Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Part P petition

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Andrew Mawson - 23 Jan 2007 10:36 GMT
Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
10 web site.

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Part-P-Review/

AWEM
mark@ems-fife.co.uk - 23 Jan 2007 11:07 GMT
> Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
> interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> AWEM

I think they should make it stiffer,Andrew.(BG) Start with testing all
the time served would be sparks out there.We only let subbies wire
lights and plugs and run cables to but not connect to machines.One guy
we use is not allowed to touch anything unless I have checked it is
safe as he has shocked himself twice here and blew a finger off on
another job.I opened up a five pin plug at the weekend that another
approved spark had wired.He had Black-phase 1,Black-ph 2,Blue-ph 3 and
Brown-neutral.And they wonder why I won`t let them into machine panels.
Mark.
Mike H - 23 Jan 2007 11:37 GMT
In message <1169550477.598212.314000@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"mark@ems-fife.co.uk" <mark@ems-fife.co.uk> writes concerning

>> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Part-P-Review/
>>
>I think they should make it stiffer,
Then it is up to you to start an alternative petition.

Insofar as the building regulations are concerned with domestic wiring
the existing position is "...The number of relevant fatalities has more
than doubled since its introduction [and this is] probably due to the
use of dangerous temporary 'lash-ups' rather than safe fixed wiring thus
avoiding the hassle and expense of complying with Part P. There is no
evidence to
indicate that there has ever been a problem with non-professionally
installed fixed wiring."

Meanwhile, having very recently installed lighting in my wife's art
studio, I am more than happy to sign
<http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Part-P-Review/>.
Signature

Mike Hopkins
CSME <http://www.cheltsme.org.uk>
5" gauge (2 1/2" scale) Alice class Hunslet

mark@ems-fife.co.uk - 23 Jan 2007 12:33 GMT
> Then it is up to you to start an alternative petition.

> --
> Mike Hopkins
> CSME <http://www.cheltsme.org.uk>
> 5" gauge (2 1/2" scale) Alice class Hunslet

The last thing we need is more petitions or rules and regulations for
that matter.
Mark
Martin Whybrow - 23 Jan 2007 19:19 GMT
> In message <1169550477.598212.314000@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "mark@ems-fife.co.uk" <mark@ems-fife.co.uk> writes concerning
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> indicate that there has ever been a problem with non-professionally
> installed fixed wiring."

This is pretty much what I and a few other (competent) people I know,
predicted would happen.
Signed.
Martin
Signature

martin<dot here>whybrow<at here>ntlworld<dot here>com

DCreed - 23 Jan 2007 23:15 GMT
I am only rated at city and guilds level and did appliance repair
washers, microwaves etc but one of the things i could never come t
terms with was the customers attitude. I remeber one call out to a
oven problem, i pulled the oven out from its housing and sat it on th
floor. I looked at the wiring which was cloth covered and connected b
a chocky block, i told the lady of the house that most times whe
looking at the morning news, (a family had died due to an electrica
fault), i walked out of the house, anyone would, the last thing yo
want is your name associated with that sort of job. Did i get the job
never heard from them since, Dav

--
DCree
Bill - 23 Jan 2007 12:07 GMT
> > Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
> > interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Brown-neutral.And they wonder why I won`t let them into machine panels.
> Mark.

Is this a case of you get what you pay for, Pay peanuts get monkeys?
Why cant i work on my home electrics without breaking the law?
Why not then ban private cars and make us use taxis because a few
people drive like c.nts?
Roger Smith - 23 Jan 2007 22:22 GMT
>> > Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
>> > interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>Why not then ban private cars and make us use taxis because a few
>people drive like c.nts?

Not the same thing, they aren't stopping you from using your home
electric's.

A better match would be if they introduced a law to make you have any
rebuilt and modified car tested before you were allowed to drive it on
the road.

The electrician who fixed the 1920's wiring in my dads house last year
said that insurers probably wouldn't pay out if they could blame
someone's uncertified DIY wiring work. So it's not necessarily just a
problem when selling.
Signature

aRJay
Who merely lurks here.

Austin Shackles - 24 Jan 2007 17:40 GMT
>Not the same thing, they aren't stopping you from using your home
>electric's.
>
>A better match would be if they introduced a law to make you have any
>rebuilt and modified car tested before you were allowed to drive it on
>the road.

I'm waiting for a thing that says I can't repair me own motors, without
taking to be inspected at ruinous expense.

>The electrician who fixed the 1920's wiring in my dads house last year
>said that insurers probably wouldn't pay out if they could blame
>someone's uncertified DIY wiring work. So it's not necessarily just a
>problem when selling.

I'm all in favour of safety, just that I don't think the Prat P regulations
are doing much to improve it.

as with most recent legislation, the underlying idea is good, but the
implementation is a pile of crap.
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
"My centre is giving way, my right is in retreat; situation excellent.  
I shall attack. - Marshal Foch (1851 - 1929)

Charles Ping - 23 Jan 2007 12:43 GMT
>> Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
>> interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>Brown-neutral.And they wonder why I won`t let them into machine panels.
>Mark.

Just shows how crap the system is doesn't it.
Needs revising

Charles
Chris Edwards - 30 Jan 2007 15:28 GMT
Charles

    Re the air brush you are advertising for a tenner....if it's still
available, I would like it please.

Regards
--

Chris Edwards (in deepest Dorset)      "....there *must* be an easier way!"
James - 23 Jan 2007 20:42 GMT
> I think they should make it stiffer,Andrew.(BG) Start with testing all
> the time served would be sparks out there.We only let subbies wire
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Brown-neutral.And they wonder why I won`t let them into machine panels.
> Mark.

This is irrelevant to Part P - which only applies to domestic installations.

James
Joules Beech - 23 Jan 2007 21:01 GMT
>> I think they should make it stiffer,Andrew.(BG) Start with testing all
>> the time served would be sparks out there.We only let subbies wire
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> James

WHAT....  Our 3 phase Morphy Richards boils a litre of water in about 5
seconds... The snag is condensing it so we can get the water in the
cups.  Three phase in the domestic kitchen is a must, never had a load
the Kenwood mixer couldn't handle, even if it had set....

                Joules, pass me the 3 phase twist connectors...
Steve W - 24 Jan 2007 20:12 GMT
>>> I think they should make it stiffer,Andrew.(BG) Start with testing all
>>> the time served would be sparks out there.We only let subbies wire
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>                 Joules, pass me the 3 phase twist connectors...

You obviously had lessons from my Grandad - he had a 13 amp socket wired one
phase to each pin...

The house I grew up in had three phase terminated in the garage but only one
phase taken into the house.

Steve
mark - 23 Jan 2007 16:08 GMT
> Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
> interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> AWEM

Whats part p

Is it something to do with diyers.
and banning DIyers from putting in or extending their electrical
installation

whats to stop you just ignoring it ...and just doing it yourself anyway
..
they are never going to know
its impossible to find out.

please explain ..
then i can make my mind up weather to put my name to this petition ..

a petition ...that you read ...and your still not any the wiser, what
it's going on about.!!!

who ever made this petition...if it is aimed at DIYers ...
then it should be spelled out ...
in simple terms ...weather it is about banning them.

All the best...mark
Andrew Mawson - 23 Jan 2007 16:30 GMT
> > Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
> > interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> All the best...mark

It is a new(ish) addition to the electrical regulations effectively
preventing you from making additions or alterations to your own
domestic wiring. If you 'just do it' then at the time you sell your
house you may well have certification problems. To make it
additionally difficult, new 'harmonised' wiring colours have been
introduced to make it more obvious that changes have been made.

AWEM
mark - 23 Jan 2007 18:04 GMT
> > > Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may
> be
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> AWEM

thankyou andrew
but there is still nothing stopping you saying that the wiring etc
...was done before this new law came in.

unless its in a new extention .

signing petition now

still think the author should reword it ...so every one understands

all the best.mark
Tony Jeffree - 23 Jan 2007 21:35 GMT
>but there is still nothing stopping you saying that the wiring etc
>...was done before this new law came in.

....but only if you can get cable that isn't to the new spec and
dated. Otherwise its a bit of a giveaway.

Regards,
Tony
mark - 23 Jan 2007 21:57 GMT
> >but there is still nothing stopping you saying that the wiring etc
> >...was done before this new law came in.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Regards,
> Tony

so what youre saying is we all should get a good stock in of the old
red and black.

like so

100 mts of 2.5

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/100meter-2-5mm-Twin-and-earth-cable-red-and-black_W0QQitem
Z110082215830QQihZ001QQcategoryZ4667QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item110082215830


100 mts of this

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/FIRELLI-1MM-TWIN-EARTH-WHITE-SLEEVED-CABLE-DRUM_W0QQitemZ2
20072424167QQihZ012QQcategoryZ4667QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem?hash=ite
m220072424167


and so on ...
are the sockets marked in some way .

All the best.mark
Tony Jeffree - 23 Jan 2007 22:00 GMT
>so what youre saying is we all should get a good stock in of the old
>red and black.

I couldn't possibly comment <G>

>are the sockets marked in some way .

Dunno.

Regards,
Tony
Austin Shackles - 24 Jan 2007 17:42 GMT
>>so what youre saying is we all should get a good stock in of the old
>>red and black.
>
>I couldn't possibly comment <G>

I've got a big reel of 2.5 T&E in the shed, as it happens.
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
"My centre is giving way, my right is in retreat; situation excellent.  
I shall attack. - Marshal Foch (1851 - 1929)

Wayne Weedon - 23 Jan 2007 22:48 GMT
> so what youre saying is we all should get a good stock in of the old
> red and black.

Or red and black heatshrink tubing ;)
brian@brian-james.demon.co.uk - 24 Jan 2007 10:22 GMT
> > >but there is still nothing stopping you saying that the wiring etc
> > >...was done before this new law came in.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> 100 mts of 2.5

I moved back to blighty in May 04 and got my house in July 04. I had to convert the garage
into a workshop. I ordered all the necessary cable from Screwfix in August and it was all
had the new spec. colours. So if anyone asks I did all the work before 31 Dec 04 and no
one can prove others wise as I have receipts for the materials prior to the cut off date.

Brian
Martin Whybrow - 23 Jan 2007 22:56 GMT
> >but there is still nothing stopping you saying that the wiring etc
> >...was done before this new law came in.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Regards,
> Tony

For some reason red and black T&E cable seems very popular on ebay, can't
think why ;-)
Martin
Signature

martin<dot here>whybrow<at here>ntlworld<dot here>com

Greg - 24 Jan 2007 13:05 GMT
On 23 Jan, 22:56, "Martin Whybrow" <aholeinthegro...@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
Regards,
> For some reason red and black T&E cable seems very popular on ebay, can't
> think why ;-)

Because many sparkies were so out of touch with changes in legislation
that they were left with stocks they couldn't use?
Greg
Andrew Mawson - 24 Jan 2007 13:53 GMT
> On 23 Jan, 22:56, "Martin Whybrow" <aholeinthegro...@ntlworld.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> that they were left with stocks they couldn't use?
> Greg

Naive or what !

Prices are now well above original list in some cases

AWEM
Greg - 25 Jan 2007 13:25 GMT
On 24 Jan, 13:53, "Andrew Mawson" <andrew@no_spam_please_mawson.org.uk>
wrote:
> Naive or what !
>
> Prices are now well above original list in some cases

Yes, but it's not me being naive 8-), from the IET:

"The new (harmonised) colour cables may be used on site from 31 March
2004
New installations or alterations to existing installations may use
either new or old colours, but not both, from 31 March 2004 until 31
March 2006. Only the new colours may be used after 31 March 2006."

"a new version of Approved document P has been issued by the Department
for Communities and Local Government (formerly the Office of the Deputy
Prime Minister (ODPM)). This came into effect on Thursday 6th April
2006"

So the idea that using red/black gets you around part P is quite silly
because of the two year transition period for the harmonised wiring
colours which came BEFORE part P was compulsory, so there's plenty of
new coloured wiring that was done before part P.

Now if the claim was of an 'illicit' trade in any coloured cable dated
before 6/4/2006 then that would make a little sense.
Greg
Austin Shackles - 23 Jan 2007 22:45 GMT
>thankyou andrew
>but there is still nothing stopping you saying that the wiring etc
>...was done before this new law came in.

The new-colour wiring was not available before the new regulations.  any
new-colour wiring must therefore have been installed afterwards.
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
"Pereant qui ante nos nostra dixerunt"
(confound the men who have made our remarks before us.)
Aelius Donatus (4th Cent.) [St. Jerome, Commentary on Ecclesiastes]

Lester Caine - 23 Jan 2007 22:53 GMT
>> thankyou andrew
>> but there is still nothing stopping you saying that the wiring etc
>> ...was done before this new law came in.
>
> The new-colour wiring was not available before the new regulations.  any
> new-colour wiring must therefore have been installed afterwards.

But the old cable has not evaporated after the new regulations - I will
get round to finishing the extension to the house wiring sometime and
have all the wire and boxes already :)

Signature

Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php

Peter Parry - 24 Jan 2007 14:21 GMT
>The new-colour wiring was not available before the new regulations.  any
>new-colour wiring must therefore have been installed afterwards.

Yes it was - the new cable was required 6 months before Part P came
in and was available before then.
Signature

Peter Parry.  
http://www.wpp.ltd.uk/

Greg - 25 Jan 2007 13:27 GMT
On 23 Jan, 22:45, Austin Shackles
<austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESU...@ddol-las.net> wrote:
>The new-colour wiring was not available before the new regulations.  any
> new-colour wiring must therefore have been installed afterwards.

Nonesense, see my other post for the quotes, but the new colours could
be used for two years before part P was compulsary and in practice was
used for a significant time.
Greg
Chris Edwards - 25 Jan 2007 15:24 GMT
>On 23 Jan, 22:45, Austin Shackles
><austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESU...@ddol-las.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>used for a significant time.
>Greg
    What any of this rubbish has to do with uk.rec models engineering
is completely lost on me...this and several other current threads have more
to do with people liking the sound of their own voices than anything even
faintly useful to anybody of sound mind.

    Perhaps we're being infiltrated by Al Qaida?
--

Chris Edwards (in deepest Dorset)      "....there *must* be an easier way!"
David Littlewood - 25 Jan 2007 15:39 GMT
>>On 23 Jan, 22:45, Austin Shackles
>><austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESU...@ddol-las.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>to do with people liking the sound of their own voices than anything even
>faintly useful to anybody of sound mind.

Since many model engineers have rewired their workshops, or would
perhaps like to do so, ISTM that it is of direct relevance to many. If
you don't find a thread of interest, don't read it. It's not rocket
science.

David
Signature

David Littlewood

Greg - 26 Jan 2007 08:55 GMT
> What any of this rubbish has to do with uk.rec models engineering
> is completely lost on me...this and several other current threads have more
> to do with people liking the sound of their own voices than anything even
> faintly useful to anybody of sound mind.
>
>         Perhaps we're being infiltrated by Al Qaida?

You owning up? 8-)

As this group regularly discusses the wiring of workshops and machinery
it's very much on topic.
Greg
John Blakeley - 23 Jan 2007 16:58 GMT
>> Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
>> interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> All the best...mark

Nothing at all to stop you doing your own wiring if you don't mind
breaking the law. The problem will come when you want to sell your
property. The potential buyer's solicitor will want to see the buyers
pack (another government interference in how folk live their lives)with
the certificates to show that any wiring done since Jan 06 has been
carried out by 'approved' sparkies or checked by 'approved' experts; the
cable has a date stamp by the way.

So that nice new kitchen that's a major selling point must have a
certificate for its sockets and without it the solicitor won't let the
buyer touch your house.

I'll sign.

John B
Boo - 23 Jan 2007 17:21 GMT
> The potential buyer's solicitor will want to see the buyers
> pack

I think that's been killed.

Signature

Boo

Charles Lamont - 23 Jan 2007 23:29 GMT
>Nothing at all to stop you doing your own wiring if you don't mind
>breaking the law. The problem will come when you want to sell your
>property. The potential buyer's solicitor will want to see the buyers
>pack

I suspect you could also have problems with an insurance claim.

Signature

Charles Lamont

Lester Caine - 24 Jan 2007 07:05 GMT
>> Nothing at all to stop you doing your own wiring if you don't mind
>> breaking the law. The problem will come when you want to sell your
>> property. The potential buyer's solicitor will want to see the buyers
>> pack
>
> I suspect you could also have problems with an insurance claim.

Nothing new there then. Anybody NOT have problems with household
insurance claims :)

Signature

Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php

Austin Shackles - 24 Jan 2007 17:51 GMT
>>Nothing at all to stop you doing your own wiring if you don't mind
>>breaking the law. The problem will come when you want to sell your
>>property. The potential buyer's solicitor will want to see the buyers
>>pack
>
>I suspect you could also have problems with an insurance claim.

there again, this house has never been inspected.  There's wiring all over
the damned place, I think all that's currently in use is modern PVC
insulation, but there's no easy way of telling.

Now, I could get an electrician to come and do a megger test on it.  But
that's about all - there's no way short of pulling up all the first floor
floorboards of inspecting the actual wiring.

so here's exactly what's wrong with the regulations - the biggest risks are
not wiring that I, who know what I'm doing, install, but the old
rubber-and-cloth insulated stuff that was installed in places 50 years ago
and is still in use.  I did some work (pre-part-P) in a friend's house:
found some wiring in there with lead sheathing on the outside of it, and
lots of it was some sort of plastic-insulated (not like modern plastic stuff
though) twin conductor with no earth, and separate earth wires.

Now that sort of wiring is much more likely to give problems than anything
other than plain stupidity with modern materials.  Obviously, there are
stupid people out there - but there are a lot more of those old
installations which have never been checked.

In me grandmother's previous house, I found a twisted pair wire leading from
a ceiling rose to a lampholder.  This was originally cloth-covered rubber
insulated, but the insulation had all gone, leaving 2 bare wires looking
like a DNA double-helix.  It still worked.
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
Beyond the horizon of the place we lived when we were young / In a world
of magnets and miracles / Our thoughts strayed constantly and without
boundary / The ringing of the Division bell had begun.  Pink Floyd (1994)

Greg - 25 Jan 2007 13:35 GMT
On 24 Jan, 17:51, Austin Shackles
<austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESU...@ddol-las.net> wrote:

> so here's exactly what's wrong with the regulations - the biggest risks are
> not wiring that I, who know what I'm doing, install, but the old
> rubber-and-cloth insulated stuff that was installed in places 50 years ago
> and is still in use.

Which is why the regs don't permit new wiring to be added to an
existing installation that is clearly dangerous, any sparky presented
with this situation is supposed to advise the owner to have the
dangerous wiring replaced, otherwise walk away, if they don't walk away
they aren't insured for the work they do.

Of course now someone's going to claim that's just a money making rule
for sparkies, even though it deals with exactly the problem you
highlight!.
Greg
David Littlewood - 23 Jan 2007 18:45 GMT
>> Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
>> interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>they are never going to know
>its impossible to find out.

When I bought some wiring, socket boxes etc. in late 2005 (to finish off
a wiring job before the regulations came into force) I noticed that they
were all date stamped. So it may be easier than you think for big
brother to know what you are doing (and more importantly, when you did
it). When you sell your house, a wiring check will probably be required,
and your sins may be visible.

David
Signature

David Littlewood

Austin Shackles - 24 Jan 2007 17:52 GMT
>When I bought some wiring, socket boxes etc. in late 2005 (to finish off
>a wiring job before the regulations came into force) I noticed that they
>were all date stamped. So it may be easier than you think for big
>brother to know what you are doing (and more importantly, when you did
>it). When you sell your house, a wiring check will probably be required,
>and your sins may be visible.

I believe you're allowed to replace sockets and suchlike anyway.  I think
tis only new wiring or rewiring that falls under the part P thing.
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
Beyond the horizon of the place we lived when we were young / In a world
of magnets and miracles / Our thoughts strayed constantly and without
boundary / The ringing of the Division bell had begun.  Pink Floyd (1994)

Austin Shackles - 23 Jan 2007 22:44 GMT
>they are never going to know
>its impossible to find out.

recently-bought cable will be dated, though.
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
"Nessun maggior dolore che ricordarsi del tempo felice nella miseria"
- Dante Alighieri (1265 - 1321) from Divina Commedia 'Inferno'

John Stevenson - 23 Jan 2007 16:38 GMT
>Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
>interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>AWEM

I'm waiting for the incoming from our resident part P expert.

Greg ? you out there ? someone is trying to steal your bowl of rice,
perhaps you need copyright   on the part P reg's ? <bg>

.
--
Regards,

John Stevenson
Nottingham, England.

Visit the new Model Engineering adverts page at:-
http://www.homeworkshop.org.uk/
Greg - 24 Jan 2007 12:30 GMT
> I'm waiting for the incoming from our resident part P expert.
>
> Greg ? you out there ? someone is trying to steal your bowl of rice,
> perhaps you need copyright   on the part P reg's ? <bg>

Yes I'm here, chuckling at the same old stuff, there are similar
threads all over usenet thanks to that childish petition. On other
threads people have noticed that the petition takes a single fact, that
the number of fatalities related to  installations AND appliances has
doubled, and takes it completely out of context to assert that these
fatalities are due to part P. Of course the flood of cheap crap
appliances from China has nothing to do with it 8-).

Just to correct some nonesence being talked in this thread, there is
nothing what so ever to ban a diyer wiring their own house, so long as
they submit it to the building regs department and pay them their fee
for the inspections it's still perfectly legal.

Anyone who really believes they are competent can do just this and it
will be cheaper than employing a sparky for a big job. Of course if
they get it wrong, fail the inspections and have to rework and pay
again it may cost them dear, but so many people are so confident they
know what they're doing that that won't be a problem, or will it...

Also people conviniently forget than many small jobs, and some not so
small, are not notifiable to building regs so there's nothing stopping
people just doing them. You're supposed to fill in a minor works form,
which is readily available, but in reality few bother.
Greg
David Littlewood - 24 Jan 2007 19:00 GMT
>> I'm waiting for the incoming from our resident part P expert.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>which is readily available, but in reality few bother.
>Greg

This is very interesting, Greg, but as a matter of fundamental principle
I just don't think Big Brother should have any right to control what I
do in my own home. I understand all the arguments about the risk that
someone might injure or kill themselves or members of their household,
or a later buyer of the house, but it doesn't wash. If protecting people
from their own stupidity involves state restrictions in this way, then I
deplore it and will vote against any politician who supports such
measures. (Note that "own stupidity" would include buying a house
without a thorough wiring test.)

I think we need a whole lot less government.

David
Signature

David Littlewood

Roger Smith - 24 Jan 2007 22:29 GMT
>>> I'm waiting for the incoming from our resident part P expert.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>supports such measures. (Note that "own stupidity" would include buying
>a house without a thorough wiring test.)

I don't want to see people protected from their own stupidity(1), I want
to see people protected from somebody else's stupidity. The number of
homes that could burn down without damaging the nearest neighbour is in
the minority.

(1) As long as they don't expect me to pay for them to be patched up
etc. afterwards.
Signature

aRJay
Who merely lurks here.

Greg - 25 Jan 2007 13:50 GMT
> I don't want to see people protected from their own stupidity(1), I want
> to see people protected from somebody else's stupidity. The number of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> (1) As long as they don't expect me to pay for them to be patched up
> etc. afterwards.

Exactly, in any decent society the most you can do is say that people
are free to do what they wish so long as it doesn't harm others.

If your house is in the middle of a field, no one but consenting adults
lives there, you pay for the fire brigade and health service costs that
result from your actions, then you can do what you like. But in the
real world, why should my house be burnt down because of my neighbours
actions, why should I pay for the public services he needs as a result,
and worse of all why should a child die because of it's parent's
stupidity?. You have to have laws against stupid actions that harm
others.
Greg
Greg - 25 Jan 2007 13:43 GMT
>This is very interesting, Greg, but as a matter of fundamental principle
> I just don't think Big Brother should have any right to control what I
> do in my own home. I understand all the arguments about the risk that
> someone might injure or kill themselves or members of their household,
> or a later buyer of the house, but it doesn't wash.

Yes it does wash, if your house burns down becaues of your DIY
electrics then quite possibly so does your neighbours. Why shouldn't
THEY be protected from your stupidity?, and why shouldn't your children
who have no say in the matter be protected?. Perhaps you believe it's
your right to put your children in any risk you choose and no one
should do anything about it?.

A statement like "I just don't think Big Brother should have any right
to control what I
do in my own home" can be used to justify anything and is fundamentally
unacceptable in any decent society, there have to be rules.

Greg
Mark Rand - 25 Jan 2007 15:40 GMT
>>This is very interesting, Greg, but as a matter of fundamental principle
>> I just don't think Big Brother should have any right to control what I
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Greg

There already were rules! Compliance with the current version of the Wiring
Regs were and are still, a legal requirement. There was no need to change
anything.

Mark Rand
RTFM
Greg - 26 Jan 2007 09:14 GMT
> There already were rules! Compliance with the current version of the Wiring
> Regs were and are still, a legal requirement. There was no need to change
> anything.

There were rules but little enforcement so they were often ignored with
serious consequences for both those ignoring them and innocent
bystanders. The changes are an attempt to improve enforcement, and like
any enforcement it will never be 100%.

But if you follow the reasoning that no enforcement is better than
imperfect enforcement you scrap the police and barricade yourself into
your fortress until someone stronger kills you!.

Not one person in this debate has suggested a single way the system of
enforcement could be more complete or fairer, the only view is "I want
to do what the feck I want and sod the consequences". Of course if a
joy rider plows into your family on the street you may just realise the
stupidity of that view.

The only way forward is to improve the system and the absolutely
pathetic 211 signatures that this petition has got indicates that most
reasonable people understand that. Compare that with the 581977
signatures against the new road taxation and you get some idea how
little support there is for scrapping part P. Nearly 1 percent of the
entire UK population has signed that one, but less than the number in
my street think part P should be scrapped.
Greg
Boo - 26 Jan 2007 09:58 GMT
> There were rules but little enforcement so they were often ignored with
> serious consequences for both those ignoring them and innocent
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> imperfect enforcement you scrap the police and barricade yourself into
> your fortress until someone stronger kills you!.

I think the argument against Part P is that the cost is disproportionate to the
benefit.  Paople are having to rip out perfectly good main boards to replace
them with ones that meet the current standards where there is basically no
improvement in safety.  Same with the new earth bonding requirements. Etc etc.

Signature

Boo

Greg - 27 Jan 2007 10:28 GMT
On 26 Jan, 09:58, Boo <reply_to_group_not_me@spam_me_no_spam.net>
wrote:
> Paople are having to rip out perfectly good main boards to replace
> them with ones that meet the current standards where there is basically no
> improvement in safety.  Same with the new earth bonding requirements. Etc etc.

A very dubious statement, if you had said that unscrupulous tradesmen
were using part P as an excuse to do unnecessary work I could agree,
nowt new in that trick though is there?
Greg
Boo - 27 Jan 2007 13:24 GMT
> On 26 Jan, 09:58, Boo <reply_to_group_not_me@spam_me_no_spam.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> A very dubious statement,

Nope, fact.  If your mains board has the lighting on an RCD they cannot move it
nor replace the RCD if it fails - it's time for a new board, despite there being
nothing whatsoever wrong with the old one.

Signature

Boo

Greg - 29 Jan 2007 12:07 GMT
On 27 Jan, 13:24, Boo <reply_to_group_not_me@spam_me_no_spam.net>
wrote:
> Nope, fact.  If your mains board has the lighting on an RCD they cannot move it
> nor replace the RCD if it fails - it's time for a new board, despite there being
> nothing whatsoever wrong with the old one.

Who says they can't?, the regs certainly don't.
Greg
Charles Lamont - 26 Jan 2007 10:25 GMT
>> There already were rules! Compliance with the current version of the Wiring
>> Regs were and are still, a legal requirement. There was no need to change
>> anything.

>Not one person in this debate has suggested a single way the system of
>enforcement could be more complete or fairer

>The only way forward is to improve the system

It is a gross oversimplification to suppose that tightening of a
regulatory regime is necessarily beneficial. It's a question of cost
benefit.

Many people see a problem with British regulators in that they tend to
overcomplicate and gold plate regulations with no consideration of how
much it will cost or what the benefit might be in the number of saved
lives (and of course all the economic benefits of that).

For example, press and public stupidity and ministerial cowardice result
in requirements to spend billions upon billions on train protection
systems to save something like four lives a year. That is not a sensible
use of resources because the same money could be used in other ways to
benefit many more lives. The tax pot is not bottomless.

To make matters worse, another bunch of ignorant people then come along
and misinterpret the intent of the law and cut down swathes of horse
chestnut trees so that they don't risk getting sued if a kid were to get
a stick in its eye.

Signature

Charles Lamont

mark - 26 Jan 2007 19:22 GMT
> > There already were rules! Compliance with the current version of the Wiring
> > Regs were and are still, a legal requirement. There was no need to change
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> my street think part P should be scrapped.
> Greg

That's because the petition is worded in such a way ...as Joe Public
don't know what the feck it's going on about ..PART-P ..never heard of
it till this thread started ...then had to look it up on google !!!
change wording to ..

"The government want to completely ban diy electrical installation
..sign if you're against this."

YOU could also add if the nanny government had its own way it would
also ban all DIY.
all car maintenance, all machinery ...and will be in favour of a curfew
after 8pm for all UK citizens...and every new born would have a chip
implant tracking their every move. ...
don't give an inch ...i say ...they are slowly but surly putting it on
us, bit by bit .

All the best.mark
mark - 26 Jan 2007 19:49 GMT
> > GregThat's because the petition is worded in such a way ...as Joe Public
> don't know what the feck it's going on about ..PART-P ..never heard of
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> All the best.mark- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

To add to this
what do you think the govs petition site is all about ..
I think it is a step along the way of completely banning paper
petitions ..
soon that site is the only way you will be aloud to make a petition
people with paper petitions will be turned away ..

the petition on-line site is all about .
ignoring them and sweeping them aside.

All the best.mark
Lester Caine - 23 Jan 2007 16:43 GMT
> Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
> interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
> 10 web site.
>
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Part-P-Review/

Anybody notice the 'big' petition there
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/traveltax/
Scrap the planned vehicle tracking and road pricing policy
Over half a million sigs looks good against only 20k for he next highest :)

Signature

Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php

Austin Shackles - 23 Jan 2007 18:45 GMT
>Those of you with views on the 'part P' electrical regulations may be
>interested to hear that there is a petition for it's repeal on the No
>10 web site.
>
>http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Part-P-Review/

signed and passed on to the shed.
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
Appearances:  You don't really need make-up.  Celebrate your authentic
face by frightening people in the street.  
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.