Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / Radio Controlled / Air Models / June 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What do you reckon ...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dave (Sgt. Pepper) - 23 Jun 2006 17:40 GMT
... LiPo battery?

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32550

Signature

Dave (Sgt. Pepper)       Epsom, England
   Nikon D2X / D2Hs / D2H / D100 / Coolpix 5700
   My photo galleries at  http://www.pbase.com/davecq
   "I will not tolerate intolerance ... Doh!!"

Greg - 23 Jun 2006 17:56 GMT
> ... LiPo battery?
>
> http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32550

Nah couldn't be as we're often told be certain people here LiPo's are
harmless...

Greg
david - 23 Jun 2006 18:19 GMT
> Nah couldn't be as we're often told be certain people here LiPo's are
> harmless...
>
> Greg

Not if they fall onto yer bleedin head from the bedroom window they aren't!!

D
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 23 Jun 2006 19:01 GMT
>> ... LiPo battery?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Greg

The more I read about LiPo's. and there's been a lot of articles lately,
the less inclined I am to want to own one... let alone use it.

There appears to be so many potential (oops) problems with them that
they start making rubber power look very attractive.

It seems you only have to look at them the wrong way when
charging/discharging and they go toes up... don't even think of dropping
them ! Then there's the unknown, but possibly short, lifespan when used
at high levels of discharge. Then there's the price. If the cells go
unbalanced..... run.

They are WAY too fragile and temperamental... you would be better off
with a wife... less hassle !

Reg
Greg - 23 Jun 2006 19:22 GMT
> The more I read about LiPo's. and there's been a lot of articles lately,
> the less inclined I am to want to own one... let alone use it.

Actually I own three very small packs for park fliers but that's my limit,
the big stuff that others proudly boast about at the field is not at all
attractive to me.

> They are WAY too fragile and temperamental... you would be better off
> with a wife... less hassle !

Now I wouldn't know, when I hear either of the dreaded words commitment or
marriage they're history 8-)

Greg
ian - 24 Jun 2006 21:06 GMT
>> The more I read about LiPo's. and there's been a lot of articles lately,
>> the less inclined I am to want to own one... let alone use it.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Greg

my machine came with a proper charger designed for that battery.  It
charges at a fixed rate and switches itself off when finished.  The nimh
charger and batt that came with the walkera didn't have the saftey light
come on it didn't switch off after two hours and it got extremely hot,
almost too hot to touch.

My twister lipo batteries have been dropped from hand height onto concrete.
There is also a balancer to ensure correct charging.  I've also crashed
landed several times with no leakage, bulging or burning.

Do not charge li po with nicad or nimh charger.  a specially designed
charger is required.  auto switch off is best.  do not fast charge.  1 hour
charging is the quickest.  Considering how small and light they are for the
charge they carry i'm not surprised they have to be handled with care.
abc123@btinternet.com - 24 Jun 2006 18:27 GMT
>>> ... LiPo battery?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>The more I read about LiPo's. and there's been a lot of articles lately,
>the less inclined I am to want to own one... let alone use it.

So you don't own a mobile phone or laptop then?

>There appears to be so many potential (oops) problems with them that
>they start making rubber power look very attractive.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>at high levels of discharge. Then there's the price. If the cells go
>unbalanced..... run.

I had the same opinion, read all the scaremonger articles etc. etc.

Then guys started turning up at the field actually using them and
guess what? no problems. I was so impressed I bought a small lipo and
controller and replaced my 7cell nicad brushed/gearbox speed400 with a
small brushless outrunner for my WLM Highlight glider..

With the low weight and small size they will transform any electric
powered glider - stick a brushless up the front and you'll never want
to go back to nicad/nimh (unless you want the extra weight for
ballast/penetration).

My advice (fwiw) find someone local who uses them , then make your
decision. Don't listen to the scare stories, especially those being
repeated from people who have only read about them and never used
them.

>They are WAY too fragile and temperamental... you would be better off
>with a wife... less hassle !
>
>Reg

nah! much more expensive (and a LiPo doesn't insist you decorate or do
the garden instead of going flying)

rgds

Bob
Greg - 24 Jun 2006 19:02 GMT
> So you don't own a mobile phone or laptop then?

Er, this thread started with pictures of a lap top that burst into flames
like an incendiary device...

As to mobiles, yes, mine has a LiPo but it's about 1% of the size of those
being flown by club mates, is protected by a hard shell instead of just a
few microns of plastic film, has no exposed terminals for you to short and
is charged by a charger that's dedicated to the particular pack and monitors
it's temperature. Oh and it's not hurled around the skies at 50Mph 8-).

As to them transforming models, well if you just go brushless as I have then
the performance of your models will be suitably transformed without the need
to go LiPo as well. Of course LiPos will increase the duration, but frankly
I've had enough after 10 minutes of hurling my Picojet Combat around at
ballistic speeds with a Kontronix motor and Sanyo NiCads 8-).

As someone else said, it's only a matter of time before there is a disaster
caused by a lap top exploding in an aircraft, unfortunately the aviation
industry is notoriously slow to respond to increased dangers if it costs
them in some way, many people have to die to kick them out of their
compacency.

Greg
The Natural Philosopher - 25 Jun 2006 10:35 GMT
>> So you don't own a mobile phone or laptop then?
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I've had enough after 10 minutes of hurling my Picojet Combat around at
> ballistic speeds with a Kontronix motor and Sanyo NiCads 8-).

Actually if you do the sums, the LIPOS transform the model MORE, at LESS
cost, than stuffing in a brushless motor.

I've got skads of LIPOS and only three brushless motors.

Going brushless addss about 20% to inflight time, for a given power, and
saves at best about 15% powertrain weight.

Going LIPO saves about 40% powertrain weight, and tends to increase
flight times by 4-6 times.

Both is best, but with a decent brushless and ESC up around £80 for
medium sized models, but packs around £35, I know which I will continue
to upgrade first.
Greg - 25 Jun 2006 11:38 GMT
> Actually if you do the sums, the LIPOS transform the model MORE, at LESS
> cost, than stuffing in a brushless motor.

Maybe in your circumstances but not in mine, I have typically three packs
per model so replacing them would be more expensive than a motor and
controller. Add the fact that I've got hundreds invested in packs with
plenty of life left in them, and only a fraction of that invested in can
motors, and it's a no brainer.

Also a properly chosen brushless gives you a lot more thrust which
transforms a lethargic model, something I value far more than duration.
Changing to LiPo with the same can motor will not give any more thrust,
assuming the motor is already being used optimally, though or course may
reduce weight and hence improve performance, I prefer the less subtle
approach of having more horses on tap 8-)..

> Both is best, but with a decent brushless and ESC up around £80 for
> medium sized models, but packs around £35, I know which I will continue
> to upgrade first.

Yes your figures confirm my findings, three packs at £105 against motor and
controller at £80, even with only two packs there's little in it. Also
throwing away NiCad's  worth say 3x£25 = £75 against a can motor worth
£10-£15.

Greg
Greg - 25 Jun 2006 11:59 GMT
On the subject of brushless though, what brands have people had good
experience with?, there are now so many obscure brands appearing that it's
hard to see the wood for the trees!, Als alone lists 7 brands and SMC
another 5. I've been very happy with Kontronik but they seem to have priced
themselves out of what's become a very competitive market. I'm after 400 and
600 replacements, not park fly or IC engine replacements.

Greg
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jun 2006 09:16 GMT
> On the subject of brushless though, what brands have people had good
> experience with?, there are now so many obscure brands appearing that it's
> hard to see the wood for the trees!, Als alone lists 7 brands and SMC
> another 5. I've been very happy with Kontronik but they seem to have priced
> themselves out of what's become a very competitive market. I'm after 400 and
> 600 replacements, not park fly or IC engine replacements.

DD 400 the best is probably the mega AC 16/15 range Or Hackers if you
can afford em.

All the AXIS are pretty good, and so are the MPjet outrunners - their
inrunners are not so good - hackers better.

Depends really..the price generally reflects efficiency and hence power
to weight - those £9.99 bell outrunners are little better than a geared
can 400 efficiency wise.

> Greg
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jun 2006 09:13 GMT
>> Both is best, but with a decent brushless and ESC up around £80 for
>> medium sized models, but packs around £35, I know which I will continue
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> throwing away NiCad's  worth say 3x£25 = £75 against a can motor worth
> £10-£15.

Ah. I tend to have one pack per three models, or so

No need for three packs when you can fly for 45 minutes on one.

Three models selected out of the hangar and three packs is at least two
hours flying time, If I take a charger and recharge pack 1 while flying
packs 2 and 3..

> Greg
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 25 Jun 2006 19:41 GMT
>>The more I read about LiPo's. and there's been a lot of articles lately,
>>the less inclined I am to want to own one... let alone use it.
>
> So you don't own a mobile phone or laptop then?

Because I don't feel the need to be in constant contact my (ancient)
phone is only kept for emergency use and has nicads !

I don't have a laptop 'cos I don't need to lug a computer around with
me, it's a benefit of being retired, but I do have two computers (his
and hers) in the house which don't need to be recharged   >:-)

Strange though it may seem some people don't want/need to be constantly
blathering or hauling slim rectangular objects about.

Reg
The Natural Philosopher - 25 Jun 2006 10:31 GMT
>>> ... LiPo battery?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> They are WAY too fragile and temperamental... you would be better off
> with a wife... less hassle !

Aw C'mon Reg..don't be a wuss.

think of the dangers of a 40 glo, in terms of the fuel, the spinning
prop...it just doesn't make the news when someone loses tow fingers in a
oops I missed the needle valve' sort of accident.

Ive got about ten packs now, and apart from ruining a couple stuck up
trees or otherwise left switched on, not a single problem in 2 years.

And those only lost capacity. in one case all ALL the capacity..and that
one went a bit baggy trousered on me too.

I still haven';t taken it down the garden for air rifle practice..

> Reg
ian - 25 Jun 2006 11:12 GMT
>>>> ... LiPo battery?
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> I still haven';t taken it down the garden for air rifle practice..

chargers seem a bit pricy.  you can't use the supplied nimh charger.
tux_powered@nowhere.at-all.net - 25 Jun 2006 19:49 GMT
> Aw C'mon Reg..don't be a wuss.

Just look at the interest I have generated on a nearly dead group.
Drawn 'em out of the woodwork again !

> think of the dangers of a 40 glo, in terms of the fuel, the spinning
> prop...it just doesn't make the news when someone loses tow fingers in a
> oops I missed the needle valve' sort of accident.

The prop is probably going to do less damage if it is driven by a glow
engine when it bites you. The glow will most likely stop before it
reaches the elbow whereas the electric bacon slicer is just going to
draw on it reserves harder and dig deeper !

Needle valves need adjusting but there are numerous incidents of
electric bacon slicers starting up unintentionally and surprising their
fond owner.

Reg
Greg - 25 Jun 2006 20:28 GMT
> The prop is probably going to do less damage if it is driven by a glow
> engine when it bites you. The glow will most likely stop before it
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> electric bacon slicers starting up unintentionally and surprising their
> fond owner.

And it's now quite common to see brushless setups that deliver the same
power as a 60 or even larger, reaching for the switch or battery connector
can be just as dangerous as reaching for the needle valve, and electrics can
start up without warning...

Greg
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jun 2006 09:18 GMT
>> The prop is probably going to do less damage if it is driven by a glow
>> engine when it bites you. The glow will most likely stop before it
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> can be just as dangerous as reaching for the needle valve, and electrics can
> start up without warning...

Not with modern speed controllers they can't. Especially with brushless
where a blown FET will NOT run them.

They need to be specifically armed.

> Greg
Greg - 26 Jun 2006 21:40 GMT
> Not with modern speed controllers they can't. Especially with brushless
> where a blown FET will NOT run them.
>
> They need to be specifically armed.

Whatever controller you have it only takes a knock of the stick and it'll
start...

Greg
Dave :^) - 26 Jun 2006 21:51 GMT
What do I reckon?.........

.....I reckon there are enough different aspects to this wonderful hobby to
suit everyone! So how about enjoying your particular favourite scene(s)
without getting your head so far up your backside that you have to prove
your kind of modelling is best? I have C/L, soarers, glow, diesel and
electric models, which is best? the one that's making me smile at the time!
If you want to be so anally retentive, give up modelling and become a
traffic warden!
As my teenage daughter would say "take a chill pill Bill"

Dave :^)
The Natural Philosopher - 27 Jun 2006 00:53 GMT
>> Not with modern speed controllers they can't. Especially with brushless
>> where a blown FET will NOT run them.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Whatever controller you have it only takes a knock of the stick and it'll
> start...

Not until its armed....

> Greg
Greg - 27 Jun 2006 19:09 GMT
> Not until its armed....

Which is unavoidable for many speed controllers like the Kontronix I have,
you move the stick to max before the battery is fitted to disable the brake,
then after a beep immediately move to min and await another beep. If you
don't do this you have to remove the battery and start again, if you do then
it's armed, like it or not, and any accidental knock of the stick will start
it up, unlike an engine. I'm not arguing which is best, just pointing out
the danger.

Greg
Allan - 30 Jun 2006 16:48 GMT
I must admit I find it amazing that people point to these motors and say
'Oooo dangerous... Accident waiting to happen...'. Then totally ignore cars
sat at traffic lights, zebra crossings, road junctions etc, engine running,
car in gear, handbrake off, just waiting for a foot to slip off a clutch.
Much more dangerous.

The reality is that cars are pretty safe at road junction. The reality is
that if your hand is in the way when the motor starts the prop blade will
just press against the skin. If the motor start then you put your hand in
the way, well, what can I say?

Allan

>> Not until its armed....
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Greg
Peter Seddon - 30 Jun 2006 17:42 GMT
I think it is symptomatic of the current belief that everything is someone
else's fault and there is no such thing as an accident.

Peter

>I must admit I find it amazing that people point to these motors and say
>'Oooo dangerous... Accident waiting to happen...'. Then totally ignore cars
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>
>> Greg
Greg - 30 Jun 2006 18:09 GMT
> The reality is that if your hand is in the way when the motor starts the
prop blade will
> just press against the skin.

That was certainly the case with the common or garden 600, but with
brushless setups equaling 120 engines becoming common place I'm not so sure.
I wouldn't want to try it would you?.

>If the motor start then you put your hand in
> the way, well, what can I say?

Ouch might be appropriate 8-)

Greg
The Natural Philosopher - 26 Jun 2006 09:17 GMT
>> Aw C'mon Reg..don't be a wuss.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> electric bacon slicers starting up unintentionally and surprising their
> fond owner.

MIne don't, because they aren't plugged in./ Once plugged in they can
start anytime once they are armed..this is expected.
> Reg
Allan - 24 Jun 2006 17:48 GMT
Just wait till methanol and fuel cells become the norm. Then one will be
spared the agony of being able to see the flames!!

Allan

>> ... LiPo battery?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Greg
ian - 24 Jun 2006 21:09 GMT
> Just wait till methanol and fuel cells become the norm. Then one will be
> spared the agony of being able to see the flames!!
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> Nah couldn't be as we're often told be certain people here LiPo's are
>> harmless...

use the correct charger and don't hit with a hammer.  Lots of crashes here
no problem.  regulated charge with autocutoff.  As for laptop i still have
nimh.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.