Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Turcite vs Moglice vs Delrin

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Boo - 27 Nov 2006 17:48 GMT
Hi,

I have been toying with the idea of making a 2 1/2D cnc router to cut out ribs
etc for model airplanes.  My thoughts for the slides were hovering around
lengths of ground ms bar, the saddles being cut from box-section ms having holes
drilled for plastic bearing bushes.  I've read around and am trying to determine
whether Turcite or Moglice or Delrin would be suitable for the bearing bushes ?
I have found Delrin readily on eBay but I know the other two materials are
specifically intended to be used in bearings,  can anyone say which of these is
best in this kind of low load application,  and whether the advantages outweigh
the convenience of Delrin ?  Also a supplier of small quantities in diameters
between say an inch and half an inch would be helpful.

Many thanks,

Signature

Boo

Tim Leech - 27 Nov 2006 18:04 GMT
>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Many thanks,

Have you considered Glacier DU bushes? They're a steel/bronze/PTFE
composite, I haven't used any for donkey's years & don't know if it's
available now in standard sizes from the usual bearing houses but it
might be quite good for that sort of job?

Tim

Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
Peter Neill - 27 Nov 2006 18:27 GMT
>Have you considered Glacier DU bushes? They're a steel/bronze/PTFE
>composite, I haven't used any for donkey's years & don't know if it's
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
>Vintage diesel engine service

Or how about Oilite bushes? Cheap and readily available.
Or buy a length of leaded bronze and make some - I made the leadscrew
bearings for my ML7 from this.

Peter
Tom - 27 Nov 2006 19:09 GMT
> >Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
> Vintage diesel engine service

Excellent things DU bushes, every modern car would be
lost without them.
If you've got a car breaker local, bludge a couple of front
suspension struts off him. That will give you good lengths
of hard chrome bar and DU bushes, all good stuff for your
router table. As cars come in various sizes so do the struts.

Tom

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Mark G - 27 Nov 2006 19:49 GMT
I would seriously consider "ball bushing" bearings or whatever ball bearing
type linear slides are around on ebay etc, plain bushings of whatever type
are troublesome in the long run- I talk from industrial and home
experience-alternatively computer printers are a source of this type of
slide-good finish bar if bushes not salvageable, any independant computer
dealer will have loads, as will your local council tip-but that is a case of
dealing with jobsworths ( or bribes !)
Mark G.

> > >Hi,
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > >whether Turcite or Moglice or Delrin would be suitable for the bearing bushes ?
> > >I have found Delrin readily on eBay ..
Tom - 27 Nov 2006 19:59 GMT
> I would seriously consider "ball bushing" bearings or whatever ball bearing
> type linear slides are around on ebay etc, plain bushings of whatever type
> are troublesome in the long run- I talk from industrial and home
> experience...

Your experience obviously doesn't include DU bushes.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Mark G - 27 Nov 2006 21:02 GMT
Er.. well yes my experience does include DU bushes from 8 mm to 50 mm bore,
they are good, but if you can get a ball bushing or other ball based linear
slide cheap you will be on a better route to success.-Does any decent
machine tool use otherwise ?
DU bushes are esentially a leaded bronze bush with a ptfe coating,steel
backed,  great when new, but will not withstand well to intermitent side
loads such as in a machine slide.
Mark G.

> > I would seriously consider "ball bushing" bearings or whatever ball bearing
> > type linear slides are around on ebay etc, plain bushings of whatever type
> > are troublesome in the long run- I talk from industrial and home
> > experience...
>
> Your experience obviously doesn't include DU bushes.
Wayne Weedon - 27 Nov 2006 21:08 GMT
>>> I would seriously consider "ball bushing" bearings or whatever ball
> bearing
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>> experience...
>> Your experience obviously doesn't include DU bushes.

They also can have some stiction compared to rolling element linear
bearings.

I used to use 1000's of 3/16" DU bushes on an instrument job I was
involved with. We found we had to burnish the bushes to stop it.  The
shafts were mirror polished stainless steel.

My recommendation for CNC use especially when using stepper motors is
the lowest friction bearing you can find.

Wayne...
Tom - 27 Nov 2006 22:10 GMT
> >>> I would seriously consider "ball bushing" bearings or whatever ball
> > bearing
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Wayne...

You blamed the bushes for the stiction? LOL

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Wayne Weedon - 27 Nov 2006 22:31 GMT
> You blamed the bushes for the stiction? LOL

LOL Indeed.   Do you think we didn't research the problem? This was a
very low force application <10g.  Nevermind clever clogs you obviously
know more than the application engineers that helped us resolve it.

But back onto subject DU's have no real place in this application.
Tom - 27 Nov 2006 23:18 GMT
> > You blamed the bushes for the stiction? LOL
>
> LOL Indeed.   Do you think we didn't research the problem? This was a
> very low force application <10g.  Nevermind clever clogs you obviously
> know more than the application engineers that helped us resolve it.

Obviously more than the designer who did the original specification.
I've been using or specifying either Glacier or INA bushings and wear
strips over 25 years, for units moving from 1 pound up to 10 tons,
without having to resort to "application" engineers to create a
workaround for a design fault.

> But back onto subject DU's have no real place in this application.

Says you... Based on one experience. I suggest you acquaint yourself
with the INA Permaglide product application range.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Wayne Weedon - 28 Nov 2006 00:09 GMT
> Obviously more than the designer who did the original specification.
> I've been using or specifying either Glacier or INA bushings and wear
> strips over 25 years, for units moving from 1 pound up to 10 tons,
> without having to resort to "application" engineers to create a
> workaround for a design fault.

You know I didn't notice you there 15 years ago when this happened,
maybe you were hiding in the closet.  But I can assure you it was
designed to the glacier recommended parameters.

Tom  each application has it's vices, what works well for one
application may not work so well for another.  In this case the
instrument had very low internal force available to return the shaft to
it's zero position. In the end it was made to work and well.  But not
quite so easily as Glacier said it would ;)

But it's History now, and I'm glad I've moved on.

>> But back onto subject DU's have no real place in this application.
>
> Says you... Based on one experience. I suggest you acquaint yourself
> with the INA Permaglide product application range.

No based on my cnc experience.   No commercial machines that I know of
use DU's and rarely do they use round linear ways except on the cheapest
hobby machines.  They just don't lend themselves to the rigidity required.

There are tons of surplus linear motion items available on ebay etc, and
the original poster might want to look to see whats available rather
than re-invent wheels.

I've seen lots of people get very annoyed and frustrated when their
homebrew cnc's don't perform well.

All my cnc milling machines use box ways, and bonded on Turcite as well
as automatic lube systems.   I've used more modern machinery with bolt
on linear ways, and although nice and fast.  SUCK for rigidity in many
cases.
Tom - 28 Nov 2006 02:06 GMT
> > Obviously more than the designer who did the original specification.
> > I've been using or specifying either Glacier or INA bushings and wear
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> on linear ways, and although nice and fast.  SUCK for rigidity in many
> cases.

Wayne, the OP only wants to cut out ribs n stuff for
model aeroplanes, most probably 20g tops...

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Wayne Weedon - 28 Nov 2006 11:04 GMT
> Wayne, the OP only wants to cut out ribs n stuff for
> model aeroplanes, most probably 20g tops...

Yes Tom I saw that.   But having been around a lot of people doing
homebrew retrofits as has J.S.  I have seen so many start off saying "I
only need this"  But later wish they had made the machine to be capable
of doing "That" !

Same with the size issue!

Sadly reading through the posts on some of the CNC forums, there is
quite a lot of frustration.  Most of which could of been avoided with a
little time spent earlier on planning the thing out.

Wayne..
Tim Leech - 28 Nov 2006 08:33 GMT
> No commercial machines that I know of
>use DU's

This one does.

http://web.onetel.com/~duttondock/Pictures/Ward-1.jpg

OK, I realise you probably meant current CNC machines, & this one is
neither current nor CNC. I just thought I would throw it in to be
mischievous. In fact it may well predate Turcite, Moglice etc., I
don't know when they became readily available?

Cheers
Tim

Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
Wayne Weedon - 28 Nov 2006 10:59 GMT
>> No commercial machines that I know of
>> use DU's
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> mischievous. In fact it may well predate Turcite, Moglice etc., I
> don't know when they became readily available?

Hehe..   Yes not CNC.   I've seen an used a fair few Ward Capstans.  But
what the hell is that thing?  I'm intrigued.   Looks more like a t&c
grinder?.
Tim Leech - 28 Nov 2006 11:54 GMT
>>> No commercial machines that I know of
>>> use DU's
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>what the hell is that thing?  I'm intrigued.   Looks more like a t&c
>grinder?.

Yes it is a controlled spiral cutter grinder, will grind spiral flutes
without the use of guide fingers as well as all the usual T&C
functions.
Made by Ward Grinders in Dorset, spiral grinders were their
speciality.  No connection AFAIAA with the other lot.

Cheers
Tim

Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
Wayne Weedon - 28 Nov 2006 12:57 GMT
> Yes it is a controlled spiral cutter grinder, will grind spiral flutes
> without the use of guide fingers as well as all the usual T&C
> functions.
> Made by Ward Grinders in Dorset, spiral grinders were their
> speciality.  No connection AFAIAA with the other lot.

Tim

I actually thought after I posted that maybe it was a product of Ward
Grinders in Parkstone, Poole.  I have quite a few friends in the
business who served their time there.  Maybe some of them worked on your
machine.

Long gone now I think.

Wayne...
John Stevenson - 28 Nov 2006 09:15 GMT
Just to throw another oar in the water here.

I have had two personal experiences where the ball bushings were
replaced by the plastic lined bushings from RS and worked better.
Both were low force applications and both had problems with fine dust.

One was on the Y axis of a laser cutter and the fine dust and fumes
caused the ball bushing to tighten up in service.
Once on a service call we couldn't get any new bushings locally in
time and replaced them temporary with some RS lined bushes whilst
spares were ordered.  They never got fitted as the lined bushes wiped
the shaft clean and it ran until it was scrapped a few years later.

Because of this experience I swapped the ball bushing on a CNC router
for lined bushings as the MDF dust was having the same problem and
again it cured the problem.

With better designed seals and covered bellows on the way the ball
bushings may have been no problem but with the skeletal build up of
both these machines the lined bushes cured what problems we had.

.
--
Regards,

John Stevenson
Nottingham, England.

Visit the new Model Engineering adverts page at:-
http://www.homeworkshop.org.uk/
Wayne Weedon - 28 Nov 2006 11:11 GMT
> With better designed seals and covered bellows on the way the ball
> bushings may have been no problem but with the skeletal build up of
> both these machines the lined bushes cured what problems we had.

Yes a problem with round linear rod is that need to support it, and
therefore the slot required through the bearing to clear the supports.

It is one of the reasons I dislike them.  The longer the travel you need
the worse the problem seems to get.  As well as their need to be
elevated over any solid base.

Those NSk(etc) linear rails at least can be bolted down onto a flat
surface.   I do realise there's a cost issue with those though ;)  There
are bargains to be had if you look hard enough.

Wayne...
Nick Mueller - 28 Nov 2006 10:08 GMT
> No commercial machines that I know of
> use DU's and rarely do they use round linear ways except on the cheapest
> hobby machines.  They just don't lend themselves to the rigidity required.

I have to correct you.
Industrial lathes with round linear ways do exist. *Big* round tubes with
hydrostatic bearing (no DUs). Can't remember a name now.

Nick
Signature

***********************************
*** Available now in NZ and AUS ***
***********************************
       <http://www.yadro.de>

Wayne Weedon - 29 Nov 2006 10:14 GMT
>> No commercial machines that I know of
>> use DU's and rarely do they use round linear ways except on the cheapest
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Industrial lathes with round linear ways do exist. *Big* round tubes with
> hydrostatic bearing (no DUs). Can't remember a name now.

Nick..  You didn't see my disclaimer ;)  "machines that I know of"  I
have used lathes with nsk style linear rails though.   Two machines come
to mind, both Mazaks (quickturn 10 and a 15)

Both replaced old flatbed Hardinges.  When it came to turning 316
stainless they effectively were slower than the 1979 and 1982 machines
they replaced.  The 15 had live tooling in the turret too, the rigidity
so so poor it sometimes struggled to mill 6082 alloy.   Those were very
expensive machines too.  ALl they were really good for was high speed
rapids.

You can't beat IRON and lots of it!   The reason I seem to collect
Hardinges ;)

If they really have as you say "tubes" thats even worse, unless they are
filled with some very high density material.  Hate to think about the
resonance problems.

Wayne..
Nick Mueller - 29 Nov 2006 11:00 GMT
> Nick..  You didn't see my disclaimer ;)

I thought you know them all. ;-)

No, I thought that round beds are crap. Maybe they are.
Now the name came back and I can give you a link. So you can judge by
yourself. At least, it is interesting. Can't say wether it really works!

<http://www.a.monforts.de/quickstart/index.php?id=104>

> You can't beat IRON and lots of it!   The reason I seem to collect
> Hardinges ;)

Yes, mass is always good. No doubt.

Nick
Signature

***********************************
*** Available now in NZ and AUS ***
***********************************
       <http://www.yadro.de>

Nick Mueller - 29 Nov 2006 11:04 GMT
> <http://www.a.monforts.de/quickstart/index.php?id=104>

Sorry, we have that in English too!
<http://www.a.monforts.de/quickstart/index.php?id=229&L=1>

Nick
Signature

***********************************
*** Available now in NZ and AUS ***
***********************************
       <http://www.yadro.de>

Wayne Weedon - 29 Nov 2006 11:34 GMT
>> Nick..  You didn't see my disclaimer ;)
>
> I thought you know them all. ;-)

Not them all!  Seen a few ;) and been inside more than I have used.

> No, I thought that round beds are crap. Maybe they are.
> Now the name came back and I can give you a link. So you can judge by
> yourself. At least, it is interesting. Can't say wether it really works!
>
> <http://www.a.monforts.de/quickstart/index.php?id=104>

Well actually that looked rather good compared to slinky little linear
rails.   They say "solid bar" but it looks like a very thick wall tube.
 They must pump oil into the bearing.   The rear slideway looks to be a
box way or something else.   There is no doubt a limit to how long they
can produce a Z axis in this form.  Shorter the better.

They seem to be using linear rails on the X axis.

>> You can't beat IRON and lots of it!   The reason I seem to collect
>> Hardinges ;)
>
> Yes, mass is always good. No doubt.

The best linear rail machines I have seen still used an iron base, but
it's still relying on all those little bolts. As machine tools can be
very resonant beasts it can cause problems.

Wayne...
Peter Neill - 27 Nov 2006 22:33 GMT
>>>> I would seriously consider "ball bushing" bearings or whatever ball
>> bearing
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Wayne...

My old Summagraphics A0 pen plotter had a stepper driven head, and ran
in plain oilite bushes on a ground 10mm shaft about a metre long. Did
a fair bit of mileage in the 13 years I had it and a few more in the
years before that. Still plotted perfectly with no stiction.

Designed and built a few cutting machines for mirror lens that we
moulded, and used plain bushes on a ground shaft too, in use everyday
since 1996 and still going strong as far as I know. Ran via pneumatic
& hydro-pneumatic motion rather than steppers though.

However, I can't disagree with you about using the lowest friction
bearings wherever possible, and linear ball bushings aren't that
expensive now, and neither is hardened and ground shafting.

Peter
Wayne Weedon - 27 Nov 2006 22:46 GMT
> My old Summagraphics A0 pen plotter had a stepper driven head, and ran
> in plain oilite bushes on a ground 10mm shaft about a metre long. Did
> a fair bit of mileage in the 13 years I had it and a few more in the
> years before that. Still plotted perfectly with no stiction.

The job I was talking about was a linear displacement transducer. Before
use  DU's the bearing was just the brass body of the instrument.   This
was broached to the correct diameter, which gave a fantastic action, but
was expensive.  Like you said can last a long time, I remember an
instrument coming back for service after 15 million full stroke cycles
(10mm) measuring Weetabix boxes!  It was as good as new.

The DU's were a cost cutting exercise, and once the problem was resolved
it was perfect, but not as long lasting as the plain bearing.

> However, I can't disagree with you about using the lowest friction
> bearings wherever possible, and linear ball bushings aren't that
> expensive now, and neither is hardened and ground shafting.

Especially with steppers, they are rather sensitive devices.  I tend to
use servo's on my CNC's when I can.

Wayne...
Chris Edwards - 28 Nov 2006 09:17 GMT
>> My old Summagraphics A0 pen plotter had a stepper driven head, and ran
>> in plain oilite bushes on a ground 10mm shaft about a metre long. Did
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Wayne...
   
    For the benefit of the terminally bewildered - would somebody
kindly tell me (and the majority of the other silent witnesses) what DU
stands for!
--

Chris Edwards (in deepest Dorset)      "....there *must* be an easier way!"
John Stevenson - 28 Nov 2006 09:23 GMT
>>> My old Summagraphics A0 pen plotter had a stepper driven head, and ran
>>> in plain oilite bushes on a ground 10mm shaft about a metre long. Did
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
>Chris Edwards (in deepest Dorset)      "....there *must* be an easier way!"    

Depleted Uranium......<bg>

.                    
--
Regards,

John Stevenson
Nottingham, England.

Visit the new Model Engineering adverts page at:-
http://www.homeworkshop.org.uk/
Chris Edwards - 28 Nov 2006 09:33 GMT
>>>> My old Summagraphics A0 pen plotter had a stepper driven head, and ran
>>>> in plain oilite bushes on a ground 10mm shaft about a metre long. Did
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
>.                    
    Get on with your work!
--

Chris Edwards (in deepest Dorset)      "....there *must* be an easier way!"
Tim Leech - 27 Nov 2006 21:37 GMT
>Er.. well yes my experience does include DU bushes from 8 mm to 50 mm bore,
>they are good, but if you can get a ball bushing or other ball based linear
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>
>> Your experience obviously doesn't include DU bushes.

My Ward T&C grinder has DU slides

Tim

Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
Tom - 27 Nov 2006 22:08 GMT
> Er.. well yes my experience does include DU bushes from 8 mm to 50 mm bore,
> they are good, but if you can get a ball bushing or other ball based linear
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> >
> > Your experience obviously doesn't include DU bushes.

Rubbish

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

John Montrose - 27 Nov 2006 20:27 GMT
>I have been toying with the idea of making a 2 1/2D cnc router to cut out ribs
>etc for model airplanes.  My thoughts for the slides were hovering around
>lengths of ground ms bar, the saddles being cut from box-section ms having holes
>drilled for plastic bearing bushes.

Can't help on the bearings, sorry. But ground bar can be very
expensive. I was looking for some a while ago for an overarm for a
milling machine. I ended up buying hard chromed bar from a hydraulic
ram supplier.

How is the router itself 2 1/2D? Manual Z? Isn't that limitation only
imposed by the CAM you use?
Andrew Bishop - 27 Nov 2006 20:29 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Many thanks,

try this guy  http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Marchant-Dice-Ltd  I brought a couple
of things from him

usual disclaimer

Andrew
Martin Whybrow - 27 Nov 2006 21:36 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Many thanks,

You seem to be missing the point (as does everyone else) that Moglice is
cast in place in a housing (it's mixed up like an epoxy) so getting the
perfect fit is easy.
It does suffer with high initial friction but the bearings bed in after a
few cycles (in my experience). One thing to watch out for is that they don't
get exposed to heat, we found that they tend to flow at >70C causing them to
seize up (found during an elevated temperature storage test).
Martin
Signature

martin<dot here>whybrow<at here>ntlworld<dot here>com

ravensworth2674 - 28 Nov 2006 07:57 GMT
Going off at a sort of tangent. Can anyone give me the addresses or web
sites of suppliers of Turcite and Moglice in amounts suitable for the
one off bloke like me?

Many thanks

Norman
Tony Jeffree - 28 Nov 2006 11:36 GMT
>Going off at a sort of tangent. Can anyone give me the addresses or web
>sites of suppliers of Turcite and Moglice in amounts suitable for the
>one off bloke like me?

I bought a small quantity of SKC 400 ELF from a local company here in
Sale a while back - its a PTFE filled castable epoxy. Planned to use
it to re-do my lTaig mill feednuts till I discovered that the backlash
was bearing end-play and crappy couplers - see my article in latest
MEW.

So, its still in its tin waiting for an excuse to use it on something
- I'm sure I will find a use for it at some point!

SKC's website:

http://www.skc-technik.de/e/e_index.html

UK dealer details:

M. Buttkereit Ltd.
Unit 2, Britannia Road
Sale, Cheshire M33 2AD

Tel. +44 (0) 161 9695418
Fax +44 (0) 161 9695419

info@buttkereit.co.uk

Regards,
Tony
ravensworth2674 - 28 Nov 2006 12:13 GMT
Tony, Many thanks from the once capital of the innovative industry.

Any chance that you could squeeze a bit down line as I am farting about
with the feed nuts on a Super7B which had a gear box full of mahogany
dust on purchase?
The rest is quite unprintable.

Again, my thanks- meanwhile, back to the shed!

Norman
Mark Rand - 28 Nov 2006 12:44 GMT
>Tony, Many thanks from the once capital of the innovative industry.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Norman

Just get a new pair from Myfords, they're not expensive.

Mark Rand
RTFM
Tony Jeffree - 28 Nov 2006 13:12 GMT
>Any chance that you could squeeze a bit down line

Its not a terribly divisible product unfortunately - it comes in a tin
with a separate bottle of hardener so its a bit of an all or nothing
job - and for what I paid for this lot (about 50 squid when you add
all the release agent paraphenalia, cartridges so that you can inject
the stuff, VAT, etc. etc.) you could probably get some shiny new nuts
from Myfraud & still have change for a couple of pints to wash the
mahogany dust out of your system.

Regards,
Tony
ravensworth2674 - 28 Nov 2006 13:49 GMT
The feed nuts are only the first part. I am now setting up dial
assemblies which are somewhat( geez) worn. And then there are the gibs
which will go onto the little Clarkson and so ad infinitum.And then
there is this Cervantes fellow who wrote " Patience, fleas, the night
is long" if you know what I mean.

Like the old maxim about having a spare clip of ammo.- Prediction is
very difficult especially about the future.

Thanks again

Norm
Peter Fairbrother - 29 Nov 2006 11:53 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Many thanks,

My homebrew hot wire foam cutter uses leaded bronze bushes (mounted in ali
box sections cut from a builders level bought in a sale) sliding on plain
ordinary unground stainless steel rods - I didn't want to use ms or cast
iron for the rods in order to avoid any possible corrosion problems,
although the frame is 18x18 mm MS box section. I did polish the rods a bit,
by hand, but I don't know that it mattered.

Uses B+Q 6x1 mm threaded rods for leadscrews, and four small very cheap
200-step steppers directly connected to the screws. Uses the bearings in the
motors for reference points, with just a loose hole in the box section for
location at the other end, though I once planned to fit a sleeve. If there
is any play, I can't see it.

~1310 mm long with two 240x120 mm X-Y areas, used for cutting wings from
1220 mm long foam blocks. As accurate as I could wish, repeatable to within
a thou or better :). Runs on a BBC micro though, so it's a hassle to input
wing sections.

The forces on a router will be quite a bit larger than on a hotwire cutter,
but I'd guess that wouldn't cause any real problems. I'd use thicker rods -
mine are only 8mm, for a small router I'd go to at least 16 mm and maybe
more.

If you want real rigidity though, and you might, try 25/30 mm cast iron bar
- College Engineering sell it "proof machined", but it ain't cheap.

The used front suspension struts Tom mentioned also sound interesting. But
bronze will do for bearings.

Signature

Peter Fairbrother

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.