Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / December 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Slight differences

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mark Rand - 11 Dec 2006 23:12 GMT
Over the weekend I needed to change the anvil on a 2"-6" micrometer. As a
matter of course I checked it against my (Chinese) gauge blocks. After having
done this, on a whim, I checked it against the late father's incomplete
collection of gauge blocks. Those blocks are mostly Matrix, with some S.E
Johansen.

The 3" blocks sere different to the eye and finger and micrometer. Checking
with a comparator showed the Matrix gauge to be a whole three tenths shorter
than the Chinese gauge. A combination of one and two inch blocks showed four
tenths shorter than the Chinese combination. The Chinese blocks agreed with
each other. A .55" S.E.J block showed three tenths shorter than the equivalent
Chinese block as well.

Until this last measurement I was having severe doubts about the Chinese set,
the last measurement and some later ones seem to indicate that dad's ones may
have re-lapped several times during calibration but not had the certificate
with them when the old man got them. I still won't be certain until I've
either scrounged the use of some Grade 0 blocks and a comparator at work or
paid more than the blocks cost to get them calibrated.

I'm continuing to use the Chinese blocks because they agree with themselves
and most of my collection of micrometer standards and zero-able mikes, but
it's been a bit of a blow to the confidence.

The moral is, don't assume that old measuring kit is accurate, or new
measuring kit for that matter...

The good news is that you _can_ work to 2 tenths on diameter with an ML7, if
you are careful :-)

Mark Rand
RTFM
Nick Mueller - 11 Dec 2006 23:33 GMT
> The moral is, don't assume that old measuring kit is accurate, or new
> measuring kit for that matter...

I had an inside-micrometer (5..30mm, Chinese) that I allways doubted. Until
I found out that its spindle has an pitch-error of 0.004mm per mm. The only
thing that is accurate is the 5mm gage ring that came with it. -0.0005mm.

Nick
Signature

***********************************
*** Available now in NZ and AUS ***
***********************************
       <http://www.yadro.de>

Pat Martindale - 12 Dec 2006 09:32 GMT
>The good news is that you _can_ work to 2 tenths on diameter with an ML7, if
>you are careful :-)

I always work to "two tenths"...

.....  give or take the odd eighth of an inch that is accurate enough
for anyone...:-/

Regards,

Signature

Pat Martindale

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.