Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / February 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

RSJ/ I Beam/ Universal Beam Selection

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Charles Ping - 25 Feb 2007 08:04 GMT
I've got an American design for a gantry crane. Very nice design by
all accounts but it's all in US steel specifications. Most are easily
translated but the main RSJ (to use the generic term) is speciifed as
a "6" 12.5 lb/ft beam".  Machinerys Handbook fleshes out the detail
but such an animal doesn't exisit in modern UK standards. The nearest
that I get is a 178x102 beam at 19kg/m.
http://www.corusconstruction.com/en/design_and_innovation/structural_design/the_
blue_book/section_properties/british_standard_sections/ubs/


The big question is whether the single point load capacity of the two
beams is comparable over a 10ft span (note the mix of imperial and
metric in my thinking - a characteristic of my age).

Can anyone who was awake in those classes on beam strength care to
offer an opinion?

Thanks

Charles
Tony Jeffree - 25 Feb 2007 09:38 GMT
>Can anyone who was awake in those classes on beam strength care to
>offer an opinion?

If you're not sure, you could always invest in a hard hat <G>

Regards,
Tony
Tom - 25 Feb 2007 10:02 GMT
> I've got an American design for a gantry crane. Very nice design by
> all accounts but it's all in US steel specifications. Most are easily
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Charles

What capacity is the gantry?

At 10ft span and hinged (uprights not restrained) rather than fixed ends
the metric UB with a 3000lb centre load, deflects .109" with a stress of
9572.4 psi. Which is acceptable. With fixed ends the stress is halved.

The US 6" x 12.5lb beam with the same conditions deflects .161" with a
stress of 12093 psi.

So the metric beam has an additional safety factor or greater load
capacity...

Tom

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Charles Ping - 25 Feb 2007 10:51 GMT
>  >
> What capacity is the gantry?

Looking at 4000lbs

> At 10ft span and hinged (uprights not restrained) rather than fixed ends
> the metric UB with a 3000lb centre load, deflects .109" with a stress of
> 9572.4 psi. Which is acceptable. With fixed ends the stress is halved.

Not fixed ends

> The US 6" x 12.5lb beam with the same conditions deflects .161" with a
> stress of 12093 psi.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Tom

Thanks Tom

Charles
John Stevenson - 25 Feb 2007 11:44 GMT
>>  >
>> What capacity is the gantry?
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>Charles

I have a 5" x 3" x 3/8" wall,  U shaped beam laid on it back. One end sits on the wall at
the back of the lathe between the rafters and the other end sits on top of a Bridgeport
fixed head series I mill. Probably 8 foot span.
Given that sitting on it's back isn't the best position, the Bridgeport mill/drill wasn't
made as a prop and the block and tackle is secured by a wrap of chain and a bolt can the
experts work out what load this isn't supposed to carry.

At the moment the biggest rotor it's had to lift is only about 1/2 a ton.

Oh forgot to mention it's the dark gray model Bridgy.
--
Regards,

John Stevenson
Nottingham, England.

Visit the new Model Engineering adverts page at:-
http://www.homeworkshop.org.uk/
John Stevenson - 25 Feb 2007 11:47 GMT
>I have a 5" x 3" x 3/8" wall,  U shaped beam laid on it back. One end sits on the wall at
>the back of the lathe between the rafters and the other end sits on top of a Bridgeport
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Oh forgot to mention it's the dark gray model Bridgy.

Also forgot to mention, any chance of an answer before Monday as there's a rotor in the
lathe at the moment and it would be nice to know if I'm safe before I take it out Monday,
If not I'll get Gert to lift it out .

--
Regards,

John Stevenson
Nottingham, England.

Visit the new Model Engineering adverts page at:-
http://www.homeworkshop.org.uk/
Nick Mueller - 25 Feb 2007 10:08 GMT
> Can anyone who was awake in those classes on beam strength care to
> offer an opinion?

You can compare any beam, if you have its "areal momentum" (hope that's your
term). Its dimension is m^4 (or mm^4). Bigger values denote stiffer beams.
You should find the values for any beam (and maybe need to make a
conversion imperial/metric).

HTH,
Nick
Signature

***********************************
*** Available now in NZ and AUS ***
***********************************
       <http://www.yadro.de>

Tim Leech - 25 Feb 2007 10:32 GMT
>I've got an American design for a gantry crane. Very nice design by
>all accounts but it's all in US steel specifications. Most are easily
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Can anyone who was awake in those classes on beam strength care to
>offer an opinion?

Not I, but I would like to butt in with a related question.

I want to put a runway beam aong the length of my workshop, mainly for
loading chucks & heavy jobs onto the big lathe. It'll probably never
be loaded to more than 100Kg, but the transverse steel beams at that
point will easily take half a ton & I have a half ton chain block and
a beam trolley, so might as well design it to that capacity. The beams
are 3m/10' apart.
Suggestions please for a suitable beam section?

Thanks

Tim

Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
Nick Mueller - 25 Feb 2007 13:10 GMT
> Suggestions please for a suitable beam section?

Sorry, didn't understand how that beam will be supported.
On both ends or one more in the middle?

Nick
Signature

***********************************
*** Available now in NZ and AUS ***
***********************************
       <http://www.yadro.de>

Tim Leech - 26 Feb 2007 07:31 GMT
>> Suggestions please for a suitable beam section?
>
>Sorry, didn't understand how that beam will be supported.
>On both ends or one more in the middle?

At both ends.
Actually it'll be 6m long, supported at either end and at 3m.

Cheers

Tim

Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
Charles Ping - 26 Feb 2007 09:23 GMT
Thanks for all the advice.

All that I need to do now is find an 8ft 178x102 beam at a sensible
price. Pity the price of steel has risen so much lately. Should have
done this 2 or 3 years ago!

Charles
Tim Leech - 26 Feb 2007 10:52 GMT
>Thanks for all the advice.
>
>All that I need to do now is find an 8ft 178x102 beam at a sensible
>price. Pity the price of steel has risen so much lately. Should have
>done this 2 or 3 years ago!

I've just been quoted £40 plus VAT by my not-very-cheap local
supplier. Doesn't sound too bad to me!
Do you want to colect it next week? <BG>

Cheers
Tim

Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
Prepair Ltd - 26 Feb 2007 11:56 GMT
>>Thanks for all the advice.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Cheers
>Tim

Our local scrappie keeps various secondhand rsj's etc in a pile and sells by the
foot, look at the seventh picture down:

http://www.oldengine.org/members/diesel/Scrap/Scrap1.htm

I'll be in there tomorrow, if you want I'll ask the question. We tend to give
our steel scrap to them for nothing, so we can always ask a favour in the
future. Nearly a ton of steel scrap already this last week and half a ton of
transformers (nothing useful for you folks) we did take some money for the
transfomers...:-))

Peter
--
Peter A Forbes
Prepair Ltd, Luton, UK
prepair@easynet.co.uk
http://www.prepair.co.uk
Charles Ping - 26 Feb 2007 12:31 GMT
>>>Thanks for all the advice.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>Peter

Peter

Thanks.
I think that I might have sorted a decent scrappie but he's not sure
if he has a suitable beam.He does have some heavy square stuff that
I'm after though.
Since you're in there and he has something please ask.

Charles
Prepair Ltd - 27 Feb 2007 13:03 GMT
>Peter
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Charles

He said that he hasn't got any of they furrin' Metric size stuff, but he'll have
a length of 7" X 4" out for us for the weekend, FOC....

Peter
--
Peter A Forbes
Prepair Ltd, Luton, UK
prepair@easynet.co.uk
http://www.prepair.co.uk
Charles Ping - 27 Feb 2007 14:28 GMT
>>Peter
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Peter
Peter

You're a star.
Between 8 and 10 ft would be great. Much longer and it starts to be
awkward in the trusty Volvo...

Charles
Tony Jeffree - 27 Feb 2007 14:44 GMT
>Between 8 and 10 ft would be great. Much longer and it starts to be
>awkward in the trusty Volvo...

Stick some trailer wheels on it & tow it behind?

Regards,
Tony
Charles Ping - 27 Feb 2007 14:49 GMT
>>Between 8 and 10 ft would be great. Much longer and it starts to be
>>awkward in the trusty Volvo...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Regards,
>Tony

That would at least make the traffic on the North Circular part in the
manner of the Red Sea

c
Prepair Ltd - 27 Feb 2007 15:23 GMT
> Peter
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Charles

I asked for 8ft as per your post.

Peter
Peter
--
Peter A Forbes
Prepair Ltd, Luton, UK
prepair@easynet.co.uk
http://www.prepair.co.uk
Charles Ping - 27 Feb 2007 15:27 GMT
>> Peter
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Peter
>Peter

Total star!

c
Trevor Jones - 26 Feb 2007 13:50 GMT
>>>Thanks for all the advice.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> prepair@easynet.co.uk
> http://www.prepair.co.uk
 You just have to be pretty pleased when you can find a scrapyard that
will allow you to "wander the halls" so to speak, without getting all
freaked out about liability and such.

 That yard looks like a gooder, too.

 Cheers
  Trevor Jones
Prepair Ltd - 26 Feb 2007 15:19 GMT
>  You just have to be pretty pleased when you can find a scrapyard that
>will allow you to "wander the halls" so to speak, without getting all
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>  Cheers
>   Trevor Jones

We've known them for many years, and have always treated them as we would like
to be treated ourselves. Much of the scrap railway stuff went in for free, but
we always got a proper ticket for it which was all our customers wanted.

It's handy to have a wander round with the camera occasionally, and we do get a
few bits and pieces there when we need them, and we usually pay for them, but at
a better rate than someone 'off the street'.

Just to have somewhere to take metal scrap is useful for us, especially as so
much of the 1950's and 1960's stuff from the railways and electricity boards is
at its end of life now.
Peter
--
Peter A Forbes
Prepair Ltd, Luton, UK
prepair@easynet.co.uk
http://www.prepair.co.uk
Trevor Jones - 27 Feb 2007 03:51 GMT
>> You just have to be pretty pleased when you can find a scrapyard that
>>will allow you to "wander the halls" so to speak, without getting all
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> prepair@easynet.co.uk
> http://www.prepair.co.uk
 Whenever I get free run of a scrap yard it ends up costing me too much
money! I se something neat, or a enameled tag, or a cast emblem, or... :-)

 Nice to see that not all of the yards don't have a "Clean floor by
Friday" attitude about pounding the scrap through the smelters.

 While I'm all for crushed car bodies being flogged through quickly,
one never quite knows when one might need a 12 foot flywheel, and you
just know you wont get one of those at the hardware shop.

 Cheers
  Trevor Jones
Austin Shackles - 25 Feb 2007 17:13 GMT
>I want to put a runway beam aong the length of my workshop, mainly for
>loading chucks & heavy jobs onto the big lathe. It'll probably never
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>are 3m/10' apart.
>Suggestions please for a suitable beam section?

So happens I have a table here sent to me by someone in this group, "Steel
Joists as Beams".

you're looking at 10' span and maximum point load of half a ton in the
centre...

There's a recommendation that span greater than 24x joist depth be avoided.
Looking down the 10' column, the lightest beam that qualifies is 4¾ x 1¾ x
6.5lb/ft which has a safe concentrated load of .75 ton.  The next one up is
5 x 2½ x 9lb/ft which has safe load of just over a ton.

If you look at
http://www.dyfedsteel.co.uk/catalog.aspx?cid=22&c=U%20Beams

you'll see that although the figures are in metric units, the beams are
still imperial sizes :-)

They don't list a 5 x 2½ but there is a 5 x 3 at 13 Kg/m which is just under
9 lb/ft according to me.  the abovementioned table says 5 x 3 x 11lb will
take 2.9 ton distributed or 1.45 concentrated.  

They're all a good deal smaller than the ones I need for my 30' span bridge
to take 10T concentrated load...
Signature

Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy!  Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\  
  >>  http://www.schlockmercenary.com/  <<      \  ...and Kill them.
a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!

Tim Leech - 25 Feb 2007 18:04 GMT
>>I want to put a runway beam aong the length of my workshop, mainly for
>>loading chucks & heavy jobs onto the big lathe. It'll probably never
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>They're all a good deal smaller than the ones I need for my 30' span bridge
>to take 10T concentrated load...

Thanks for that, I'd envisaged needing something a bit heavier & will
be pleased if I don't.

There are differences between 'Joists' and 'Universal Beams', I don't
think many sizes of 'joist' are made now. I should think a UB of
equivalent size to an RSJ rated for 1.45 ton would do my job quite
adequately, though.

What about John's  'Gert saver', then?
<G>

Cheers
Tim

Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
John Montrose - 25 Feb 2007 19:08 GMT
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:04:36 +0000, Tim Leech

>There are differences between 'Joists' and 'Universal Beams', I don't
>think many sizes of 'joist' are made now.

The other thing to bear in mind is that RSJs have tapered flanges; UBs
have parallel flanges. A girder trolley will run better on one than
the other.

The link Charles posted is really all you need. The specific link he
shows pulls up a table of section sizes and data. The next 'tab' on
the page is titled 'bending'; this gives you the allowable moment for
any particular section size. For larger spans, torsional buckling is
the limiting factor.
Tim Leech - 26 Feb 2007 11:05 GMT
>On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:04:36 +0000, Tim Leech
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>any particular section size. For larger spans, torsional buckling is
>the limiting factor.

All you need if you understand the language <G>

Thanks

Tim

Dutton Dry-Dock
Traditional & Modern canal craft repairs
Vintage diesel engine service
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.