Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
ModelsRailroadsRockets
Radio Controlled
Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater Models
ModelGeeks.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Model Forum / General / Models / November 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Expected accuracy from home-built clock?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mike.crossfield@virgin.net - 30 Nov 2007 12:02 GMT
I have just completed my first clock, a simple non-fusee, recoil
escapement, timepiece to a design by Colin Thorne.After the initial
euphoria that it actually worked, and ran for 8 days at a winding, I
have got down to regulating it.

My question for the Group clockmakers is what accuracy of timekeeping
should I expect?  Careful measurements over the last week show that it
ran progressively more slowly as the spring ran down, the total
variation in rate over 7 days being about 4 minutes. For the current
setting of pendulum, if I set the hands correctly when  fully wound,
it shows 4 minutes fast at mid-week, then correct again after 7 days.
Obviously, I could play around with the pendulum length to make the
error - 2 minutes at the beginning, +2 minutes mid-week and -2 minutes
at the end of the week if I fiddled some more.

Is this good, bad or indifferent?

Mike
mark - 30 Nov 2007 12:23 GMT
On 30 Nov, 12:02, mike.crossfi...@virgin.net wrote:
> I have just completed my first clock, a simple non-fusee, recoil
> escapement, timepiece to a design by Colin Thorne.After the initial
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Mike

i would wind it up at the same time every night

and do calcs from that ...

for a few weeks before you make assumptions that the spring is causing
it to loose time as it winds down.

as you've also have to factor in ...

clock oil .
i know this will slow a clock down ...for a couple of weeks when first
applied ...
so after them couple of weeks it will speed up again .

bearings ...they are all brand new ...and still running in.

think you need to give the clock a run-in period of 3 months.

then proceed with some experiments.

all the best.mark
mark - 30 Nov 2007 12:32 GMT
On 30 Nov, 12:02, mike.crossfi...@virgin.net wrote:
> I have just completed my first clock, a simple non-fusee, recoil
> escapement, timepiece to a design by Colin Thorne.After the initial
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Mike

another thing

8 days

why do you think they make an 8 day clock rather than a seven day one

the extra day is there so you wind it up on the 7th day ...and it does
not run down .

all the best.markj
Cliff Coggin - 30 Nov 2007 13:04 GMT
>I have just completed my first clock, a simple non-fusee, recoil
> escapement, timepiece to a design by Colin Thorne.After the initial
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Mike

That's pretty good Mike. I don't think you can expect better without
refining the design by installing a deadbeat escapement or installing a
fusee. The rate change is entirely to be expected from a going barrel
spring.

Cliff Coggin
Wealden Clock Repairs
mike.crossfield@virgin.net - 30 Nov 2007 16:25 GMT
> <mike.crossfi...@virgin.net> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Excellent.  Just what I wanted to know. Thanks Cliff.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.