Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / December 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Suits you sir...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Myford Matt - 29 Nov 2006 22:41 GMT
..now that's a nice lathe

eBay: 26005760782

--
Myford Mat
Wayne Weedon - 01 Dec 2006 21:24 GMT
> ...now that's a nice lathe
>
> eBay: 260057607829

It is..  All DSG machine are very nice so are Holbrooks.   Shame they
are all very limited by their very low highest spindle speeds.

Wayne..
Tim Leech - 01 Dec 2006 22:08 GMT
>> ...now that's a nice lathe
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Wayne..

I'm not sure that's entirely fair.
I agree for that 13" lathe 750 rpm is very low, but my 17" from 1955
has a top speed of 1230 rpm. I know that's not high by modern
standards, but the lathe is replacing a 400mm (16") TOS which had two
speed ranges - up to 1000 & up to 2000 rpm. I had that for 6 years,
never used it in the higher range, never had any wish to do so.

Cheers
Tim

Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
Wayne Weedon - 01 Dec 2006 23:06 GMT
> I'm not sure that's entirely fair.

Maybe not, seeing as they are from a bygone age.

The main issue these days is not comparison to more modern machinery but
rather the needs of modern carbide tooling.   This tooling is not
designed for or works well at such low speeds.

Still a lovely machine though, they really had some nice features.

Wayne...
Mark Rand - 01 Dec 2006 23:57 GMT
>> I'm not sure that's entirely fair.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Wayne...

Hold on a minute... 2 1/5" diameter at 750rpm is nigh on 500sfpm. The lathe
isn't designed as a bloody watchmakers lathe. It'll produce as much blue swarf
as one can eat, if turning the parts that it was designed to turn.

Mark Rand
RTFM
Wayne Weedon - 02 Dec 2006 00:19 GMT
> Hold on a minute... 2 1/5" diameter at 750rpm is nigh on 500sfpm. The lathe
> isn't designed as a bloody watchmakers lathe. It'll produce as much blue swarf
> as one can eat, if turning the parts that it was designed to turn.

Hold onto your rattle Mark ;)

500fpm eh.  Glad I can go a lot higher than that ;)  Maybe it's the
reason my inserts last a fair while.

Here's some carbide feeds n speeds for you 500 fpm is NOT fast.

http://www.carbidedepot.com/iscar-spdsfds.htm

I'm NOT knocking it...  But if you want to go slow then I can recommend
the KC720 grade from Kennametal for the speed challenged lathes.

I guess the fact I'm production orintated makes me work that way even if
I'm doing model engineering.

Nor is the Colchester Triumph range of lathes a watchmakers lathe and
they all did 2000 rpm, the later ones 2500.

Your not meant to eat blue swarf you should be able to chip it enough so
you can move aside and hit the guy 10 feet behind you ;)

Wayne...
Tim Leech - 02 Dec 2006 09:43 GMT
>> Hold on a minute... 2 1/5" diameter at 750rpm is nigh on 500sfpm. The lathe
>> isn't designed as a bloody watchmakers lathe. It'll produce as much blue swarf
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>Nor is the Colchester Triumph range of lathes a watchmakers lathe and
>they all did 2000 rpm, the later ones 2500.

Nitpicking a bit, I think the older Triumphs were limited to around
the 1000 rpm mark.

>Your not meant to eat blue swarf you should be able to chip it enough so
>you can move aside and hit the guy 10 feet behind you ;)

I could certainly do that on my TOS, even in the lower speed range <G>

Going back to DSG's, this item strikes me as a bit odd

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260039621953

Clearly a fairly old machine (1930's?), with a rather poor & tasteless
(IMO) paint job, capacity isn't specified, and a very high price.
If he's just using the item to advertise his services, as I suspect, I
wouldn't see that as a very good advert.

As for the original DSG in the subject, it's clearly got some extra
goodies which the vendor hasn't mentioned. A relieving attachment
perhaps? I've seen one, but can't remember what it looked like.

Cheers

Tim
Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
Wayne Weedon - 02 Dec 2006 10:03 GMT
> Nitpicking a bit, I think the older Triumphs were limited to around
> the 1000 rpm mark.

Yes the roundhead ones.  I was referring more to the more modern triumph
2000 range.    Even the Mastif could do 1400 rpm IIRC.   I used to run a
90's shortbed VS2500 with the 10HP VFD drive, that thing was so versatile.

>> Your not meant to eat blue swarf you should be able to chip it enough so
>> you can move aside and hit the guy 10 feet behind you ;)
>
> I could certainly do that on my TOS, even in the lower speed range <G>

I used to constantly do it when roughing billets of 6" en24T and EN40
crankshaft blanks!  Nice short chips, but bloody hurt when then managed
to hit me.   There was really no-one behind me by the way !

> Going back to DSG's, this item strikes me as a bit odd
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> If he's just using the item to advertise his services, as I suspect, I
> wouldn't see that as a very good advert.

It is rather expensive.

> As for the original DSG in the subject, it's clearly got some extra
> goodies which the vendor hasn't mentioned. A relieving attachment
> perhaps? I've seen one, but can't remember what it looked like.

and a taper turning attachment which I dont think he mentions.

As lovely as these machines are, they occupy a fair bit of real estate.
 I'm still surprised that not more Hardinge's are used in ME circles.
 Even the Feeler copies which come up from time to time are good.

Wayne...
Mark Rand - 02 Dec 2006 23:47 GMT
>> Hold on a minute... 2 1/5" diameter at 750rpm is nigh on 500sfpm. The lathe
>> isn't designed as a bloody watchmakers lathe. It'll produce as much blue swarf
>> as one can eat, if turning the parts that it was designed to turn.
>
>Hold onto your rattle Mark ;)

Just pissed off because I'm currently trying to remove significant amounts of
metal whilst limited, temporarily, to 600rpm and 1/4hp :-(

>500fpm eh.  Glad I can go a lot higher than that ;)  Maybe it's the
>reason my inserts last a fair while.

At 500fpm with the current EN24, I'm getting the swarf coming off red. The
nuisance is that I can't keep the speed up with the smaller diameters.

If I broke off from swarf making for long enough to get a pulley for the
3-phase motor and wire it up to the invertor I've already mounted in the
stand, then I'd be able to get 1500rpm. Me, stupid... I don't know what you're
talking about :-)

>Here's some carbide feeds n speeds for you 500 fpm is NOT fast.
>
>http://www.carbidedepot.com/iscar-spdsfds.htm

Not fast, but perfectly acceptable and that was at 2 1/2", at 17" the speed
would be a little more!

>I'm NOT knocking it...  But if you want to go slow then I can recommend
>the KC720 grade from Kennametal for the speed challenged lathes.

Trouble is, they only make drilling bits in that grade :-{

I'm currently looking for better options in CCM* and CNM* styles, but I
suspect that the problems will reduce drastically once the Hardinge is
operational.

>I guess the fact I'm production orintated makes me work that way even if
>I'm doing model engineering.
>
>Nor is the Colchester Triumph range of lathes a watchmakers lathe and
>they all did 2000 rpm, the later ones 2500.

They are very lightly built compared with DSG's. This can be significant when
you are turning parts weighing a ton and a half, which is the sort of size we
would expect to handle in a 17" DSG

>Your not meant to eat blue swarf you should be able to chip it enough so
>you can move aside and hit the guy 10 feet behind you ;)
>
>Wayne...

Mark Rand
RTFM
Wayne Weedon - 03 Dec 2006 00:17 GMT
> Just pissed off because I'm currently trying to remove significant amounts of
> metal whilst limited, temporarily, to 600rpm and 1/4hp :-(

I can imagine.   When I worked in a small engine development shop, I
used to turn a lot of cranks from billet.  The Colchester VS2500 used to
knock down 5-6" diameter EN40B to say about an inch dia for the end
journals in about 10 minutes or less.  No-one wanted to be in the
workshop working behind me though !

> At 500fpm with the current EN24, I'm getting the swarf coming off red. The
> nuisance is that I can't keep the speed up with the smaller diameters.

I've turned a LOT of EN24T we used to get almost mirror finishes on it
with heavy cuts and negative inserts.   Are you rounging my facing to
diameter?  I found that easier on the lathe sometimes.

> Trouble is, they only make drilling bits in that grade :-{

CCMT is available I'm sure. I use them on the M300 clone.  I think you
got to ask, J&L may not list all grades in the catalogue.

> I'm currently looking for better options in CCM* and CNM* styles, but I
> suspect that the problems will reduce drastically once the Hardinge is
> operational.

So you have at least one redeeming feature ;)  I'm very fond of the flat
bed Hardinges myself.  I own a couple ;)  One 5C one 16C.

> They are very lightly built compared with DSG's. This can be significant when
> you are turning parts weighing a ton and a half, which is the sort of size we
> would expect to handle in a 17" DSG

True.   But they are able to take some decent cuts.  I prefer the
shorter bed variants.  Fair bit stiffer.  Very popular down here.   I'd
have another 7Kw VS2500 in a flash if I had the room.

Wayne...
Wayne Weedon - 03 Dec 2006 22:26 GMT
>> I'm NOT knocking it...  But if you want to go slow then I can recommend
>> the KC720 grade from Kennametal for the speed challenged lathes.
>
> Trouble is, they only make drilling bits in that grade :-{

Mark

Just had a chance to cheack some inserts.   I quoted KC720, in fact I
think I should of said KC730.  That was the positive grade more suited
to lower RPM's

Wayne...
Austin Shackles - 03 Dec 2006 21:47 GMT
>Nor is the Colchester Triumph range of lathes a watchmakers lathe and
>they all did 2000 rpm, the later ones 2500.

not sure the earlier ones did.

There was a Mk1 Triumph on ebay earlier for about 300-odd notes.

"8 speeds were provided that could, on the first models, be specified as
either 30 to 600 rpm or 40 to 800 rpm; originally a single-speed 3 hp motor
(later 5 hp) was fitted but within a few years machines were being offered
with either an 8-speed 50 to 1000 rpm speed range or a two-speed motor that
provided 16 speeds from 30 to 1200 rpm."

Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
Blue:  The sky is blue for a reason.  Blue light is a source of strength
and harmony in the cosmos.  Create a blue light in your life by
telephoning the police
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.

Wayne Weedon - 03 Dec 2006 22:24 GMT
> "8 speeds were provided that could, on the first models, be specified as
> either 30 to 600 rpm or 40 to 800 rpm; originally a single-speed 3 hp motor
> (later 5 hp) was fitted but within a few years machines were being offered
> with either an 8-speed 50 to 1000 rpm speed range or a two-speed motor that
> provided 16 speeds from 30 to 1200 rpm."

Thats why the Triumph 2000 was brought out  ;)   Not used a round head
one for years.

Wayne..
Austin Shackles - 04 Dec 2006 21:41 GMT
>> "8 speeds were provided that could, on the first models, be specified as
>> either 30 to 600 rpm or 40 to 800 rpm; originally a single-speed 3 hp motor
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Thats why the Triumph 2000 was brought out  ;)   Not used a round head
>one for years.

good machines, though, if they've been reasonably looked after.  My
roundhead student is 1960, apparently, and has had what appears to be a
rather chequered career - but with a bit of fettling it's getting quite good
again.

However, I won't be buying a new crossfeed screw and nut - found a supplier,
but they cost more than I paid for the lathe.  I'll have to live with the 14
thou or so backlash in it.

Granted, for serious production work they're out of date, but for
small-scale, prototyping etc., you can get a hell of a lot of lathe for your
money.

I've been contemplating a 2-speed setup on mine.  They originally came with
the option of a 2-speed motor, giving both lower and higher speeds.  2-speed
single phase motor doesn't sound too easy, so I'm contemplating instead a
variation on the main belt drive, which is a biggish flat belt on this one.
Replacing the pulleys with some V (or A) belt ones ought to allow space for
2 different sizes.

Unless someone knows different about the single-phase motors... it's got a
1400-ish RPM one on it at the moment which is the correct speed (makes it a
4-pole, I think)
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
"I am tired and sick of war.  Its glory is all moonshine... War is hell"
Gen. Sherman (1820-1891) Attr. words in Address at Michigan Military
Academy, 19 June 1879.

Wayne Weedon - 04 Dec 2006 22:35 GMT
> However, I won't be buying a new crossfeed screw and nut - found a supplier,
> but they cost more than I paid for the lathe.  I'll have to live with the 14
> thou or so backlash in it.

You might be able to buy stock LH acme screw and nut somewhere, and
modify to suit.  Or even make them.

> Granted, for serious production work they're out of date, but for
> small-scale, prototyping etc., you can get a hell of a lot of lathe for your
> money.

I nearly bought a roundhead triumph some years ago, somplete with
Ainjest and loads of other tooling, but by then I had been spoilt by
faster machines, and as I mainly do production work it was a wise
choice.  The Ainjest would of been handy on occasions though.

> I've been contemplating a 2-speed setup on mine.  They originally came with
> the option of a 2-speed motor, giving both lower and higher speeds.  2-speed
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> 1400-ish RPM one on it at the moment which is the correct speed (makes it a
> 4-pole, I think)

Yes 4 pole.   But have you considered a 3 phase 3 or 4Hp motor and VFD?
 Much easier.

Wayne....
Austin Shackles - 05 Dec 2006 09:40 GMT
>Yes 4 pole.   But have you considered a 3 phase 3 or 4Hp motor and VFD?
>  Much easier.

not if you don't have 3-phase.

Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
"Nessun maggior dolore che ricordarsi del tempo felice nella miseria"
- Dante Alighieri (1265 - 1321) from Divina Commedia 'Inferno'

Wayne Weedon - 05 Dec 2006 10:26 GMT
>> Yes 4 pole.   But have you considered a 3 phase 3 or 4Hp motor and VFD?
>>  Much easier.
>
> not if you don't have 3-phase.

Austin

Single phase input VFD's are easily available upto 3Kw.   2.2Kw is more
common though.

A VFD will give you variable speed from just about zero rpm to more or
less whatever's safe for your machine.

What HP are you using?

Wayne...
Tim Leech - 05 Dec 2006 11:27 GMT
>>> Yes 4 pole.   But have you considered a 3 phase 3 or 4Hp motor and VFD?
>>>  Much easier.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>A VFD will give you variable speed from just about zero rpm to more or
>less whatever's safe for your machine.

Some in the UK might not realise that VFD (variable frequency drive)
is the same thing as an inverter drive (or indeed an AC VSD!)

>What HP are you using?

My MkII student had 3hp, I've just converted a CVA with 4hp motor to
single phase input inverter drive, which works a treat.
240V input drives do seem to get expensive over a couple of hp,
though.

Cheers
Tim
Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
Wayne Weedon - 05 Dec 2006 12:27 GMT
> Some in the UK might not realise that VFD (variable frequency drive)
> is the same thing as an inverter drive (or indeed an AC VSD!)
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> 240V input drives do seem to get expensive over a couple of hp,
> though.

Yes they do get a little expensive.   Last year I bought a 4HP Siemens
drive with a good cast iron flange mount motor and braking resistor for
one of my cnc retrofits.   I think it all came to about a grand.

2.2Kw would not cost anywhere near as much.

Wayne...
Austin Shackles - 05 Dec 2006 14:11 GMT
>>Single phase input VFD's are easily available upto 3Kw.   2.2Kw is more
>>common though.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Some in the UK might not realise that VFD (variable frequency drive)
>is the same thing as an inverter drive (or indeed an AC VSD!)

aha, thanks.

I've looked into it a bit - by far the cheapest option is to replace the
current motor with a bigger single-phase one.  Doesn't get me any more
speed, though, but it'd make it easier to use the higher gears it's got.  

most of the time I'm doing small diameter jobs, and running faster would be
good.

Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
Soon shall thy arm, unconquered steam! afar  Drag the slow barge, or
drive the rapid car; Or on wide-waving wings expanded bear the
flying chariot through the field of air.- Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802)

Austin Shackles - 05 Dec 2006 14:07 GMT
>>> Yes 4 pole.   But have you considered a 3 phase 3 or 4Hp motor and VFD?
>>>  Much easier.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Single phase input VFD's are easily available upto 3Kw.   2.2Kw is more
>common though.

2.2 is about 3HP which is what the Student should have...

VFD? Variable Field Device?  Visceral Function Detector?

OK, I could google for it...

>A VFD will give you variable speed from just about zero rpm to more or
>less whatever's safe for your machine.
>
>What HP are you using?

the current motor is only a 1.5HP, and as such not really enough for the
machine; it'll only run at 1200 once it's warmed up; it needs a bigger motor
anyway, and a bit more top speed would be nice.  Colchester sold them
running at up to 1500 (with the 2-speed motor) so I don't see why I
shouldn't run it at up to 1500.

variable speed would be neat though, especially as I could then up the
pulley speed so as to get 1500 top end and no lose the low speed in the
process.  Currently, it goes down to 54 and I do actually use that
sometimes.

Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
Soon shall thy arm, unconquered steam! afar  Drag the slow barge, or
drive the rapid car; Or on wide-waving wings expanded bear the
flying chariot through the field of air.- Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802)

Wayne Weedon - 05 Dec 2006 19:26 GMT
> VFD? Variable Field Device?  Visceral Function Detector?

Variable Frequency Drive.

> the current motor is only a 1.5HP, and as such not really enough for the
> machine; it'll only run at 1200 once it's warmed up; it needs a bigger motor
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> process.  Currently, it goes down to 54 and I do actually use that
> sometimes.

There are more benefits to be had by using a VFD over any single phase
motor other than the ability to alter the speed.

1. Programmable start up ramp usually from zero to many seconds.
2. Same with deceleration.
3. Instant reversing

Plus some others not so obvious ;)

The output frequency and therefore speed can be altered from zero to
200-400 hz in many cases.  BUT you have to be sensible!   Some motors
and other parts of the machine may not be able to withstand such speeds.

As an example, my CNC machining centre has a spindle rated 2 pole motor
which does 3000rpm at 50 Hz.  I have max frequency set to 100Hz or 6000
rpm, which is what the spindle itself is rated to.  I can go from
0.5Hz-100hz in 2 seconds and 100Hz to stop in 0.5 seconds (Braking
resistor fitted).

But your 1500 rpm will be easy for a delta connected 3 phase motor and
VFD of 3HP rating.

J.S.  or others may be able to suggest sources, I have used in the past
 http://www.acpd.co.uk/9.html  Sometimes eve RS have good prices on VFD's.

Wayne...
Austin Shackles - 06 Dec 2006 12:45 GMT
>> VFD? Variable Field Device?  Visceral Function Detector?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Plus some others not so obvious ;)

All sounds neat.  I assume though that what I need to work this is the VFD
and a suitable-sized 3-phase motor?

Unless I can find 'em second hand, I reckon from some study that this would
cost about 4x what a bigger single-phase motor would cost, even considering
that 4 pole motors cost more than 2-pole.

another nice touch would be to get hold of the clutch which was apparently
fitted to single-phase and DC machines, but unless I happened to find one
cheap somewhere I'm not likely to do that either.
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
"Remember that to change your mind and follow him who sets you right
is to be none the less free than you were before."
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (121-180), from Meditations, VIII.16

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.