 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General ModelsRailroadsRocketsRadio Controlled Air ModelsHelicoptersLand ModelsWater ModelsModelGeeks.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Model Forum / General / Models / February 2008Online Mechanical Engineering Calculator Tool - FREE to use online
Hello Guys, I found an interesting website at www.calculatoredge.com an online engineering calculator for formula and equations you can solve at click of a button, If you like this website send links to your friends and engineering group members. Tom >Hello Guys, > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Tom No you didn't find it unless you were pissed / lost / under drugs or hen pecked because if you look carefully your email address is the same as the link. Durrrrrr. . >>Hello Guys, >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >. They've been spamming the Yahoo groups too...just deleted the post/banned the submitter from DIY-CNC. Actually, its their second try - last time was a different email address. Persistent or what. Regards, Tony >>>Hello Guys, >>> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >Regards, >Tony Whilst these calculators and converter programs are good I'm dead against the on line ones as it not always possible to have a machine that can get on line. My CNC machines have no networking capability and never will have. I also get pissed off with all the adverts these programs carry with them plus whatever else rides on the back of them. > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:49:05 GMT, John Stevenson > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > - Show quoted text - whats he stand to gain by spamming ... the calculater site is quite good .. is he saying... hey guys look how clever i am or is there money to be made. all the best.mark >is he saying... hey guys look how clever i am > >or is there money to be made. The latter I believe. Regards, Tony >No you didn't find it unless you were pissed / lost / under drugs or >hen pecked because if you look carefully your email address is the >same as the link. Sir John, Don't you hate it when the spammers assume we are both easy and stupid? Wes >Hello Guys, <snipped lies> >Tom I don't buy from cold callers. Not even if it's something I want. Not even if its free. FOAD :-| Mark Rand RTFM Welcome to my blocked senders list. I shall never hear from you again. Cliff Coggin. > Hello Guys, > > I found an interesting website > Welcome to my blocked senders list. I shall never hear from you > again. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> >> I found an interesting website Did you type that whilst standing on your head, or are you currently on holiday in the southern hemisphere?...  SignatureA: Top posters Q: What is the most annoying trait found on Usenet? >Q: What is the most annoying trait found on Usenet? A: Guys who bang on about the relative merits of top vs bottom posting. Regards, Tony >>Q: What is the most annoying trait found on Usenet? > > A: Guys who bang on about the relative merits of top vs bottom > posting. So when reading a murder mystery you read the "Who dun-it" page before reading the plot? SignatureA: Top posters Q: What is the most annoying trait found on Usenet? I don't read murder mysteries. >So when reading a murder mystery you read the "Who dun-it" page before >reading the plot? >>So when reading a murder mystery you read the "Who dun-it" page >>before >>reading the plot? > >I don't read murder mysteries. Ok, you make your piston rings before you make your pistons?... >>>So when reading a murder mystery you read the "Who dun-it" page >>>before [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Ok, you make your piston rings before you make your pistons?... I don't make either pistons or piston rings. Having said that, Trevor put it very well, this is another piss poor analogy - I'm damn sure that the ones in your car were made entirely independently of one another - and probably in different factories. The reality is that both posting methods are in common use - as far as I am concerned, as long as the post is either on topic or amusing, I don't give a damn which method the poster used. Unfortunately, your posts have neither redeeming feature. Regards, Tony :Jerry: wrote: > So when reading a murder mystery you read the "Who dun-it" page before > reading the plot? Piss poor analogy. Do you start at book 1 of the series, every time you get to the end of one of them? You must read fast! For me, the quoted text is just something I can refer back to if I have to, not something that I need every time I look at a new post. If top or bottom posts is the best you can come up with to whinge about, maybe you need a hobby. Cheers Trevor Jones > Did you type that whilst standing on your head, or are you currently on > holiday in the southern hemisphere?... Dear Mr. Anonymous. Sorry I couldn't reply earlier, but I have a life. By avoiding the real issue of spam, and focussing instead on the trivial I suspect you may well be involved with the spammer, a suspicion re-inforced by your lack of courage in using a real name or valid email address. Consequently I invite you to reveal your true interest and identity, or to join the ranks of those notorious spammers already on my blocked senders list. Cliff Coggin. >A: Top posters >Q: What is the most annoying trait found on Usenet? A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email and usenet? >>A: Top posters >>Q: What is the most annoying trait found on Usenet? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email and usenet? Just ask any proficient secretary/filing clerk whether he/she files the newest letters on the top or the bottom of the pile? JW² === >>> A: Top posters >>> Q: What is the most annoying trait found on Usenet? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >> >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email and usenet? >Just ask any proficient secretary/filing clerk whether he/she files the >newest letters on the top or the bottom of the pile? >JW² >=== The Usenet convention is for bottom posting with unnecessary text/message content snipped. Top posting only came about because Outlook Distress did is a default IIRC, and wasn't fixed for some years. My 'secretary' files most stuff in the waste bin... :-)) Peter -- Peter & Rita Forbes Email: diesel@easynet.co.uk http://www.oldengine.org/members/diesel http://www.stationary-engine.co.uk http://www.oldengine.co.uk >Just ask any proficient secretary/filing clerk whether he/she files the >newest letters on the top or the bottom of the pile? The reason for bottom posting is to ensure that text to speech software, used by the partially sighted, reads out the posts in the sequence they are written. This makes sense to the listener. Signaturebrightside S9 >Just ask any proficient secretary/filing clerk whether he/she files the >newest letters on the top or the bottom of the pile? >JW² >=== She will file them the way that the office requires them to be filed. Idiot. PLONK Mark Rand RTFM I'll chip in a quid or two to get her to sort this out then. Otherwise, not really concerned about whether it gets posted on top or bottom. Cheers Trevor Jones > Just ask any proficient secretary/filing clerk whether he/she files the > newest letters on the top or the bottom of the pile? > JW² > === >>>A: Top posters >>>Q: What is the most annoying trait found on Usenet? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >> >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email and usenet? Sadly, [snip] went out of style. Wes |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.