50.

Signature

Paul McIntosh
RC-Bearings.com
"when steel just isn't enough"

> I'm looking at using LiPo batteries for an upcoming project, but have been
> concerned about the safety issues and so am looking at the Saphion
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Simon.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.