My experience was with the VMAR Chipmunk. I'd score it as follows:
i) Looks (9/10)
ii) Price (9/10)
iii) Weight (6/10) bit heavy
iv) Manual (4/10) Bad english and often referred to a different aircraft
(cut n paste errors I guess)
v) Quality of fittings (clevises, spinner, engine mount etc) (1/10) You buy
cheap you get cheap
vi) Quality of wood and construction (4/10) Bad wood - see below.
vii) Quality of undercarriage (4/10) Far too soft
Overall, it is the robustness and repairability that concerns me. The wood
is a strange type. It is neither balsa nor lite ply. It is heavier than
balsa but very brittle. When I crashed mine (not a bad crash) the fuselage
literrally exploded (little match sticks everwhere). A balsa/lite ply ship
would have cracked but would have been flying the next day.
Also, the covering is beautiful, but it is a sticky back plastic material.
This would be difficult to repair and you certainly would acheive the same
finish.
I stress that I lost my Chipmunk over 4 years ago and vowed not to touch
VMAR again. I accept that VMAR may have addressed some of these problems
since then so don't take my comments as gospel.
Cheers,
Nigel
> I have been looking at the vmar hornet sport trainer .40 size. Can anyone
> tell me if VMAR is worth the money? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Nigel, I couldn't agree more with your assessment. I too had a Chipmunk and
on the first flight, I was coming in for a landing and much to my surprise,
it just fell out of the air. I had no idea I was anywhere close to stall
speed. Yes, mine was heavy and obviously had a high wing loading. The plane
broke in two even though I have had much harder landings with other kits
that survived to fly again. It was a good looking plane but that was it. It
was cremated shortly thereafter. Never again!!
> My experience was with the VMAR Chipmunk. I'd score it as follows:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > I have been looking at the vmar hornet sport trainer .40 size. Can anyone
> > tell me if VMAR is worth the money? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
widnesmodelflyingclub - 16 Jan 2004 22:09 GMT
Later kits just the same, I had a PC9, and the 4 flights it had, 3 ended up
just falling out of the sky and falling to bits (2 at the hands 2 of the
most experienced instructors in the club.
Utter cack, no more no less.
--
Widnes Model Flying Club
http://widnesmfc.tripod.com
> Nigel, I couldn't agree more with your assessment. I too had a Chipmunk and
> on the first flight, I was coming in for a landing and much to my surprise,
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> > > tell me if VMAR is worth the money? Any help would be greatly
> appreciated.