On May 28, 2:32 pm, Chris Edwards <Mustardmender-...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 14:49:59 -0700 (PDT), the wizard wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Chris Edwards (in deepest Dorset) "....there *must* be an easier way!"
Hi again Chris
Four Tee slots allow a rigid fitting of a 4Jaw independant chuck .
What can you bolt to three Tee slots? My point is, given the option of
3 or 4, 4 is more useful.
Ignoring all the debate over 3 or 4 slots, any Rotary Table is better
than none, and the Vertex is a solid and accurate bit of kit
T.W.
Its quite easy to make a backplate one side of which will fix to both a
rotary table and to a lathe spindle, and the other side to a 3-jaw and a
4-jaw chuck and even to a collet chuck, which gives a good solution in terms
of rigidity and function.
Pat
Steve - 28 May 2008 20:26 GMT
> On May 28, 2:32 pm, Chris Edwards <Mustardmender-...@yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Pat
I have a 6inch RT from AET which has four slots and comes with a backplate
that allows 3 and 4 jaw chucks to be mounted. I didn't realise I had a
problem mounting three jaw chucks on my four slot table until I read this
thread....
ANyway it's a great table, though more expensive than the vertex.
Steve
Chris Edwards - 29 May 2008 08:54 GMT
>On May 28, 2:32 pm, Chris Edwards <Mustardmender-...@yahoo.co.uk>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>Pat
Everybody is right, of course. There is certainly less rigidity if
the chuck is spigot mounted. However, I'm a modeller rather than a
production engineer and my four-jaw chuck on the RT is a small one, four
inch diameter, and is only used for 'light' work. As Pat says, it's
certainly not beyond the wit of man to produce a 'universal' backplate.
--
Chris Edwards (in deepest Dorset) "....there *must* be an easier way!"